User talk:Sk Wasim Akram 13

April 2021

Hello, I'm Mattplaysthedrums. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to User:Sk_Wasim_Akram_13—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 02:11, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sk Wasim Akram 13

A tag has been placed on User:Sk Wasim Akram 13 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:44, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Sorry, but your user page does not conform to Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
a workspace for a draft article
a personal website, blog, or social media site
a space for self-promotion or other advertising
a CV/resumé
a lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bankim Chandra Chatterjee Literary work

Hello, Sk Wasim Akram 13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bankim Chandra Chatterjee Literary work, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mukul Gain (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You may not use user editable sites such as Youtube as references. I also see WP:BOMBARD whcih leads me to this being WP:ADMASQ

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mukul Gain and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mukul Gain, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 17:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sk Wasim Akram 13! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 17:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello Sk Wasim Akram 13. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Mukul Gain, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sk Wasim Akram 13. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sk Wasim Akram 13|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 18:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Blablubbs

Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention. I want to clarify that I am not receiving any compensation, either directly or indirectly, for my contributions to Wikipedia. My edits are made in good faith to improve the quality and accuracy of articles. I understand the importance of transparency and neutrality on Wikipedia and have no affiliation with any organization or individual that would require paid editing.

I apologize if my recent edits gave the impression otherwise, and I will ensure that my future contributions strictly adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines. And by mistake I had registered two different account from y two computers and started editing the same page. Please remove the ban from my account I promise I will all the rules and guidelines further.

Please feel free to reach out if you have any further questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Wasim Sk Wasim Akram 13 (talk) 18:16, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising and abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sk Wasim Akram 13.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 17:46, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sk Wasim Akram 13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Mistakenly I created two different account from two different computer and started editing my same pages on wikipedia

Decline reason:

We will be happy to consider your request when you write one without the aid of an AI. 331dot (talk) 18:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am writing to request an unblock of my Wikipedia account, Sk Wasim Akram 13, which was blocked on march 5 2022 by Blablubbs for the reasons of advertising and abusing multiple accounts, as stated in the block notice.

I want to express my sincere apologies for any actions that may have violated Wikipedia's guidelines. I acknowledge that my recent edits gave the impression of undisclosed paid editing, which was not my intention. I would like to clarify that I am not receiving any compensation, either directly or indirectly, for my contributions to Wikipedia. My edits are made in good faith to improve the quality and accuracy of articles. I understand the importance of transparency and neutrality on Wikipedia and have no affiliation with any organization or individual that would require paid editing.

Furthermore, I must admit that I inadvertently registered two different accounts and began editing the same page from two different computers, leading to a breach of Wikipedia's multiple accounts policy. I deeply regret this oversight.

I am committed to making amends and ensuring that my future contributions strictly adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines. I understand that Wikipedia takes issues of advertising and multiple account abuse seriously, and I have learned from this experience.

I kindly request an opportunity to continue contributing positively to the Wikipedia community. I assure you that I will follow all rules and guidelines meticulously in the future to prevent any recurrence of such issues.

I understand that my request will be thoroughly reviewed, and I am prepared to engage in a constructive dialogue with administrators to address any concerns or provide further information as needed.

Thank you for considering my unblock request.

Sincerely, Sk Wasim Akram 13