User talk:Helloarunsunil007123

Welcome!

Hello, Helloarunsunil007123!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello Helloarunsunil007123. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to User:Helloarunsunil007123/sandbox, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Helloarunsunil007123. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Helloarunsunil007123|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. -Lemonaka 10:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lemonaka,

Thank you for reaching out and bringing this to my attention. I would like to clarify that I am not being compensated, directly or indirectly, for my edits on Wikipedia. I do not have any financial or promotional interest in the content I have contributed.

I apologize if my edits gave a different impression, and I appreciate your guidance on adhering to Wikipedia’s policies. I will be mindful of these standards in future contributions and make sure my edits are aligned with Wikipedia’s principles of neutrality and transparency.

Best regards,

Helloarunsunil007123 Helloarunsunil007123 (talk) 19:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This response cannot be accepted. It is almost certainly LLM generated. I will thus ask you a further time and will expect a reply by you not by "AI" 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Helloarunsunil007123, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Helloarunsunil007123|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:38, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello FiddleTimtrent,

I appreciate your guidance and want to clarify that I am not being compensated, directly or indirectly, for any edits on Wikipedia. I have no financial or promotional interest in any of the content I’ve contributed. My intention has always been to provide neutral, informative contributions, and I apologize for any impression to the contrary.

Please let me know if there are specific concerns about my contributions. I will ensure that my edits strictly adhere to Wikipedia's policies on neutrality and transparency going forward.

Thank you,

Helloarunsunil007123 Helloarunsunil007123 (talk) 15:04, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ChargeMOD (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ChargeMOD and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Curb Safe Charmer,

Thank you for reviewing my submission for “ChargeMOD” and providing detailed feedback. I understand now that the draft needs to include more reliable, secondary, and independent sources to meet Wikipedia’s notability standards. I’ll work on improving the article by adding references that are in-depth and strictly independent of the subject.

I’ll also review the guidelines on referencing and citing sources to ensure the draft aligns with Wikipedia’s requirements. I appreciate the resources and support options you mentioned, and I’ll reach out to the Articles for Creation help desk or Teahouse if I need further assistance.

Thank you again for your guidance!

Best regards,

Helloarunsunil007123 Helloarunsunil007123 (talk) 19:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Helloarunsunil007123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
7	Saint Francis High School (Louisville) (talk)	Add sources
6	Quest Academy (Palatine, Illinois) (talk)	Add sources
50	Kentucky Country Day School (talk)	Add sources
17	Louisville Collegiate School (talk)	Add sources
10	Fern Creek High School (talk)	Add sources
4	Walden School (Louisville) (talk)	Add sources
15	Seneca High School MCA (talk)	Cleanup
13	Oklahoma School of Science and Mathematics (talk)	Cleanup
60	Episcopal Academy (talk)	Cleanup
56	Louisville Male High School (talk)	Expand
39	The Ursuline School (talk)	Expand
96	Education in Kentucky (talk)	Expand
50	Basilian monks (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
296	Digital distribution of video games (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
26	Commodore 64 software (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
10	Special and differential treatment (talk)	Merge
14	Roaring Rapids (talk)	Merge
16	Preston Bus (talk)	Merge
5	Holy Rosary Academy (Alaska) (talk)	Wikify
18	University of Louisville School of Law (talk)	Wikify
7	National Senior Classical League (talk)	Wikify
2	Alexander Granberg (talk)	Orphan
2	Althea Mortimer (talk)	Orphan
4	Artem Tatarevich (talk)	Orphan
4	Holy Angels Academy (Louisville, Kentucky) (talk)	Stub
5	Louisville Academy of Music (talk)	Stub
9	Kantonsschule Rämibühl (talk)	Stub
3	Sayers Classical Academy (talk)	Stub
7	Western MST Magnet High School (Louisville, Kentucky) (talk)	Stub
4	Southside, Louisville (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:32, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Helloarunsunil007123/Sandbox

This material used to be at your user page. Without my move it woudl have been summarily deleted. Please see WP:USERPAGES 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:16, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Large Language Models in responses

Analysis of your responses here suggest that you are using a Large Language Model to generate your responses here. This makes this responses invalid, though you are responsible for them. We need to hear from you, the human being, not from some AI LLM, please. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xylem (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Xylem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 15:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Helloarunsunil007123! The thread you created at the Teahouse, i have created a xylem learning page - improvements needed, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:52, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]