Jump to content

Talk:Blaze and Blade: Eternal Quest

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Any help welcome.

[edit]

although i realize this game wasnt exactly hugely popular or easy to obtain i myslf feel it was very underatted, especially with it being the only decent 4 player proper RPG game on the ps1, any fan of RPG games not caring about graphics will have understood why this was so fun with its multplayer mode.

Anyway im after any good help i can get with this, i have completed this game a few times solo and with friends but this was over 5 years ago and i am lacking alot of the knowledge i used to remember. Lukey12345 16:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there, I just picked up this game and was looking for any sort of info about the game I could find. Turns out there's next to none, perhaps a few guides on Gamefaqs.com that provide really badly organized, probably incomplete information. I've been doing some edits on the page as you can see, mostly sticking to grammar stuff right now to make it look better, since you probably have more knowledge about the game. Looking good though! Thanks for your work =)

First up, I was wondering...do you have any images of the game? Maybe we could put up pictures of all the jobs you can choose from, some kind of stuff to decorate the page/make it look like it's been worked on a lot.

Lordjamz 00:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)lordjamz[reply]

  • Yes i have been planning this for awhile now! just need to get a copy of bleem! again so i can take screenshots of it on my laptop, then post them up. I agree on the gamefaqs info, it is totally useless for blaze and blade, your best bet is scanning the Internet!

P.S. thanks for fixing the grammar, as im usually at working when making articles or in a rush i usually mess up quite alot hah. Lukey12345 11:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blaze and Blade: Eternal Quest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]