Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 January 27

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< January 26 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 28 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 27

[edit]

01:20:08, 27 January 2022 review of submission by Supermanfan1979

[edit]

My page was denied because it didn't have reliable sources. I referenced the Better Business Bureau, the production companies' own website, an article written about them, and a link to the website with all the information about their current project. What other kind of reference links should I add? If the page can't be found under Theme Parkology, check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Supermanfan1979/sandbox Thank you Supermanfan1979 (talk) 01:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Supermanfan1979 (talk) 01:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New link. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Theme_Parkology Please advise me on what to add so it can be approved.

Supermanfan1979 (talk) 23:32, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

01:27:18, 27 January 2022 review of submission by 고양이 발자국

[edit]


고양이 발자국 (talk) 01:27, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

고양이 발자국, you didn't ask a question but wikipedia does not accept ads. Wikipedia is not for promotional use and please see WP:COI and WP:PAID given your likely connection to the company.Slywriter (talk) 01:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

04:47:11, 27 January 2022 review of draft by Dgregory4

[edit]


My article submission was declined because the subject did not meet the notability criteria. However, I'm not sure if the reviewer applied the notability guidelines for academics to my article or not. The subject of my article holds a named chair at a major research institution (Baylor University is an R1 school; only 137 universities in the U.S. have that designation). Moreover, in the U.S. there are two major guilds for homiletics, and my subject is the co-founder of one of those guilds as well as the editor of its peer-reviewed journal. Furthermore, he was recently honored with a Festschrif. Do you think he meets the notability requirements for academics? Also, when I submitted the article I did so in the general biography category; is there a separate category that I should have submitted it to for academics?

I appreciate any guidance you can give in this matter. Dgregory4 (talk) 04:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Dgregory4 Dgregory4 (talk) 04:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dgregory4: - The sources you included are called primary sources. They are papers Gibson wrote himself, or directory listings or announcements made by the organizations he worked for. I don't see any third party coverage of him. Notability sometimes comes from what others write about a person or subject. Without articles written about the subject, the only path to notability (at least in Wikipedia's definition) is to see if papers Gibson wrote are frequently cited, thus showing Gibson's academic influence. Here's some information about citation metrics. Wikipedia:Notability (academics)#Citation metrics There's no category to submit the info. That's irrelevant. Skilled reviewers apply notability guidelines depending on the subject. Lastly, it won't help if you can't find proof of his works being cited, but if you can, you'll also want to clean up the syntax. There should be no inline citations, no bolded section titles, and section titles should be sentence case, with only the first word capitalized. TechnoTalk (talk) 05:21, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

06:36:57, 27 January 2022 review of draft by Fleacollar

[edit]


Fleacollar (talk) 06:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi There-

I submitted an updated article for 'Tim Mostert' last week. I made all the requested changes and am awaiting feedback, hoping the subject will be able to go up on your platform. The article was declined twice, but seems to be in the correct format now, after I learned to follow your process and article citing rules.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

Tim Mostert

The reference are very poor and don't prove the person is notable. scope_creepTalk 10:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

07:37:25, 27 January 2022 review of submission by 2130598shreyamrao

[edit]


I have been given the assignment to write a few lines about myself as a part of my course. The deadline is 28th January at 11.59 pm Please do the needful to publish this article

2130598shreyamrao (talk) 07:37, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been deleted. Wikipedia is not a social media platform or a place to post your autobiography. --Kinu t/c 18:11, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

09:14:47, 27 January 2022 review of submission by 2409:4071:200C:9297:0:0:776:58AD

[edit]


2409:4071:200C:9297:0:0:776:58AD (talk) 09:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The person isn't notable in the least. scope_creepTalk 10:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

09:30:07, 27 January 2022 review of draft by OurWayz

[edit]


Greetings:

Thank you for the quick review of my draft submission.

I realize that I did not have references to support the material. I personally graduated grade school from Mullikin Elementary and recently realized that, if I didn't document its existence based on my memories for others to expound upon, the school will disappear from history. It will be effectively erased.

So, the reason I drafted the Mullikin Elementary School piece for Wikipedia is for the exact reason it was rejected by Wikipedia. There are no really reliable sources online out there, except my remembrances. The only support I can provide is a Classmates.com entry for the school at https://www.classmates.com/places/school/mullikin-elementary-school/18774611.

On the other hand, there is nothing controversial in what I wrote.

Could you reconsider Wikipedia's rejection of my draft, please?

Thanks and best regards,

Steve


OurWayz (talk) 09:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is NOT for merely providing information. A Wikipedia article about an organisation must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about them, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable organisation. Wikipedia has no interest in what you want to say about it only in what others unaffiliated with the school choose to say about it. Theroadislong (talk) 09:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

09:43:56, 27 January 2022 review of submission by 59.185.248.65

[edit]


59.185.248.65 (talk) 09:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


please advice what can i do to publish this page, this page is regarding CMD of ntpc shri gurdeep singh

There is nothing that you can do, the draft article(not a "page") was rejected and will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about someone, it is for summarizing independent reliable sources, showing how the person is notable as defined by Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 17:11, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

17:02:15, 27 January 2022 review of submission by Qazigundstreets

[edit]


Qazigundstreets (talk) 17:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

18:08:13, 27 January 2022 review of submission by Samostadxxs

[edit]

Hello why it's not possible to post about Mr.Pooyan Mokhtari on wikipedia?He is famous and talented enough as google recognizes him.what is wrong with here? Samostadxxs (talk) 18:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

18:17:38, 27 January 2022 review of submission by 2402:4000:1382:E587:DA8:7505:9BEB:A32F

[edit]


2402:4000:1382:E587:DA8:7505:9BEB:A32F (talk) 18:17, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

18:33:18, 27 January 2022 review of draft by Itisthebio

[edit]
Hi Wikipedians, i need help checking if the sentence and words are correct or any changes needed please change it

Itisthebio (talk) 18:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19:18:13, 27 January 2022 review of submission by Wintercake93

[edit]

got told to go here to see why my article was declined

Wintercake93 (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: Draft:Poor Mans Poison @Wintercake93: The sourcing is insufficient. You can't use YouTube, Spotify and social media to show notability, since anyone can put content there. You need to find things written about the band by independent sources. See WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:RS. TechnoTalk (talk) 23:03, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:53:18, 27 January 2022 review of draft by Liza Zimmerman

[edit]


Hi I added to the draft of Tor wines and documented it with many reliable sources but I have had few people question the listing. Can you help me fix it? Thanks,

Liza Zimmerman (talk) 20:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liza Zimmerman: I cleaned it up a bit to help you out. Keep thinking about reliable, independent sources that discuss the vineyard, or its wines. It's still a bit thin. See WP:RS and WP:GNG. TechnoTalk (talk) 23:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2022_January_27&oldid=1069397617"