Talk:Chaotix

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Knuckles' Chaotix
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Knuckles' Chaotix

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 July 2019. The result of the discussion was redirect.

Video games: Sega

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

This redirect is supported by the Sega task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gilman Louie (1 participant)
Yoshimitsu (1 participant)
Dr. Wily (2 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (2 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

B-class assessment

Please have someone besides the originating editor assess the article beyond C class. Thanks. Also, is this a fictional organization like Team Rocket or just a group of characters? Should the infobox be changed appropriately? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:00, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This seems closer to start class than anything. And while I won't personally push for it alone, I really don't think this would survive an AFD or merge discussion by WP:VG. The reception section is rather short, and mostly consists of passing comments pulled from article about other things, like their game reviews or comments about the series itself. It looks a lot like all the Sonic articles that were merged years back. Sergecross73 msg me 13:41, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first character article, and I didn't really have another article to base it on, so I think that's why it doesn't look too good. However, I've looked back to the merger discussions from 2014 and I think that this is a different case. The IGN, Destructoid, and Sega Magazine articles are all about them, and there's a good deal of information I'm yet to implement. I'm tagging the reception section as incomplete for now, until I expand it. The reason I assessed it as a B-class article is because the creation and appearances sections are pretty good, but that's just my opinion. JOE BRO 64 20:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the Xbox World preview of Sonic Heroes has a page dedicated to them, if that helps. JOE BRO 64 23:49, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I very much disagree that the article should be a start class article, it seems quite well written. If you can prove that it has notability, and I'd say from the sources that it does; then the article is well written. With it being a small topic, the information on offer seems to be quite large. In terms of a B class rating, I think it's between C and B, with the reception section just needing better wording for a B. The article rating system is designed for how well the information is displayed, and if the information is full. Not on the topic of the article. Lee Vilenski(talk) 11:33, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]