Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Discussion on if climbing routes should be in italics on WP. If you have an opinion, please join. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion has moved on to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Climbing#Suggesting_a_change_of_WP:WikiProject_Climbing/Article_recommendations. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:15, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Maritime (Togolese region)#Requested move 21 August 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 14:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse question

[edit]

Some knowledgeable opinion requested at Wikipedia:Teahouse#Removing_Precise_Coordinates_from_Article_about_Private_Property/Sensitive_Ecological_Site. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:27, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of municipalities

[edit]

I'd like to let you know that Mattximus and I are working on improving lists of municipalities for provinces in Spain. We aim at getting all of them to featured list status, which has already been achieved for Albacete. Right now, we've got a couple more (Guadalajara and Toledo) as featured list candidates, where they would require suggestions for improvement. Comments are welcome there. I mention it here, should anyone be interested in having a look at them. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 09:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for England

[edit]

England has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion regarding linking historical geographical entities

[edit]

We hope that an uninvolved party can assist in resolving the issue at Talk:A. K. Fazlul Huq#Messing up the infobox and Talk:Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy#Linking. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 17:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

[edit]

Hello,
Please note that Human geography, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
Delivered by MusikBot talk 00:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team[reply]

Does WikiProject Geography cover all town and village articles?

[edit]

I've encountered many articles that fall under the scope of WP:WikiProject Cities (such as town, village, and city articles) that have also been added to WikiProject Geography (see Talk:Ferdows and Talk:Taheriyeh, towns and villages in Iran, and Talk:Lesnoye Ukolovo, a rural locality in Russia). However, the inclusion of these types of articles in WP:Geography is rare, and most town and city articles haven't been added to WP:Geography. My question is: do these articles actually belong at WP:Geography, or do they not? If they do, what criteria should be met for, say, a village article to be included in WP:Geography? And if they don't, then they could be removed from the project. Nythar (💬-🍀) 07:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging a few active editors from the volunteers list. Nythar (💬-🍀) 05:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cities is a subset of human geography. Any article which deals with a populated place should be included in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities. Any article which deals primarily with the physical geography of a populated place should also be included in Wikipedia:WikiProject Geography. My two bits. Yours aye,  Buaidh  talk e-mail 01:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That makes sense. I had been wondering why numerous articles were added to both WikiProjects because it didn't make sense to me why we'd include regular WP:Cities articles in WP:Geography; it seemed a bit excessive. Nythar (💬-🍀) 05:59, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

[edit]

Hello,
Please note that Longshore drift, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
Delivered by MusikBot talk 00:05, 14 October 2024 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team[reply]

Looking for reviews

[edit]

guys I just added a lot of links to the Geography sidebar, Human geography and Geography topics templates, can some of you check to see if it is appropriate or should I continue adding links. I personally think that these templates should have all the branches of geography that there are articles of (my limit is just the articles with titles "Something geography") (not the human geography one for those outside it of course) and therefore should add their respective links to the templates Atakes Ris (talk) 12:18, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

side note: all my edits are based on pre-existing wikipedia articles (see Outline of geography and Category: Geography) and aims to remove the inconsistencies in the templates Atakes Ris (talk) 13:12, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lowercasing of all tectonic plates discussed in a relisted RM

[edit]

A discussion of lowercasing the titles of all tectonic plates on Wikipedia was relisted at Talk:Eurasian Plate#Requested move 6 October 2024 a few days ago. Editors here may have an interest in participating before it closes. fgnievinski (talk) 02:15, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Adriatic Sea

[edit]

Adriatic Sea has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Geyser

[edit]

Geyser has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed swapping Vital article level 1 Human history with vital article level 2 Geography.

[edit]

I have proposed swapping vital article level 1 Human history with vital article level 2 Geography. This would make geography a level 1 vital article. Please join the discussion here if you are interested. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 20:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An RM asking to lowercase Mediterranean Basin to Mediterranean basin may be of interest. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:11, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on re-naming individual fracture zone articles in sentence case

[edit]

See Talk:Mendocino Fracture Zone as input from those familiar with outcomes of historic debates on capitalisation of geographical names may be helpful. ChaseKiwi (talk) 23:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]