This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Production; a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's documentation of Record Production articles. Questions or comments related to record production and related articles are welcome at the project's talk page. Anyone interested may join the project: add your name to the list of project members!Record ProductionWikipedia:WikiProject Record ProductionTemplate:WikiProject Record ProductionRecord Production articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Stagecraft, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.StagecraftWikipedia:WikiProject StagecraftTemplate:WikiProject StagecraftStagecraft articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
While trying to reorganise the table (by putting each entry into a separate row) the following problem cropped up.
For several years in the table, the number of Department entries does not match the number of Recipients. Apart from the first two years (where all recipients fall under the same department), there are the following differences:
Year
Nr recipients
Nr departments
1956
6
5
1968
3
2
1972
5
6
1996
7
8
1997
11
10
Can someone check the entries against the source and correct them please? I can't reorganise the table while this mismatch exists. Hops Splurt (talk) 04:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've checked the entries on the official Academy Awards Database and fixed them. Ken Perlin was moved from 1996 to 1997 by a user but I moved them back to 1996 as per the database citation. No Swan So Fine (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there! The edit on Ken Perlin's award date would have been me. I believe I may have misinterpreted the article initially. Ken Perlin won the Technical Achievement Award in 1997, as is mentioned on his own website (https://mrl.cs.nyu.edu/~perlin/doc/oscar.html). However, he was nominated for it in 1996, to which I naively mistook as an error to his award date. Sincerest apologies. MakotoMiyamoto (talk) 01:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at this again, I think the Winners category should explicitly mention that the dates provides are the years in which the recipients were nominated, rather than having won their respective awards. The edit I made (albeit I admittedly neglected to edit the table directory. Much apologies for that) was in light of the fact that while Ken Perlin was nominated in 1996, he had won the award in 1997, as stated on his website. I think this is a fair change to make, because the inexplicit mention that these dates are nomination dates rather than award dates can be confusing. MakotoMiyamoto (talk) 02:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've made changes to the header title of the Winners section. I'm not sure if it's worded the best way -- granted, I am admittedly novice in editing data entries -- but I believe it better describes the table. MakotoMiyamoto (talk) 02:38, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure that people are nominated as such for this award, it appears as if a list of winners is announced by the Academy and they are then listed as the recipient of the award under that year's Academy Awards. No Swan So Fine (talk) 15:51, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If that is the case, why is the table subtitle declared by year of nomination? I understand that the 69th Oscar's Awards took place in 1997 (for all 1996 awards), but it is still correct to say that he was nominated in 1996 by virtue of this format. It seems a bit confusing to make the dates and awards this ambiguous. MakotoMiyamoto (talk) 04:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
