Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 December 30

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< December 29 << Nov | December | Jan >> December 31 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


December 30

[edit]

06:07:03, 30 December 2021 review of submission by Muniraj789

[edit]


Muniraj789 (talk) 06:07, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Every possibly challengeable claim MUST be accompied by an inline citation to a reliable source. This draft was rejected and as such will not be considered further at this time. Victor Schmidt (talk) 08:48, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:27:42, 30 December 2021 review of draft by KetchupSalt

[edit]


Hi

Does lp_solve being part of Debian not make it notable? This it has in common with GLPK, which is what I've been basing my draft on.

There are R bindings for lp_solve, node.js bindings and stackoverflow discussions related to it.

I found some academic references to it as well: Understanding Systems of Linear Equations and Programming through lpSolve and R Language, Calling the lp_solve Linear Program Software from R, S-PLUS and Excel

The R bindings are particularly popular and show up as references in tons of stuff, like this book on marketing: Fuzzy Optimization and Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Digital Marketing


KetchupSalt (talk) 09:27, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:50:33, 30 December 2021 review of submission by Ig sk 09

[edit]


Ig sk 09 (talk) 09:50, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:51:53, 30 December 2021 review of submission by Sk Wasim Akram 13

[edit]


Sk Wasim Akram 13 (talk) 09:51, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We consider reality TV personalities to fall under WP:BLP1E. Therefore, you need to prove he is notable independent of the reality TV show. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 14:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:48:37, 30 December 2021 review of draft by Mivida2021

[edit]


Hi. Greetings. I have made some changes to my page of canadian chamber of commerce middle east. Earlier my page was declined as they asked for some more sources to be included. I have added them but I want your advice on how could i improve my chances of getting the page getting accepted. Would really appreciate your help on this. Thank you. Mivida2021 (talk) 10:48, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mivida2021, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotion. Currently, your article is just reciting what the subject wants the world to know and Wikipedia cares very little what a subject has to say about themselves. Either write what independent reliable sources have to say about the subject or abandon the draft. Also see WP:COI as the promotional nature raises concern you may have an interest in the subject. Slywriter (talk) 13:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

11:35:18, 30 December 2021 review of submission by Rambabuyadavnepal

[edit]


Rambabuyadavnepal (talk) 11:35, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

draft:Milan_Pandey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rambabuyadavnepal (talk • contribs) 11:40, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I Want to say that why my first article draft:Milan_Pandey is decline. He is the top level politician of Nepal and his facebook and twitter account is already verified. so please approve.

Having a verified Facebook and Twitter account confers zero notability. Theroadislong (talk) 11:43, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rambabuyadavnepal the important thing is to show that he passes WP:NPOL. Does he? FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 21:23, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:13:35, 30 December 2021 review of submission by 79.73.247.119

[edit]

Dear Sir, I have added many references as i can when i created this wiki page and used her main website as refernces and articles to back all of it up. 79.73.247.119 (talk) 15:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Her own website is useless for notability (connexion to subject), with all the rest being passing mentions (too sparse), gossip (no editorial oversight), or written under role bylines (unknown provenance). —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 15:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:13:30, 30 December 2021 review of submission by 831n

[edit]


Hello, i'm a little confused as to how I can improve this submission to be approved. This league is essentially a slightly diluted version of the MASL2, is just regional as opposed to national. I used the MASL2 wiki as a guide and has the same kind of references/content. To add, this league has a lot more clout and backing than other soccer divisions readable/available on wikipedia. 831n (talk) 21:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

831n, if the league launches and is successful then the reliable sources will be available to prove notability. Trying to force the article before then with minimal sourcing available is not the best use of everyone's time.Slywriter (talk) 21:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response, i suppose I understand however there are numerous american soccer leagues which rely on niche or own-source coverage due to a general disinterest by national media, particularly indoor soccer. This league however has had regional coverege (linked). Other wikipedia examples with less (or like) compliance by these rules would include the NISA nation page, Womens independent soccer league, Major Arena Soccer League 2, USL League One, other sports too like the USA Rugby League, I could go on. What would I need to add at this point (it is a short season) to make this page approve? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 831n (talk • contribs) 21:43, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@831n No precedent is ever set by any article for any other. If it were we would have a brutally fast descent into idiocracy
We have a great number of poor articles here, and they will, eventually, be improved or excised FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 21:46, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, appreciate that, bummed that they made it through the scrutiny but not mine despite holding to the "rules" as best as possible. Thats life. What kind of extra sources do you need? A major newspaper and tv stations have had their references used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 831n (talk • contribs) 21:48, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:24:05, 30 December 2021 review of submission by 831n

[edit]

I added a few more media source references as recommended. 831n (talk) 22:24, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:42:07, 30 December 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Ryanmyles123

[edit]


should everything in the article that does not have a site or independent source at the end of it be removed from the article?

which areas in particular need independent sources on this article?


Ryanmyles123 (talk) 22:42, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:33:22, 30 December 2021 review of submission by JaredMars

[edit]


JaredMars (talk) 23:33, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 23:35, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_December_30&oldid=1063824313"