Help desk
< July 31	<< Jul \| August \| Sep >>	August 2 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

August 1

06:47:57, 1 August 2022 review of submission by Universe is Quantun Build

Universe is Quantun Build (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Quantum hypothesis by our Lord الفرضية الكمومية من قبل ربنا (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Universe is Quantun Build (talk) 06:47, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see article related to : 🤔 Quantum Bullsh*t https://twitter.com/SOSDeveloper/status/1550924293772656640 For this reason ,I think quantum control is a new approach in quantum physics that consist to control everything entity that exists in the universe through QLI (Quantum Logical instances) ✍️ Description : God is not a being.. God is the light of the heavens and the earth, but everything that exists in the universe is considered a being and has a solution under quantum logical instances described with a continuous funtion according to Leibniz's principle such as f(x)= 2^2x With x ∈ N* . For each infinitesimal Variations of x --- correspond an infinitesimal variations of the value f(x) that we can represent by an infinitesimal of wave vector Vnpr (nuclear vector of released photon) as interpreted by Dr.Feynman in Fig1 .رحمه الله Example : for x = 1; f(x) =(4 quantum Logical instances) ; For x = 2 ; f(x) = (16 quantum Logical instances) ..; For x = 512 ; f(x) = 17.97732+e307 ..etc Finally ,by associating 1x to 1 qubit , we can resolve issue of everything entity that exists in the universe . For this reason ,quantum control is a new approach in quantum physics that consist to control everything entity that exists in the universe through QLI (Quantum Logical instances) ✍️ https://1drv.ms/u/s!AglDSdZdofJ2g2cPlxNhHS1KMMKB

Interpretation of the infinitessimal "Vnpr" vector of released Photon ( Nuclear vector of released photon ),by Dr.Feynman . https://1drv.ms/u/s!AglDSdZdofJ2gVzxXwmnr1-utu1h

@Universe is Quantun Build: see SOAPBOX. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Universe is Quantun Build: Wikipedia is not the place for crackpot theology or proselytising. ~~This draft should have been rejected (why it was declined is beyond me) and~~ I've tagged it for speedy deletion under G11 as blatant promotion (i.e. preaching). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 07:12, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jéské, you can decline drafts and tag pages for deletion without insulting editors without implying they are "crackpot". I agree this draft will be deleted soon but civility is called for in all situations with well-intentioned by misguided editors. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:41, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I called the POV crackpot, not the editor. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 09:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment which I really appreciated. But i think that you needs to study on what said by Dr.Feynman about Quantum physics by first step .

https://1drv.ms/u/s!AglDSdZdofJ2gjHCyPhfphhJpmkc Universe is Quantun Build (talk) 08:09, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please quit posting that link. We're not interested. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 09:55, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

09:42:44, 1 August 2022 review of draft by Byteutates

Byteutates (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Bezau Business Schools (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, thanks for the fast check of the draft of Bezau Business Schools. However, I am a bit confused that it was declined, as it is simply a translation (just a bit shortened history section) of the wiki-page in German - see here: [Bezauer Wirtschaftsschulen] which is checked and worked on by several users (check version history). The references are given in the literature section and with the weblink. It is just a school, so this is not about advertisement etc. and the information are for all out there to see and it seems not to make sense to cite the given sources (given in the literature section) in the text - but if that is, what is critizised - I can do that, even though it seems to make no sense to me in this case? The remark, that there should be independent / secondary sources seems to make - in part - no sense, as we often use (also in sciences) data from a source, without having other sources. Especially in this case - with a public school - when the resources are from the public school, it seems to make no sense!? So it would be more realiable to use secondary sources, which copy or use information from the primary source? Looking forward for a reply. Best! (also asked user Pbrks directly and posted this text on his page as well - see: [Pbrks]

Byteutates (talk) 09:42, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Byteutates: this is a common problem when translating articles from other wikis; enwiki has higher notability and verifiability standards than the others (that I'm aware of, at least), and therefore the existing sources are often insufficient. And given that this draft doesn't cite a single source, it was indeed declined correctly.

On a separate point, if, as you say, you've translated this from a dewiki article, you need to attribute that as the original source, see WP:HOWTRANS. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:04, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DoubleGrazing, ok, added 2 secondary references (in my view it is usually more desirable to have primary sources (which were already given) than secondary sources - but ok). Hope it is fine now. Best Byteutates (talk) 10:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I make that just one secondary source; the Bezau.at and the school's own website are both primary. (I'm not sure whether the third one is entirely secondary, either, but I'm giving it the benefit of doubt.)

Secondary sources are absolutely needed to establish notability per WP:GNG; this isn't a question of opinion or desirability. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:29, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 14:58:07, 1 August 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by RTbluesky

RTbluesky (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Wefox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am not sure why my submission keeps getting declined. Are there specific lines that can be highlighted which are making it seem like an advertisement? Or is it to do with the sources, if so can the particular ones be named? I have worked very hard many times to fix this and cannot seem to get approval on it.

RTbluesky (talk) 14:58, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RTbluesky You are a paid editor but haven't yet made the correct disclosure on your user page. Theroadislong (talk) 08:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

18:04:08, 1 August 2022 review of submission by Dilshadhassan

Dilshadhassan (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!

Fortune Park Vacation.

Why my page decline ?

Dilshadhassan (talk) 18:04, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dilshadhassan: it has been declined because the draft is poorly referenced and highly promotional, with no sign of notability. (And for those reasons, I have just tagged it for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia isn't a platform for companies to market themselves. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]