Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 78

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 75Archive 76Archive 77Archive 78Archive 79Archive 80→Archive 85

GlobaLex

The article was deleted through Speedy Deletion because it was deemed to be promoting a company. GlobaLex is a resource used by legal researchers who research foreign, comparative, or international law. GlobaLex is a free database available to anyone. I created the GlobaLex article to assist law librarians, such as myself, in finding international law resources that are available. If this article cannot be undeleted, can you please userfy it so that I can make the necessary additions to it so that the GlobaLex article is more useful and does not violate policy. -Birdhousebirdy (talk) 04:28, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

 Not done. It's not surprising that the article seemed promotional because it was a straight copy of this, so for copyright reasons it cannot be restored, even into a sandbox. You need to write in your own words. I will give some advice on your talk page in a day or two, but meanwhile read WP:YFA and WP:BFAQ and note particularly that you need to establish WP:Notability by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 19:30, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Jonas Hartmann

Article was accurate and can be confirmed by others which I will have them do -216.113.168.136 (talk) 19:41, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

  • You will need to add some references to keep this around. I restored this before, but due to lack of supporting references it got deleted again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:00, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
  • (edit conflict) Done. This article was restored a year ago at your request (or that of someone on the same IP) but was deleted again after ten days because no references were supplied. I have reset the clock, but referencing of articles about living persons is essential, and the article will be deleted again if in ten days there has not been supplied at least one reference to a reliable source to confirm what it says. JohnCD (talk) 21:06, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Tomorrow's Company

I am quite new to wikipedia and that was the first page I have edited and I wasn't sure about the guidelines and I think I have now figured it out -Soniasingh27 (talk) 14:04, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Article was deleted because it seemed to exaggerate the importance of the article and also self-promote. I have drafted a new article which is neutral and factual with links to articles and other websites substantiating the facts.

 Not done. Because the article was re-created after deletion, the title Tomorrow's Company was salted - protected so that an administrator's permission is required to create it. You cannot get around that by calling it Tomorrow's company with a lower-case "c". You will need to convince user DGG (talk), the administrator who salted the title, by showing him an acceptable draft. I have "userfied" your new version - moved it into a user sub-page at User:Soniasingh27/Tomorrow's Company where you can work on it. One problem is that, as it told you on your talk page, our automatic copyright-problem-detection system found rather a lot of phrases in common with the company's website. You need to rewrite more in your own words, and find references that are about the company from outside, which would count for much more than statements by the company or interviews with its people. For advice see WP:Your first article, WP:42, WP:FAQ/Organizations.
If you are the same person as user Clare500 (talk · contribs) who wrote the first versions three days ago, please choose one account and use only that one, to avoid suspicion of "sockpuppetry". If you are not, read her talk page - there is good advice from DGG at the bottom of it. JohnCD (talk) 20:11, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
It was created again in similar form, and I deleted it again. I decided not to create-protect, because I think a proper article could possibly be written about the organization, and I will advise the contributor how to go about it. I notice the user or someone closely connected is apparently also editing the article as Risonanze (talk · contribs). At this point, I think an explanation might work instead of blocking, but I will block if necessary. DGG ( talk ) 18:13, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Ric Dragon

This pages deletion is in error as the subject fits the criteria for notability: "credible and authoritative books." The subject was the author of two books on digital marketing published by McGraw Hill, a leading publisher of business books. -Rdquay (talk) 16:23, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

 Not done. I was puzzled where you got that phrase, but I see it is at WP:NRVE. I'm afraid you have misunderstood that; what it is saying is that coverage of a subject in credible and authoritative books counts towards notability, not having written them. The notability standard for authors is at WP:AUTHOR. Just having written a couple of books is not enough, but it is arguable that when they are published by a mainstream publisher like McGraw Hill that could be enough to avoid speedy deletion. So, if you like, I will undelete the article and send it to WP:Articles for deletion for the community's view, or alternatively I could userfy it for you - move it into a user sub-page where you can work on it. The only references at present are his own and his book's websites: to establish notability will require references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Let me know what you would like me to do. JohnCD (talk) 21:44, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

A sub-page sounds like the proper course - I know there are many articles reviewing and citing the subject's work. I'm struggling to understand the line where an author like, say Brian Solis or Dave Kerpen makes the cut, but Ric Dragon does not. Rdquay (talk) 15:28, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

 Done to User:Rdquay/Ric Dragon. Two comments in regard to the other authors:

Association of Medical and Dental Students of India(AMDSI)

reasoning -Kshitij Bhardwaj 06:46, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

it is about a student society and it will be of great use to the medical and dental students. And if this article is violation wikipedia's rules why is this article not deleted yet.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kb893 (talk • contribs)

 Not done. The article has been deleted, three times, and the reasons explained on your talk page: it does not give any indication that the organization is notable enough for an article, which would require showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 17:08, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Star Ocean First Departure.jpg

I wonder if this page has other similar images. If so, can other revisions be undeleted? -George Ho (talk) 07:53, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

There are no earlier versions (at this title) than the one you uploaded today. JohnCD (talk) 17:10, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Tyondai Braxton performing at the Brooklyn Academy of Music.png

Because the OTRS ticket has been approved as to be licensed under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 license by the Copyright Holder. Please see OTRS Ticket 2012101510005827 for more information. As well the Image was originally deleted by Administrator Explicit on 20 September 2012, under the deletion rationale of F7 stating that it meets the criteria. -Clarkcj12 (talk) 14:31, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

 Done - please annotate the file description accordingly, as this is no longer a case of fair-use. JohnCD (talk) 17:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_of_Amanda_Todd

reasoning -220.245.39.242 (talk) 03:25, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Please do not delete this page - the world needs to know about this sort of stuff and as the parent of a very beautiful girl I get increasingly worried for her as she gets older and nears her teens.

Not done. The page has not been deleted yet; it is still being discussed at articles for deletion Lectonar (talk) 10:44, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

the artery vfx

the article "the artery vfx" that i wrote is here to promote a visual effects company that i work for. people mentioned in it gave me their consent to do so. please don't delete it -Altverse (talk) 15:46, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done So, you admit it is promotional in intention, and that you have a massive conflict of interest. Why on earth would we restore it???? --Orange Mike | Talk 19:46, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

JizzaBella

I feel this page was removed due to reasoning that is unfair. JizzaBella is a drag queen from Rochester, NY, and has been all over the web, including FOX GoodDay LA, Featured on the RuPaul Drag Race Blog, she owns her own radio show with over 12,000 listeners, she is the manager of the #1 Madonna Impersonator in the world, who was on RuPaul Drag Race Season 3, she has also worked with the winner of Season 1, Bebe Zahara Benet, and so on. Her managing skills and performing has caught attention from countries all over, and has expanded her travels. She is worthy of an article, since not all Drag Queens are able to establish all of this. More interviews are in the works of being published with a journalist from huffingpost etc. I think this page should be restored. -67.247.91.166 (talk) 19:12, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. By the way, doing a podcast with a few hundred fans does not equal "owns her own radio show", even if that was a qualification for notability (do you have any idea how many non-notable local radio DJs there are, working hard every shift?). --Orange Mike | Talk 19:44, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Bubble Tree

Hello, this is Shane Kim, who is a staff of Bubble Tree. I will gladly correct any wrong thing you point out on my article so I plead you with giving me a chance. Please, Please let me know what to fix, this "Bubble Tree" article is crucial for my company. Thank you so much for your help!! -Shanekim2 (talk) 09:46, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

The Lost Souls of Bell Valley (book)

My page was delete by user Fastily in December 2001. This user is no longer affialiated with W perhaps because of additional deletion issues.

The page WAS NOT a self-promotional effort on my part and I have multiple 3rd party references included.

Please consider a restoration of this page. If you look at my history, I have created several viable pages over the years and have felt I am a positive contributor to W.

Sincerely, add925 -Add925 (talk) 20:44, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done By your own admission, you are the author of this self-published book (and of this shamelessly promotional "article", which lacked reliable sources and substantial coverage). Wikipedia is not a venue for self-promotion. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:30, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Take a look at your own talk page, Orange Mike, for real evidence of reliable sources, shameless self-promotion and lack of substantial coverage. Looks like ex-wikipedian Fastily has been replaced by another common deletionist.

add925— Preceding unsigned comment added by Add925 (talk • contribs)

You seem not to understand the distinction between a userpage, where an editor tells you something about her or his skills, beliefs and attitudes, in order to understand his/her edits better; and the content of Wikipedia articles, which must hold to our standards of reliability, verifiability, and neutral point of view, without conflict of interest. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

List of Verizon FiOS channels

reasoning -108.52.84.139 (talk) 00:06, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

This page was very useful. Verizion FIOS has hundred of channels, many of which have three or four different incarnations (two standard def and a high def), as well as separate east and west coasts feeds. Neither the cable box interface nor anything on the FIOS website provides the easily searchable index that this page provided.

Not done and will not be done Wikipedia is not a directory service. A number of these articles are being removed, as grossly inappropriate to an encyclopedia. I should note that it has been clearly established that "It's useful" is not considered a valid argument for retention of a non-encyclopedic listing such as this.. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:34, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
For more information, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of DirecTV channels (2nd nomination). (Thanks to User:PrimeHunter for that link.) --Orange Mike | Talk 15:59, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Coupon Refund

Coupon site info -Asavvyshopper (talk) 09:39, 19 October 2012 (UTC)


I've a very well knowledge about Coupons and discount because I've been using coupons for 6 years and have been writing articles on different places. Visiters like my content and infrom me through emails and comments. This time I decided to contribute on Wiki but you have deleted my page. But there are pages similar to me are live on Wiki. Please check these and then compare these pages with mine.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coupon_Smarter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coupons.com http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savings.com

Please undeleted my article. It was my dream to contribute in wiki. Please edit my page but don't delete it. I worked 24 hours then I publish it on Wiki. Please help me.

Thanks

Advocate T Siddique Kozhikode

Deleted by mistake choosing remove from wishlist -Iamurs0072005 (talk) 10:35, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

This hasn't been deleted but is is at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Advocate T Siddique Kozhikode. Please follow the instructions there. --Tikiwont (talk) 08:35, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Kidd Flash

Requesting it be undeleted i have the references ready i have sources the sources ready -Mediacornerstone21 (talk) 06:49, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

[1]

[2]

[3]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. You may want to add the second source at Ginuwine, mentioning his son's stage name and review the situation in due time. Bets, --Tikiwont (talk) 08:57, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Misa Campo

I re-wrote the article and removed copyrighted material: User:Huperphuff/projects/Misa_Campo -Huper Phuff (talk2me) 18:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

History of Explosives

There's a dead link to this article from the main Explosives article, which in turn has only a stub 'history' section pointing to "Main article: History of explosives."

I've no way to tell if there actually was a useful article here or not, because I can't see when or why the page was deleted. But there should either be *something* here, or else the 'history' section should be removed from 'explosives.' -Collabi (talk) 23:39, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

There never was an article. I's just a dead link added here.[1]. --Tikiwont (talk) 08:50, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
All right; I'll simply remove the dead link and we can call it done. -- Collabi (talk) 01:24, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Which makes this a Not done. Lectonar (talk) 10:37, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Lifetime logo.svg

This old logo is not eligible for copyrights, as typeface is below threshold of originality. -George Ho (talk) 09:52, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Are you requesting restoral of the older versions? we have a 22 × 10 pixel version and a 175 × 78 version, both small. There is nothing really worthwhile here in the deleted copies as it is a .svg, easily scalable to other sizes anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:50, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Tim Lawson (writer)

this author's book is a essential research tool to the voice over community. It is still in print and had been cited in numerous articles. -Ebola300 (talk) 17:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

User talk 71.201.145.206

User talk 71.201.145.206 was rewritten and saved with the proper references added as well. I would like to have this reviewed and restored. I tried to contact webmaster Jim,however I had no luck.

Thank you, Nixmom 71.201.145.206 (talk) 02:41, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Articles for creation is elsewhere, so I've moved it to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clyde David Jones. Please have some patience with the review.--Tikiwont (talk) 19:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Morgan Air Conditioning

reasoning -Scabrera1 (talk) 18:43, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:28, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Chelsea Korka (Musician)

she is a real singer and has realeased actual musc i hat you can actually buy and download. She has also appeared inmusic videos and The Pussycat Dolls Present: The Search for The Next Doll — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.167.61.73 (talk) 12:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

But does any of that meet the requirements under WP:MUSIC? (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
With no response, and nothing convincing, Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 13:09, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability

reasoning -Scholarscentral (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

This article/journal is supporting Open Acccess, proper reason is required why it was nominated for deletion?

List of channels on Sky

I would like to userfy List of channels on Sky along with the sub-pages (List of channels on Sky: Adult, List of channels on Sky: Box Office, List of channels on Sky: Documentary, List of channels on Sky: Entertainment, List of channels on Sky: Gaming, Dating and Specialist, List of channels on Sky: International, List of channels on Sky: Kids, List of channels on Sky: Lifestyle and Culture, List of channels on Sky: Movies, List of channels on Sky: Music, List of channels on Sky: News, List of channels on Sky: Other, List of channels on Sky: Radio, List of channels on Sky: Religious, List of channels on Sky: Shopping and List of channels on Sky: Sports) in order to copy them to another wiki, create redirects and fact checking of articles which aren't under the scope a batch of the AfDs. The articles were deleted under WP:NOTDIR. -Jasmeet_181 (talk) 13:58, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Think about List of AT&T U-verse channels; it got userfied and then became a redirect to AT&T U-verse. Maybe this post will make vandals aware about it, but who knows what is next? --George Ho (talk) 16:29, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of channels on Sky, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Wifione (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:39, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
... or, there's a list of Admins willing to provide userfied copies of Deleted Articles ... and I'm usually one of them, but not in the situation noted above (✉→BWilkins←✎) 17:49, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Shofiul Alam

reasoning -Safi.exe (talk) 23:29, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing to our attention a page that really needed to be deleted ASAP. Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 23:39, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Callum Lucas

reasoning -AquaBlueAdam (talk) 22:03, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Appears to be either a hoax or press-agent puffery of the most shameless sort. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:06, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Filip Filipi

notable musician and creator of Political and Charity Organisation 28. Jun which raised over $1.5 million of medical supplies to the needy in Kosovo -121.45.126.39 (talk) 00:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

 Not done. This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sin Sizzerb so, as stated at the top of this page, it will not be undeleted here. It is already being discussed at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 October 29#Filip Filipi, and that is the right forum. JohnCD (talk) 17:31, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Comparison of United States presidential candidates, 2012

Based on this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion I understand I can request to get a Userification copy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Userfication because I did not get a chance to save a copy before deletion. This was a lot of work. Thanks. -Wikilogin123 (talk) 06:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

 Not done. In view of the history, and the fact that user Beeblebrox (talk), the closing admin, has salted the title, I would be happier if you asked him about userfying it. Alternatively, if you enable email on your account (at the bottom of the "user profile" tab under "My preferences"), I will email you the text of the article. JohnCD (talk) 17:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 Done. Wikitext (copied from the edit window) emailed. Needless to say, you should not repost this without permission from Beeblebrox or, failing that, WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 18:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
  • OK. I have tagged it "userspace draft" (which makes clear it's not an article, and stops search engines indexing it) and commented out the categories (necessary as it is in user space). If by DRV or some other process it is eventually permitted to repost this (which I think highly unlikely) you should not simply copy/paste or move this version, which would lose the history attached to the deleted draft. As long as no-one edits that, a history-merge of the two would be possible. JohnCD (talk) 20:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MusicBlvd

This page was being review by another editor and I did not modify any speedy deletion tags. The other editor took them off and now I'm getting blamed for them. This domain is the oldest lyrics site on the web. How is it soapboxing? -204.195.88.71 (talk) 16:35, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

 Comment:: this page has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MusicBlvd, and that is where you should comment. Read WP:AFD#Contributing to AfD discussions first. JohnCD (talk) 16:50, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Cherries and Clover

Page was removed with a speedy PROD deletion on the claim that it is a "Non-notable film with little to no coverage" however the reason the film doesn't have MUCH coverage yet is because it hasn't yet been released, it is due for release later this year. Therefore the notability of the film is yet to be determined but it should be noted that articles have been written and at least 3 media outlets have conducted interviews with the film members due to its notable accomplishment of having been shot by an all teenage cast and crew and yet maintain an unusually high production value for an independent feature. Clips from some of these interviews can be seen in the Making Of Featurette available on the official website, www.cherriesandclover.com -75.84.218.248 (talk) 03:18, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Brandon Davis

I am trying to create an athlete's page, but it looks like a music page was created before with the same name in 2008 and then deleted -XK8ER (talk) 05:34, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

the AFC is ready and its located here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Brandon_Davis XK8ER (talk) 06:15, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

List of locations used in Transformers: Prime

Please place in my userspace so I can work on it. Thanks! -Mathewignash (talk) 12:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Sigma Alpha Kappa

The article refers to our fraternity. Our fraternity was the first and oldest fraternity at Loyola University New Orleans. It was one of the first fraternities on a Jesuit campus. Loyola's website has articles referencing it, and the Fraternity has a website. It is also related to smaller fraternities nationwide. If there were any content issues, I should be happy to help in resolving them. Thank you. -AndrewTPoland (talk) 20:56, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Djorn Buchholz

Article is now cited -Djorn21 (talk) 21:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Cauldron Development

Found additional independent 3rd party sources. -Jcoffland (talk) 20:45, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Presumably you're referring to Cauldron Development LLC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), which has been userfied. I believe that this is pending a credible claim per WP:NCORP. Have you considered submitting the article via Articles for creation? -- Trevj (talk) 10:22, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Sibchen K Mathew

I created this page and there has been discussion on the page [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sibchen K Mathew],there has been a consensus that the page has been good,but it was deleted wrongfully.please see it to it.can i recreate it with better edits ,so can you restore to my homepage.but just see if it can be restored because i added a lot of references after the afd and made it better,my efforts were not seen post afd.(Harishrawat11 (talk) 08:58, 2 November 2012 (UTC))

  • Malformed Request - please use {{subst:refund|pageName|reasoning}} (replacing pagename with the name of the page you wish to have restored and reasoning with the reason for your request). (non-admin closure) -- Trevj (talk) 10:00, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at [Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sibchen K Mathew]], it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Firsfron (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (non-admin closure) -- Trevj (talk) 10:00, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Owl's Head Park

THERE IS A PARK IN BAY RIDGE NAMES Owl's Head Park. The history is correct. -142.255.95.67 (talk) 22:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

 Question: But is it notable? Existence is not being questions, notability is. I recognize that this is an expired PROD, but undeleting it will lead to immediate re-deletion (✉→BWilkins←✎) 08:52, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
http://www.nycgovparks.org/parks/OwlsHeadPark/history covers the park in general, news items such as http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=7w00AAAAIBAJ&sjid=qCMIAAAAIBAJ&pg=1586,2878705&dq=owls-head-park&hl=en abound.
If the park is not notable in its own right the content could usefully be used to seed a Parks of Brooklyn article. Rich Farmbrough, 14:54, 3 November 2012 (UTC).

David William Pyke

reasoning -1.44.29.99 (talk) 06:23, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this page is a copyright violation of http://www.davidwpyke.com/index.php/david-w-pyke-biography. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:06, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

BEEBUG

Recreated article is currently at AfD. The version speedily deleted on 14 February 2011 may contain some useful text which could be incorporated into the current article, providing guidance for seeking sources contrtibuting to demonstrating notability of the subject. My request is for this to be restored to user space, in order to avoid conflict with the recreated article. Apologies if deletion review is the more appropriate forum, but WP:DEL#Undeletion "It should be used to appeal most instances of ... speedy deletion" seems to be ambiguous regarding CSDs when read in conjunction with this page and DELREV. I'd contact the deleting admin, but s/he {{can't retire}} and hasn't edited since Dec 2011. Thanks. --- Trevj (talk) 13:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

 Done - I have done a history-merge, so that the previously-deleted version can now be seen in the history here; but I am afraid it will not be much help. JohnCD (talk) 14:25, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Thank you Any restored content is potentially of value. I'll incorporate the old text and search for citations when I get a chance. -- Trevj (talk) 15:06, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Selena Rose

Selena Rose is a popular pornographic actress and I created a Wikipedia article for her with reliable sources. I spent at least two hours working on that page but it was deleted within a few minutes after I saved it. There are pornographic actresses who are a lot less popular than Selena Rose and they have a Wikipedia page, so why was Selena Rose's page deleted? I'll be glad to continue researching her and expand her page and include citations if her article is restored. -Rebecca1990 (talk) 03:54, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

 Comment:: re-created article now at AfD for the second time here, see also WP:WAX. JohnCD (talk) 12:10, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Liliana Gil

reasoning -Acento123 (talk) 00:06, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia lists Liliana Gil as a World Economic Forum Young Global Leader, yet the page was deleted for her not being notable. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Young_Global_Leaders

She is also a regular news contributor on MSNBC and CNN en Español weekly on issues of minorities and women. http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49109422 http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49573549/ Can the page be undeleted and supported with all these new sources?

 Not done. From a look at that list , it is clear that being a "World Economic Forum Young Global Leader" is not enough for notability, and your two links just show that she contributes. What is really needed is independent comment about her, see WP:42. In any case, this was deleted after a deletion debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liliana Gil so, as stated at the top of this page, it will not be undeleted here. If you can find good references you should approach user Jclemens (talk), the administrator who closed the discussion; then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 17:07, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Nisarg Gandhi

I would like to review the deleted article, please email me the last diff, no mainspace restoration required. Thank you. -Phearson (talk) 17:24, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

 Done - copied to your talk page, too short to need email. JohnCD (talk) 12:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Quezon Service Cross Medal Copy new.jpg

reasoning -Bonvallite (talk) 01:40, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

It was deleted due to unclear description and so the copyright status. it must be mark as

and its derived from the Presidential Communications Operations Office.

Bonvallite (talk) 01:40, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Not done Unfortunately we still do not know when the photo was produced. The date is important to prove lack of copyright. And also this image is on commons too at commons:File:Quezon Service Cross Medal.jpg, so please fix that up in preference to a copy on en.Wikipedia. We do not need to restore it here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:51, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Learnstreet

Learnstreet is a new startup, it has some coverage in several notable media sources and has also won awards. This is verifiable by 3rd party resources. -Belmond (talk) 07:35, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

J. Sargeant Reynolds Community College Police Department

The J. Sargeant Reynolds Community College Police Department is a police department organized under Virginia Law. -164.106.146.178 (talk) 03:03, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Kudpung (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. What the article needs if it is to be kept is references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 15:43, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Pexco, LLC

I am a newbie to Wikipedia and am writing to see if the possibility exists to either un-delete and userfy an article or incubate it as a user-space draft. The article was Pexco, LLC.

Since starting the article, I've engaged with contributors to learn more about what makes an article Wiki-worthy. The admin who deleted it disagreed with certain aspects of the article, and I now see he has some valid reasons for it. For instance, I see that sources was a concern and have since identified alternative reputable sources to most of the citations that seemed to be the ones in question.

Having a much better sense now of what makes a solid article, I am asking for the chance to make the necessary changes and properly address the concerns that were raised. Please let me know what might be possible. Wikipedia is certainly an interesting world, and I look forward to learning even more.

Thanks for the consideration. S harp44 (talk) -204.60.123.11 (talk) 18:46, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pexco, LLC, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Orange Mike | Talk 19:53, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


Ok. Seems I've misunderstood this deletion process. Thanks for the clarification. And the suggestions for possible next steps. S harp44 (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.60.123.11 (talk) 22:06, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Tiffany Alvord

She is a huge Youtube musician with over 1 million subscribers and her videos were viewed more than 240 million times. She also released two original albums and she made countless cover. Youtubers with much less subscribers have their own article on wikipedia. Article was previously deleted because she wasn't "notable" enough. -Josethim (talk) 07:38, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Time in Malta

This page was deleted a couple weeks ago with a G5 rationale, created by a banned or blocked user. However, if memory serves, I created this page. If this is not literally the case, I'm quite sure I was the first user to add any significant content to it. Can someone please take a peek and verify whether this is so? -Chubbles (talk) 02:02, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

No, be of good cheer, the article you created is still there, but it's now at Time in Malta (band). The banned User:TimeCurrency a.k.a. User:Tobias Conradi moved it to that title in March 2010 and then created the article which has been deleted (with a hatnote pointing to yours, to give him credit). I guess yours could be moved back, if you like? JohnCD (talk) 20:18, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
I thought about that while doing the washing-up, decided to move it anyway because of incoming links, and came back to find Orangemike had already done it. JohnCD (talk) 22:19, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Great, thanks! Chubbles (talk) 05:13, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Vaibhav Maloo

He is a prominent figure and son of one of India's leading businessman. He gave many TV interviews and is being promoted by key businessment in India for PM's committee on trade and commerce. I as a journalist feel that with his values, he must be promoted and hence I created this page. He is well educated and is likely to be a big figure in the near future. There are many articles about sons of businessmen on wikipedia and people who are less relevent in the media. Keep in mind the family shies away from media and hence he doesnt come out in the press. -Timesofindia1967 (talk) 16:31, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaibhav Maloo, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 16:49, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
A few more points, to help you understand Wikipedia:
  • "he must be promoted" - Wikipedia is explicitly not for promoting anyone or anything;
  • "he is... likely to be a big figure in the near future" - see WP:UPANDCOMING;
  • "There are many articles about sons of businessmen on wikipedia" - see WP:Other stuff exists.
JohnCD (talk) 20:29, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

hack/reduce

This page was flagged for speedy deletion because it was not considered notable enough despite third party references from the Boston Globe,SF Gate, XConomy and the Boston Business Journal. Hack/Reduce is a notable non-profit Big Data workspace founded by Christopher P. Lynch of Atlas Ventures and Frederic Lalonde of Hopper, with funding from the Massachusetts' State Government. It is the first such space of its kind on the East Coast and gives hackers a place to work with Big Date resources. Here are the several article which note the importance of Hack/Reduce in the Massachusetts innovation sector.

Boston.com[4] Bostinno.com [5] XConomy[6] BizJournals[7] HeraldOnline[8] SFGate[9] MassHighTech[10]

http://www.hackreduce.org Leeathopper (talk) 19:48, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:59, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

A Great Big Pile of Leaves

reasoning -72.63.106.139 (talk) 21:16, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Duffbeerforme (talk) who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. The notability standard for bands is explained at WP:BAND; Twitter, Youtube and the like do not count towards demonstrating it. JohnCD (talk) 22:11, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Sociology in medieval Islam

I run into some red links, which waere deleted redirects, but I cannot find any traces of the target page. Before fixing the red link myself (finding a good target or even writing a stub), I'd like to figure out what was the original intention. I am asking for your help, since the deleting admin is inactive account.

  • Sociology in medieval Islam · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
    • 01:25, 1 December 2011 Fastily (talk | contribs) deleted page Sociology in medieval Islam (G8: Redirect to a deleted or non-existent page)
    • 01:17, 7 December 2010 Someone65 (talk | contribs) moved page Sociology in medieval Islam to Sociology in the Caliphates (more appropriate name) (revert)
  • Sociology in medieval Islam · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
    • 01:25, 1 December 2011 Fastily (talk | contribs) deleted page Sociology in the Caliphates (G8: Redirect to a deleted or non-existent page)
    • 23:46, 10 January 2011 Someone65 (talk | contribs) moved page Sociology in the Caliphates to Medieval Islamic sociology(revert)
  • Medieval Islamic sociology · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
    • 01:24, 1 December 2011 Fastily (talk | contribs) deleted page Medieval Islamic sociology (G8: Redirect to a deleted or non-existent page)
    • 13:56, 6 May 2011 Xiquet (talk | contribs) moved page Medieval Islamic sociology to Saracenic sociology (more appropriate name) (revert)
  • Saracenic sociology · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
    • 01:25, 1 December 2011 Fastily (talk | contribs) deleted page Saracenic sociology (G8: Redirect to a deleted or non-existent page)
    • 14:38, 6 May 2011 William M. Connolley (talk | contribs) moved page Saracenic sociology to Medieval Islamic sociology over redirect

I suspect that Fastily screwed up with edit comments. Alternatively, somewhere along the road a good page was replaced with a bad redirect and subsequently deleted. In any case, it appears that the truth may be learned only from deleted article histories. I'd like to have these articles restored in my user space, for investigation. Thanks, Staszek Lem (talk) 21:23, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

 Done. What a mess. Fastily's edit summaries were OK, it is your second guess that is right: after a lot of argument and a tangle of moves, someone redirected the article in June 2011 to a page which then or later was deleted, resulting in a chain of redirects ending in a red-link. Six months later, Fastily cleaned up that chain of redirects-to-non-existent page.
The actual content ended up in the history of Medieval Islamic sociology and I have userfied that for you to User:Staszek Lem/Medieval Islamic sociology and restored the last version that had content. The history, and the talk page, show a lot of argument about the content and may help you understand what went on. If you think of restoring it, you should probably consult with those involved; that may restart the arguments, but you'll get those anyway sooner or later. JohnCD (talk) 23:02, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Comment for anyone else interested: the reason why all this stuff was reduced to redirects and effectively deleted was that it was all based on OR and, worse, misrepresentation of sources by Jagged 85 (talk · contribs) who was eventually banned - for details, see WP:Requests for comment/Jagged 85 and its talk page. JohnCD (talk) 12:06, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Jimmy_Carter_rabbit_incident

reasoning -William Jockusch (talk) 18:15, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Article was merged into Presidency of Jimmy carter by user Ashbrook Station, who is a confirmed sock.William Jockusch (talk) 18:15, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Um, so? It certainly does not appear to deserve a separate article, besides, it's not been deleted ... the entire history remains (✉→BWilkins←✎) 18:28, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
  • The user was blocked for using multiple accounts to push their political POV. I've seen other incidents were articles that were largely created by socks were deleted/merged for that reason. I'm not 100% familiar with the relevant policies, but this feels similar, even though it deals with merger rather than creation. William Jockusch (talk) 18:42, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Again, the article was not deleted. If you honestly think the article is notable enough to stand on its own, simply revert the most recent changes to it that included the redirect. Personally, it doesn't look anywhere close to significant enough that the coverage in the main article cannot be considered enough (✉→BWilkins←✎) 19:10, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Tahar Aguemmoume

i want to have this page to show my real information to my friends and im from algeria and if you want to show you my identification cart im ready to show you, please i want this page -Tahar-stark (talk) 18:20, 9 November 2012 (UTC)


the world will know every thing about me especially my friendds and i really need it -Tahar-stark (talk) 19:07, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Please have a look at What Wikipedia is not. --bonadea contributions talk 19:35, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

It's learning

It's learning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) This article is about a signuficantly large, notable learning management system. It should not have been deleted. -Laserlasse (talk) 22:20, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

What article? According to our records, you haven't edited in Wikipedia since 17:42, 13 April 2010! --Orange Mike | Talk 22:24, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
apologies, I have never used this page before, and I normally edit the Norwegian Wikipedia. The page is "it's learning"

Laserlasse (talk) 22:29, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

That was deleted as an article about a company, corporation, organization, or group that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. The "sources" were all from its own website. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:53, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Nevertheless, it should be trivial to verify its notability and tag the page for improvememt. It has a presence in several European countries as well as the US. Laserlasse (talk) 22:57, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

nevertheless the requirements to have an article on the English wikipedia are far more stringent than other projects. Existence is not enough. See WP:CORP. --(✉→BWilkins←✎) 00:59, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Are these samples of independent references enough to determine notability?

http://m.s21.com.gt/internacionales/2012/11/06/miles-estudiantes-usan-nueva-plataforma-aprendizaje

http://e24.no/kommentarer/nettrevolusjonen-innen-utdanning/20294109

www.trimeritus.com/vendors.pdf

http://www.bt.no/na24/article641723.ece

http://www.hib.no/aktuelt/nyheter/2007/03/itslearning.asp

http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft_blog/archive/2010/04/16/it-s-learning-adopts-microsoft-platform-for-cloud-educational-services.aspx

http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=4000010004

http://skole.hamar.kommune.no/article24802-3550.html

http://www.masshightech.com/stories/2010/05/17/daily38-Microsoft-donates-cloud-apps-to-web-educator-Its-Learning.html

176.11.54.107 (talk) 14:43, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

  1. ^ [2]
  2. ^ [3]
  3. ^ [4]
  4. ^ http://www.boston.com/business/innovation/2012/11/07/big-data-center-opening-cambridge/Suutqva9ORpZ1j2n1URkMP/story.html
  5. ^ http://bostinno.com/2012/11/07/no-hacks-allowed-hackreduce-launches-thursday-to-help-boston-step-up-its-big-data-game/
  6. ^ http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2012/11/07/hackreduce-to-open-thursday-as-lynch-fires-back-at-big-data-knuckleheads/
  7. ^ http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/blog/startups/2012/11/big-data-center-hackreduce-cambridge.html
  8. ^ http://www.heraldonline.com/2012/11/08/4398797/hackreduce-on-a-mission-to-make.html
  9. ^ http://www.sfgate.com/business/prweb/article/GoGrid-to-Partner-with-hack-reduce-Boston-s-Big-4019531.php
  10. ^ http://www.masshightech.com/stories/2012/11/05/daily36-hackreduce-set-to-launch-tonight.html
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_78&oldid=1136068501"