User talk:ScienceBecky

This is ScienceBecky's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Superelectrophilic anions (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Serial Number 54129 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Entire sections without sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Superelectrophilic anions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Superelectrophilic anions, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SN54129 15:03, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ScienceBecky! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SN54129 15:03, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Superelectrophilic anions (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mako001 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The "Scientific relevance and potential applications" section has no sources. Most of the sourcing elsewhere seems solid though. You may also want to read MOS:BOLD which gives guidance on the appropriate use of bold font in articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Superelectrophilic anions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Superelectrophilic anions, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 07:11, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilhelm-Ostwald-Institute (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Many unsourced statements in "The institute building" and "Research, people and structures of the institute" sections.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wilhelm-Ostwald-Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wilhelm-Ostwald-Institute, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 22:28, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Superelectrophilic anions (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Noahfgodard was:

The article reads like a paper rather than an encyclopedia article, and it is likely far too technical for the average reader to understand. Please see WP:TECHNICAL for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Superelectrophilic anions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Superelectrophilic anions, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noahfgodard (talk) 22:25, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I've read the technical guidelines and would appreciate some more concrete advice on what seems to be too technical in my article.

For example, if you compare my article with the one on Metal carbonyl, the target audience is pretty similar. I would be interested to know where my article is too special compared to that.

Thank you for a reply. ScienceBecky (talk) 09:59, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Superelectrophilic anions has been accepted

Superelectrophilic anions, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilhelm Ostwald Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry has been accepted

Wilhelm Ostwald Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Sagotreespirit (^talk) 22:46, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve André Anders

Hello, ScienceBecky,

Thank you for creating André Anders.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

It will be helpful to integrate this article into Wikipedia by linking it from other sites.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Klbrain (talk) 17:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Leibniz Institute of Surface Engineering

Hello, ScienceBecky,

Thank you for creating Leibniz Institute of Surface Engineering.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This institution is notable but would be great to have some more references that are not from the institution itself? thanks

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 15:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jens Beckmann moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jens Beckmann. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:01, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect, thank you! ScienceBecky (talk) 14:15, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jens Beckmann Page possible COI

Hello ScienceBecky,

I noticed you have created the page Draft:Jens Beckmann which appears to be related to your username. If you are connected to the subject of the article, please see WP:PLAINSIMPLECOI. This is not a accusation of any wrongdoing, having a Conflict of Interest on Wikipedia is only a description of a situation.

If you have a conflict of interest I suggest you remove your page and wait for someone not directly connected to the subject to create the article. Thanks, Hihyphilia (talk) 14:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hihyphilia,

I understand the question and the source of confusion. I'm not in any way related to Jens Beckmann. Just writing about him and his work, because it's very interesting. Thanks for your question.

Becky ScienceBecky (talk) 14:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jens Beckmann (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

That is a massive amount of references, and makes it difficult to navigate. Primary sources and self-written information should be cited in moderation, see WP:PRIMARY. Selected works included in the article should be non-exhaustive.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jens Beckmann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]