Talk:Amouranth

Edit warring

LRP19PT, you are currently edit warring over something as trivial as an infobox image, and you have just made the third revert to this page involving the same material within the past 24 hours. I invite you to read WP:EW thoroughly before you carry on with your tendentious editing. I should also point out that the burden is on your initiative to carry out your proposed edit, which is to crop an image from Wiki Common, you do not make demands of other editors to edit things your way. Haleth (talk) 13:55, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

@Haleth Ok but please can you just do a "cropped" to the photo, by just showing her face! We don't need to get a vision on her breasts and thong, because it as to be a portrait, and it's a infobox photo, so just the face is ok! LRP19PT (talk) 13:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

I'll repeat what I told you in one of my edit summaries. Wikipedia is not censored. That is a non-negotiable site policy. As for your proposal to modify the image to make it seemingly more "modest", do it yourself, or stop being disruptive and move on. Haleth (talk) 14:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Amouranth wave.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:52, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Article photo

Considering recent events, and her stating that she's "free" and "I don't have to wear cleavage anymore, I can wear clothes" now that she isn't being controlled by her husband, an effort should be made to find a more modest picture for the article (while still being generally representative and suitable for the article, of course). I'm really not sure how photo licensing works, but if someone can advise or suggest a photo, I think it would be good to do. WPscatter ^t/_c 05:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

@Wpscatter Just cropping the image would be the simplest method in my opinion. Roostery123 (talk) 07:59, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

As of 28/12/2022 she's still... how can I say it modestly.. 'out and proud' on fansly, so pearl clutching over modesty isn't one of HER concerns 🙄. (source: https://fansly.com/Amouranth/posts ...) 87.114.14.227 (talk) 12:10, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, that's totally fair. Strangely it seems like she went back to the softcore porn content a little while after the whole debacle. I retract the above, though I wouldn't object to changing or cropping the image either. WPscatter ^t/_c 23:55, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

"Alleged" husband

It doesn't seem like much of an "allegation", but they are married: [1] --causa sui (talk) 18:41, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

I have removed her husband's name because WP:BLPNAME requires stronger sources than heavy.com. Further her allegations trigger WP:NPF. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Cross-over boxing

Amouranth is scheduled to compete in cross-over boxing on July 1.

Details here: https://bloodyelbow.com/2023/05/31/amouranth-fight-la-velada-del-ano-3/ Timob85 (talk) 18:57, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Pornographic Actress

Recently, Amouranth has begun creating pornographic content on jerkmate.com. This is in addition to other deals to create "softcore" porn content. I believe that characterizing her as such is not inappropriate. A quick Google search will reveal this. Must we add a source for such widely disseminated information? 174.70.32.232 (talk) 18:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

There should not be any edit war over whether she is an unlinked "adult content creator" vs wikilinked pornographic film actress. A pornography film actor is anybody that performs sex acts in a pornography video. This includes streaming video like webcamming. She acknowledges working in the adult film industry.[2] Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Support this change. Amouranth has referred to herself as a pornographic actress before, and the partnership with Jerkmate really makes that line less blurry.. GarlicBreadBen (talk) 03:14, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

kiCk

Is somehow moving the activity to less restrictive streaming platform kiCk.com 88.80.224.229 (talk) 21:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Got a reliable source? –Novem Linguae (talk) 03:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Can write here link to her kiCk profile. 88.80.224.229 (talk) 00:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Date of birth

On what grounds are we applying WP:BLPPRIVACY in this specific case? The hidden note doesn't give a rationale. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 22:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

You should ask Sangdeboeuf[3]. However, the birth date should be widely published by RSes. I don't believe this is met by just a citation to a National World clickbait article. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Granted. That's the answer I was after. I'll be more aware of it in future cases of semi-notable personalities. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 23:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Yes, that was essentially my reason for adding the note. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:20, 31 March 2024 (UTC)