Talk:Cacowards

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Notability

The "Doomworld" article was deleted last year for being non-notable, so I fail to see how a particular thing done by a non-notable website can be notable. Linguica (talk) 19:12, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notability (or a lack of notability) is not inherited. As you can see from the sourcing, the Cacowards have been covered by numerous secondary media outlets, including several print magazines (PCGamer in particular has covered them in their magazine for 3 years straight). FlotillaFlotsam (talk) 02:06, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The Cacowards have received extensive media coverage in recent years and after more than 20 years they are already well established. The Wikipedia page however could benefit from the use of more sources (which currently exist, it's just a matter of adding them) Sergeant Batou (talk) 09:24, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]