Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 June 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< June 28 June 30 >

June 29

[edit]

Template:Infobox Australian baseball team

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox baseball team. Izno (talk) 21:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Australian baseball team with Template:Infobox baseball team.
Only 12 transclusions. Pretty straight forward merge. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:49, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Routesplit

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn Frietjes (talk) 14:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

Unused; appears to be an abandoned experiment. Useddenim (talk) 13:59, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn and relisted at Redirects for discussion. Useddenim (talk) 13:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Current-PhiladelphiaCOTM

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:51, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While well intentioned, this has not been used recently and the page linked from the template for page curation is red-linked, leading me to believe it might not have ever been used. TartarTorte 12:59, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox natural region of Germany

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 6. Izno (talk) 21:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Doctor Who episode/d

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Removed from the template in 2018. Gonnym (talk) 12:28, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:In the news/random

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. The author has not edited since March, so it is unlikely a timely response is forthcoming. He is free to undelete these himself per WP:SOFTDELETE.. ✗plicit 13:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and non linked from anywhere. Gonnym (talk) 12:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2022–2023 Rugby Europe Super Cup Eastern conference table

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and empty sports tables. 2022–23 Rugby Europe Super Cup uses different tables. Gonnym (talk) 12:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hockey at the 2022 Commonwealth Games – Women's tournament Pool A standings

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sport tables. Hockey at the 2022 Commonwealth Games – Women's tournament uses the tables directly. Gonnym (talk) 12:13, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Costa awards intro

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 07:03, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yearly award pages redirected after this discussion. Gonnym (talk) 06:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Disney+ films

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 07:04, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For the same reasons mentioned here. With so many Disney+ original films, it is better handled by this and this. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:44, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep - very useful for its intended purpose of navigation, I would encourage undeletion of the prior template as well. (Oinkers42) (talk) 13:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (or should I use "strong delete"?). Copying my comment from previous discussion. These "original x" templates are really bad in general as they end of being a huge cluster of unrelated links. It is safe to assume that a user who is reading an article on an item in the group will not go on reading more from the navbox as they are not related other than the fact that they were both released by the same entity which most readers just don't care and for them it's just trivial (as an example, there is no connection between Marvel's Behind the Mask and Crater (film)). So other than failing at WP:NAVBOX points 3 and 5, what these navboxs end up to be are just huge. I couldn't find a Template:Warner Bros. original films template (and I really hope there isn't), but I can just imagine the size of such a template Gonnym (talk) 13:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Films based on the Ramayana

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 6. Izno (talk) 07:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:South Ossetia-note

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:South Ossetia-note. Izno (talk) 07:06, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:South Ossetia-note with Template:South Ossetia note.
{{South Ossetia-note}} was created in 2013 and {{South Ossetia note}} in 2020. I just edited the latter and created its documentation before being aware of the former. They basically serve the same function. Theurgist (talk) 03:46, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong (conditional) merge First time back in a while, so pardon me if formatting is a bit off. Anyways, I see no reason not to merge these two as long as there's a balance between the languages of both templates in the final result. Back to you, Theurgist—I have given the consent, you do the magic. Cheers, u|RayDeeUx (contribs | talk page) 16:30, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox BBL team season

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep but feel free re-nominate it for merging as indicated in the discussion. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:55, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with {{Infobox basketball club season}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:25, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 00:44, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_June_29&oldid=1097071128"