Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 June 20

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< June 19 June 21 >

June 20

[edit]
[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and useless template Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:58, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox FIBA tourney

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:41, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox FIBA tourney with Template:Infobox basketball tournament season.
Same article scope, {{Infobox FIBA tourney}} does not really add anything unique to FIBA/national teams. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox all-star basketball game

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox basketball game. Izno (talk) 00:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox all-star basketball game with Template:Infobox basketball game.
Redundant template. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:36, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox BBL team season

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 June 29. Izno (talk) 00:44, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox ANZ Premiership team

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with {{Infobox sports team}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 21:27, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Marmaray style

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/TCDD Taşımacılık. Gonnym (talk) 20:18, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Optima Tours succession templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Optima Tours. Gonnym (talk) 20:16, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ADA color

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Adaray. Gonnym (talk) 20:14, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WEmoji

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a template to show emojis - Template:Emoji. Additionally, there is no need to create a template for each single emoji as was done with this template's subpages. Any usages should be replaced with {{Emoji}}. Gonnym (talk) 09:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - I agree with deleting the subpages as seen at the nominations above. However, upon looking closer at Template:Emoji, you will find it has more emojis but is not very user friendly -- For instance, to display a basic smile (☺) you must use the following: {{emoji|263A}}
The goal of WEmoji is to provide Wikipedians with an easy-to-use, user-friendly system which has codes that are easy to memorize. If you use the other system, you'd need to constantly check the codes depending on the emoji. The code for a sunglasses emoji looks like this on Emoji: {{emoji|1F60E}}. The code for sunglasses on WEmoji looks like this: {{WEmoji|cool}}. In summary, the two templates are different -- Emoji is better supported, but not as refined. WEmoji is not as well supported, but easier to use. Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 23:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The templates can give the same result and have very similar syntax (it's written in the documentation). {{Emoji}} just giving you more options. For basic "word" usage: {{WEmoji|cool}} vs {{Emoji|name=sunglasses}} ( vs 😎). Gonnym (talk) 09:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:41, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tram İzmir color

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:52, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Tram İzmir. Gonnym (talk) 09:23, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

İzmir Metro succession templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/İzmir Metro. Gonnym (talk) 09:16, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NRLW2019Ladder

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Table was merged into article. Gonnym (talk) 08:50, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

İZBAN succession templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/İZBAN. Gonnym (talk) 08:47, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox hiking trail

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was moved Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:40, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Current name Target name

Propose renaming Template:Infobox hiking trail to Template:Infobox trail.
This template covers hiking trails, cycling trails, greenways, and more; so, it makes sense to broaden the name. –Aidan721 (talk) 02:00, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Suport move Makes sense. PamD 06:01, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Aidan721, at the top of WP:TFD it says "To propose the renaming of a template or templates, use Wikipedia:Requested moves." Frietjes (talk) 15:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - The term "trail" in Wikipedia referred to your classic hiking trail a long time ago, but has since been expanded to include all the other types of paths mentioned by the nominator here. Therefore I think renaming the infobox as suggested here makes sense and should be harmless. This is my official vote for accounting purposes; see more in my rather lengthy comment below. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 18:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tangential Comment - I have done a lot of work recently on "trail" articles for Pennsylvania (a topic for which I am knowledgeable), which informs my vote above. However I would like to point out that navigation boxes and categories for "trails" are in really bad shape throughout Wikipedia, due to the definitional issues merely introduced in this discussion about the infobox name. Navboxes for "hiking" trails are polluted with things that do not fall under the definition of hiking (see Template:Maryland hiking trails as just one example among hundreds), pure "hiking" trails appear in navboxes and categories for old railroad tracks that are now bike trails, sidewalks alongside freeways (e.g. US 202 Parkway Trail) have been categorized as hiking, and lots of other confusion in every conceivable direction. I have fixed this problem for Pennsylvania, but for anyone interested in this general topic area, cleaning this up for the rest of the world will give you Wikipedia work for months to come. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 18:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support move - no prejudice on the rename as we have infoboxes that are listed as Template:Infobox item to keep it simple. – The Grid (talk) 18:56, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • SUPPORT since I use it for bike paths. jengod (talk) 23:58, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, definitely makes a lot of sense! 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 22:06, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • May I please make a couple of supplementary suggestions. (1) For trails in the UK, can we have an alternative to "Trailheads"? A trailhead is an American concept that refers to a location specifically intended as the start or end point for a hike (or bike ride, or whatever), most often consisting of a dedicated parking area and typically with toilets (rest rooms), information boards, a distribution point for brochures and leaflets, and so on. Such trailheads are not at all common in the UK. In Infoboxes on UK trails, the "trailhead" is usually given as a town or village (rightly so). For exammple, for the Cross Borders Drove Road, one of the "trailheads" is listed as Hawick which is a town of 10,000 people which just happens to be the start or end of the route. So my suggestion is that the Infobox should have an alternative parameter: "Start and end points". (This probably applies to trails in most European countries, not just the UK.)
(2) My second suggestion is that, when giving "Elevation gain/loss" in the Infobox, editors should specify in which direction is the gain and which is the loss.
Mike Marchmont (talk) 15:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_June_20&oldid=1098183866"