Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 February 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< February 28 << Jan | February | Mar >> March 1 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


February 29

[edit]

00:36, 29 February 2024 review of submission by Ppotatoman

[edit]

WHY WAS IT DECLINED??????? Ppotatoman (talk) 00:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ppotatoman I fixed your link so we can look at the draft. It was not only declined, itnwas rejected, as you provided no summary of independent reliable sources that discuss this Sims character and why it is notable If you just want to tell the world about it, you should use social media, or perhaps a wiki type project on Fandom. 331dot (talk) 00:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
331dot, thank you for your patience. Please note on their talk page that I blocked a few accounts. Drmies (talk) 01:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jim Pickens already has a Fandom page, https://callmekevin.fandom.com/wiki/Jim_Pickens#:~:text=Jim%27s%20personality%20has%20varied%20depending,and%20anti-heroic%20serial%20killer. is the link. Ppotatoman (talk) 23:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I honestly thought I had linked it but I forgot Ppotatoman (talk) 23:58, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

02:08, 29 February 2024 review of submission by Erm1bas

[edit]

I finished adding properly references and citations. Could you please check improved version I have made. I don’t think anyone would be able to do this informations except me. If you have more questions about source please ask me. I think there is now enough informations and it is worth for Wikipedia. If you want to publish it yourself please do it with informations I included myself. Thank you very much Erm1bas (talk) 02:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft was rejected, it won't be considered further, please use social media to promote yourself, not Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 09:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is not promoting my self. I have right to write this article as I am most skilled to write it. Someone else wrote description and I just transferred it to Wikipedia. I think I deserve consideration for article to be accepted. I am not the only one who did it this way and it isn’t against rules. I only needed time to do it properly as this is first time that I wrote article. Please read it again and try to consider it to be accepted. Thanks Erm1bas (talk) 12:47, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Erm1bas: of course it is promotion, you are 'telling the world' about yourself and your books; that is pretty much the definition of promotion, see WP:YESPROMO. Besides, there is no evidence that you are notable by Wikipedia standards.
In any case, I have rejected this draft, and it will therefore not be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So if someone else try to do same article about Ermin Basic then it wouldn’t be promoting and it would be accepted. Is it what you are saying? Erm1bas (talk) 13:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, the draft was rejected because it had zero evidence of you passing WP:GNG it doesn't matter who writes it, if there are no independent, reliable sources it will not be accepted. Theroadislong (talk) 13:04, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thanks. This is good experience for me where I learned little bit about your rules and the way how it is working for someone biography to be published in Wikipedia. So in the future I will have more experience about writing articles in Wikipedia as this is really for me respectable organisation. I hope in the future someone else will be able to write proper Ermin Basic biography on Wikipedia and that it will be accepted.All the best for you who contributed to my experience on Wikipedia 😊🙏❤️
Thanks Erm1bas (talk) 13:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

04:06, 29 February 2024 review of submission by MintSpiral

[edit]

The reviewer just left the comment “Charts?”. I’ve added some information regarding the artist’s radio chart positions (Billboard Pop Airplay and Mediabase Top 40/Hot AC) for their most popular song. I don’t believe any of their other songs have entered charts. I believe the artist should already meet notability guidelines (as they have 2 albums published with a large record label), but I want to check that this will now be sufficient with this additional information. Also, have I provided this chart information in the correct place within the article? MintSpiral (talk) 04:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that interviews are not considered to be reliable independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 09:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

08:31, 29 February 2024 review of submission by Africatalyst

[edit]

Hello there.

I need assistance with this draft. It states that it has not been written in a neutral perspective and it has peacock terms on it. Apart from that it also has references which are not enough to warrant a wikipage for the person in the topic. Please help me with this. Africatalyst (talk) 08:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have eleven paragraphs which are unsourced. The review says to avoid peacock terms, that is not a big issue with your draft, just the lack of references. Theroadislong (talk) 14:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

08:36, 29 February 2024 review of submission by Kalamkh

[edit]

Can you help to put in a proper Biopic page template? Kalamkh (talk) 08:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

08:54, 29 February 2024 review of submission by Wikinoobrider

[edit]

Have a doubt. I was told IMDB is not a genuine website. I have added links from journalists who have written articles and some are government oriented so are these links not genuine for referencing as well ??? Wikinoobrider (talk) 08:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikinoobrider: there appear to be at least a couple of user-generated sources, which are not considered reliable. Whether the others are suitable for verification and/or notability purposes, I don't know without doing a proper review. You will get more thorough feedback if and when you resubmit. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:04, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09:16, 29 February 2024 review of submission by 118.200.218.124

[edit]

Hi, this page is on Robert Zhao, who is a well-known Singaporean artist representing Singapore at the Venice Biennale in 2024. Majority of the references in the article are from credible third party sources, such as overseas museums (eg. Tate), institutions and foundations (Kadist), as well as publications. We hope to have this page up and running for the public urgently as the Venice Biennale opens very soon, in April, so would really appreciate it if you could advise further, on what we can do to get this page approved. Thank you very much. 118.200.218.124 (talk) 09:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, if you are TRAhgnahs, please log into your account when editing.
Secondly, who is "we" in "We hope to have this page up and running for the public urgently"?
Thirdly, while you may be in a hurry to publicise this subject, we are not: Wikipedia is not edited to a deadline, and in any case we have no interest in promoting this or any other subject; for that, you need to find different marketing channels.
And finally, this draft was declined on November 5, and has not been resubmitted since. Therefore it is currently not on track to be reviewed, let alone published. If you feel that you have sufficiently addressed the earlier decline reasons, feel free to resubmit and a reviewer will get around to assessing it sooner or later. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note that museums that are exhibiting or have exhibited the subject's work are not generally independent sources: they can only be cited for limited purposes, and do not contribute to establishing notability. ColinFine (talk) 16:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

10:56, 29 February 2024 review of submission by Rajadeshwal611

[edit]

how can i write full topic Rajadeshwal611 (talk) 10:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not social media for people to tell the world about themselves. Please read the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 10:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13:43, 29 February 2024 review of submission by TheRealDogND

[edit]

I do not understand why my draft was declined. My draft is in depth and has lots of information on the subject. My draft is reliable and I have a source from the original Pokémon company. I also did not copy and paste information from the source. I rephrased everything. And I am not the Pokémon company. TheRealDogND (talk) 13:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft Draft:Spheal has zero independent sources, we have no interest in what the Pokemon company says. Theroadislong (talk) 14:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. ColinFine (talk) 16:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

16:43, 29 February 2024 review of submission by Youngjimmymusic88

[edit]

We don’t require any assistance, we Will wait for further developments in the coming months a let someone without a COI write this article. Thanks. Youngjimmymusic88 (talk) 16:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but who is "we"? 331dot (talk) 16:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The draft has been rejected so will not be considered further? Qcne (talk) 17:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19:15, 29 February 2024 review of submission by Twenty4marc

[edit]

There is nióthung wrong with my last submission, is it? Twenty4marc (talk) 19:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected (not just declined) and will not be considered further. Wikipedia articles must be based almost entirely on independent sources. Wikipedia has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. ColinFine (talk) 19:37, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19:46, 29 February 2024 review of submission by ColForbin123

[edit]

I wanted to edit the title of the page to Harvard Case Research and Writing Group. How do I do that?

-Chris ColForbin123 (talk) 19:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @ColForbin123, don't worry about the title of the page - if it's accepted, the reviewer will select a suitable title, which will most likely be what the subject is called in the first few sentences. Once it's a live article it can be changed if needed. Focus on making your draft the best it can be for the moment. Happy editing! StartGrammarTime (talk) 10:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

21:40, 29 February 2024 review of submission by Edu Lacroix

[edit]

Looking for input on how to improve this article for acceptance. I have kindly responded to past critical comments. Edu Lacroix (talk) 21:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have resubmitted it for review, so the reviewer will leave you feedback; I can say that the personal life section is completely unsourced. 331dot (talk) 22:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2024_February_29&oldid=1212475749"