Jump to content

Talk:Bangladesh/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8

Changing the meaning of Bangladesh

Over the years, It's been written in the article that Bangladesh literally means "The country of Bengal". I don't disagree, but i think it's inappropriate. It doesn't make a good sense. However, i propose more meaningful and appropriate translation of Bangladesh would be "The land of Bengalis". Desh not only means country but also land.

There are countries with the name Desh, Land and Stan at the end. All have the similar meaning and a synonym to country. If we see the other country's meaning, we can find that

We can see these countries name refers the land of its people. Historically, This region was called Bongodesh or Bangladesh (Bengal in English) and it refers to the land where the Bengalis live i.e. the land of the Bengalis. In Bangladesh, 98% of its population is Bengali.

Please comment your opinion and suggestion. Pinging NahidSultan, Nhasive, Worldbruce, Nafsadh, Ibrahim Husain Meraj

Lonely Explorer (talk) 09:29, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

I think this would be a moot point discussion. If you go through Etymology section and Names of Bengal, it is obvious that Bangladesh literally means "Land of Bengal" or "Country of Bengal". In, lede, we've "The country of Bengal". This makes more sense and is technically more correct. Modern day definition obviously means Country of Bengal. Historically the word often used as exact synonym of Bengal, and meant Land of Bengal. Modern use of Bangladesh has a more clear geopolitical definition, which differs from Bengal. Land of Bengal encompasses modern day Bangladesh, West Bengal, and parts of various eastern states of India. Land of Bengal may sound better, but semantically, Country of Bengal is more accurate.
On the second note, Bangladesh never meant and doesn't mean Land of Bengalis. The name is not about the people. Bengal is the original word, and Bengalis is the derivative; i.e., the name of country came first, and the ethno-linguistic group is named after the land, not the other way around. This is unlike the examples you've given. --nafSadh did say 08:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 31 July 2017

103.75.239.140 (talk) 07:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Not done: as you have not requested a change.
Please request your change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 12:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 August 2017

÷

In the section headed "7.3 Women in Bangladesh" it says "Bangladeshi female workforce participation is among the highest in the Muslim world, at 59%" quoting a World Bank document. This document does not support the statement. In fact, it is stated in the WB document on page 55: "Women’s work participation rates have doubled in Bangladesh since 1995 but they are still extremely low at 26 percent". The mentioned 59% may have been an oversight, as this figure is correct for the sector Agriculture/Fisheries Wjahn (talk) 13:01, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

 Fixed. Thank you for noticing this issue. MPS1992 (talk) 17:44, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 September 2017

The land area of this country is wrong .it will be ( 147569.753 sq km/56,977 mi² ) by calculation or ( 147570 sq km ) by text books. source : web & text book. Sunee Sheikh (talk) 01:15, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 02:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Done For future reference, edit requests require precisely described sources. "Text book", for example, is insufficient. The title of the textbook, author (and/or editor), year of publication, publisher, and page number would be required. In this case it was possible to correct the land area (to 147,570 sq km) because it didn't match what was stated in the source already cited. --Worldbruce (talk)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 September 2017

Just a typo: in the final sentence of the Union with Pakistan section, change Paksitani to Pakistani. 51.6.94.240 (talk) 19:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Done Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:28, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

== 

==

Change "critically endangered Bengal tigers" to "endangered Bengal Tigers"

Done SparklingPessimist Scream at me! 04:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 October 2017

TopSelfie (talk) 12:35, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. — IVORK Discuss 13:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bangladesh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:31, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bangladesh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 January 2018

Largest city is not Chitagong. --194.88.228.86 (talk) 09:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC) 194.88.228.86 (talk) 09:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

 Done - thanks for pointing that out - Arjayay (talk) 10:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

$751billion PPP (32nd) $273billion nominal (44th) Omer Roxy (talk) 23:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 February 2018

The capital city and the largest city of Bangladesh is Dhaka and not Brahmanbaria. Fahmymalaysia (talk) 06:48, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

 Fixed. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 07:32, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

I tried following the link for citation 104 "The climate refugee challenge". The link appears to be broken. I believe the correct URL is: https://reliefweb.int/report/bangladesh/climate-refugee-challenge

Please change the link to citation 104 to https://reliefweb.int/report/bangladesh/climate-refugee-challenge — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avdempsey (talk • contribs) 21:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 April 2018

Article says Bangladesh is 14th in Corruption Perceptions Index while it's 145th. It's an important mistake and needs editing. Drq123 (talk) 10:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done as 14th is clearly stated here - Arjayay (talk) 12:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Edit war between Manipulateus and Vivaan65

Vivaan65 has notified me of the edit war with Manipulateus. From user contribs it appears both of them are relatively new to Wikipedia English (less than 100 edits and first edit being in this year). While looking at edit logs, it appears both of them yelling at each other and accusing one another of vandalism. In my opinion both of their edits are constructive, while both of them showing bit of knack towards POV pushing. I have made an edit to restore what I think would be more balanced version of this article. @Vivaan65: and @Manipulateus:, please work together to improve the article and avoid edit warring. Both of you have violated WP:3RR already. So, for any further disagreements, please take a moment to talk here before redoing and reverting edits. --nafSadh did say 14:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Let's settles the differences here first. Before that I am not going to accept a biased Bengalis only Bangladesh in the top section. --Manipulateus (talk) 14:39, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Also Vivaan65 has not been constructive anyone checking the logs can see he's been making unconstructive reverts that promotes a biased account of Bangladesh against the sources that I cited. --Manipulateus (talk) 14:59, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
See above, @Manipulateus. I have mentioned both of you and Vivaan65. Both of you had been warned for the 3RR violation yesterday. According to long held convention, when in dispute, and a discussion is ongoing, the article is kept in pre-dispute version. Please do not exacerbate. --nafSadh did say 15:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Do you have multiple accounts Nafsadh ? Just asking. --Manipulateus (talk) 18:40, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Why you ask? Also see this: User:Nafsadh/Doppelgangers. --nafSadh did say 18:53, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
@Aditya Kabir:, @Tarif Ezaz: Please help improve this Bangladesh article. Go though history of this article get some idea. I have already violated 3PR with Manipulateus.--Vivaan65 (talk) 07:53, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
I request both of you to stop directly editing for the moment. Let us deescalate the situation. Can you guys tell what are you trying to achieve? May be other can lend a hand too. Aditya(talk • contribs) 14:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Is there any rule in Wikipedia that allows fair representation of editors from varying POV? For example if I feel most editors in Bangladesh article support Bengali nationalism and pro India POV that minimize the difference between Bangladesh and West Bengal instead of Bangladesh's own nationalism that is inclusive of non Bengalis such as Sylhetis, Chittagonians and other Bengali-Assamese Muslims and I cannot reach a concensus with them even after citing sources (see also my talk page for my arguments) but know the article is not neutral (an undue weight given to Bengalis and the insignificance afforded to other ethnicities in the top section; check my edits in the history logs), what should I do? I am talking about the representation in terms of content not background or intention of editors (that would be discrimination and also because I am aware that it would not make any sense because content does not always correlate with background or intention for example even a Pakistani editor could promote pro India content or an Indian editor could promote pro India content while making it appear that he is a Pakistani pretending to be Indian to put the blame on Indian editors).--Manipulateus (talk) 16:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Drives on the right

People in Bangladesh drive on the right. The information is wrong Ryu tsui sen (talk) 12:29, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

 Not done, @Ryu tsui sen:, Take a look here Left- and right-hand traffic. - Rafi Bin Tofa (talk) 21:09, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 May 2018

Bangabandhu-1 Satellite 

Country's first communications satellite Bangabandhu-1 to its orbit on May 10 US local time or May 11 Bangladesh standard time. The country's first geostationary communications satellite would be launched by Falcon 9 rocket, which has also been found okay to carry the satellite from Cape Canaveral launching pad of Florida, USA.Earlier on May 4, a Falcon 9 rocket was test-fired and after analysing the data collected from the test the final date has been fixed, said satellite project related officials.

After getting the fresh date from SpaceX, a high-powered government delegation flew for Florida yesterday evening to be a part of the launching programme. The 3.7-tonne satellite, built by Thales Alenia Space, a France-based satellite company, was supposed to be launched in December. But the date has been deferred several times due to inclement weather and technical reasons.

Bangladesh is going to be the 57th country in space once Bangabandhu-1 is launched.

In November 2015, the BTRC signed a $248-million deal with Thales to manufacture and launch the satellite. Earlier in January the same year, BTRC bought a slot from Russian satellite company 'Intersputnik' for $28 million to launch the country's first satellite. Rahibd wiki (talk) 19:18, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 May 2018

Area • Total 148460 km2 (56,980 sq mi) (92nd) land 130170 sq km water 18290 sq km • Water (%) 6.4 Population 157,826,578 (july 2017)

References https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bg.html Ashis21 (talk) 04:00, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:27, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 June 2018

223.176.58.176 (talk) 10:13, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Sam Sailor 12:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Error

4th paragraph says 43th, should be 43rd

86.158.34.69 (talk) 03:17, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 July 2018

Title: Public Administration at Name : Mahfuzur Rahman.png Web: www.mofa.gov.bd (Public Administration) Globalpartnersmahfuz (talk) 13:34, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 13:42, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Lack of source

There isn't a source on the "the bnp hacked the election of 2014" thing. --181.169.125.32 (talk) 21:35, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Student protests 2018

Should there be mention of the ongoing student protests at the moment?

There has been a post on Reddit about it and I was wondering if it would make sense to include it in the recent history of Bangladesh.--EviL GaMer (talk) 19:41, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 August 2018

Rayhan ahamed (talk) 03:26, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
 Not done Empty request. Please specify the current text you want edited and what you want it edited to.— Alpha3031 (t • c) 03:41, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 September 2018

HDI (2018) Increase 0.608 medium · 136th Ref: https://www.prothomalo.com/bangladesh/article/1557565/%E0%A6%AE%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%A8%E0%A6%AC-%E0%A6%89%E0%A6%A8%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%A8%E0%A7%9F%E0%A6%A8-%E0%A6%B8%E0%A7%82%E0%A6%9A%E0%A6%95%E0%A7%87-%E0%A6%8F%E0%A6%97%E0%A6%BF%E0%A7%9F%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%9B%E0%A7%87-%E0%A6%AC%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%82%E0%A6%B2%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%A6%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%B6 Raihan Hossain Shohag (talk) 06:31, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

 Done with a different source Danski454 (talk) 18:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 September 2018

119.30.38.157 (talk) 19:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Hhkohh (talk) 13:26, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 October 2018

Bangladesh - GINI index 32.40 URL: https://knoema.com/atlas/Bangladesh/topics/Poverty/Income-Inequality/GINI-index Nazmus Sakib Al Hasan (talk) 07:13, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done Fish+Karate 09:43, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 October 2018

103.63.158.234 (talk) 03:53, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 04:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 October 2018

Current Information Religion (2011) 90.4% Islam (Official) 8.5% Hinduism 0.6% Buddhism 0.4% Christianity

Update Information from Bangladesh Govt. website Religion: Muslims - 86.6%, Hindus - 12.1%, Buddhists - 0.6%, Christians -0.4%, Others -0.3%.

URL : https://bangladesh.gov.bd/site/page/812d94a8-0376-4579-a8f1-a1f66fa5df5d/Know--Bangladesh Nazmus Sakib Al Hasan (talk) 16:50, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done JC7V-constructive zone 04:40, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 November 2018

Please include the information in the Sports section (7.9): On 04 November 2018, Bangladesh national under-17 football team won the 2018 SAFF U-15 Championship, defeating Pakistan national under-17 football team in the final.[1] SouthAsianGuy891 (talk) 08:00, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ https://www.samaa.tv/sports/2018/11/bangladesh-defeat-pakistan-to-win-2018-u15-saff-championships/

Chuadanga Pauro Degree College,Chuadanga

Chuadanga Pauro Degree College,is a reputed college in chuadanga sadar and all over the district.It was established in 1983.The college bears the EIIN number:115382. The college have at least 1000 students.There are many students from the college has got admitted in many reputed Universitys in Bangladesh. To know more about the college please visit:www.cpdc.edu.bd — Preceding unsigned comment added by TIR22122002 (talk • contribs) 07:07, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Chuadanga Pauro Degree College,Chuadanga

Chuadanga Pauro Degree College,is a reputed college in chuadanga sadar and all over the district.It was established in 1983.The college bears the EIIN number:115382.

visit:www.cpdc.edu.bd — Preceding unsigned comment added by TIR22122002 (talk • contribs) 07:31, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 December 2018

223.238.252.163 (talk) 12:15, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Please change map because Kashmir is part of India not Pakistan

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Babymissfortune 12:32, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 January 2019

change "ninth general electionn" to "ninth general election" Libby Kane (talk) 11:46, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

 Done, thanks! ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 14:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

History of Bangaladesh - %ages of religions

Adds up to 105%. Can someone please correct this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.116.97 (talk) 12:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 February 2019

2601:249:8700:1340:F900:2548:F907:9FBE (talk) 17:51, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
There are some spelling mistake
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. aboideautalk 17:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Total Fertility Rate Update

The demographic section references to national total fertility rates should be updated to reflect 2016 World Bank statistics of 2.1 for Bangladesh, 2.3 for India, and 3.5 for Pakistan. Updated hyperlink: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_and_dependencies_by_total_fertility_rate Thanks. Efendley (talk) 01:22, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Note that Bangladesh's updated TFR is of particular significance, since 2.1 is approximately replacement rate. Efendley (talk) 01:31, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Update the gdp figures

please update the gdp figures for 2019 as given in the same source Giastwo (talk) 13:31, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 February 2019

Per Capita Income is written incorrectly: it is $1,190 in the source not $1,754 213.172.112.62 (talk) 13:38, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

 Done Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 16:39, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 March 2019

Bangladesh's per capita gross national income (GNI) jumped more than 9 percent to $1,909 last fiscal year from $1,751 a year ago, showed provisional official figures released yesterday. Mahmud Ali Khan Shovon (talk) 03:23, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. NiciVampireHeart 07:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

per capita nominal.

present per capita is 1909 $. pls change it. Ahsifat123 (talk) 18:50, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

About Bangladesh article

Hi guys, Please read thoroughly Wikipedia:WikiProject Countries guidelines for the improvement in Bangladesh country article. Read articles like India, Canada or Australia these are all featured article and help nominate Bangladesh article as Good or Featured article. Thanks--Priyansh90 (talk) 07:10, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 June 2019

Please change the government system from "unitary parliamentary constitutional republic" to "unitary dominant party parliamentary constitutional republic", because the ruling party is ruling for more than 10 years and currently there're almost no opposition party exists to challenge them. [1] 103.230.105.2 (talk) 11:30, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominant-party_system
 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Please find a source that includes that description of Bangladesh's government system. Anne drew 00:38, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2019

Population density is incorrect from the reference attached:

  1. please change population density 1,106/km2 to 1,158/km2.
  2. please change population density 2,864.5/sq mi to 2,999/sq mi.
  3. please change population density rank 10th to 7th.

Kuttumiah (talk) 01:57, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

 Question: Which reference are you referring to? Where did you get these numbers from? NiciVampireHeart 02:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 Answer: I am referring the reference attached to the page. I am providing it below for your convenience. Also I have noticed that the numbers I provided changed a bit since my request. Please update with latest values.
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_population_density#Main_table

Kuttumiah (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

@Kuttumiah: Wikipedia cannot be used to source itself. See WP:CIRCULAR. Please provide a reliable source for the figure you want updated. NiciVampireHeart 14:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

References

Please check the references in the top slot, a lot of references are not working and are saying that they were never defined. Can anybody fix that? Thanks. -- Gridlust (talk) 17:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

This seems to come from this edit where Tubslubeamorepersempre added a number of references with names but didn't specify the content of the reference properly. I don't know which ref was meant to refer to which source so I can't fix it. Busy now, but will look into it more later if it's not fixed by someone else first. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:37, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

12% of the world's GDP

The source for this claim is an op-ed in the Daily Star [1] which in turn doesn't cite any sources:


Now the 25% value is probably taken from Angus Madison's estimates for the whole India (List_of_regions_by_past_GDP_(PPP)#Indian_empires). Even if we assume that Mughal Empire is equivalent to India (which wasn't the case) and take the 50% claim at face value, this refers to the whole State of Bengal of which a sizeable portion is not in modern-day Bangladesh.

The 50% claim itself requires reliable scholarly sources as it's quite extraordinary (but might well be true). --Alaexis¿question? 08:17, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Concepts such as GPD are not applicable to economies of pre-industrial age, the quoted books do not have this claim but are only based on conjectures of no historical validity. Most of the global economy was subsistence and not based on the free market. There were no statistical bodies. The quality of food could be better in an African village than in a suburb of industrialized London in the XIX century but this has nothing to do with the market economy which is measured with gdp. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andriolo (talk • contribs) 13:14, 7 July 2019 (UTC)


By 1700, the Mughal economy surpassed Qing China and Europe to become the world's largest and at the time Bengal accounted for 12% of the world's GDP, which was larger than the share held by western Europe.

Annual Bengali shipbuilding output was 223,250 tons, compared to an output of 23,061 tons in the nineteen colonies of North America. Bengali shipbuilding proved to be advanced than European shipbuilding prior to the Industrial Revolution. ...[58][22][59][60][61][62]

The first sentence is not reflected in the cited bibliography. Wikipedia:No original research. The second sentence like the first is also based on conjectures of no historical value. I believe these statements of comparative history are not useful to the wiki item.

--Andriolo (talk) 10:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Lwaye

58.84.32.177 (talk) 07:05, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

 Not done Please specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. The request must be of the form "please change X to Y". --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:26, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 22 August 2019

Grammar error in the introduction, second paragraph:

" ... whose military power led Alexander the Great to withdrew from India."

change "withdrew" to "withdraw" Omiyawaki (talk) 08:59, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

 Done. El_C 09:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 August 2019

I would like to update the population of bangladesh 194.193.32.50 (talk) 00:21, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. aboideautalk 00:45, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for


—2601:406:5001:F40:2497:5D1:A946:4A6F (talk) 14:47, 29 September 2019 (UTC) Cjw math231math121math231

You haven't said what you think is erroneous. I've added parameters in the {{coord}} template for the country's coordinates and altered Dhaka's coordinates to match those in our article about the city, but if you still think that there is an error, you'll need to provide a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 18:29, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Protected edit request 4 November 2019

To add to Category:Least developed countries (last remaining omission, after Tanzania). Source: [2]. 165.91.13.55 (talk) 19:23, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

 Done--Goldsztajn (talk) 12:18, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Area of Bangladesh?

I found myself wondering if the independence of Bangladesh from Pakistan resulted in any loss of territory due to what might be described as unsettled conditions. A quick comparison of the East Pakistan page (147,610 sq km) with this page (147,570 sq km) showed a difference of 40 sq km seemingly lost by Bangladesh. Perhaps my skimming of this lengthy article failed to pick up any mention of this loss of territory. While 40 sq km is a fairly inconsequential amount of land, less than half a township in American Midwest of my youth, I would think that such a comprehensive article as this would mention it.

Interestingly, a quick business of summing the areas of the administrative districts from the table included in the article gave a total of 147,627 sq km. Seemingly, this is a nation where the whole is less than the sum of its parts!

So, what is area of Bangladesh? Was territory lost from the time it was East Pakistan? Was territory somehow magically added? Providing varying numbers for what should be constant number calls into question all of the numbers.

- sj Slickjack (talk) 02:45, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

According to the last census the total surface area of Bangladesh is 147,570 sq km - and this is the current official estimate. Thanks for pointing out the inconsistency with the divisional table within the same article. This will be fixed shortly. In earlier decades the estimate of the surface area used to be a bit higher - which is reflected in the East Pakistan Article. There is no political reason for such difference - the legacy East Pakistan and current Bangladesh are supposed to be the same geographic entity. Post independence, there has been exchanges of a few "enclaves" between India and Bangladesh, but the impact of these exchanges is miniscule. The 0.03% difference in land area estimates should be attributed to the subjectivity inherent in the process of defining how surface area should be calculated near coastal lines and the natural phenomenon of rivers gradually changing course and movement of coastal lines. Arman (Talk) 07:42, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
The table has been updated. Arman (Talk) 07:55, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 January 2020

hh 122.102.39.146 (talk) 08:15, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Arman (Talk) 10:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Bangladesh - Location Map

please edit Bangladesh - Location Map to this one Bg-map from this one 3.07pm 2 August 2019 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahmudsakib14 (talk • contribs) 09:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for


—5.36.102.10 (talk) 09:07, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article, and they appear to be correct. If you still think that there is an error, you'll need to provide a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 18:01, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

@@NinjaRobotPirate: there appears to be an on-going—long term—edit war on this page. ——SN54129 12:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Ugh. I'll take a look at it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:55, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
@Respected Person and Liberty Pedia: I suggest you discuss this here because I'm reluctant to fully protect the article. If I do that, it will override the semi-protection, and I'll probably forget to restore that. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:14, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

IPA Pronunciation of "Bangladesh"

Hi, I had earlier today done an edit on this article to remove the English IPA for the pronunciation of Bangladesh and replace it with the Bengali IPA on the basis that the English IPA in my opinion does not match with the audio sample. However, my edit later on got reverted by Liberty Pedia on the basis that the English IPA does match with the audio sample and that the Bengali IPA was poorly written with no syllables, now I can understand the point on syllables but I disagree with Liberty's statement in his/her edit summary that the English IPA matches because even though the English IPA is similar to a degree, the vowels in the Bengali pronunciation are different - with a (phonetically ɐ) being used in Bengali instead of ɑ which is not present in the language, e is different to ɛ and d is pronounced as a dental stop (d̪) in Bengali instead of the usual alveolar stop (d) you get in English, so for these reasons I don't think it matches with the audio sample (which very clearly follows the Bengali phonology rather than English, I know because despite growing up in England, I speak Bengali as a second language) even though it is similar.

And I think the respelling of English here creates more clutter than the IPA which was why I removed that too (especially since the English spelling of Bangladesh itself is a romanisation of the Bengali spelling and in my opinion doesn't need any further respelling) and regarding the syllable matter, wouldn't it be better to introduce those syllables in the Bengali IPA rather than remove it completely? Most countries in Wikipedia have their native phonology with the designated native language IPA (e.g. Afghanistan, France, Germany, Serbia etc.) rather than just an English IPA so I see no reason to remove an IPA just because its seems poorly written, in fact, wouldn't it be better to improve that IPA rather than taking it off completely when it has been in this article for years? I'd be grateful if either Liberty Pedia or any other editor can reply to this, until then, I won't make any more edits on this matter here because I'd preferably want to resolve this through a discussion rather than edit war over this matter. Many thanks. Broman178 (talk) 20:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

If however, there is no response to this query within a week, I won't hesitate to take action on this matter myself (which could involve reverting Liberty Pedia's edit). Broman178 (talk) 03:37, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
As no one responded to this despite me raising it here, I've now boldly taken action on this myself so if anyone disagrees with my changes, feel free to discuss it here with me, many thanks but if my changes get reverted without a good explanation, I will not hesitate to revert it back. Regards. Broman178 (talk) 11:25, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Bangladesh/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Editoneer (talk · contribs) 11:14, 19 March 2020 (UTC)


Alright, starting with Criteria.

Well-written

  • The prose is clear and uses terms that are common for a broad audience.
  • The "design" is perfect. And didn't detected something unneutral.

Now with the mistakes.

Others

  • It is stable as it was modified last 5 days despite the ongoing talk on the talk page.
  • I didn't detected hateful or praise words, so it is neutral.
  • The page is illustrated with elements required such as the flag and coats of arm and many geographic elements.

Verifiability

  • It contains a list of references.
  • In terms of land mass, Bangladesh ranks 92nd, spanning 147,570 square kilometres (56,980 sq mi), making it one of the most densely-populated countries in the world., where is the reference of this claim?
For this claim the reference is in the main body (Demography section). The introduction section may skip references if the claim is discussed in detail in the body with proper references. This norm is followed in FA class articles as well. Arman (Talk) 14:25, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Royal Bengal tiger, which is the national animal., add the [14] reference from Royal Bengal tiger after the dot, as it needs to be a reference there even if you link the article.  Arman (Talk) 14:31, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Link [6] just links me to the main page of "2019 Revision of World Population Prospects"... am I supposed to press something here?
Reader is supposed to download the data; the link of the data set is given in Ref [7]. This is the standard source used in Wikipedia Country infobox template and as such consistent across countries.Arman (Talk) 13:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Who can help me with [13] link? As I'm not sure how I can possibly read it and review.
Are you referring to "Aging and Adult Development in the Developing World: Applying Western Theories and Concepts"? It is a book reference. The book needs to be collected to verify. Arman (Talk)
  • I need help with someone translating [3] for me. And [2] The Law book doesn't help me with the population of Bangladesh.
I can confirm for [3] that it says Ethnicity Distribution for Bangladesh is Bengali: 98%, Small ethnic groups: 2%; where it says:
"জাতিগোষ্ঠী: বাঙালি : ৯৮% ক্ষুদ্র নৃ গোষ্ঠী : ২%"
Ref [2] is regarding "Bengali" being the state language. Arman (Talk) 13:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Assistance needed with [16] and [17].
  • Its large Muslim population makes Bangladesh the fourth largest Muslim-majority country in the world., Let's add a reference here otherwise it sounds like original research.  Arman (Talk) 09:38, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
  • ...with one of the fastest real GDP growth rates in the world. Its gross domestic product is the 39th largest in terms of market exchange rates, and 29th in purchasing power parity. Bangladesh's per capita income ranks 143th nominally and 136th by purchasing power parity., we will need references here.
All of these data elements are sourced from the infobox on the right where they are referenced. These references should not be required to be repeated in the article lead. Arman (Talk) 09:43, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
  • [27], [28], Wikipedia isn't a reliable site, if you want to get a reference from there put them in the article.
Sorry, couldn't find any source from wikipedia; please be more specific. Arman (Talk) 09:49, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
  • [31], this book just won't be found for me, can someone help me confirm that the Austriac word "Bonga" means "Sun God"?
Please check this. I have also fixed the ISBN in the ref so that the book can be found easily. Arman (Talk) 10:10, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

I'm going to tell you that I'm still a newbie at reviewing a GA, so please correct me if I'm wrong using good faith (BTW I hate criticism), I need to go now as reading caused my eyes to be tired and I can't review something if I feel like I meditated for 40 minutes straight. After I found all the errors and put the "onhold" then you resolved all the problems I'm going to ask for a second opinion as I might did something wrong. Editoneer (talk) 12:43, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Early and medieval periods

Anyways let's resume.
Was this in reference to " History of Bengal. B.R. Publishing Corp."? I have now provided the ISBN (which links to the book). Arman (Talk) 08:39, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
  • I didn't found how Wari-Bateshwar is linked with Alexander the Great's invasion. Help.
I have updated the links to establish this link more clearly. "In fact even Alexander of Macedon, although he had subdued all Asia, refrained from making war upon the Gandaridae alone of all peoples..."(Here) and "Wari-Bateshwar could be a part of Gangaridae, which was described as a rich place of trade in the estuary of the river Ganges in Greek and Latin literature..." (Here) Arman (Talk) 09:09, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
  • I can't read the book [49] somebody help me with this.
Are you referring to this? If not please mention the book name. Arman (Talk) 05:46, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
  • These states had well-developed currencies, banking, shipping, architecture and art, and the ancient universities of Bikrampur and Mainamati hosted scholars and students from other parts of Asia. Xuanzang of China was a noted scholar who resided at the Somapura Mahavihara (the largest monastery in ancient India), and Atisa travelled from Bengal to Tibet to preach Buddhism. The earliest form of the Bengali language began to the emerge during the eighth century. Need reference, reference and a reference in there.
  • The Islamic conquest of Bengal began with the 1204 invasion by Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar Khalji, Put a reference after that as a shortcut than going through the page.  Done RRRW (talk) 19:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Go reference [50], please link the page of the book.
  • Need help with [51].
  • [52] instead of referencing a Wikipedia article, reference the link that proves it.
  • [53], is literally another encyclopedia that everyone can log in and doesn't reference anything, how do we trust this link?
  • [54], again is an encyclopedia that you can log in and how does this prove it? We can't compare encyclopedias with other encyclopedias.
  • and shipbuilding,., the serial comma should be replaced with a punctuation if it's the end of the sentence don't put a comma there.
  • [61], try to give the page that also says about the living condition that you can search with CTRL+F, by the way.
  • [63], [64], [68], [69] (nIcE), can you please link external links to those?
  • [71], please link the page.
  • [73], try to sort this link out as viewers shouldn't think that someone was paid to spread misinformation or a site to praise themselves.
  • [75] [76], is again an encyclopedia which isn't reliable.
  • [79], Google books can't identify this book. Editoneer (talk) 17:21, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Colonial Periods
  • I can't access the book [80], somebody help me out.
  • Can you please tell me at what page is [83]? Seeing [84] I suggest just delete the [83] reference.
  • I can't break [85] with Sci-Hub, what can I do?
  • and pledged allegiance to the last Mughal emperor, Bahadur Shah Zafar, who was later exiled to neighbouring Burma., throw a reference in there "how 'bout deh?"?
  • The challenge posed to company rule by the failed Indian Mutiny led to the creation of the British Indian Empire as a crown colony. The British established several schools, colleges and a university in what is now Bangladesh. the reference [87] doesn't provide information about this.
  • [88], I can't read the book and the Wikipedia link isn't reliable.
  • During the late 19th century, novelists, social reformers and feminists emerged from Muslim Bengali society. Electricity and municipal water systems were introduced in the 1890s; cinemas opened in many towns during the early 20th century. East Bengal's plantation economy was important to the British Empire, particularly its jute and tea. The British established tax-free river ports, such as the Port of Narayanganj, and large seaports like the Port of Chittagong. reference, reference, reference is where?
  • [90], encyclopedias aren't reliable, source a reliable site instead.
  • [92], encyclopedias aren't reliable.
  • However, the first partition of Bengal created an uproar in Calcutta and the Indian National Congress. In response to growing Hindu nationalism, the All India Muslim League was formed in Dhaka during the 1906 All India Muhammadan Educational Conference. The British government reorganised the provinces in 1912, reuniting East and West Bengal and making Assam a second province...The Raj was slow to allow self-rule in the colonial subcontinent. It established the Bengal Legislative Council in 1862, and the council's native Bengali representation increased during the early 20th century. The Bengal Provincial Muslim League was formed in 1913 to advocate civil rights for Bengali Muslims within a constitutional framework. During the 1920s, the league was divided into factions supporting the Khilafat movement and favouring co-operation with the British to achieve self-rule. R e f e r e n c e s .
  • In 1929, the All Bengal Tenants Association was formed in the Bengal Legislative Council to counter the influence of the Hindu landed gentry, and the Indian Independence and Pakistan Movements strengthened during the early 20th century. After the Morley-Minto Reforms and the diarchy era in the legislatures of British India, the British government promised limited provincial autonomy in 1935. The Bengal Legislative Assembly, British India's largest legislature, was established in 1937. R E F E R E N C E S.
  • Although it won a majority of seats in 1937, the Bengal Congress boycotted the legislature. A. K. Fazlul Huq of the Krishak Praja Party was elected as the first Prime Minister of Bengal. In 1940 Huq supported the Lahore Resolution, which envisaged independent states in the northwestern and eastern Muslim-majority regions of the subcontinent. The first Huq ministry, a coalition with the Bengal Provincial Muslim League, lasted until 1941; it was followed by a Huq coalition with the Hindu Mahasabha which lasted until 1943., again we need references.
  • Huq was succeeded by Khawaja Nazimuddin, who grappled with the effects of the Burma Campaign, the Bengal famine of 1943, which killed up to 3 million people, [94] only says that the famine caused 3 million deaths. Nothing about Khawaja or the Burma Campaign.
  • In 1946, the Bengal Provincial Muslim League won the provincial election, taking 113 of the 250-seat assembly (the largest Muslim League mandate in British India). H. S. Suhrawardy, who made a final futile effort for a United Bengal in 1946, was the last premier of Bengal., reference required here.
Partition of Bengal
  • On 20 June, the Bengal Legislative Assembly met to decide on the partition of Bengal., reference here.
  • At the preliminary joint meeting, it was decided (120 votes to 90) that if the province remained united it should join the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan. reference here.
  • At a separate meeting of legislators from West Bengal, it was decided (58 votes to 21) that the province should be partitioned and West Bengal should join the Constituent Assembly of India. reference here...
  • On 6 July, the Sylhet region of Assam voted in a referendum to join East Bengal. Cyril Radcliffe was tasked with drawing the borders of Pakistan and India, and the Radcliffe Line established the borders of present-day Bangladesh., add a reference here.

To be continued, again... Editoneer (talk) 16:35, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

I apologize, I need to put the article in second opinion as I can't help but strain my eyes reading this article (not that the article is the problem or anything). Editoneer (talk) 07:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
@Editoneer: Is there anything in particular you want advice on? AIRcorn (talk) 04:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
@Aircorn: For you to take over... thanks. Editoneer (talk) 06:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
I can do it, but with an article this size I need to know that Armanaziz is still willing to respond. They haven't replied to the last few points yet. You don't have to agree with them, a simple "I don't think this is necessary" will do. I just need to know there is someone willing to engage in the process. AIRcorn (talk) 19:29, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
I am very much willing to work on any development suggestion, but my response timing may be a bit slow. I'll try to address the remaining items above and buzz you when I have completed. Thanks to both of you for your involvement. Arman (Talk) 05:38, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Great. Either ping me here or leave a message on my talk page. AIRcorn (talk) 21:14, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Status query

Armanaziz, it has been 30 days since your last post and you haven't edited on Wikipedia at all since then; where does this stand, and how soon can you return to it? GA nominations can't stay open indefinitely—regular progress needs to be made. Indeed, Aircorn wanted to be assured that you would respond, and though you did make that assurance, it's looking a little threadbare at the moment. I'll leave it to Aircorn to decide how to proceed; the review has already been open for about two and a half months, and it could be closed soon. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:08, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Sorry I cannot commit any timeframe. Arman (Talk) 14:48, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
I will close this for now and then when you can commit some time you can renominate. Ping me if you want and if I have time I will look at it. From a cursory glance there is some more referencing needed and a lot of trimming to do (it sits at 111kb of prose). AIRcorn (talk) 07:27, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:22, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Requesting opinion on a page move request.

Hello,

@ Talk:Aurat (disambiguation)#Requested_move_11_May_2020 is taking place about article relating to women of mainly of Asian origin. In Past 2 days only two opinions are received and more opinions will be preferable. Thanks for your opinion and participation in discussion.

Bookku (talk) 12:02, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

flag

The flag of Bangladesh is a piece of rectangular green cloth with a red circle at the centre. The ratio of the lenght and breadth of it is 10:6 or 5:3. The radius of the flag is one -fifth of it's length. It is usually made of cotton cloth, linen, silk and other fabrics. The green colour of the flag symbolizes the everlasting freshness of the youth and vitality of our nation. The red circle symbolizes the rising sun indicating our prosperity and bright future. Late artist Kamrul Hasan is the designer of our national flag. It was first raised on the premises of the University of Dhaka on the 2nd March, 1971. That's why, it is called the Flag Day. It is hoisted everywhere on the Indepedence Day (26th March) and the Victory Day (16th December). The freedom fighters achieved the flag instead of their blood and lives. Zturash (talk) 12:20, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Source

The late Tareque Masud is regarded as one of Bangladesh's outstanding directors due to his numerous productions on historical and social issues. IW. (talk) 12:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

I have fixed the issue. There is no source which says he made any historical films, so I removed this part. He made films mostly on social issues. - Ivan hersee (talk) 07:27, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Template

I need to tag this page. What is the template? I tried searching. {{Bangladesh}} doesn't work. Can anyone please help?! Raymuncho (talk) 20:59, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Raymuncho, did you try {{Bangladesh topics}} (for articles) or {{WikiProject Bangladesh}} (for talk pages)? Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:02, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Oh thank you. I found the right text, already. Bangladesh Thank you for your caring reply though. I appreciate a lot.

-) Raymuncho (talk) 08:49, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 August 2020

 Not done: It's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Ed talk! 14:25, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

21st february

21st February is the International Language Day .It is a memorable day for Bengalis. Bengalis sacrificed their lives for the mother tounge. The story behind it was started in 1937. When East Asia was under British rule, it was pretty sure that Asia will not be under british rule anymore. It was partly decided in 1947 that a state will born named Pakistan. Then the arrgument began, what will be the state language of Pakistan? On 17 May, 1947 Chowdhury Khalikujjaman and in July Dr. Jiyauddin Ahmad proposed to make Urdu the state language of the would be Pakistan. Dr.Muhammad Sahidullah and Dr. Muhammad Enamul Haq went against them.

Then the East Asia was seperated into two states, India and Pakistan. East pakistan (Bangladesh) was with Pakistan because of the common religion. It was not declared but everyone was sure that Urdu would be the state language of Pakistan.On 2nd September,1947 a cultural institution called Tamuddun Majlish was stablished. This year " Rashtro Bhasha Parishad " was made. The Pakistan Government issued section 144. On 25th February, 1948 Dhirendronath Datt proposed to make Bengali the state language as well with English and Urdu. But they denied so, a strike held in Dhaka on 26th and 29th February. Because of those strikes, slogans, piketing 69 leaders of East Pakistan was arrested. On 15th March, Khaja Najimuddin signed the contract of 8 points. On 21st March, General Muhammad Ali Jinnah declared that, "Urdu and Urdu will be the only state language of Pakistan." The students became protestant. As a reasult, the Pakistan Government permitted to promote Bengali but in Arabic letters. But the students became anger and defendent. On 26th January, 1952 Khaja Najimuddin declared Urdu being the state language of Pakistan. Against that declaration of Jinnah, a strike held on 30th January all over the East Pakistan. Again a protestful movement started and the political groups joind them. Again on 4th February in Dhakia the students showed their scattered. On 21st February a strike happened all over the East Pakistan and it was decided to celebrate 21st February as the State Language Day. They vowed to contine the protest till Bengali became the state language of Pakistan. Shekh Mujibur Rahman and Mahiuddin Ahmad was Sent to the Faridpur prioson because they were being the commender of the movement. That time public meetings, gatherings were restricted.But they decided to not maintain that section 144.On 21st February a meeting took place in the mango garden. they made decition to do procession with 10 people and so it happened.Firstly the police started arresting people, stick charge and then throwed gas. Atlast they started shooting. Abul Barkat, Jabbar, Rafiq, Salam and some more unknown people were killed. aA few people were harmed also. The news spreaded so fast. A huge mourning rally occurred in Dhaka. This rally was also attackted by police and a boy named Shafiur Rahman was died. To made the sacrifice unforgotable people made a SAHID MINER beside the medical college where they were shooted.But the SAHID MINAR was distroyed by thge police on 24h February. Then "KADTE ASHINI FASHIE DABI NIYE ESHECHI ", "SRITIR MINER"," "AMAR BHAIYER ROKTE RANGANO EKUSHE FEBRUARY"," ORA AMR MUKHER BHASHA KAIRA NITE CHAY ','TORA DHAKA SHOHOR ROKTE BHASAILI "," KOBOR","AREK FAGUN", etc writings were written.The Language Movement of 1952 ws not enough to make Bengalies right sure, after some more steps in 1956 the Pakistan Government mentioned Bengali as one of the state language in the constitution of Pakistan. In 1999 UNESCO declared 21st February as the international Language day. And it is also celebrated as SAHID DIBOSH in Bangladesh.On that day every political groups and people went to the SAHID MINER by bare foots with flowers to show respect to the language martayrs. Zturash (talk) 17:30, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

International Language Day Saditmito05 (talk) 13:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 September 2020

103.199.111.255 (talk) 14:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bangladesh&action=edit

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Dylsss (talk) 15:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Tiktok

To get verification accounts Saditmito05 (talk) 13:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Plz unfreeze my id (ifthakhar02) Ifthakhar023 (talk) 03:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

hi Monsurnow (talk) 11:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Subsection for climate change

As we're trying to figure out how much information is appropriate about climate change in different country articles, I think this is an example of the minority of articles where subsection is appropriate for two reasons.

  • The effects of climate change are nonclimatic effects: rising seas are a consequence of climate change, but are not climate itself. The reason Bangladesh is mentioned so much in the climate change literature is also non-climatic: it is extremely vulnerable to its poverty levels of agriculture.
  • Climate change has a massive effect on Bangladesh, meaning that two substantial paragraphs is the minimum to discuss this.

We should not surprise our readers, I think we do by putting all these effects under a heading which is off topic. Femke Nijsse (talk) 09:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Moxy? Femke Nijsse (talk) 19:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I would say no every time as climate change is a sub topic of a sub topic of a sub topic and does not tell anyone about the country per say or its people (Country articles rarely predict the future[speculation?]). Basically your asking to have the same weight as "Presidential era and coups " and I dont think it should. But will put it too 4th level for now and see if others think differently (as in those that actually edit this article and plan too in the future) ...lets see what they say. That said we have to fix the transclution...get it out of here and add real text here....as I am worried someone will come by and remove it as this article has \had a TRANS removed before for the Art section. On a side note I will be moving most of the "Human rights" stuff to the main page no need for history lesson in this one section.--Moxy 🍁 00:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your response. As I argued above, it is inappropriate here to consider climate change a sub-topic of climate. I think it is appropriate to have it at the same level as those subsections of the economy (which is a more useful comparison imo). That call may be professional brain damage, hence I appreciate your input. I don't know much about other envirnomental issues in Bangladesh, but if there significant at a similar level to climate change (which I doubt, otherwise I would have heard about them?), those could be bundled in a level three heading?
There is global consensus that well-documented projected in peer-reviewed literature are not speculation: Predictions, speculation, forecasts and theories stated by reliable, expert sources or recognized entities in a field may be included, though editors should be aware of creating undue bias to any specific point-of-view, from WP:FUTURE. We've had many discussions about that when climate change was still mostly something of the future and climate denial was rampant on Wikipedia. I'll move the text over this weekend (removing excerpt), ensuring that the citations are of appropriately high quality for an article like this. The sentence before SLR should be cited to a modern source, and probably be mostly in the present tense. Femke Nijsse (talk) 08:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Disagree completely. The transclusion is a terrible idea on any article, especially a high level country article. It means that information could be changed without triggering a watchlist and makes an extra impediment to editing. There is no need for a level 4 sub level for climate change, let alone a level 3 heading. Most readers would expect to find information on climate change under climate. It is an overview article and if it needs expansion it needs to be done at the daughter article, not here. Restoring per BRD. AIRcorn (talk) 11:32, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Seems to some people should really stop about their speculations, advocacy and private crusades, that always can made on some kind of a personal blogs and websites. About climate charge it is one part of a climate as that climate is changing and that is it. So no need for special subsections or so. 178.221.117.141 (talk) 03:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
  • I wanted to come here with a comment similar to Femkemilene's -- for Bangladesh -- Climate change is expected to displace most of the population, and is radically changing the entire country's relationship to land, cities and other issues-- this should be at least a level 3 heading, if not a level two -- its the defining environmental issue for the country, not some subset of "climate" or geography -- there is already dramatic population displacement, and its going to be significantly worse in the coming years. Sadads (talk) 11:57, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
As mentioned many times predicting the future in these historical articles does not fit.--Moxy 🍁 15:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Hmm, why not? Of course, we shouldn't do speculation, but here we're talking current developments. The energy/infrastructure sections typically also mention developments, not only historical energy provisions. Femke Nijsse (talk) 15:27, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Because it is an overview article. We already have bloat issues with country articles. If you want to expand on this start with Climate of Bangladesh (currently a redirect). Also there is a complete misunderstanding of how we use headers. We don't make something a level two or three header if it is a subsection of a header that already exists in the article. AIRcorn (talk) 23:32, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Okay did some digging and see you and Sadads have been adding these subsections to multiple articles. I see no consensus for this and a a lot of complaints by established country editors (particularly Chipmunk). Please stop this until a consensus is reached regarding country articles and climate change. I agree with what Moxy has said at Talk:Australia here. The excerpt template is a terrible terrible template to use in general and doubly so in these cases. Please do not use that and I can't think of any country that needs a sub section. If you and other editors are looking to increase coverage of climate change in countries start with that particular countries dedicated climate article. AIRcorn (talk) 23:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
    I agree excerpts are a bad idea, and I agree that country articles are typically bloated. What I'm trying to do here is have a discussion on a variety of articles (three) to see how much space this requires for the basis of an advice page the wikiproject. I fear my fellow editors on this topic are overly enthusiastic. Bangladesh is an extreme case, where climate change is having a defining impact on the country. Hence, a good showcase as "Never add any more information than this". India is more typical case, Australia somewhere in between.
    So far the discussion has been quite fruitful, despite friction, with multiple good suggestions from outside editors: in most articles, a subheading is inappropriate, climate change is only partially a subtopic of climate, so spread the info to appropriate sections (climate, biodiversity, energy/economy, politics, all only if super-relevant for that country). If there are other environmental issues that are super-prominent, consider bundling it under a subsection "environment/environmental issues".f
    If the outcome of this discussion is that one paragraph suffices, that's acceptable, and I'll include that in a guide to be written as the typical maximum. It's not super easy to discuss when we've done such a poor job at showing what that text should be (using excerpts).
    I think we got of the wrong foot because of the use of excerpts, which is now clouding this discussion. (I could have caught that if I'd paid better attention to the WikiProject, sorry!) While for GA/FA and for less experienced editors 'practicing' on the subarticles is a good idea, in general I believe editors shouldn't spend too much time on less relevant pages. Femke Nijsse (talk) 08:06, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
    Okay. Sorry for my grumpy response. I saw the Australian comments, Wikipedia:Meetup/Online edit-a-thon on climate change - November 2020 and then randomly checked Algeria and thought it was more widespread than maybe it is. I have a natural aversion to wikiprojects dictating article content like this, especially at such broad articles covered by multiple projects with sometimes conflicting aims, but am probably in the minority here (and it is a rant not worth starting). Take into account Moxy and CMD's comments. CMD in particular is our resident country editor. I am more interested in the Good Article process (I have this on my watchlist as I failed it a little while ago[3]). I think the major issue here is due weight relative to the other information we could or should present. Many country articles will only require a sentence or two, some might not even need a mention at all. Maybe some of the low lying island you could justify a paragraph or in some rare cases a sub-sub-sub section. This will always be a case-by-case situation. I do disagree with the less relevant pages comment though. I think we should stick to summary style as much as possible (in fact this article should be pure summary style) and the daughter articles are where the more developed information should go. AIRcorn (talk) 23:32, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
    No worries, I think this pandemic is making most of us a bit grumpy. When I talked about less releavnt pages, I didn't mean ditch summary style. Summary style is the best thing Wikipedia has. What I meant is that I prefer editors (me..) add 1 sentence in a country article to four paragraphs in a 'climate in X' article if the latter doesn't get read.
    These discussions are indeed very case-by-case. I recognize my biases here as well. With low-lying islands that are thinking about 'abandoning ship', SLR is the most important climate change aspect, and ãs that is not part of climate, so it should be mentioned elsewhere in the article. Femke Nijsse (talk) 10:48, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Come at this with lightweight is your best bet Wikipedia:Main article fixation.--Moxy 🍁 15:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Moxy said: "Country articles rarely predict the future" and "As mentioned many times predicting the future in these historical articles does not fit.". I disagree with you. Climate change is no longer "the future". It is here and now and it is here to stay. A country like Bangladesh is already NOW deeply affected, and all countries are contributing to climate change NOW due to their current and past CO2 emissions. Who says that these are "historical articles"? For me they are articles where people go when they want to learn more about a country - past and present. They want to know about the history of the country but also what is happening there right now, whether the country is a good holiday destination whether one would want to migrate there, whether there is migration from there etc.". I really don't understand why you would weigh "history" above other aspects.EMsmile (talk) 03:41, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

I agree with EMsmile. Every country article must have a subsection "environmental issues" visible in the table of content, with a redirection to main article about the environment issues in this country above. This is because environmental issues affect every country now more than econoical or political now. 7-8 millions people die each year from air polution, the corona pandemic is a result of nature destruction.

In my opinion better about environment and not climate change because in other case I afraid that paople will forget about the link with issues like deforestation and air pollution. In this subsection we should write 10-15 lines including, of course, about climate change. The main article about environmental issues should have a subsection about climate change with a redirection to a page specifically about climate change in this country.

--Alexander Sauda/אלכסנדר סעודה (talk) 10:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Best bring this up page by page as what your suggesting is the opposite of the outcome of every talk has been thus far.--Moxy 🍁 00:38, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi User:Moxy I don't think there has been an "outcome" or consensus of any kind for the other country articles yet. Please point me to where a consensus has been achieved? I felt that in each case a few of use suggested one thing but were usually overruled and steam rolled by others who wanted to keep the status quo (i.e. no or absolute minimal mentioning of climate change on country articles). In the case of Bangladesh, the discussion got stuck and not completed. For example, you had not replied further to my comment above on 8 December. I am getting so fed up with discussing it again and again on each country page. It makes more sense to discuss it at the WikiProjects Country (which I have tried), or with a WP:RfC (not yet tried). If we could reach a resolution that way, it would save us all a lot of time. EMsmile (talk) 07:46, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit request 3 January 2021

In the demography section the Religion percentage is 89.5% Muslim, 8.5% Hindu, 0.6% Buddhist and 0.4% Christian as per 2011 census. But the overall addition of the percentage gaves 99% as 1% is missing and as per 2011 census 90.5% of the Bangladesh population is Muslim, 8.5% Hindu, 0.6% Buddhist and 0.4% Christian. Change X (89.5%) Islam into Y (90.5%) Islam in the bar diagram. 2409:4065:D93:87D6:2E5E:556E:AA3:D51D (talk) 14:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done Thank you for pointing this out. Indeed, the existing census report lists the distribution of population by religion as "Muslim 90.39% Hindu 8.54% Buddhist 0.60% Christian 0.37% Others 0.14%". I updated the infobox and the citation to reflect this by updating Islam from 89.5% to 90.4% and adding "Others" at 0.1%. TimSmit (talk) 21:59, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit request 5 January 2021

Plz change the Hindu percentage in both the introduction and demography part: (X) 8.5% into (Y) 15.7% as Hindu percentage have increased from 8.5% in 2011 to 15.7% in 2019 according to Bangladesh Bureau of statistics and PLz see the below reference for my claim-: [1] [2] 2409:4065:10F:833:BD55:DBD3:7C6E:3F67 (talk) 17:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

 Not done for now: we'd need figures of every group otherwise that'll add up to more than 100%. --Paul ❬talk❭ 09:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ https://www.pratidintime.com/centre-rolls-out-red-carpet-for-2-5-crore-bangladeshi-hindus/
  2. ^ https://www.apnnews.com/bangladesh-national-hindu-grand-alliance-secretary-general-claimed-2-5-crore-bangladeshis-ready-to-come-to-india-if-the-cab-is-passed/amp/

Semi-protected edit request on 12 April 2021

Shadab Mehedi (talk) 13:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 Not done not clear what is to be edited. — Please ping to Meghmollar2017(UTC), unless you're responding in the User's TalkPage. — 04:56, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Plz update the demography

Plz update the Hindu percentage 8.5% (x) into (y) 15.7% in the demographic section as per 2019 year. There are 25 million Hindus in Bangladesh constituting 15.7% of the Bangladesh population and this data have been provided by census authority of Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. As per 2019, Muslims constitute 83.2 per cent of the country's population and other religions percentage have remain the same, so plz change Muslim percentage 90.4% (x) into 83.2% (y). Also change the year 2011 (x) into 2019 (y) in the demographic section. 2409:4065:D9D:384A:FB89:58A5:F2C8:3E4C (talk) 05:31, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:21, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Update the demography section

Plz update the Hindu percentage 8.5% (x) into (y) 15.7% in the demographic section as per 2019 year. There are 25 million Hindus in Bangladesh constituting 15.7% of the Bangladesh population and this data have been provided by census authority of Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. As per 2019, Muslims constitute 83.2 per cent of the country's population and other religions percentage have remain the same, so plz change Muslim percentage 90.4% (x) into 83.2% (y). Also change the year 2011 (x) into 2019 (y) in the demographic section.

Below is the reference of my claim [1] 2409:4065:D9D:384A:FB89:58A5:F2C8:3E4C (talk) 05:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ https://www.apnnews.com/bangladesh-national-hindu-grand-alliance-secretary-general-claimed-2-5-crore-bangladeshis-ready-to-come-to-india-if-the-cab-is-passed/
 Not done: That is not what the source says or claims. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:25, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2021

The area of Bangladesh is 147570 sq.km Please check the ministry of foreign affairs of Bangladesh to verify this information 103.72.76.129 (talk) 03:56, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

  • Comment: (Though CIA factbook is cited,) in recent years (after Indo-Bangladeshi exclave-enclave resolution), it is widely acclaimed that Bangladesh's total land area is 1,47,610. But, unfortunately, neither the national webportal nor the national encyclopedia, Banglapedia, is updated with that sum. Furthermore, all mentions the area to be 1,47,570. Cites: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Britannica, Banglapedia. — Please ping to Meghmollar2017(UTC), unless you're responding in the User's TalkPage. — 05:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 Done ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Plz update the demography part

Plz update the Hindu percentage 8.5% (x) into (y) 15.7% in the demographic section as per 2019 year. There are 25 million Hindus in Bangladesh constituting 15.7% of the Bangladesh population and this data have been provided by census authority of Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. As per 2019, Muslims constitute 83.2 per cent of the country's population and other religions percentage have remain the same, so plz change Muslim percentage 90.4% (x) into 83.2% (y). Also change the year 2011 (x) into 2019 (y) in the demographic section. Below is the reference of my claim [1] The real edit pro (talk) 07:28, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ https://www.apnnews.com/bangladesh-national-hindu-grand-alliance-secretary-general-claimed-2-5-crore-bangladeshis-ready-to-come-to-india-if-the-cab-is-passed/

Imus

37.224.252.104 (talk) 21:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Please update religion section

Hey,

Let me ask you. Why did you change the religion percentage without verification or proper citation of articles? see this religion =

Please remove and update according to official Bangladesh Statistical Census data in 2011. Other things do not follow any manipulate of wrong data from blog sites like WorldAtlas for using as citation references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hana88gf (talk • contribs) 10:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

GDP per capita

@Pullar56: Please provide reliable source before editing. Please see the International Monetary Fund's published report in March. IMF official website. Thanks! Dineshswamiin (talk) 10:14, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Please revert this edit. Dineshswamiin (talk) 03:13, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 June 2021

The pronunciation spelling is incorrect. Change /bæŋləˈdɛʃ/ To /bɑːŋlɑːˈdɛʃ/ Nibrasislam (talk) 07:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: The version in the article doesn't seem incorrect, and the proposed version is basically the same as the Bengali pronunciation already listed... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 June 2021

If this country is secular country then why you said the religion of the country is Islam. Islam and Secularism totally opposite to each other. 110.175.26.34 (talk) 07:48, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Run n Fly (talk) 16:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 June 2021

Plz change the religious demography of Bangladesh. As per as 2021 research by Bangladesh government census authority, Muslims constitute 91.57% of the country's population, Hindus 7.26% and others 1.17%. Population of Bangladesh is 174.3 million as per 2021.

Below is the link -

[4] 2409:4065:D9F:54B3:10E3:F5FF:12B2:A6F4 (talk) 15:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

  •  Not done This represents not any official datum. Official statistics from Bangladesh Government is more preferable than personal research. — Meghmollar2017 (UTC) — 16:34, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Etymology of Bengal

I have problem with this: "In Abrahamic tradition, it is said to have come from "Bung/Bang", a son of Hind (the son of Hām, who was a son of Noah) who colonised the area for the first time.[29]"

This is original research without any evidence or proper references. The reference that is give (ie reference 29) is dead internet link. We should only put theories that are evidence based that are supported by real historian and published in reputable sources. First, there is no historical evidence that Abraham even existed. The only source that Abraham even existed comes from religious text such as Bible or Quran. Bible and Quran do not mention Bengal. Even in context of religion which is not historical evidence, I could not find name Hind or Bung/Bang in the primary religious texts. Again, there is no evidence at all or proper reference to support the claim that: "Bung/Bang, a son of Hind (the son of Hām, who was a son of Noah) who colonised the area for the first time". If you have actual evidence, please post them. Wikipedia has clear rules against original research and this is original research. Tarikur (talk) 15:33, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

This is not original research as references have been provided. Your edits had a a Vanity Press tag which is not acceptable in Wikipedia. I agree, the wording should be changed as it is not part of the original Abrahamic tradition but a later one. UserNumber (talk) 11:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
You changed to this "Abrahamic genealogists suggest that the area was first colonised by Bang, a son of Hind who was the son of Ham (son of Noah).[31][32][33]" and I still have a problem. Please look at your reference and none of your references says that. You are pushing an original research without any evidence. No historical evidence that Abraham even existed to begin with. No one has Noah, Shem, Ham's DNA, genetic is out of question. Second, every primary religious literature (Bible, Quran) does not even mention Bengal region or anything related to your theory. With what evidence can any genealogist come that conclusion? Please share the evidence. Your first reference (31)(https://persian.packhum.org/persian/pf?file=07601010&ct=11) is dead internet link. Your second reference link (32) (http://countrystudies.us/bangladesh/4.htm) does not mention your theory: it states "Historians believe that Bengal, the area comprising present-day Bangladesh and the Indian state of West Bengal, was settled in about 1000 B.C. by Dravidian-speaking peoples who were later known as the Bang." Dravidian-speaking peoples are totally different people than Semitic people such as Abraham. Your third reference link ((33) (https://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=History) does not mention your theory. Tarikur (talk) 17:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
I have never mentioned anything about Abraham,. There is a difference between the Abrahamic tradition and Prophet Abraham himself. Also, click the archived link and it will take you to the correct place. All the references should be easily accessible now. Semites are descended from Shem, whilst this theory states that Bengalis are descended from his brother, therefore no one is pretending that Bengalis are Semites. You are just misunderstanding. UserNumber (talk) 12:54, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
The theories should be evidenced based. Again, with what evidence can any genealogist come that conclusion (no DNA of Bang Ham and Noah and no primary literature)? You are pushing a theory that is based on blind faith (not evidence). The only mention of Noah and his son Ham comes from religious texts and those religious texts don't mention Bang colonizing Bengal. The notion that Semitic people are descendent of Shem and Africans and some Asians are descendants of Ham is based on religion, not history. People used Curse of Ham to justify racism and slavery. Regarding your references, your first reference (Ghhulam Husain Salim) does mention your theory but he gave no evidence where he got it from. The old Christian historians used to believe that Adam and Eve was first humans and we, humans, started in the Middle-east (now we know that first humans were due to evolution and Humans started in Africa). Your Second reference (Dow, Alexander: History of Hindostan), did not mention your theory. I am in the process of getting hold of your third reference (Trautmann, Thomas (2005). Aryans and British India). The published year is 1997 (not 2005). Tarikur (talk) 16:29, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
This isn't my theory, and all of the citations mention this. Whether it is true or false, is not our job. This is a prevalent idea that is mentioned by many academics. I am more than happy to include that this is, of course, a legendary telling. UserNumber (talk) 11:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
So far only only one reference checks out and support the theory which is your first reference, ghulam husain salim. Your second reference (Dow, Alexander: History of Hindostan) does not mention the theory (the book is on Google Books for free and you search the whole book and no mention your theory). We can keep as is (your edits) until I get hold of the your third reference: (Trautmann, Thomas (1997). Aryans and British India). Tarikur (talk) 16:07, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
@Tarikur:, Dow's book does mention the theory. UserNumber (talk) 15:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Dow's book does mention the theory. The book is free online on Google Books. The read the pages that cited. I also searched for it. The book does not contain it. Tarikur (talk) 03:48, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Regarding Religious demography

As per as Bangladesh 2013 religious census, Muslim population in the country stands at 89%, Hindu at 10%, while practitioners of other religions like Buddhism, Christianity, Animism etc together compose 1% of the population. Below is the reference - [https://www.justice.gov › filePDF Web results Bangladesh: Treatment of Religious Minorities - Department of Justice]

As per as 2016 report from Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, hindu population in the country have increased upto 10.7%. The country population is 158.9 million as per as report, of which 17 million are Hindus. Below is the proof - [5]

So, as of 2016 year by combining the two references, Bangladesh have 88.2% Muslim, 10.7% Hindu, 1.1% as others religions. Pitush Puttar (talk) 15:59, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2021

103.16.24.37 (talk) 17:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

uo0uj[p io4ruy 6o5okerjt5e e5om re7o w7ioue 7y79pi7 dwu e7u7 nep9r 6wpu y6p9ieu e[pe4iufypkgo'py7ngf 5yj5 wejfhokf vpojkmgt

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. -ink&fables «talk» 18:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 September 2021

103.231.176.181 (talk) 06:51, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

One of the most corrupted country in the world The P.M. is the mother of mafia

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — LauritzT (talk) 09:18, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

English pronunciation

The ipa pronunciation uses the ae ligature symbol for the first vowel in Bangladesh as the English sound described in the pronunciation key as being “like in bat”. But the next non-ipa pronunciation right after the ipa gives the same vowels as “ah” which is described as “like in father”. In no English dialect are these the same sound. Therefore the two given pronunciations are inconsistent. I’m not opening this discussion to give an opinion which correct. Rather that, If an ipa and non-ipa are both give in this article they must be consistent, that is describe the same sounds. Kangermu (talk) 14:43, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:23, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Regional languages

Rangpuri, Chittagongian and Sylheti are usually considered as a dialect of Bengali, not a separate language. There is no recognition of these languages in Bangladesh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taheri Supporter (talk • contribs)

Bangla Twhidul (talk) 13:44, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Removing Sayeed Abubakar from Literature section

I removed Sayeed Abubakar from the "important figures of modern Bangladeshi poetry" sentence [6] and २ तकर पेप्सी reverted my edit [7], saying that he is "one of the great name of bangla literature", so I am opening a discussion here per WP:BRD. In addition to the sentence lacking a source, our article on Abubakar was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayeed Abubakar (Poet), with almost all participants finding that he has not received enough significant coverage in reliable sources to be notable by Wikipedia's standards. If he does not meet the threshold for an article, I do not think this article should present him as an "important figure of modern Bangladeshi poetry", especially without any sources to merit his inclusion. DanCherek (talk) 19:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

User:DanCherek from childhood I heard the name Sayeed Abubakad if you say about coverage there are many articles on Wikipedia main page which has less than 5ref [this] and [this] just with three coverage but Mostly we know their name from the nursery. That's why I undid your edit. २ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 19:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Yes, other poorly referenced articles exist. If this article is going to list Abubakad (or anyone else in that sentence) as an important figure of modern Bangladeshi poetry, there needs to be sourcing to back it up. DanCherek (talk) 20:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Population and Population Density of Bangladesh.

Bangladesh has now more than 183 million people. It may soon overtake Nigeria in terms of population. So changes in List of Countries by Population and Bangladesh will be required soon. Recently, I have changed the population and population density of Bangladesh in the article People's Republic of Bangladesh. HELLO IM NAZEEF (talk) 17:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

@HELLO IM NAZEEF: Wikipedia is not a crystal-ball that predict the future. Better update those articles in the future/with proper sources. Thanks. — Meghmollar2017 (UTC) — 01:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

GDP PER CAPITA NOMINAL $409 Billion

GDP PER CAPITA NOMINAL $409 Billion GDP PER CAPITA $2,534.44 instead of $2,138 PLZ UPDATE

CALCULATION: Here Given, $409 Billion Nominal GDP-2021 Population: 161,376,708

SOLUTION: $409 X 100,00,000,000 (1 Billion) = 409,000,000,000 / 161,376,708 = $2,534.44 Per Capita Nominal-2021 . As a result , Please update $2,534.44 Correctly and Please remove $2,138 ,it was old figure .

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.253.215.33 (talk) 16:29, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 January 2022

71.126.246.89 (talk) 23:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

let me edit.

 Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:27, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bangladesh/Archive_7&oldid=1142753575"