Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 August 16
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < August 15 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | August 17 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
August 16
[edit]05:50, 16 August 2024 review of submission by 2806:2A0:B18:880C:94D3:1B45:E11E:5143
[edit]Could you please let us know where we became non-compliant with the article so that we can make the necessary amendments? 2806:2A0:B18:880C:94D3:1B45:E11E:5143 (talk) 05:50, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Who is "we"?
- If you mean the original author of this draft, then the answer to your question is that blocked users are not allowed to edit from any account or IP address. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:56, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
why was my article rejected???
[edit]I worked hard on my piece of writing. Let me share my take on the rats of NYC with the world!! >-< SKIBIDINOMETAMER (talk) 07:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Uhhuh. Carry on like that, and you will be blocked soon. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Blocked. Hey, I must be clairvoyant! -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:24, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- No. Find somewhere else to post funny junk. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 07:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
14:28, 16 August 2024 review of submission by Lnplohar 388
[edit]- Lnplohar 388 (talk · contribs)
Please my article are true please help Lnplohar 388 (talk) 14:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Lnplohar 388 The truthfulness of the information is not at issue. It is completely unsourced and you have not demonstrated notability. This is why it was rejected and will not be considered further. Writing a new article is the most difficult task to attempt on Wikipedia, and it is highly recommended that you first spend much time editing existing articles to gain experience and knowledge as to how Wikipedia works and what is expected of article content. Please also consider using the new user tutorial. 331dot (talk) 14:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- This draft is also within the scope of a contentious topic. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:26, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
16:22, 16 August 2024 review of submission by TornadoSpeciakost
[edit]Why is this getting deleted? TornadoSpeciakost (talk) 16:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- @TornadoSpeciakost Because it's a mixture of a copyright violation and made up stuff. Please read HELP:YFA 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 17:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
18:51, 16 August 2024 review of submission by A.reymn
[edit]Bonjour, Ma récente soumission n’a pas été acceptée. Mais je continue à modifier, selon vos instructions, mon article en complétant les références (citations) dans le Sandbox où se trouve mon article. Je souhaite vous soumettre à nouveau cet article une fois les modifications terminées. Ma question est de savoir si je peux vous soumettre l’article directement depuis le Sanbox ? Merci beaucoup de votre réponse. A.reymn (talk) 18:51, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ceci est le Wikipédia anglais. Veuillez communiquer en anglais. (this is the English Wikipedia, please communicate in English) 331dot (talk) 18:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- CFA has added a submission button, but in my opinion, this will not be accepted, as it reads like an essay. A Wikipedia article summarises what reliable sources say on a subject, nothing more. It should never present any argument or conclusion, except to summarise an argument or conclusion wholly contained within one of the sources. ColinFine (talk) 22:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your opinion. I will try to modify and turn it into a compilation of different sources instead of essay. A.reymn (talk) 20:27, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- CFA has added a submission button, but in my opinion, this will not be accepted, as it reads like an essay. A Wikipedia article summarises what reliable sources say on a subject, nothing more. It should never present any argument or conclusion, except to summarise an argument or conclusion wholly contained within one of the sources. ColinFine (talk) 22:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- @A.reymn: I added the submission button to your sandbox. C F A 💬 19:00, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
21:46, 16 August 2024 review of submission by OliveRacc
[edit]I need help from qualified Wikipedians who know about Lifesteal and are dedicated to make the articles top quality. OliveRacc (talk) 21:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- @OliveRacc The draft has been rejected. This means that, as written, it is not a top quality draft. Wikipedia has been improved by not accepting it. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC)