Hello, Welcome to my talk! User Page · Talk page · Contributions ·
Hi=) welcome leave a message here,replies! Thank you!

Harishrawat11, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Harishrawat11! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:33, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Harishrawat11. You have new messages at Kudpung's talk page.
Message added 12:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hi harsh I am new to wikipedia and no matter how hard I try I cant make sense of it =(( ... anyways I just wanted to request some information in an article you edited, the article is on Mr Arvind Kejriwal, and I would really appreciate it if you could add a link to his actual twitter and facebook page, as of late there has been a lot of misinformation being spread through his fake accounts

regards, HR — Preceding unsigned comment added by PrometheusHR (talk • contribs) 21:32, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Harishrawat11. You have new messages at Sesamevoila's talk page.
Message added 14:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Sesamevoila (talk) 14:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Harishrawat11. You have new messages at Sesamevoila's talk page.
Message added 08:18, 5 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Sesamevoila (talk) 08:18, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Harishrawat11. You have new messages at Sesamevoila's talk page.
Message added 11:44, 5 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Sesamevoila (talk) 11:44, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Harishrawat11,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daya Shankar IRS for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Danrok (talk) 14:53, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daya Shankar (IRS officer)

The article Daya Shankar (IRS officer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is about a person who is not notable in Wikipedia's sense

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 15:40, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sagar Alias Jacky (Character) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sagar Alias Jacky (Character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagar Alias Jacky (Character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SarahStierch (talk) 09:44, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Investigation Division of the Central Board of Direct Taxes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Member (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sagar Alias Jacky

This page has been nominated for deletion because there isn't any sign of notability. For articles to be accepted, especially for characters, the content must be properly sourced by reliable third-party sources (not self-references such as Wikipedia). Considering the character has only been featured in two films, this suggests the character is not notable and probably hasn't received any fame aside from those two films. Additionally, any information about the character would be available at each of the articles for the films. SwisterTwister talk 20:43, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Sibichen K Mathew. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 21:57, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! This is especially the case when you are nominating an article for deletion. Thanks! KTC (talk) 10:00, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When nominating an article for deletion, please also ensure you transclude the discussion page onto that day articles for deletion log as per step 3 of WP:AFDHOWTO. This way, other editors will be able to see an article have been nominated for deletion and possibly give their comments. Thanks! KTC (talk) 10:10, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Some editors have forgotten what it is to be a new editor here. But not all editors are as "not warm" as the others, and we shall try to help you in anyway possible. For starters, you can go to the Teahouse - they are quite helpful to understand wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse

But you also got to see if what the other editors are saying is correct. Most of the times, they do have a point. Its usually helpful to go through the Article for Creation before you create a new article. That way, its easier to verify if the article meets the quality standards here.

TheOriginalSoni (talk) 14:51, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia.

Merge of "List of converts to Islam from Hinduism"

Hi, you posted a 'merge' template on the "List of converts to Islam from Hinduism" article about two weeks ago. May I ask what page you wanted to merge this one with? It usually should be included as part of the full merge template. I'll add it in if you want, as long as you can point out to me the redundant article(s). Thanks.--ɱ 21:45, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Vehicle beacon lights in India

The edits you reverted at this article were not frequent and blatant vandalism so it would be pointless to protect the article. Warning the user should suffice but if not, request page protection at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection for the future. SwisterTwister talk 04:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the edits are not blatant vandalism or frequent enough to require protection (it has been a week since it was last edited, December 12). Please visit Wikipedia:Vandalism to learn what is and what is not vandalism. As I mentioned above, please go to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection for any future and real vandalism. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 21:17, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Abhay K

Hi Harish, I got your feedback on the page I made - Abhay K, I've added more links and citations in order to increase the credibility of the article. Possible for you to review the page again? Thanks Shivam Sharma 05:51, 21 November 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shivam.s88 (talk • contribs)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Central, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Member (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to C. Sylendra Babu, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Anbu121 (talk me) 13:52, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kerala Excise, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages IAS and IPS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Investigation Division of the Central Board of Direct Taxes

The article Investigation Division of the Central Board of Direct Taxes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only one independent source is not enough. Not every division of every part of every government needs a separate Wikipedia page. Any relevant info should be covered on the CBDT article (since most of this is not of encyclopedic value).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:04, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CVU

Hi. Could you please provide more details on exactly what you meant in your message on my talk page. Cheers. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:03, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for consensus for editing Template:Catholicism

You are invited to join the discussion at Template_talk:Catholicism#Edit_request_on_7_December_2012 to edit the list of Doctors of the Church to add John of Avila and Hildegard of Bingen and do this by embedding Template:Churchdoctor. I am messaging you because you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Catholicism --Jayarathina (talk) 16:34, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hopeless Pages yet to be editted

Look up Imam Siddiqui before and after I edited it. It was horrible. I've tried to do as much as I could, you can add what you want. I think we should search for such articles and start straightening them out.Ajayupai95 (talk) 12:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Directorate of Income Tax Intelligence and Criminal Investigation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tag and Assess

Hi Harish, the competition is completed. You can still take up the review of articles from Category:Unassessed India articles. Ssriram mt (talk) 14:07, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harishrawat11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ji i dont know why i have been blocked.....regarding the deletion of the dci page.i had earlier posted on spaceman spiff's wall regarding whether i can edit and make the page to which i didnt get any reply.i dont know blamecivil and i dont know how i can be his sockpuppet.the blocker please use checkuser i am certainly not someones sock puppet i have created many pages and did atleast 500 edits.i just joined wikipedia recently.i dont how i can explain but please just check and again i say i am not blamecivil,because blamecivil him/her is itself sockpupet

Decline reason:

Explanation given below. Please don't use an unblock request to just ask "Why am I blocked?" — Daniel Case (talk) 18:54, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The block log indicates you were blocked because the blocking admin believed you are a WP:SOCKPUPPET of Blamecivil95 (talk · contribs), who is indefinitely blocked. Monty ₈₄₅ 16:17, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harishrawat11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sir, i mean that i know why i am blocked but do not see the reason behind it.i am only one user and i am not a sock puppet of anyone.blamecivil who was blocked may have some striking similarities,but it is because we might share the same interests.regarding the dci page which he created it may or may not have copyright material but i created that page as i created a parent article for that page,so i made 2 other articles to fill the parent page the Investigation Division of the Central Board of Direct Taxes.i again truly state that i am not a sockpuppet and i will never be.my humble opinion if i am blamecivils sockpuppet just because on the basis of similarities of edits,then vence1234 nirmal95 and other editors who edit my interest pages are sockpuppets? Harishrawat11 (talk) 14:49, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am not anyones sockpuppet and will never will be.Please use checkuser to verify my claim Harishrawat11 (talk) 11:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Just denying you're a sock puppet is insufficient. A check user is not warranted just because you request it. An account may be blocked as a sock puppet without technical evidence. In any event, a CU would be stale as Blamecivil95 was blocked over six months ago. Finally, a quick look at your edits confirms the block was justified. Bbb23 (talk) 02:34, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harishrawat11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sir,blamecivil might have similarities in editing with me but seeing all my edits on the whole it is completely different,blamecivils edits are mostly on the pages vrghs jacob and his other socks have gone through.my edits i believe are more constructive focused and of a another nature.my edits i agree are similar but a careful look will show they are different.hence i appeal to the wikipedia editors to unblock me Harishrawat11 (talk) 12:02, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's pretty clear that you're the same. First of all, you have 14 articles in common that you edited, claiming that you edited in different areas is futile. Secondly, your very first edit on this account looks like an edit from someone who has edited before (asking someone on a talk page how to "make your article good"). Finally, the odd way that you do your signature, and the way Blamecivil95 wrote his signature are identical. There are more indicators to show similarity but an admin can't give away all of his tricks. :) -- Atama頭 22:23, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

=spaceman spiff

I BELIEVE I AM BLOCKED AS I CREATED THE PAGE Directorate_of_Income_Tax_Intelligence_and_Criminal_Investigation.(DCI).I ASKED SPACEMAN SPIFF WHETHER I CAN MAKE THE PAGE AGAIN.BUT I DIDNT GO BACK TO HIS PAGE TO CHECK HIS ANSWER HERE IS WHAT I WROTE.IF THERE ARE COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS,I DIDNT KNOW THAT AS I USED INFO FROM THE PAGE Law Enforcement in India.I MADE THAT PAGE AS I HAD CREATED A PARENT ARTICLE AND THE DCI LINK WAS RED SO I CREATED IT.

is it ok if i make a page on dci,eventhough you have blocked it and not allowed other users to write it.I am currently make admin dept of india pages(Harishrawat11 (talk) 08:38, 27 November 2012 (UTC)) Can you explain what you're asking? I'm not able to follow you. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 14:18, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Marine unit

Hello Harishrawat11,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Marine unit for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock requests

You will no longer be able to make unblock request here. If you feel that you have a very good, plausible reason to be unblocked, please see Unblock requests.

Icthus

Christianity newsletter: New format, new focus

Hello,

I notice that you aren't currently subscribed to Ichthus, the WikiProject Christianity newsletter. Witha new format, we would be delighted to offer you a trial three-month, money-back guarantee, subscription to our newsletter. If you are interested then please add your name tothis list, and you will receive your first issue shortly. From June 2013 we are starting a new "in focus" section that tells our readers about an interesting and important groups of articles. The first set is about Jesus, of course. We have also started a new book review section and our own "did you know" section. In the near future I hope to start a section where a new user briefly discusses their interests.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:09, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Harishrawat11! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 19:49, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Need your Help to fix some issues

Hello Harishrawat11,

i am new o wikipedia and i created one Wiki page name: S P Varma. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S._P._Varma) but i am finding some issue while uploading pics. i am able to upload the pics on the page but due to copyright issue pics got removed from the page can you please help me with this issue.. along with this it is showing some more issues like: This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (August 2013) The neutrality of this article is disputed. (August 2013) This article may be confusing or unclear to readers. (August 2013)

can you please help me with this problems to get fix. please write on my talk page

Anish basheer (talk) 09:34, 26 August 2013 (UTC)Anish basheer[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Central

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Central requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mediander.com/connects/37757286/chief-commissioner-of-income-tax/#!/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lakun.patra (talk) 04:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adhuna Akhtar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adhuna Akhtar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adhuna Akhtar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:03, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sagar Alias Jacky

The article Sagar Alias Jacky has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability outside the films.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Vensatry _(Talk) 13:04, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]