Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 July 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< July 16 << Jun | July | Aug >> July 18 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


July 17

[edit]

07:24:41, 17 July 2014 review of submission by 83.57.7.177

[edit]

Why was my article declined? 83.57.7.177 (talk) 07:24, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you referring to Mobsyte created by the now blocked User:Mobsyte? Click on Mobsyte and it will tell you why: "Unambiguous advertising or promotion". There are also similar warnings and explanations on User talk:Mobsyte. Read them. Voceditenore (talk) 08:01, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

11:06:02, 17 July 2014 review of submission by Bakerga1

[edit]

Hello, I am trying to add a company page for the company I work for and I cannot understand why it keeps getting rejected. I have tried to put as many references in the article as possible. I really need some help with this. Please HELP?!!? Bakerga1 (talk) 11:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are two points here.
  1. You have a conflict of interest and are unlikely to be able to write a neutral and well structured article about your employer.
  2. The references are not appropriate. I have left a comment on the article to that effect and flagged many of the references as primary sources
I do not see the firm as notable at this stage, and would decline it as such if I reviewed the article today. Many law firms are not notable. My son works for one of your size, give or take. It's a great firm, but notable it is not. If you have been asked by a manager to create a WIkipedia article they have given you a poisoned chalice, perhaps unwittingly so. Wikipedia is not web space for your firm, nor a place to hang its shingle. There is a high hurdle to leap. If you can leap it, fine. Fiddle Faddle 11:35, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

12:41:19, 17 July 2014 request for review by Estelle.mab

[edit]


Dear Sirs,

I am asking some help today because I have to create a Wikipedia article/page about my company, VSL International, in English. I am French, and I speak and understand English well but when I'm trying to follow your instructions for creating an article I get confused... I know that it is not advised to write an article on our own firm but I'm sure that with your help I will be able to create an article which will remain neutral.

I have already submitted twice my article, which has been refused, and I wish I could get some help from you so that the lay out (which is very difficult to understand to me) and the sources can be accepted by your administrators.

A French Wikipedia article already exists as "VSL (entreprise)", I suppose that this is an important information for you. Yet, neither my colleagues nor me are the authors, and we don't want a simple traduction of the French existing page.

Here is the article I have submitted a few weeks ago:

VSL, a company with Swiss origins, is specialized in the construction of concrete bridges and special structures. Well-proven systems and sound in-house engineering are the basis for innovative conceptual design and reliable, efficient engineering solutions. VSL has been contributing since 1956 to some most prestigious and complex concrete structures in the world. It has applied the principles of post-tensioning to bridges (including cable-stayed structures), buildings, LNG tanks, nuclear containments, industrial plants, tunnels, offshore concrete structures. VSL operates through 60 locations as a worldwide network. The Group provides technical consultancy and support, with a full range of works from project planning through to complete final design, construction engineering and the execution of works on site.

Key figures[edit] • 3900 employees in 2013 • 60 locations worldwide in 35 countries • 2 technical centres (Switzerland, Singapore) • 32 registered patents in use

Some references[edit] • Kwidzyn Bridge – Poland • Chi Shi Bridge - China • Tran Thi Ly – Da Nang, Vietnam • Second Penang Bridge – Malaysia • Aberdeen Channel Bridge, Hong Kong • Foundation works on the Observatory road, Hong Kong • Heavy Lifting of the Fonte Nova stadium roof, Salvador Da Bahia, Brazil

References[edit] • http://www.vsl.com/ • http://www.vsl.com/images/brochures/general/vsl_presentation_03_2014/view/index.html

Thank you for your help, waiting for your response. Best Regards

Estelle Mabille Estelle.mab (talk) 12:41, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is the company notable? If so please read WP:42. We require references from significant coverage about the entity, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. If it is notable then you will find some. If not, then you will not. The words above are an advert. This will not be acceptable, even with references. Fiddle Faddle 13:11, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

13:02:48, 17 July 2014 review of submission by Fionnloch

[edit]


Hi. Am awaiting review of this, and just wondered if I needed to shift it from the Draft/Sandbox to my User space (there's a message to this effect at the top of the page, which I've been ignoring). Sorry to bother you, but this is my first contribution, and I don't know my way around the system yet - but I want to avoid the piece not getting reviewed because I hadn't moved it!. Thanks.

Fionnloch

Fionnloch (talk) 13:02, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fionnloch; it's fine to ignore that message. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 13:10, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

14:25:09, 17 July 2014 review of submission by GeoffreySmithGalleries

[edit]


GeoffreySmithGalleries (talk) 14:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I submitted my article for review months ago. I have no idea why it hasn't been reviewed or approved.

Hello, it does not appear that your draft was Submitted, it was simply sitting on your userpage with an incorrect "unreviewed" template (that template is for published articles needing further review). I have moved your draft to the correct place and put it in line for submission. Bear in mind the line may take a few days, and also it is very common that even a viable article will have to go through several reviews to get polished up enough to publish. Your draft is now at Draft:Geoffrey C. Smith. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:44, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

15:06:59, 17 July 2014 review of submission by 108.86.125.204

[edit]


108.86.125.204 (talk) 15:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC) why was it rejected?[reply]

IP, you haven't told us which article you're asking about. You wrote the article from either another IP or from a logged-in account, since it isn't shown on the history of this IP. If you have a username, please log-in and re-sign your message with your username. If you wrote it on an IP account, please provide here the address of the specific article you're asking about. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

17:28:24, 17 July 2014 review of submission by Musence

[edit]


Hello, I have made the inline citations I needed to make and also edited the heading to correct format for my Wikipedia page, but when I click the "resubmit" it prompts me to a new blank screen where my previous page with all it's sourcing and text is gone. Please help.

Thank you,

Teddy

Musence (talk) 17:28, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, I thought this would be a simple misunderstanding, but I'm getting the same. (To reviewers:) Is there a glitch with AFCH currently? MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:36, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

17:41:51, 17 July 2014 review of draft by Margielennon

[edit]


Hello. I'm requesting help on my citations and references. I was told to put in cites, and I used a template. This also put <ref></ref> around the cites, so my article had duplicate references instead of citations, then references. Then I put in the cite with just {{ info }} and references [1] and it still isn't looking right. I'm confused on if the cites {{ }} need a <ref></ref> or if not, how do I not have duplicate references?

Margielennon (talk) 17:41, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ info
@Margielennon:, your footnotes appear to be listing just fine now; did the problem work itself out? MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

17:58:24, 17 July 2014 review of submission by Zarathuddite

[edit]


Greetings! I'd like to correct the issues with my article which was recently accepted, Tristan Meinecke. One issue is that additional citations are needed, and I am researching that in his estate's archives and at the library, because I know there are publications and articles which exist but I had not previously been able to track down.

Another issue is that the page is an orphan, and I was hoping for some guidance on the best way to go about fixing that. I know Meinecke was an associate of the Chicago Surrealists, that he studied at the University of Michigan and was exhibited multiple times at the Art Institute of Chicago's Chicago and Vicinity shows in the 50s. It sort of surprises me that none of those exhibitions have pages of their own, not even the 1957 No-Jury Show which got a lot of press coverage at the time. Any advice on how best to un-orphan the article is appreciated. Zarathuddite (talk) 17:58, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If the 1957 show got a lot of press coverage, why not create an article about it? That article in turn may end up being an orphan, of course... --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:18, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

20:18:33, 17 July 2014 review of submission by 86.144.86.205

[edit]

I tried to create an article here .Can this project be deleted please - it will no longer be used - it will not be published. REPEAT - can it please be deleted. Thank you Steve Butcher

86.144.86.205 (talk) 20:18, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@86.144.86.205: What draft? You'll have to sign-in with the same account or use the same IP you used with whatever draft in order to request deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:10, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

21:06:58, 17 July 2014 review of submission by Emiskew

[edit]


Hi, I submitted an updated article for review on July 4 and I'm still waiting for it to be reviewed. Have I resubmitted it correctly?

Emiskew (talk) 21:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have. Reviews take an arbitrary period because those who review are volunteers and tend to stick to their own specialist areas. Please continue to improve the draft while you wait for a volunteer to pass your way. Fiddle Faddle 21:16, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
no Declined with substantive reasons in two additional comments at the draft article. Fiddle Faddle 21:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

22:06:49, 17 July 2014 review of submission by Carnalito

[edit]


I'm not sure, why it was rejected. Please tell me why so I can make the changes and make improvements. Thanks!

Carnalito (talk) 22:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Don Benito Alvarez Toral was rejected for the reasons given at the top of that page. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:16, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2014_July_17&oldid=1109522020"