Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Video game articles by quality statistics

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Track changes over time

Please note the discussion that went on here regarding giving users the ability to track changes over time and over varying time periods. SharkD (talk) 12:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fix cat

The category code should be fixed to make this article appear at the top. I.e.:

[[Category:Video game articles by quality| ]]

I'm not sure if it will screw up the bot if I change it, though. SharkD (talk) 03:08, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You need to ask the bot owner to change it. If you change the page, the bot will just replace the page the next time it updates it. Gary King (talk) 03:52, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. SharkD (talk) 09:48, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessed/unassessed rows

Some other tidbits: 1) I noticed that the bot omits the "Unassessed" row when there are no unassessed articles. This makes things tricky when copy-pasting into spreadsheets because you have to pay special attention to whether or not the row is there. 2) I think the "Assessed" row is redundant since you can just subtract the unassessed articles from the total. SharkD (talk) 09:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed The assessed bar is now removed, because there are no unassessed articles. Dylanlip (talk) 16:56, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]