User talk:Jyotsanaj03

Welcome!

Hello, Jyotsanaj03, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• How to write a great article
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! VViking_TalkEdits 13:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VViking_TalkEdits 13:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Bhanot (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asukite was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 A S U K I T E  15:43, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Jyotsanaj03! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!  A S U K I T E  15:43, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Bhanot (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:16, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Bhanot (May 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: just advertising

Theroadislong (talk) 08:32, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Bhanot (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Bhanot (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Bhanot (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 11:18, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Bhanot (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Bhanot (May 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: More concerned with decline removal than any attempt to add any new sources to show they pass WP:BIO

KylieTastic (talk) 09:28, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 10:37, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Bhanot (May 29)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:41, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

paid editing

Hello Jyotsanaj03. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jyotsanaj03. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jyotsanaj03|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 14:28, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Paid editing (again)

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Jyotsanaj03, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jyotsanaj03|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. --- Possibly (talk) 19:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

To clarify, if you work for the person you are writing about, "(I work in his team)", that is what we call paid editing.--- Possibly (talk) 19:03, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Some advice

Hello. I see that your start to editing Wikipedia has not been smooth, and that you have had some setbacks which must be frustrating, particularly since you have clearly put a lot of work into something which has been repeatedly rejected. I will offer a few pieces of advice, in the hope that some or all of them may be helpful to you.

1. I see that in messages which you have posted on other editors' talk pages you have indicated that you believe that the person you have written about deserves to be better known, as he has done wonderful and beneficial work. That is a line which is taken by a good many new editors who come to edit Wikipedia in order to publicise someone or something that they think should be better known. However, rightly or wrongly, that is not the way Wikipedia works. Editing to make someone or something better known because you think they deserve to be better known is known as "promotional editing", and it is not allowed by Wikipedia policy, which requires a neutral point of view. Also, Wikipedia's approach is to cover only topics which have already received substantial coverage in reliable independent sources, which rules out any attempt to get more prominent coverage for someone or something not yet well known.
2. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. Of course that advice may not appeal to you if you you have no interest in doing any editing other than to publicise the person you work with, but in that case Wikipedia probably isn't the best place for you to do so anyway.
3. Please bear in mind that the people you are dealing with on Wikipedia are volunteers, who are giving up their own time to do the best they can towards upholding Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you don't like those policies and guidelines then you are perfectly free to try to get them changed, but as long as a particular policy is in force, it is reasonable to expect editors to seek to uphold those policies, and it is therefore best to make sure that any criticism you may make is criticism of the policy, not of the editor who has explained the policy to you. You are also much more likely to get support from other editors if you come across as making friendly suggestions than as expressing anger.
4. You should certainly look at Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline before you do any more editing about Sanjeev Bhanot, and make sure that your future editing complies with that guideline. I know that editors who have posted above have put emphasis on the issue of paid editing, but whether your editing forms part of paid work or not the conflict of interest guideline applies to your editing. Amongst other things that you will find in that guideline a requirement for you to disclose your conflict of interest. I know that you have stated that you work in Sanjeev Bhanot's team, but that statement is buried in among talk page posts where it is unlikely to be seen by many editors, so it does not really cover the requirement. You should certainly post a clear statement of your situation on this page, and on the talk page of any article you edit where the guideline applies.

As I have said, I have written these pieces of advice in the hope that they may help you. Obviously, whether they will succeed in doing so is something only you can judge. If you would like clarification of any of the points I have mentioned then please feel very welcome to ask me. JBW (talk) 20:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)