Help desk
< April 24	<< Mar \| April \| May >>	April 26 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

April 25

03:23:20, 25 April 2022 review of submission by 2409:4042:220A:6834:C9C4:D589:4890:73F0

bw group official 18 2409:4042:220A:6834:C9C4:D589:4890:73F0 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Bw group official 18 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

No sources, no article, no debate. The article as writ is also almost entirely sentence fragments that turn the whole text into a series of non sequiturs that makes zero sense what-so-ever. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 06:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

06:32:22, 25 April 2022 review of draft by FilthyDon

FilthyDon (talk · contribs)
- User:FilthyDon/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Query resolved - please ignore. Thank you. FilthyDon (talk) 06:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FilthyDon (talk) 06:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08:35:44, 25 April 2022 review of submission by Pranjalsharma2023

Pranjalsharma2023 (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!

Pranjalsharma2023 (talk) 08:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pranjalsharma2023 If this is about Draft:Ashraw, you don't ask a question, but it is a long way from being a Wikipedia article. Please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 08:52, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:02:14, 25 April 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by ScienceBecky

ScienceBecky (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Superelectrophilic anions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

I've got a problem with my draft about Superelectophilic Anions.

I got the following message from a reviewer: „The article reads like a paper rather than an encyclopedia article, and it is likely far too technical for the average reader to understand. Please see WP:TECHNICAL for more information.“

I've read the technical guidelines and would appreciate some more concrete advice on what seems to be too technical in my article. For example, if you compare my article with the one on Metal carbonyl, the target audience is pretty similar. I would be interested to know where my article is too special compared to that. Thank you for a reply.

ScienceBecky (talk) 09:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ScienceBecky I differ from the view of the prior reviewer. That is fine. Opinions differ. I believe this stands a better than 50% chance of surviving an immediate deletion process. I have accepted it to allow the community to decide 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

10:48:34, 25 April 2022 review of submission by Isaiasavoca

Isaiasavoca (talk · contribs)

I am unsure why what is wrong with it, and if someone can help me make it look more like a usual Wikipedia page(box of content, box with logo and other small facts on right side) that would be very much apreciated. Isaiasavoca (talk) 10:48, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please confirm that you have read the very clear message in the big, pink, decline box. Then ask any further questions in this thread. Please do not start another thread unless this one has been archived 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:26, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11:32:57, 25 April 2022 review of submission by Nicsav

Nicsav (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Electric Sub Meters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I need advice on how to improve this article. I have added information as well as the citations for it. Please let me know the best way to overcome the errors. Nicsav (talk) 11:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nicsav Your draft has been declined. The topic is inappropriate, and consists of WP:OR. Instead of improving it, which is relatively pointless now, improve Wikipedia by editing something else. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:25, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small correction @Nicsav the draft has been rejected not declined, which means it will not be considered further. Theroadislong (talk) 16:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong thanks. I must have had brain failure. I said 'rejected' in my head and my fingers typed 'declined' 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:51:13, 25 April 2022 review of submission by Artipreneurs India

Artipreneurs India (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!

Artipreneurs India (talk) 14:51, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requestor is blocked, and any possible drafts they'd've been asking after are deleted. Moot. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 19:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:32:05, 25 April 2022 review of draft by Muzsky17

Muzsky17 (talk · contribs)
- User:Muzsky17/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Muzsky17 (talk) 16:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC) Please help me to clean the page I created for Michael Mulligan. My intention was to create his profile on Wikipedia similar to other European football players have. I appreciate any help. Lenka Mulligan[reply]

The draft as written is blatantly promotional and is completely bereft of sources, including any sources that could support an WP:NFOOTY claim. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 19:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:40:23, 25 April 2022 review of draft by Marinaxaykosy

Marinaxaykosy (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Lyman Guitar Co. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Marinaxaykosy (talk) 16:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I need help with this particular submission. I am an employee of this company and would like to make a guitar company/brand page for Lyman Guitar but since we are fairly new, there are no other news sources for the brand besides what I can actually receive from the owners and founders of the company. Wikipedia keeps denying my submission but I really cannot provide any more sources besides the information I receive straight from the owners. Please assist as soon as possible, we would like to try and get this Wikipedia page up as soon as we can before June.

In order to demonstrate notability, you need to provide multiple references to in-depth articles written about the company in unrelated, independent journals, magazines, books or online. If there are no sources then we simply can’t have an article about them, not every company is notable. Theroadislong (talk) 16:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Marinaxaykosy, to echo what Theroadislong said, Wikipedia takes notice of a company after it has become notable enough that news sources have written about it. See WP:TOOSOON. 73.127.147.187 (talk) 11:13, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]