Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 November 10

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< November 9 << Oct | November | Dec >> November 11 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


November 10

[edit]

00:55, 10 November 2024 review of submission by Carol Ann Shevrolay

[edit]

THIS IS A CULTURAL ICON Carol Ann Shevrolay (talk) 00:55, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has already been rejected, so it will not be reconsidered, and to be perfectly frank, it appears to be unadulterated nonsense. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 04:41, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

02:28, 10 November 2024 review of submission by BizChrome

[edit]

I had edited this submission as per the guidelines and still it gets declined. This article was once been accepted. Would be grateful if you can assist me here. 

BizChrome (talk) 02:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BizChrome: you don't say what assistance you require, but you've resubmitted the draft and will therefore get feedback when a reviewer comes along to assess it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:41, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But while you are waiting for review, you could spend the time looking for sources which meet all three criteria in WP:42: being reliably published, independent, and containing significant coverage of Munasinghe. Not one of your current sources meets those criteria. We do not cite sales sites like Sarasavi; and a source which does not even mention the subject (like the Sunday Times one) is almost always a complete waste of anybody's time.
My earnest advice to new editors is to not even think about trying to create an article until you have spent several weeks - at least - learning about how Wikipedia works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have understood core policies such as verifiability, neutral point of view, reliable, independent sources, and notability, and experienced how we handle disagreements with other editors (the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle), then you might be ready to read your first article carefully, and try creating a draft. I realise that you have had an account for more than a year, but apart from creating and working on this draft, almost the only thing you have done is added unreferenced information to half a dozen articles; so you are still an editor who has not yet learnt how to edit. ColinFine (talk) 11:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

02:57, 10 November 2024 review of submission by SparkyStar10200

[edit]

I Need Help Please. SparkyStar10200 (talk) 02:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With what, specifically? CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 04:37, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SparkyStar10200 please start with HELP:YFA 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

05:37, 10 November 2024 review of submission by Helloarunsunil007123

[edit]

Can I get an assistance with this article I am working if review and guidelines may help but if you can also hop on too great https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Helloarunsunil007123&direction=next&oldid=1256104527 Helloarunsunil007123 (talk) 05:37, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Helloarunsunil007123: sorry, can you rephrase that – what assistance are you seeking? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

06:02, 10 November 2024 review of submission by Rishabhwiki897059

[edit]

I was trying to create this page but it was declined, can i kknow the reason why ? Rishabhwiki897059 (talk) 06:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rishabhwiki897059: presumably you mean  Courtesy link: User:Rishabhwiki897059/sandbox? The reason was given in the rejection notice, before you blanked it. Namely, there is nothing to indicate that the subject is notable by Wikipedia standards. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:38, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

12:35, 10 November 2024 review of submission by MD. Sazid Bin Sahid

[edit]

Subject: Request for Review and Clarification Regarding Draft Article

Dear Wikipedia Editors,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to respectfully request a reconsideration of my draft article titled draft:Fulgazi Women's College. I understand that the draft has been declined multiple times, but I would like to clarify a few points regarding its content and purpose.

First, I would like to emphasize that the article I have created is not intended to serve as an advertisement. The subject of the article is a government organization, and as such, it is not in need of any promotional content. The article aims to provide a neutral, informative overview, in line with Wikipedia’s standards. I have ensured that the tone is unbiased, factual, and aligned with the guidelines set out for encyclopedic content.

Furthermore, I have noticed that some articles with fewer original references have been published on the platform. In comparison, my draft includes five or six reliable, verifiable sources that support the information presented. I believe this makes the article meet Wikipedia's standards for notability and verifiability. Given this, I would appreciate it if you could review the draft once more, as I feel it adheres to the platform’s criteria.

If there are specific areas that need further attention or modification, I am more than willing to make adjustments. I highly value the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia and would be grateful for any guidance you could provide to help my article meet the necessary standards for publication.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your feedback and hope for a positive resolution.

Warm regards, MD. Sazid Bin Sahid MD. Sazid Bin Sahid (talk) 12:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MD. Sazid Bin Sahid Analysis of this request suggests that it has been created by the use of a Large Language Model. Typically, these models can help themselves.
Resubmission with no improvement is rather pointless, too. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MD. Sazid Bin Sahid: the draft is inherently promotional, because it only tells what the institution does. Moreover, the draft provides no evidence that the subject is notable, as none of the sources cited meets the notability guideline for organisations, WP:ORG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:47, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks bro for the advice. Bro you can see some other pages which are more promotional than the one I made. Still I have nothing to say. Please advise me how may improve the page, or prove that it is significant and not promotional. Please do not take any action against me, as I am a new user. I'm asking you for help. MD. Sazid Bin Sahid (talk) 14:10, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Bro", if you see other articles that are worse than your draft, please let us know so action can be taken, see other stuff exists. That's not a reason to add more inappropriate articles. 331dot (talk) 14:13, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MD. Sazid Bin Sahid: we don't assess drafts by comparison to articles that may exist out there among the nearly 7m in the English Wikipedia alone. We assess them by reference to currently-prevailing guidelines and policies. One of the core requirements for publication is notability, of which this draft provides no evidence whatsoever.
Nobody is taking any action against you (whatever that means), and repeated insinuations of that kind are not appreciated. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:25, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MD. Sazid Bin Sahid, please understand that Wikipedia has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. ColinFine (talk) 12:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:52, 10 November 2024 review of submission by Cybernatus01

[edit]

Is it possible to delete this draft? The article is a duplicate of article "Africa Corps (Russia)" Cybernatus01 (talk) 14:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cybernatus01 Please place {{Db-user}} at the top of the draft 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 15:09, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

15:31, 10 November 2024 review of submission by Mnorouzian

[edit]

I just added a reference for her history of work The One (talk) 15:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mnorouzian the draft has been rejected which usually means it will not be considered further. Reach out to @SafariScribe directly if you feel it has fundamentally changed since the last review. qcne (talk) 16:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

15:40, 10 November 2024 review of submission by Tinaaki

[edit]

Please participate in the editing of Mr. Hamidreza Ghorbani's article and add the necessary standards that you know yourself. I made several edits and added completely independent sources. Your reasons for disapproving this article are unclear. If the article needs any kind of editing, I request you, please help the verifiability of this article with your participation. Thanks and respect Tinaaki (talk) 15:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tinaaki This is a helpdesk, and not a place to solicit co-authors. Please read WP:BURDEN and speak the mantra "If it's to be it's up to me" aloud. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

16:38, 10 November 2024 review of submission by Edescather

[edit]

whut Edescather (talk) 16:38, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Edescather unreferenced and arcane. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


idk Edescather (talk) 16:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Edescather If you want anyone to take notice of you then you will need to use real English and sentences. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Edescather: This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. This is a bunch of disjointed sentences with no sources whatsoever other than the subject itself. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 20:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19:15, 10 November 2024 review of submission by LuxHaitch

[edit]

Want to link to Nature Journal but it's linking to the definition of 'nature'. How do I fix this please? LuxHaitch (talk) 19:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @LuxHaitch. Sounds like you want to use a wikilink - an internal link to another Wikipedia article? You'll need to write: [[Nature_(journal)]]
Alternatively, using the Visual Editor you can insert a link using the toolbar. qcne (talk) 19:23, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!! LuxHaitch (talk) 20:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20:18, 10 November 2024 review of submission by Stella Worth

[edit]

I have removed "peacock" terms and think the tone is encyclopedic. Can you please review and point out areas that are problematic? Thank you. Stella Worth (talk) 20:18, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Stella Worth. We don't do pre-reviews: the way to get a review is to resubmit.
But you can continue to improve it while it is waiting for review. A tip: consider every single piece of information in the draft, and ask, "How can a reader verify this?" If the answer is not "From a reliably published source", remove the information. If the information is not "From a source wholly unconnected with the hospital and its associates", consider whether the information falls within the range of what can come from primary sources, and if it does not, remove it.
If what you have left does no more than describe the routine activities of an organisation, the hospital is probably not notable. ColinFine (talk) 12:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2024_November_10&oldid=1257663690"