Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 May 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< May 28 << Apr | May | Jun >> May 30 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


May 29

[edit]

02:29:52, 29 May 2021 review of draft by Zeezoo17

[edit]


Zeezoo17 (talk) 02:29, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Surely you jest? I don't see any evidence you've ever worked on a draft under this account. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 06:17, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

03:25:33, 29 May 2021 review of draft by Jericho347

[edit]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Andrea_M._Matwyshyn - This article was rejected by @CommanderWaterford citing it did not meet the criteria for WP:NACADEMIC. Their rejection: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jericho347#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation%3A_Andrea_M._Matwyshyn_%28May_2%29 I have posted a reply on the article talk page that outlines why I believe this decision to be incorrect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Andrea_M._Matwyshyn Per the rejection, it says I can ask her for additional guidance on this matter so I am requesting additional review of the page and if it meets criteria. If it does not, additional information beyond a few form-reply lines would be very helpful. Thank you.

Jericho347 (talk) 03:25, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: CommanderWaterford can't respond to your concerns because he is currently blocked from editing. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've commented at length at Draft talk:Andrea M. Matwyshyn. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:11, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

04:00:32, 29 May 2021 review of draft by 49.205.82.105

[edit]


49.205.82.105 (talk) 04:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Every biographical claim the draft makes that could potentially be challenged for any reason what-so-ever MUST be cited to a strong third-party source that corroborates the claim or removed wholesale. This is a hard requirement when writing biographical content about living or recently-departed people on Wikipedia and is NOT NEGOTIABLE. None of your citations are in-line, as is required. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 06:15, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

04:31:28, 29 May 2021 review of submission by Sneha-SIPL

[edit]


Hi, Need to request for re-review of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Shivani_Khetan, as the subject is having relevant references from authentic sources. She has won awards for her services and excellence mentioned below. Please review it again and let me know what can be done to improve it.

  1. Awarded Golden Book of World Records for Tarot a healing tool in modern times, as first coffee table book on tarot.
  2. Global Goodwill Ambassador (GGA) program from LinkedIn Company for volunteering program
  3. Peace 2019 International Awards

If https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitin_Soni this can be published then Dr. Shivani Khetan also be as there are many authenticate references of her works and experiences.

Sneha-SIPL (talk) 04:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nitin Soni never went thru AfC, making that a very poor argument. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 06:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05:37:23, 29 May 2021 review of submission by Sakander batth

[edit]


Sakander batth (talk) 05:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

06:21:09, 29 May 2021 review of draft by Inspirenasim

[edit]


Inspirenasim (talk) 06:21, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

no sources, no article, no debate. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:34, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:05:56, 29 May 2021 review of draft by Ukuser691

[edit]


Hello, I have made all requested changes to the draft and there are ample references and links to show that this person meets the requirements. If any further changes are required, please let me know. Many thanks

Ukuser691 (talk) 09:05, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You still have not shown how they meet the criteria at WP:NARTIST? Theroadislong (talk) 14:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:06:15, 29 May 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Danjensen137

[edit]


I'm currently creating a Wiki page for someone and heard it's possible to add tags or keyword metadata into it. I can't find any information on how to do it, so I was hoping someone might be able to explain it to me.

Thanks in advance!

Danjensen137 (talk) 09:06, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Danjensen137: Depends on what you mean by keywords / metadata. If you mean things that would normally go into <meta name="keywords" content="..."> no, you don't. If you mean Categories, you can add them by creating an internal link to the category. Victor Schmidt (talk) 09:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 11:35:21, 29 May 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by SageWRLD

[edit]



SageWRLD (talk) 11:35, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:36:41, 29 May 2021 review of submission by Jyotsanaj03

[edit]

Hello. I have been trying to publish this article for Sanjeev and I work in his team. I would like to bring to your notice that the links in the references should re reviewed. All the links come from a reliable source. There is a link in which the Prime Minister of the country is speaking about Sanjeev. There Are articles from Hindustan Times and Ted's official website. Either please specifically help me understand how do you think it is not notable. As, for the current content of the page, there is no reference that does not support what we have written. Jyotsanaj03 (talk) 13:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jyotsanaj03 The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further, and no amount of editing will confer notability on this person. That the PM mentioned him does not confer notability on him, see WP:NOTINHERITED.
If you work for him, the Terms of Use require you to make a formal paid editing declaration. Please also review conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 14:19, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:54:50, 29 May 2021 review of draft by 2409:4041:E85:520F:8BE6:DFC0:84BE:6A3C

[edit]


I don't understand where my mistake for publishing article 2409:4041:E85:520F:8BE6:DFC0:84BE:6A3C (talk) 14:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please compare what you have created to WP:NPOL FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 17:18, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:51:34, 29 May 2021 review of submission by Reesashukla

[edit]


Reesashukla (talk) 15:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

what is criteria to create a page of book al wikipedia? please guide me.

@Reesashukla: please read WP:YFA and return to this sectiomn if this talk page (unless it has been archived) wioyth any further questions FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 17:14, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:14:23, 29 May 2021 review of submission by 37.153.190.90

[edit]


37.153.190.90 (talk) 18:14, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't ask a question. repeatedly submitting a draft without changing anything or taking advice is disruptive. Victor Schmidt (talk) 21:04, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:59:39, 29 May 2021 review of submission by WriticBee

[edit]


WriticBee (talk) 19:59, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question. 331dot (talk) 20:09, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:03:53, 29 May 2021 review of submission by 95.104.81.155

[edit]


95.104.81.155 (talk) 22:03, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. We can't use streaming sites or online storefronts as sources under any circumstance. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 03:13, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_May_29&oldid=1026752979"