Talk:Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (0 participants)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (2 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (3 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (8 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Reception

The writer of the article states the following: 'The game was met with mixed reviews.' It used to be 'Met with generally good reviews' but someone changed it to mixed without discussion on this page or without a source.

I really do not agree with that statement. The PC version has an average score of 81 out of 100 on Metacritic and both console version scored 76 out of 100. That is what I would call 'Generally positive'

The entire section seems a bit anti-BiA biased (No pun intended) The writer talks mostly about the multiplayer, wich was indeed horrid, but alot of reviewers were very positive if not praising about the single player part, wich this section barely embraces. Brothers in Arms is not about the multiplayer, but most and foremost about the single player campaign. This would be like complaining about the historical innacuracy in Titanic, but that's not what the movie is about, it's about the love story. I would like to rewrite the section entirely, but not without the insight of other people. What have you all got to say about this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soulwaxx (talk • contribs) 18:03, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]