Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 9

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11→Archive 15

Abby Jan Dharamsey Undeletion

Sir/Madam

Here is the proof that I created the original copy and sent it to the website mentioned for publication on their website.

Forwarded Message ----

From: Abdulla Dharamsey <edited> To: Jon Davey <jon.davey@businessleadgeneration.co.uk> Sent: Sun, 25 April, 2010 3:57:34 Subject: WESTMINSTER NORTH CONSTITUENCY - INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE PROFILE

Hey Jon

Set out below is my profile that you could consider for publication on your website. I have also attached my Election Communication (it has my photographs in Western and Middle Eastern style!) of which 60,000 copies will be delivered by Royal Mail from Tuesday.

My website will be published on Wednesday (www.dharamsey.co.uk and www.dharamsey.info).

I am rather surprised that no Independent Candidate has taken up your splendid offer.

Kind regards

Abby -Ajdharamsey (talk) 20:44, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. I'm afraid you have misunderstood what Wikipedia is about - it is an encyclopedia, not an election notice-board or a vehicle for promotion of any kind. We do not offer to publish candidates' election manifestos; in fact, because of our requirement for a neutral point of view, people are strongly discouraged from writing about themselves. The convention, explained at WP:POLITICIAN, is that candidates' articles are redirected to the appropriate constituency article, and I have re-created your article as a redirect to Westminster North (UK Parliament constituency). Please do not add to that. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:31, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

TechExcel

I would like to add the TechExcel article so that readers know about TechExcel - the application lifecycle management and IT service management software provider. The contents of the article will look like the contents of the article Tech_Excel. I plan to delete the Tech_Excel article as soon as the TechExcel article is live. -Fjabbour (talk) 02:29, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. The TechExcel article was deleted three times as a result of deletion discussions at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DevPlan, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TechExcel, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TechExcel Software, and the title has been protected from creation because it was re-created so often. I have returned your new version to your user space at User:Fjabbour/TechExcelDraft; if you want an article about this company, you should first approach user Ihcoyc (talk · contribs), the admin who closed the most recent AfD and protected the title; and if he does not agree you can take it to WP:Deletion review. Note that an article must not merely not read like advertising; it must also establish that the company is notable enough to have an encyclopedia article, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." I will add some helpful links on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 10:58, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

SETI (The Kovenant album)

The Kovenant may be a little known band, but as long as they are considered notable themselves, it seems logical that their releases (at least the full-length albums) are just as notable as the band. An article on SETI was deleted on May 2, 2010, after a proposal on grounds of non-notability. -Uzyel (talk) 10:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done. As a contested PROD, the article is restored on request. I have notifed user 92.11.105.66 (talk · contribs), who PRODded it on grounds of "notability", in case s/he wishes to nominate it at AfD. It does not follow that every album from a notable band is also notable - see WP:Notability (music) and in particular WP:NALBUMS. You may like to consider adding sources to help establish notability and to comply with the verifiability requirement. JohnCD (talk) 13:13, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Ghum Gham Tours & travel

please do not delete the page i will modify the content as per the rules -124.41.239.164 (talk) 10:15, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. Article deleted as spam, author Ghumgham (talk · contribs) blocked. JohnCD (talk) 13:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Gregg_Distributors

This article was deleted for failing to establish notability. I would like for it to be undeleted and possibly put back in sandbox mode so that I may append to it the grounds for notability and be reviewed again afterward. thanks! -Distributer1 (talk) 15:56, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the page has been restored to your userspace at User:Distributer1/Gregg Distributors. --Tikiwont (talk) 07:37, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Classixx - (2)

The website had been edited. The musical duo's career is valid with credible websites of record labels, valid label websites and an artist page. Interview websites are also added and websites where the discography is credible is shown. Please reconsider because the references are edited and every fact is accounted for. I believe the article is in threat of being deleted because every sentence was not referenced. -Cjpark30 (talk) 19:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

This page is only for requesting undeletion of deleted pages. You should make your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classixx; the debate has still several days to run. JohnCD (talk) 19:38, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
edited the page with appropiate internal and external links. non-personal websites are listed as references. -Cjpark30 (talk) 22:26, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
See above. Please weigh in at the debate listed above as the original refund request here has been granted and is closed.--Tikiwont (talk) 07:23, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

File:ScarboroughPylons.jpg

I transfered that file in the past onto Commons (at the begining 2006, when I was still a baby here), but with a reduced resolution (see commons:File:450px-ScarboroughPylons.jpg). It after has been deleted here under WP:CSD F8 (probably my fault). I completly forgot that till today. Now I would like to upload the full resolution original image to Commons. Could you restore it? I will do everything on the Commons side so that it replaces the lowest resolution version (if applicable, I don't remember), with the correct original upload log and description. For that I need that you accept to restore this image during the time necessary for me to cleanup all that or that you do it yourself, but I'm not asking for that. -GaAs (d) 16:37, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done--Tikiwont (talk) 12:10, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Michael James Arman Brough

this composer is continuing to produce valuable work which is finding an increasing audience in the UK, in Europe and in North America; and there seems no particular reason to remove the information in the article making it unavailable if it is of use to musicians who might want to search. -Hintersatz (talk) 09:06, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.--Tikiwont (talk) 12:15, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Simon Danczuk

Subject has since become notable through being elected as an MP. -Wereon (talk) 11:42, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done Election makes old Afd moot.--Tikiwont (talk) 12:25, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Sam Gyimah

I wanted to create a page for this person as he was elected MP yesterday for Surrey East but I saw it had already been deleted and I didn't want to be blocked for recreating a deleted page. This is sourced in http://www.thisissussex.co.uk/eastgrinstead/news/Conservative-victory-East-Surrey/article-2128952-detail/article.html and http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/results/constituency/b53.stm . May I recreate the page, or should a sysop do that? --Quentin Smith 12:04, 7 May 2010 (UTC) -Quentin Smith 12:04, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Just go ahead. The old page had virtually no content and heaven forbid that someone blocks without warning for a good faith (re)creation of a notable topic.--Tikiwont (talk) 12:38, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Arslan Mahmood

its about my own self -Samnok896 (talk) 19:20, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done The page Arskan Mahmood has never existed in the English Wikipedia, as far as I can see. However, if you meant Arslan Mahmood, you might want to read WP:COI to see why writing an article about yourself is a really, really bad idea.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:53, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Pants Yell!

Was deleted as not notable, but clearly meets WP:BAND -Christopherbdnk (talk) 03:35, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done Nope; that was closed after a full AfD discussion here at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pants Yell!. --Orange Mike | Talk 03:46, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Paramahansa_Srimat_Swami_Nigamananda_Saraswati_Dev

lack of knowledge how to cite references -Biswaranjan.das (talk) 15:03, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Please do not delete the page and restore it. This page was on Shri Shri Thakura Nigamananda, who is one of the revered, universal Gurus from India. If you have any doubts or concerns about the contents we wrote , then please let us know. Subrat Nayak 02:15, 6 May 2010 (UTC) Subrat Nayak

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paramahansa Srimat Swami Nigamananda Saraswati Dev. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.--Tikiwont (talk) 07:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Request submitted to Cirt http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cirt#Paramahansa_Srimat_Swami_Nigamananda_Saraswati_Dev http://www.odisha360.com/photos/1856/95th-paramahansa-srimat-swami-nigamananda-saraswati-dev-samilani-in-kuchvihar http://nigamanand.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=97&Itemid=57 www.jayaguru.org www.jayaguru.net

Do not undelete. Violations of conflict of interest, WP:VANISPAM, promotion, and WP:Role account ongoing here. -- Cirt (talk) 15:38, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Manoj Singh

reasoning -Rakeshvekariya (talk) 11:54, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Manoj Singh is not currently deleted, and you've removed the prod tag. However, take a minute to read over WP:BIO and see what you need to do to avoid a trip to WP:AFD. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:21, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

paul uppal

elected as MP for Wolverhampton South West constituency at the 2010 UK general election. -92.23.36.48 (talk) 13:17, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Uppal. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Veinor (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Paramahansa_Srimat_Swami_Nigamananda_Saraswati_Dev 2

No definitive response from Administrator, looks dead. -Biswaranjan.das (talk) 13:45, 8 May 2010 (UTC)


Can Someone please restore it, and advise what need to be done so it wont be deleted in future. --Biswaranjan.das (talk) 13:45, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Do not undelete. Looks like violations of both WP:VANISPAM and WP:Role account going on here. -- Cirt (talk) 15:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paramahansa Srimat Swami Nigamananda Saraswati Dev. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
And since the closing admin has weighed in here, it seems you have two viable options. You can make a new properly sourced draft at User:Biswaranjan.das/Paramahansa Srimat Swami Nigamananda Saraswati Dev, showing sources that meet the objections raised at the original AfD, or you can take it to deletion review. I'd strongly suggest the first course, because deletion review will ask you for that information anyways.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:33, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Also, please don't continue to submit requests here. You'll get the same answer every time, and you'll only annoy the volunteers here.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Simon Radford-Kirby

Elected as new MP for Brighton Kemptown (UK Parliament constituency). There may be some useful information on the page to include in Simon Kirby after which the Radford version of his name should be a redirect -Sussexonian (talk) 17:33, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done There wasn't much of any content there. Your best bet is to work from the only two sources listed, *East Sussex County Council and Ashdown Forest. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Erik Bremer

reasoning -71.63.213.92 (talk) 18:00, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

I have purchased buttons from Bremer Haderdashery. It is real.

Real ≠ notable. Take a minute to read WP:BIO and see what's needed in order to have an article. If you think you can write one that meets the criteria, feel free to sign up for a free account and create one. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:39, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Richard Drax

Another newly-elected MP whose page was deleted while just a candidate -Sussexonian (talk) 07:27, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please add the new info accordingly. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:29, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Paramahansa_Srimat_Swami_Nigamananda_Saraswati_Dev 3

When Volunteers with limited knowledge make decisions they are bound to waste time of every one. The admin here "Cirt" is kind of irresponsible. We are not begging here to undelete, we are demanding "just undelete it" and I want to see it done with this request.

When contacted to admin the reason given here was sharing of accounts. When asked again no response and on the 2nd request there are two more violations listed Can you please list all your violations at once, Or you think as you go? --Biswaranjan.das (talk) 14:24, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. This board is not a place to 'demand' anything' but merely a place for uncontroversial deletions and as a result of an AfD this by definition is not uncontroversial considering also Cirt's objection. The way forward is exactly the one outlined by Fabrictramp above. Start from a list of reliable sources that are not connected to your community, write a userspace draft based on them and bring it to deletion review because that is the place where we could correct it if necessary. --Tikiwont (talk) 14:32, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Example of reliable source? -Biswaranjan.das (talk) 14:39, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Can you give some example of reliable source? Ok can you reindex your web site so your broken link do not appear on google. I am fine not to be present on wikipedia? --Biswaranjan.das (talk) 14:39, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
WP:RS gives a general idea on reliable sources. The cache will clear by itself.--Tikiwont (talk) 14:53, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Conservative Humanist Association

Don't know why this was deleted. Another overzealous admin probably. qv special:whatlinkshere/Conservative Humanist Association. thx. -86.144.124.197 (talk) 15:03, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the page has been restored to your userspace at User:Toussaint/Conservative Humanist Association. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please consider contacting NawlinWiki (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 16:08, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Shallon Lester

At the time her article was deleted, she was not notable. Now, however, she has a new reality show that is set to debut in 3 weeks. Rather than starting a new article, it would be useful to edit the article as it was prior to deletion. -However whatever (talk) 15:46, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 16:05, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Mensur boydas

The title is Interweaver: MENSUR BOYDAS.

Do not delete if please...

Thanks, -Mensurboydas (talk) 19:34, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done The article was deleted because it was not an encyclopedia article at all, it was the report of an interview. Wikipedia is not a webspace provider for you to keep your interview notes in; it is an encyclopedia. Please read that link, and WP:What Wikipedia is not and WP:Your first article, to learn more about contributing here. JohnCD (talk) 19:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Michelle DeFraites

The page was deleted because Michelle had not done enough work. Michelle's career has progressed; she was one of the stars of the record-breaking Lifetime movie 'Pregnancy Pact' and is currently a MovieSurfer on the Disney Channel. -Sgdiii (talk) 19:22, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle DeFraites. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:27, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Thinkers 50

Was deleted speedily as WP:CSD#A7. Google news archive indicates sufficient independent references to demonstrate notability. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Kpbizbuzz/Thinkers 50. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please consider contacting Alexf (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Bge-win-cover.jpg

It was incorrectly deleted as unused fair-use media within a few minutes of becoming unused. Currently there's a discussion regarding the image, but until it's finished it should not be deleted. -MrStalker (talk) 23:27, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello? The link isn't red but that's because a tag is placed there, not because it has been undeleted. --MrStalker (talk) 20:57, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
The discussion is at Talk:Beyond Good & Evil (video game)#Image and the argument is not yet resolved. Normally an unused fair use image would get a few days grace. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
So delete first and talk later is the policy here..? --MrStalker (talk) 21:58, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I tried to handle this earlier but due to an edit conflict it didn't post (see below). Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 23:30, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 Not done - if consensus is gained to use the image in Beyond Good & Evil (video game), then the image may assuredly be restored. Since the image is not currently used however, restoring it at the present time would again subject it to the same deletion criteria. Best regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 23:30, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
I understand, but it doesn't seem right to me that an admin uses his tools to delete the image, ignoring the 7 day holding time, without checking for consensus. The cover was used for 3 years without any objections, then just *poof*. --MrStalker (talk) 23:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

eMudhra SecMsg

This product is owned by 3i Infotech Consumer Services Ltd.eMudhra SecMsg is our flagship product. We created the article with the sole purpose of providing information to people about the product. Any information provided in the article which doesn't conform to the terms or which promotes/ advertises the product will be removed. As we are not professionals in wikipedia editing, request to excuse this time and we'll take necessary steps in future to avoid such circumstances. -Divya1006 (talk) 09:18, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a notice-board for companies to provide information about their products, and editing by people with a conflict of interest is strongly discouraged. This title has been protected against re-creation, and you would need to approach user HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs), the administrator who protected it; but first you should read the guidelines linked from your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 17:59, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Sudev Limbu

My friend told me to make his wikipedia -TheWhit3Knight (talk) 16:20, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a social-networking site for people to make pages about themselves and their friends. Article subjects have to be notable. More advice on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 17:45, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Repossessed!

I am currently working for the production company producing Repossessed!. I don't mind if my page got deleted I would just like to know how to write it correctly so it does not get deleted next time. -DAskinasi (talk) 20:10, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - the page was deleted because it was considered "unambiguous advertising or promotion". My recommendation would be to be first start a draft of the article in your userspace. Please be very careful, however, about conflict of interest. Good luck, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Quassel IRC

Quassel IRC was meanwhile chosen the default IRC client in Kubuntu's current LTS release 'lucid'. The originally critized lack of coverage should be resolved by that. -87.234.110.87 (talk) 23:59, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. The article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quassel IRC. If there is new information, you should approach user JForget (talk · contribs), the administrator who closed the discussion; if he does not agree, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 14:01, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Taylor Duryea

I think that it should be undeleted because i didn't know that you had to put in a reference. I apologise for this inconvenience, though. Could I please have some advice how to not make it deleted? I would greatly appreciate if you could! Steven Gazeas (talk) 07:06, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. There are two issues here: every article needs references to confirm what it says - see verifiability - and that is the reason for the first notice on your talk page. But the reason the article was deleted is that it doesn't seem that he (yet) meets Wikipedia's notability standard for athletes - see WP:ATHLETE and for Australian Rules football WP:NSPORT#Australian Rules Football. The article says he is "a viable option to debut in the AFL late in the season" - once he has actually played in the AFL he can have an article. Being a "future star" is not enough - see WP:Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. JohnCD (talk) 15:28, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
See also WP:UPANDCOMING. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:46, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Kita Nicole Bradley

This is a notable person and all the information provide is 100% accurate

I am not sure why this article was deleted, but the article has great significance, because this individual wrote an article in the Howard University's student newspaper and the paper was voted #1 by Princeton Review in 2004 and became the first HBCU newspaper published daily. This information that alot of people can use. Please undelete this page. -Castorandpolluxtroi (talk) 10:12, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. It is not enough to be 100% accurate; as regards notability, all the article says is that she is the daughter of a former mayor of LA (but notability is not inherited) and that she has published an article in a student newspaper. Sorry, but this is nowhere near notability by Wikipedia's standards, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 14:14, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Trill-Star Da Playa

i really want it back because i want to be known for work -Playaboy92 (talk) 19:31, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. You mean Trill-Star Da Playa? We have no interest in improving the visibility of a self-described wannabe who "plans" to do this and "wants" to do this and generally fails to come anywhere near notability by Wikipedia's standards, which would have to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." --Orange Mike | Talk 19:45, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Herman Marks

Article was created from easily verifiable material. Granted it was not referenced, but it was written in 2004, when references were not yet universal on Wikipedia. I have no idea why it was deleted, or when. -69.136.221.252 (talk) 16:13, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

It was deleted on October 26, 2009 as an attack page -- basically, it called him a sociopathic loner. There isn't a neutral version to restore, nor is there a sourced version. Best bet is to write one with sourcing. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Fictional history of the DC Universe

It's a good reference for all who want to know or just get familiar with the DC Universe, even if the timeline presents variations or inconsistencies. Is more the help provided by the references on this article than the inconsistency problems, that can be fixed by those advanced readers who make contributions to wikipedia by editing and improveing the article. -201.148.29.100 (talk) 23:32, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done This was originally deleted as a result of the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional history of the DC Universe. The article was subsiquently userfied as a result of a request here in October, 2009. It's currently at User:AdamBMorgan/Fictional history of the DC Universe; however, that user has not worked on it for 6 months. If you'd like, it can go to the article incubator where it can be more widely worked on to address the issues brought up at the deletion discussion.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Conrad Lynn

The article is a bio of a prominent civil rights lawyer. It was nominated for speedy deletion by User:C1k3 one minute after i created it. I was in the process of adding a citation to The Harvard Crimson that establishes notability when he did that. Please see my post to his talk page and his second post to mine for more information. The page was "speedily deleted" by User:Texas Android around 04:00 today. Maybe she/he didn't look very closely at it. Please rreinstate the thing if possible -- Ong saluri (talk) 05:43, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Ong saluri/Conrad Lynn. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please consider contacting Texas Android (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:19, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Ashley Woolard

This article, from my understanding, was deleted because I did not include why it belongs in an encyclopedia. I feel it belongs there because the incumbent Congressman, G.K. Butterfield, has a page on Wikipedia. I feel it only fair that his opponent should also have a page. The fact that this was deleted in less than an hour, before I had a chance to make my case, make it seem to me that Wikipedia is simply biased against Republican candidates. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pantherfan719 (talk • contribs)

 Done - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Pantherfan719/Ashley Woolard. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please consider contacting NawlinWiki (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Umm ... a major party congressional candidate deleted under A7? That is insane. --B (talk) 22:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Yep, I'm glad to see it's back up. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 13:39, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
No, it's not insane, B. We have a very clear standard that just being a candidate (or even nominee) for office does not make one notable. The current practice is to redirect such attempted articles to the article for the constituency being contested, if any. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:16, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Ni Hao

This is not advertising as stated by the user who deleted the page. This is a fully sourced article and is the title of a series of language books. Ni Hao has been publish by ChinaSoft Australia since 1991 and is popular world wide. If you regard this as advertising then Ni Hao Kai Lan, iPod etc are also advertising. -Jem xf (talk) 06:31, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - the page was deleted as "unambiguous advertising or promotion" and so can't be restored. However, please contact the administrator who deleted the page, Vianello (talk · contribs), for clarification on the deletion and to request restoration. Otherwise, you can try to rewrite the article yourself, but be careful to avoid promotion of the subject. Best regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 13:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Atlantic Monthly Top 100

Just want it in my user space. That can be arranged, can't it? -Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 23:23, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - because of the possible copyright infringement issues, please contact the administrator who deleted the page to request userfication just to make sure. Thanks, and sorry, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 13:28, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Kickin' Kenny V

If you go to facebook, you can find old school flyers with his information on them, performing with bad boy bill, 2 young brothers, and many other groups, if you cannot find them, please let me know and I will be more then happy to send them too you, plus he has pod casts available plus his information on facebook is valid and has as many or more friends then most of the popular DJ's in the Chicagoland area, plus his friendships with White Knight, Fast Eddie and others if full documented. -70.131.55.57 (talk) 04:40, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kickin' Kenny V. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user JForget (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 13:37, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Beşiktaş JK new.gif

This picture was upload to update Beşiktaş JK article with picture of new logo showing the Black Eagle -ThirdWorldTony (talk) 23:43, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - the file is not currently used in the article space. Would it be possible to gain a quick consensus to use the image at Beşiktaş J.K.? Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:16, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

File:F-emasculata-xfiles-episode.jpg

Article back in place. Corrected for WP:NOTPLOT -Group27 (talk) 00:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

The article was originally deleted for WP:NOTPLOT. A bot subsequently came along and deleted the image because there was no article for it.--Group27 (talk) 00:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the file has been restored. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:11, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

James Theaker

I am working on reliable sources to back up my page as a source of information on myself for my fans. I believe the page was deleted as it was deemed to be an autobiography, but it is not. Please can you undelete. Thanks. -Jamestheaker (talk) 21:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

I am confused. Are you claiming that you are not James Theaker? --Orange Mike | Talk 00:03, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 Done - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Jamestheaker. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please consider contacting Anthony.bradbury (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Satu Musikk

This was a article about a Norwegian record label that is releasing major European Jazz musicians that record on some of the worlds biggest jazz labels like ECM records. I can not see why it should be deleted, this is worthy of wiki most definitely -Hrothrekr (talk) 06:42, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

In addition to previous comments about the validity of this page, it also did not conform to ‎ (A7: Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject) rules for deletion as it is not a band or musician but a publisher of music. This is an important example not only of how some of Europes best jazz musicians publish, but also of the changing face of improvised music publishing from minor labels to independent musician collectives. Please reinstate this page, it is valid. -Hrothrekr (talk) 07:06, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. Companies and record labels also have to meet Wikipedia's requirement of notability by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." This seems to be a new label which has only released one record; the only reference was to their own website. It is unlikely that a new label will (yet) qualify for an entry; but if, after reading the guidelines WP:Notability and WP:Notability (organizations and companies) you think you can show sufficent independent references, ask here or on my talk page and I will userfy the article to a user subpage for you to work on. JohnCD (talk) 12:20, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Isadora (software)

Requesting that the "Isadora (software)" page to be undeleted.

Here are some of the reasons Isadora is a notable software tool and why it should be restored to Wikipedia.

For all of these reasons, I would respectfully request that the Wikipedia page for Isadora (software) be restored. -Mconiglio (talk) 08:30, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested PROD, the article is restored on request; but I will notify user Miami33139 (talk · contribs) who proposed it for deletion, in case he wishes to consider nominating it at Articles for deletion. You may like to add some of these references to the article. JohnCD (talk) 12:03, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Gelo P.

This is my first time to make an article then you gonna delete it. Please Don't Delete this article. This Article Is Important. To Share My experiences, early life to the world! -Gpemps (talk) 11:20, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. Sorry, but Wikipedia is not a place to write about yourself. More advice on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 11:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

International Association for Information and Data Quality

I was in the middle of editing this page. Conscious of Wikipedia policy I was trying to edit the page to conform. I could not work out how to build a sandbox - the instructions are far too complex.

So I was doing lots of saves. I inserted a HANGON tag.

Yet in spite of the HANGON tage, someone deleted the text I was working on. Please restore it somewhere - if needed in a sandbox - so I can write it in a way that conforms with Wikipedia's policies and provide evidence that the professional association has sufficient notability to be listed

BlueMoses (talk) 22:03, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done. I have restored it to your userspace at User:BlueMoses/International Association for Information and Data Quality where you can develop it. Check out WP:Your first article, WP:Notability and WP:Notability (organizations and companies). You may find the WP:FAQ/Organizations helpful, too. JohnCD (talk) 22:21, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Stevan Plinck

His history and background are important for research regarding the ancient martial arts of silat and serak. He should be linked to Paul DeThouars page aswell since Plinck is one of only 3 people certified to teach these ancient arts. -98.22.139.89 (talk) 22:27, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:39, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Sameer Iqbal Patel

He has featured and written some prominent tv shows which are already on Wikipedia like mr aur mrs verma ki rasoi,ehsaas,yeh chanda kanoon hain -120.60.130.16 (talk) 22:30, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Sameer Iqbal Patel is not currently deleted, only proposed for deletion. Simply remove the prod tag from the article; however, it would be a good idea to address the concerns about sourcing when you do so. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:36, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Plainfield Seahorses

This article is about a swim team that demonstrates some of the early success of African Americans in swimming. I want to expand it to include Milt Campbell who was from the same town and was an outstanding swimmer.

Please advise how I can make this relevant for posterity under Wikipedia. thank you Dr. Steven A Sawyer -Steveshadow (talk) 01:23, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

The article in question was deleted under our criteria for speedy deletion (A7) because you did not state in the article why the subject is important or significant. If you believe that this was a mistake then the usual route is to first contact the administrator who deleted it. However, in this case the admin in question, user:Alexf is on wikibreak so you can go to the next step and request a deletion review. Another option is to recreate the article and make sure you state why the subject is important. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:48, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Kids On The Blockk

This article helps many people around the Chicago area because this group is becoming noticed by record labels and also because many people are asking about them. Therefore, i'd like to share all my resources with everyone. thank you. -Adantellem (talk) 04:16, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Adantellem/Kids On The Blockk. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please consider contacting Acroterion (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 10:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Luc Courchesne

Is a reknown artist in New Media winning relevant prizes such as the Ars Electronica. The German and French editions of Wikipedia feature articles about him, I can't see why he would be irrelevant in the English version. -Panoramedia (talk) 09:37, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Panoramedia/Luc Courchesne. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please consider contacting Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 10:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Endless Sacrifice (Band)

I spent an hour trying to make a page for my cousin's band, since they are getting popular and their first cd came out, and i decided to save my work so I wouldn't lose it. Then I go to upload a picture, and some person deleted my page, and they said it wasn't specific! Well, of course it wasn't specific, it wasn't even finished! This isn't fair. I wasted my whole morning for nothing. I checked, and h the person had wrongfully speed deleted it. The band already has an album, have been around for more than a year, and pass many things under(I think it is) A7. I wrote one sentence, made aaa sidebar, and saved it so i could add a pic. I didn't get a chance to write much. I didn't get any time either! -Shark king 727 (talk) 11:24, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry that your first experience here is getting your article deleted. The actual deletion was carried out by User:NawlinWiki because in the text of the article you didn't say why the band was "important or significant" and under our "criteria for speedy deletion", such articles can be deleted without discussion. If you disagree with this then the first step is to discuss the issue with NawlinWiki and after that if you still disagree you can have his decision reviewed. However, the article is still in the Google cache and from reading it I have to agree that he made the right call. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 11:40, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Also, check out WP:BAND for what a band need to have achieved before they can have a Wikipedia article; it looks to me as if this band have some way to go yet. Sorry. JohnCD (talk) 14:48, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
See also our warning essay on band articles which are doomed to deletion, and why; and our guidelines on "conflict of interest" (such as writing about your cousins). --Orange Mike | Talk 18:43, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

I talked Felisha, the band manager and she said she would take care of making one.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Shark king 727 (talk • contribs) — Shark king 727 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Jim_Tisdall

Please userify this page under creator, user Desalane, for improvements and possible future undeletion: it was deleted due to notability concerns -Desalane 17:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Certainly not; this article was deleted after a full-length discussion. This page is not for deletion reviews after such discussions. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:46, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
They're asking for userfication, though? –xenotalk 19:52, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

File:CAWLogo.jpg

building a company page that will be published when done -Rpaul9578 (talk) 19:46, 17 May 2010 (UTC)


Why the logo was deleted - I'm not sure exactly. I thought I connected it to the page I'm building? I don't understand what's happening here.

 Not done The image is not deleted. However, since it is used under a claim of fair-use, you cannot display it on your page until the page is moved into the mainspace. –xenotalk 19:51, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Camila_Alves

One new source. There are, in fact, 3 references. PLEASE, let me know if is everything right. 3 - "Matthew McConaughey, Camila Alves Welcome Daughter Vida". -Soulartdesign (talk) 20:26, 17 May 2010 (UTC)— Soulartdesign (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

This page is only for requesting restoration of pages that have been deleted. Camila Alves has not been deleted, and is not currently proposed for deletion. I suggest you discuss the article with Phil Bridger (talk · contribs) who has been helping to improve it; if you look at the article history, you can read the edit summaries which explain his changes. (And please, use edit summaries yourself.) If you like, you can also ask for comments by posting at WP:Requests for feedback. JohnCD (talk) 20:42, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Soulartdesign is the name of a Brazilian website company. This account has been blocked. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:17, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Folding Plug

I am not the originator of this page, but responded to the published reqest to expand on a stub. The stub related to a single design of a UK folding plug which its designer has called "Folding Plug", it misled by implying that this was something new and unique. There has been much hype about Min-Kyu Choi's "Folding Plug" which has won several major design awards despite the fact that it is designed in a way which makes it ilegal to offer it for sale. I believe that it is important to tell the truth about this, and also to place Min-Kyu Choi's work in the context of the two other designs which hold precedence, one of which has already been approved for sale. My work on the article was in support of this conviction and I fail to understand why censorship has been imposed! The links to the (only) three companies engaged in this market were provided as verification of the facts, and to provide access to the relevant illustrations and demonstrations which are essential to understanding the issue. (I am unaware of any illustrations in the public domain.) I have absolutely no commercial interest in this, but I do have a strong interest in upholding the regulations which ensure that plugs and sockets made to British Standard 1363 , the safest in the world, have been preventing the deaths of small children for over 60 years. -Deucharman (talk) 21:01, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

It looks like this information, written in a more neutral manner, belongs under BS 1363 rather than in an article of its own. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:22, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
That may well be the case but would be an editorial question. I'll let the deleting admin User:AGK know. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:37, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 Done After discussion with AGK I've restored it. I left an advert tag, because obviously it looks to some other editors as such but hopefully this can solved by editing or at worst reverting to the previous stub, and the merge idea needs further evaluation as well.--Tikiwont (talk) 23:10, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Deadly Steel Refund

This article was created with sole purpose of informing people about the bands creation and its recent history, just as all other band articles do. I do not understand how it constitutes advertising as I feel it is in the same format as other band's wiki entries. -Skater8705 (talk) 23:02, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

 Not done I'll agree that it's not fundamentally advertising, but it would have been eligible for an A7 speedy anyways. Take a few minutes to read WP:BAND. When this band meets the requirements, it will be time for an article, not before.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:30, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Plainfield Soccer Association

I'd like to have access to the article that I wrote about Plainfield Soccer Association. Not asking for it to be undeleted, just want to have access to what I wrote. -Rich1008 (talk) 23:08, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the page has been restored to your userspace at User:Rich1008/Plainfield Soccer Association.

Hellenostic asatru paganism

hellenostic asatru paganism may not be well known, but it is still a legit religion that i, and many others, are joined in. i believe it should be undeleted as to allow information on this subject to become available to the public -Hellenostic (talk) 01:21, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

I have removed the speedy deletion tag G3 CrimsonBlue (talk) 01:50, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 Done - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Hellenostic. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please consider contacting Zscout370 (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:08, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Ponnala Lakshmaiah

Please do not delete this article. we will provide sufficient information on this page -Naresh Babu. K —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thgrp (talk • contribs) 08:59, 18 May 2010

The page has not been deleted, and is not proposed for deletion. The "maintenance templates" at the top are only suggestions for improvement. JohnCD (talk) 10:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

FastReport

I wrote the article "FastReport" myself. And to my big surprise I found that it was deleted several times. When I wrote at first, someone deleted it and said it doesnt qualify to be in wiki. I redid the work and submitted again and someone else deleted and said it was an advert and gave me a list of articles from which I can get an idea on how to write a good article.I did that, and "Happily" again someone deleted and said it was an advert, but that was after I had written that am still editing the article, and it wasnt an advert like he said.I know a lot of adverts in wiki which I can point to, but they arent deleted.The article was deleted on an unknown reason to me. So that was lacking good judgement on the part of those who deleted. So I rewrote the article and want to submit it again, is it possible to have it done ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by HERBERT43 (talk • contribs) 1:17, 18 May 2010

The article was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FastReport and has been protected from creation because it was re-created again after that. Your best course would be to prepare a draft in your user space at User:HERBERT43/FastReport, make sure that it demonstrates notability by citing independent reliable sources, and then approach user Peter (talk · contribs), the administrator who protected it, for permission to post it. If he does not agree, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 11:45, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Note that if an existing article is clearly an advertisement, all you have to do is to tag it with {{db-spam}} and an admin will be along soon to examine it and (if you are correct) delete it, or nominate it for possible deletion discussion as FastReport was nominated. Such nominations, if done in good faith, are welcome. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:46, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Market_Theatre_(Ledbury)

I do not see why this entry was substantially different in the type of information it was conveying than other 'Market Theatre' entries, eg. that for Johannesburg. It is only fair that if one theatre is listed in Wikipaedia, then all others should also be listed. -Superstevegs (talk) 23:49, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:06, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Orchard Towers

Long-standing article summarily nuked under CSD A7 (No indication of importance) despite in-article references attesting to importance. When questioned by several users including myself, deleting admin simply repeated his claim that the article does not "assert" notability [1] and, when presented with evidence to the contrary, refused to reply. [2] -Jpatokal (talk) 22:28, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

In this particular case (having already been discussed with the deleting administrator), you might consider seeking a deletion review. Otherwise, consider asking the deleting administrator for userfication of the page, in order to try to improve the subject's assertion of notability. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
No, I'm not going to accept that as an answer. If an admin can delete a viable article at a whim with one click, then it should be possible to undo his whim with one click, and that's exactly what DRV says: For articles deleted via proposed deletion, post a request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Jpatokal (talk) 10:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Also, A7 was an invalid criterion in the first place: This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software, or other creative works, and we're talking about a honking big building on Singapore's main drag here. Jpatokal (talk) 10:25, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
This wasn't deleted under Prod it was deleted under Speedy deletion. The next step if you disagree with the deleting administrators decision and response is to take the article to deletion review. ~~ GB fan ~~ talk 11:12, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
No, I'm not going to accept that as an answer. If an admin can delete a viable article at a whim with one click, then it should be possible to undo his whim with one click. I mean, seriously, WTF? Jpatokal (talk) 12:13, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Then you're not going to get your article back. This is the only answer you're going to get here. You've been repeatedly told what the proper venue is. Harassing the volunteers monitoring this, the clearly improper venue, isn't going to accomplish anything. —Korath (Talk) 12:56, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 Done Article restored in a rare victory of common sense! And climb down off your high horse, I've been "volunteering" on Wikipedia for as long as you.
<rant> What happened here is that an article was deleted under a patently invalid reason. If any of you three admin "volunteers" had wanted to correct this obvious mistake, you could have simply clicked "undelete"... but no! "Go to counter 6, fill out form 17 in triplicate and you'll get a response in 8 business days!" I've been here for 8 years and counting and I find WP's bureaucracy impenetrable, are you seriously expecting newbies like the guy who told me about the deletion of the article to navigate this thicket without the help of volunteers like yourself? </rant> Jpatokal (talk) 23:57, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_9&oldid=1138664785"