Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/September 30

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Today's featured article for September 30, 2025
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 30, 2025
Picture of the day for September 30, 2025

The featured picture for this day has not yet been chosen.

In general, pictures of the day are scheduled in order of promotion to featured status. See Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Guidelines for full guidelines.

Merger of the Duchy of Lancaster

[edit]

According to the respective articles, the Duchy of Lancaster was merged into the crown in 1413, when Henry V became king of England. Which year was it, 1399 or 1413? /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 08:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Both. The Duke of Lancaster currently reads that "There were three creations of the Dukedom of Lancaster..."
"...Later that same year [1399], the 2nd Duke usurped the throne of England from Richard II, ascending the throne as Henry IV, at which point the Dukedom merged in the Crown."
"The third creation was on 10 November 1399 ... When the 1st Duke ascended the throne as King Henry V in 1413, the Dukedom merged in the crown again.
So the blurb is technically correct. The Duchy was merged when Henry IV became King in 1399, but was re-created about a couple of months later, and then merged back again in 1413. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 09:27, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mozart

[edit]

Die Zauberflöte (aka The Magic Flute) was not Mozart's last opera. This distinction goes to the far less popular La clemenza di Tito, premiered twelve weeks before his death. Steinbach (talk) 12:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indonesia

[edit]

We seriously need to include 30 september 1965 events in Indonesia, as they were precursors of a major genocide in the 20th century. see Indonesian killings of 1965–66. --Soman (talk) 13:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eid ul-Adha

[edit]

Could somebody add Eid ul-Adha to this for 2008? (i.e. Today) --83.226.64.212 (talk) 15:29, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eid ul-Adha does not begin until December. Do you mean Eid ul-Fitr? Zzyzx11 (Talk) 17:28, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops. That's exactly what I meant. And I see that somebody has added it, which is great. Also, it is perhaps worthy to note that it lasts for three days. And "beginning of Eid ul-Fitr" sound somewhat strange. Maybe "first day of Eid ul-Fitr" would be better? --83.226.64.212 (talk) 19:22, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Madonna dell'Olmo

[edit]

The item on this battle has grammar problems and the phrase "Pyrrhic victory" is mistyped and unlinked.Koumz (talk) 03:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2012 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 10:54, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2013 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 03:51, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 07:22, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2015 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 10:47, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2016 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 07:49, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Blasphemy Day"?

[edit]

So I'll just say it: What the fuck is that and how is it relevant? Could I also make up a bullshit yearly celebration and come here and post it and you guys will accept it? This is offensive to religious people as it is to me, so what if my bullshit celebration satirized or made fun of a minority such as homosexuals? It would still make it to the front page if it was funny enough? How is it ok to criticize a majority but not a minority they have a special license or what? I know Wikipedia has never been very serious, with articles about unknown Japanese cartoons and what not but Blasphemy is completely irrelevant and ridiculous, just leave it blank if you don't have any legitimate anniversary.

--177.230.93.9 (talk) 02:07, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 02:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2018 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 16:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rosh Hashana and blasphemy day 2019

[edit]

@Howcheng: Rosh Hashanah and Blasphemy Day coincide this year. I think it looks kinda funny to see the two in one line in OTD. Regardless, Blasphemy day is of waning importance. A google search limited to the last year - and discounting results from CFI (the organization which created it) - brings up a significant mention from newsweek and not much else. Doesn't seem to have much impact anymore, certainly not outside the US and Canada. Can it be removed this year? Hydromania (talk) 17:48, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hydromania: Their Facebook and Twitter pages also seem to be inactive, so it's probably not worth keeping. howcheng {chat} 16:20, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 15:49, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2020 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 16:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021 notes

[edit]

Magic Flute has the offending paragraph removed and should be listed as eligible. Sparafucil (talk) 03:21, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 16:39, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2022 notes

[edit]

Heart (talk) 21:18, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023

[edit]

1139 Ganja earthquake - Hi Vaticidalprophet, firstly, thanks so much for your work. I just checked this entry for tomorrow. The date for this earthquake is was not cited. I could not find the date in lede, or anywhere in prose actually. The only place I could see it was in the infobox.

I had a quick look in refs. First I checked was FN 2 Earthquake.usgs.gov (now FN 3), used in lede, but cannot see this quake mentioned in there? Found a date mentioned in FN 17 Ambraseys (now FN 1) so have added it to the date in infobox.

Also the estimated death toll in article has a range of 230,000 to 300,000, whereas OTD item has "killing an estimated 300,000 people." I think that should be changed to either the range or 'up to' 300,000 people or similar. Ravenpuff, I usually agree with (and very much appreciate) 99% of your tweaks but this one seems odd?

Just wanted to discuss this with you before thinking about mentioning at ERRORS. JennyOz (talk) 07:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JennyOz: Yes, you're right about that – it should be "up to". Thanks! — RAVENPVFF · talk · 09:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about missing that one at the time! Thanks so much for your comment and for getting the infobox date. Vaticidalprophet 11:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks both. I've suggested tweak at ERRORS. JennyOz (talk) 14:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]