Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 September 20

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< September 19 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 21 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 20

[edit]

00:21, 20 September 2024 review of submission by Cole Massi1

[edit]

May I respectfully ask why the Wikipedia community does not find it acceptable for one editor to start an article and for others to continue it, especially after an explanation provision and an additional missing information template specifically querying others' assistance?

Thank you for your time and consideration. Cole Massi1 (talk) 00:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What makes you think that's the issue with your draft? The main issue is that Wikipedia is not for dictionary definitions, that's what Wikitionary is for. That said, the draft submission process is (usually) voluntary. If you want to roll the dice that your article would survive an Articles for deletion discussion, you may move it into the encyclopedia yourself. I would highly advise you against it, though. 331dot (talk) 00:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

01:43, 20 September 2024 review of submission by Dentonslee

[edit]

I am not sure if the references are all up to standard. Can you please give me some guidance here? Dentonslee (talk) 01:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dentonslee: you have resubmitted the draft, and will get feedback when a reviewer has had a change to assess it.
Judging by your user name, you may have a conflict of interst in this subject, and need to disclose that. I have posted a message on your talk page with instructions. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

02:26, 20 September 2024 review of submission by Wynnsantiy

[edit]

Wikipedia Please do not delete a Draft:Incursion Red River for Six months. Wynnsantiy (talk) 02:26, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wynnsantiy: that is, indeed, how the system normally works. However, this is a clear copyright violation (not to mention, purely promotional), and I have therefore requested its speedy deletion. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:51, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

05:33, 20 September 2024 review of submission by Reshma27

[edit]

Please help me to post this article. Reshma27 (talk) 05:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reshma27: you need to demonstrate that this subject is notable according to the WP:GNG guideline. It would also be helpful if you could provide some context for the reader; I've read this twice, and I'm still not entirely sure what it's about. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

05:33, 20 September 2024 review of submission by 87.121.61.177

[edit]

Please review this article 87.121.61.177 (talk) 05:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This draft was rejected months ago, and will not be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

06:45, 20 September 2024 review of submission by Ebni.hassan79

[edit]

I want move my draft page to main space Ebni.hassan79 (talk) 06:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ebni.hassan79: this draft has been rejected and is awaiting speedy deletion. So no. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09:27, 20 September 2024 review of submission by Kingofports

[edit]

I need help with the review of this article.. the refences have been taken from notable sources as per Wikipedia policy. Please help to make this better Kingofports (talk) 09:27, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingofports: I don't know what "notable sources" means, but if you mean sources that are sufficient to demonstrate notability, then the reviewer(s) are very much saying that isn't the case. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The sources are the mainline news, that fits under wiki guideline.. How do i now move the news as published. Its been pending since very long. Kindly help. Kingofports (talk) 09:42, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kingofports: it isn't pending; it was declined in August, and hasn't been edited since. Before that, it was declined in July, by a different reviewer, and you just resubmitted it without any improvement. If you carry on like that, it will eventually get rejected outright, without the option to resubmit.
I'm not sure what exactly you're asking for. You've not made any improvements since the last decline (or rather, last two declines). I see no reason to overrule two reviewers' assessments, who both concluded that notability hasn't been established.
What is your interest in this subject? If you have an external relationship with the subject, you must disclose it. This has been queried on your talk page months ago, but so far you appear not to have responded to it. And if you have been hired to write this and related articles, you need to specifically make a paid-editing disclosure; I've just posted a message on your talk page with instructions. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not a paid editor ! Kingofports (talk) 10:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What are you, then? What is your relationship with this subject? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Sir,
I would like to clarify that I do not have any personal relationship with the subject. My aim is to publish profiles of notable individuals from the business world who deserve recognition on Wikipedia. The subject in question is a well-known figure, and I believe there is a strong case for him to have a dedicated page.
Once this entry is published, I plan to pursue profiles of other prominent individuals who also merit a presence on this valuable platform. Kingofports (talk) 10:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kingofports: you uploaded a photo of Adani as your own work. Either he posed for you, in which case we need to understand how that happened, given your assurances that you have no relationship with him; or you didn't actually take that photo yourself and have instead almost certainly violated someone else's copyright by releasing this image into the public domain. Would you care to clarify which it is? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We don't have "profiles" here, we have articles. I can say that the awards are meaningless in terms of notability, as they lack articles themselves(like Nobel Peace Prize or Academy Award). 331dot (talk) 10:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

12:46, 20 September 2024 review of submission by Bewarethebull

[edit]

Can some one have a look at my draft and let me know what i need to complete or do, to make this a proper article... TIA Bewarethebull (talk) 12:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bewarethebull: That review will happen when you submit the draft, but I'll tell you immediately that everything, all the information, has to be attributed to a reliable source. There are currently no sources in the draft. Please read through the notices on your user talk page that discuss this, and follow the links to the information about sourcing. --bonadea contributions talk 13:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:15, 20 September 2024 review of submission by Avinycomm

[edit]

I have worked hard to compile a biography of an author, Abid Ali Mir, who has been featured in over 8 news media channels. However, the article was rejected without any in-depth research or consideration. I believe this deserves a closer review to ensure accuracy and fairness. Avinycomm (talk) 14:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: SPI filed: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abidalikashmiri. KylieTastic (talk) 14:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

16:20, 20 September 2024 review of submission by San1976Marino

[edit]

I have added several new citations (including a link to a birth certificate, and a newspaper article that establishes Mr. Mathews's life in Rockford, Ill.) and removed unsupported information. I would like to know if I now meet the requirements for acceptance. San1976Marino (talk) 16:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@San1976Marino: We don't cite gov't documents, including (and especially) birth certificates. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And actually looking at the draft, it's still woefully undersourced. Every single claim that could be challenged by a reasonable person must be cited to a third-party source that corroborates it or (failing that) removed wholesale. This is not negotiable. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17:33, 20 September 2024 review of submission by 2001:579:10A8:9C0:44C2:19AB:4664:B728

[edit]

Hi, Hope you having a great day. This is the 3rd time my submission was rejected , Source I used for this article all comes from national news agency from person home country. Please help me to fix this issue. 2001:579:10A8:9C0:44C2:19AB:4664:B728 (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The overwhelming majority of your sources are under role bylines (we're sceptical of these because they're used very frequently to launder PR as news). We don't cite iTunes/Apple Music (online storefront). https://dailyasianage.com/news/325032/?regenerate is the only source you have that is both legitimate news and credited to an identifiable author, and even then it's borderline due to its short length. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18:05, 20 September 2024 review of submission by HagopP-Editor

[edit]

Greetings, it's been over a year since we first tried to get the simplest page on YellowfinBI published, with no end in sight to the rejections. Can someone provide some better guidance or steer us through the process?

HagopP-Editor (talk) 18:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@HagopP-Editor: The present incarnation of the draft has a single source, and that source is M&A news. Even if it were utterly flawless, one source by itself cannot support a Wikipedia article. What we're looking for is in-depth, non-routine, independent-of-the-subject news/scholarly sources that discuss the subject at length, are written by identifiable authors, and subject to fact-checking and other forms of editorial oversight. Your sources up to this point, based on reviewer comments, don't meet that bar. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Jéské Couriano I have been given an extensive list of articles about Yellowfin that were used successively but were still rejected. If I were to provide a full list of the sources that were given, would someone be able to tell me which sources WOULD pass the bar? HagopP-Editor (talk) 18:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@HagopP-Editor: I can go thru the history. Refer to my /Decode subpage (linked in my signature as "critiques"):
Got any other sources? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
BTW the only reason there is currently one source is because after trying to go through successive multiple sources, I just need one to get the page published. I used the best I could find. Maybe someone can help me identify 2-3 that would meet the requirements? HagopP-Editor (talk) 18:27, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would provide the full list of articles on the company. Just help me pick the right 2-3. HagopP-Editor (talk) 18:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Provide the list, minus what I already critiqued above. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Jéské Couriano here's all I have that I haven't used yet:
https://aimagazine.com/data-and-analytics/yellowfin-bi-business-benefits-predictive-analytics
https://bicorner.com/2019/03/28/how-yellowfin-brings-real-time-insight-to-business-analytics/
https://blog.ventanaresearch.com/enterprise-bi-from-yellowfin
https://davidmenninger.ventanaresearch.com/yellowfin-is-innovative-leader-in-mobile-and-collaborative-analytics
https://devops.com/yellowfin-receives-top-rankings-in-worlds-largest-business-intelligence-survey/
https://en.prnasia.com/releases/global/Yellowfin_Launches_the_Next_Generation_of_Analytics_for_Faster_Better_Insights-192622.shtml
https://influencing.com/pr/40730/yellowfin-7-analytics-software-to-deliver-deeper-insight-with-multi-chart-capability
https://itbrief.com.au/story/melbourne-analytics-solution-provider-named-idc-innovator
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/analysts-recognize-new-version-of-yellowfin-as-where-bi-should-be-headed-1002066049
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/gartner-again-positions-yellowfin-in-magic-quadrant-for-business-intelligence-and-analytics-platforms-1001776603
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/yellowfin-bi-named-a-strong-performer-in-enterprise-bi-platforms-by-major-independent-research-firm-1002360520
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/yellowfin-declared-champion-in-consecutive-info-tech-business-intelligence-vendor-landscapes-1001894532?miRedirects=1
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/yellowfin-introduces-the-bi-industry-s-first-automated-analysis-and-cross-vendor-storytelling-solutions-1027676365
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/yellowfin-launches-the-next-generation-of-analytics-for-faster-better-insights-1006312459
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/yellowfin-partners-with-global-technology-company-pitney-bowes-to-drive-deeper-customer-insights-1001814524
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/yellowfin-placed-top-in-nucleus-research-analytics-value-matrix-2018-1027806931?miRedirects=1
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/yellowfin-receives-top-rankings-in-world-s-largest-business-intelligence-survey-1027763874
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/yellowfin-receives-top-rankings-in-world-s-largest-business-intelligence-survey-1027764804
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/yellowfin-recognized-as-a-challenger-in-barc-s-2016-score-business-intelligence-report-1001896688
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/yellowfin-recognized-as-a-challenger-in-barc-s-2016-score-business-intelligence-report-1001896688
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/yellowfin-recognized-as-a-challenger-in-barc-s-2016-score-business-intelligence-report-1001898781
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/yellowfin-to-launch-7-3-analytics-platform-in-global-webinar-series-1001860938
https://martechseries.com/analytics/yellowfin-named-gartner-magic-quadrant-analytics-business-intelligence-platforms/
https://realbusiness.co.uk/the-changing-nature-of-business-intelligence-and-how-it-affects-smes
https://sdtimes.com/softwaredev/sd-times-news-digest-idera-acquires-yellowfin-fastly-launches-fastly-academy-jellyfish-raises-71-million-in-series-c/
https://solutionsreview.com/business-intelligence/yellowfin-bi-unveils-new-data-analytics-mobile-app/
https://techcrunch.com/2021/04/22/to-sell-or-not-to-sell-lessons-from-a-bootstrapped-ceo/?_guc_consent_skip=1678250324
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211203005015/en/Yellowfin-Launches-Guided-Natural-Language-Query-Making-True-Self-service-Analytics-Available-to-Everyone
https://www.forbes.com/sites/adrianbridgwater/2021/11/03/building-the-new-narrative-for-data-storytelling/?sh=42008f214496
https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2018/10/16/nine-methods-for-keeping-your-tech-team-happy-and-engaged/?sh=76109fa250a4
https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2019/07/23/will-ai-kill-the-dashboard/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2020/11/03/how-and-why-you-should-use-ai-and-machine-learning-to-enhance-business-intelligence/?sh=42b0c9df22a7
https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2021/03/19/data-literacy-training-has-failed-heres-what-chief-data-officers-need-to-do-instead/?sh=28d0e97e34d3
https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2021/09/15/what-kindergartners-can-teach-us-about-data-analytics/?sh=6b40adfc5cf3
https://www.forbes.com/sites/hvmacarthur/2020/06/10/why-data-is-king-during-times-of-uncertainty-and-how-to-use-it-to-inspire-commitment-from-others/?sh=22c057e04335
https://www.forbes.com/sites/quickerbettertech/2015/09/15/why-your-business-lacks-intelligence/?sh=34a036b87411
https://www.guru99.com/business-intelligence-tools.html
https://www.passionned.com/business-intelligence/tools/yellowfin/
https://www.performancemagazine.org/business-intelligence-glen-rabie-yellowfin/
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/yellowfin-named-leader-in-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-for-business-intelligence-300896991.html
https://www.techradar.com/news/internet/cloud-services/is-cloud-powered-business-intelligence-genuinely-useful-or-mere-hype-1309672
https://www.wdhn.com/business/press-releases/ein-presswire/683127170/yellowfin-bi-celebrates-20-years-of-embedded-analytics-innovation/
https://www.zdnet.com/article/idera-acquires-yellowfin-bi-adds-it-to-developer-tools-business/
https://www3.technologyevaluation.com/research/article/idera-acquires-yellowfin.html HagopP-Editor (talk) 18:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jéské Courianokeeping my figers crossed here. HagopP-Editor (talk) 19:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's a huge list and you appear to have not taken previous comments onboard. Notability is based on independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). Just clicking on several they were all PR. KylieTastic (talk) 20:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]