Jump to content

User talk:Dgregory4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Dgregory4, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! 331dot (talk) 23:48, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 17:28, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Dgregory4! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:28, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Scott M. Gibson has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Scott M. Gibson. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:35, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Scott M. Gibson has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Scott M. Gibson. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 08:16, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

There are still hyperlinks in the text. Remove those. David notMD (talk) 11:33, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All of my cuts are intended to make the draft more likely to be approved. David notMD (talk) 19:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Dgregory4! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Questions about notability, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott M. Gibson (March 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 20:27, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have a question about notability, since you said that the subject of my article did not satisfy the notability criterion. On the wiki page detailing the notability criteria for academics, the first criterion states that "1. The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources." Subsection "c" notes that this first criterion may be met through the a publication of a festschrift in honor of the subject of the article: "(c) The publication of an anniversary or memorial journal volume or a Festschrift dedicated to a particular person is usually enough to satisfy Criterion 1, except in the case of publication in vanity, fringe, or non-selective journals or presses." Since the subject of my article did have a festschrist published in his honor by a non-vanity press (wipf and stock), it seems like he does meet the notability criteria for academics. Indeed, the wiki page on notability states that "Academics meeting anyone of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable." Since I have demonstrated that he had a festschrift published in his honor (please see the body of the article along with the references) by a reputable publishing company, can you re-evaluate the notability of the subject of my article?
I appreciate any help you can provide in this matter. Dgregory4 (talk) 01:46, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Scott M. Gibson

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Dgregory4. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scott M. Gibson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott M. Gibson (August 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gusfriend (talk) 12:05, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott M. Gibson has been accepted

[edit]
Scott M. Gibson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:41, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]