Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 301

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 295←Archive 299Archive 300Archive 301Archive 302Archive 303→Archive 305

Portal:Civil Rights Movement

The deletion was made under G7 as the portal had only one significant contributor. The deletion was disputed by Winged Blades of Godric, but this dispute was removed with the comment that "G7s cannot be contested by anyone other than the creator(s) of the content". I'm not aware of any such rule, and I think given that this was controversial it should be restored and debated fully at XfD if necessary. I also think the portal had good and useful content, so should be retained. The deleting admin, Fastily has given permission for it to be restored or listed here as well. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 08:49, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Strongly Oppose as out of process - I still request that this be deleted as per WP:G7. I have the full right to ask that my contributions be removed if no other editor has changed them in any substantial way (in this case, literally no editors other than myself). I've been here for over a decade and this is the first time I've seen a valid G7 contested, especially when there has been only one contributor to the content, and especially in the portal/project space instead of the mainspace. I didn't put all this (*volunteered*) effort forward so I would have to deal with constant headaches caused by a band of users. I created the portal, no one added or edited any of it (including the sub-pages), and now I feel that I wish that I never had. If this stays with the ridiculous name change, then I'm simply finished with this site. Period. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 09:01, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
I'm not sure if this is the right place for all this - Coffee, for the record, and to perhaps quell any false notions people may have, could you briefly explain why you wanted the page deleted? - TNT❤ 09:20, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Because I am the sole author and decided to work on other more pressing projects for now. I do indeed not like the name change that was being done, but that's a fight for another day (and that talk page, which includes that discussion is still public) as it seems our standards for consensus have changed drastically. Like I said, this stays, I go. Because there's no reason to continue to have a daily headache about something no one had even thought to create, when I can simply use my energy elsewhere until I feel motivated to recreate this portal in a manner that will benefit everyone. If that isn't a valid enough reason for a G7 request, then you better believe I will spend my time finding and listing the thousands of "bad" G7 deletions that are done every year, and post them here so we can all discuss each one in truly intense detail. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 09:51, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Support, we don't own our contributions once made, and G7 is for clear and incontrovertible situations only. Fish+Karate 10:57, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
    • Requesting a G7 does not imply ownership. As to your second point, that is not written in the policy at all so it is therefore moot here. The only requirement for a G7 deletion is as follows: If requested in good faith and provided that the only substantial content of the page was added by its author. This request is not done out of frustration, nor out of bad faith, but merely a refocusing of my efforts for the time being. Simply because you wish to see personal stress or a potential punishment? of some kind come my way, is not a good enough reason to try to stop me from requesting a G7. And were it any other editor, it would be just the same. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 11:16, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Support - Per Fish and Karate.Coffee's tagging is an example of behavior of extremal ownership to such extents, that once he realised that the MRV isn't going his way, and the page will be moved, to a non-favorite title, he choose to dispense the entire setup , in what could be easily cited as an example at WP:POINT.A deletion would be in contrary to our collaborative spirit and a bowing down to Coffee's under-handed tactics. ~ Winged BladesGodric 11:06, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Oppose Coffee and I are members of the WikiProject Civil Rights Movement. Amakuru, Fish+Karate, Winged Blades, Serial Number 54129 are not members. Coffee created the portal and performed most, if not all, the work to maintain the Portal. Coffee has decided to nolonger participate in the maintenance of the portal. I won't participate in the maintenance of the portal. Coffee and I have a demonstrated history of working on CRM related content. If Amakuru, Fish+Karate, Winged Blades, or Serial Number 54129 have a history of working on CRM related articles, then please share it. Otherwise, I am inclined to believe none of you will participate in a continuous effort to maintain or improve the portal. If you don't intend to actively participate on the project, then why seek to restore a portal that will be neglected by its membership? Mitchumch (talk) 12:11, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Personalises the issues —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap shit room 13:04, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
The issue is the portal will need to be continuously maintained and improved. I don't know what your edit history is regarding CRM related content. If you don't contribute to the CRM space, then it is a legitimate question as to whether you will contribute to the continuous maintenance and improvement of the portal. A portal that is ignored by its membership won't serve the article topic nor Wikipedia well. Mitchumch (talk) 13:16, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Coffee Do you have any objections to this request? Mitchumch (talk) 13:25, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Done, I have restored it under my own name, if that will alleviate Coffee's concerns. There are enough people who want to maintain this to make it viable. I hope this solution respects the original G7 while allowing those interested to continue it. So please don't un-delete Coffee's contributions. Note, I will not be maintaining this portal. If it goes stagnant, I will delete it again. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:17, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
    @Anachronist: unfortunately there's a WP:RUD issue with this approach. The restored material needs to be attributed to those that originally wrote it. Honestly, I can't see why everyone is treading on eggshells over this. We should just restore the page with its full history, move it to the lowercase version as per the completed RM, and get on with our lives. I've never known so much drama around the following of simple Wikipedia procedures.  — Amakuru (talk) 15:45, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
    @Anachronist: I agree with Amakuru that this solution is problematic. You cannot use content that someone else created, whether in whole or in part, and repost it “under your own name” – that’s a violation of the attribution requirement of CC BY-SA, as noted in WP:RUD. We should either completely rewrite the portal from scratch, attribute the material to Coffee, or leave the material deleted. Mz7 (talk) 17:23, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
    Then we simply create an attribution statement on the talk page. That will satisfy WP:RUD. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:57, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
    Right, but you can start to see how this is now a roundabout equivalent to just undeleting the whole page. If we’re unsure of how CSD policy applies here, maybe we should start a policy discussion at WP:AN or WT:CSD. Mz7 (talk) 12:05, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

There are a couple of other pages that need to be undeleted as well:

They should also be moved to wherever the main Portal winds up - there's currently a misspelling in the title. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:50, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Restored and moved.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
And, Coffee is back with his disruptive G7 tagging, despite being declined by his fellow sysops. ~ Winged BladesGodric 15:54, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Arun Mandola

I, Sahil3193, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sahil3193 (talk) 18:39, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (CambridgeBayWeather (talk · contribs)) instead. The draft is not presently in danger of deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:35, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Christine Rotenberg

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Alexander.Snave (talk) 21:24, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. You need proper references, not youtube. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:39, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Jordan Paul (musician)

I, Hismajestykingmoonracer, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hismajestykingmoonracer (talk) 22:25, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Mykal Coles submission draft

I, 174.204.39.45, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 174.204.39.45 (talk) 05:01, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

File:PlaceReddit.PNG

File was replaced by a Commons version and deleted as orphaned non-free content, but the Commons version has since been deleted. —Paul_012 (talk) 05:38, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Registered Buildings of the Isle of Man

I, Doncram, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Doncram (talk) 19:29, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Shaban ali turi

Deleted, no reason left in summary. —Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 00:18, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

It is not worth coming back. You yourself tagged it for deletion as an advert. it had this to say on the topic "is one of the best person of the world", and nothing else. So if you think the topic is worthwhile, start again from scratch. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:23, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Facepalm Facepalm I retract my request. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 00:30, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:China Rainbow Network

I, Jjjjjjdddddd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:23, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

User:Brandong10/sandbox

I, Jjjjjjdddddd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:28, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

  • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I hope you have a good reason for wanting this, as it does not look promising at this point! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Reuse Wasted Areas of Donghae Nambu Line

Actually I made a page that 'Reuse Wasted Areas of Donghae Nambu Line'. But someone deleted this articles for duplicates an existing topic 'Donghae Nambu Line'. But it's not true. 'Donghae Nambu Line' doesn't include the topic about 'Reuse Wasted Areas of Donghae Nambu Line'. And also It's not duplication. 'Reuse Wasted Areas of Donghae Nambu Line' is one of a work of Busan city, South Korea. Totally different with 'Donghae Nambu Line'. 'Donghae Nambu Line' is made by KORAIL (Korean Railroad). So I made a article 'Reuse Wasted Areas of Donghae Nambu Line'. But It's already deleted. So I want to restore my writing. So I ask here. Thanks to read my bad writing. ^^ —Genie.P (talk) 06:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

You could add your content to the Donghae Nambu Line, as although it is a slightly different topic, is would be a subtopic. Or you can try to persuade user:RHaworth who deleted it. Because it is an A10 case you should ask the person who deleted it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Can I get the writing what i wrote ? I didn't save any other without wikipedia. Genie.P (talk) 10:26, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Areas=9.8 Km|Location=Busan Haeundae Olympic intersection ~ Gijang-gun East Busan Tourist Park Boundary|Period=In 2012 ~ 2018|Budget=31 Billion KRW}}Between Ulsan and Busan Donghae Nambu Line a scrapped ship to utilize the space between East-Busan resort complex and that they would work together to Haeundae with connecting the invigoration of the local economy by creating a tourist resources. Haeundae Olympic Intersections created a green rail road that runs through Haeundae Station, the coastal spectacular Mi-po, Cheongsa-po, and Gudeok-po to provide pleasant and energetic spaces for tourists and local residents visiting Haeundae Beach.[1] 
Project[1]  

 1st Step  : Busan Green Rail Way Project 1

Section is from Haeundae Olympic Junction to Busan Mechanical Technical High School. Period is from Sep 23. 2015 to Dec. 29. 2016. Budget of this step is 3.41 Billion KRW. 

2nd Step : Busan Green Rail Way Project 2

Section is from Busan Mechanical Technical High School to East Busan Tourist District Entrance. Period is from Jun. 27. 2016 to Dec. 11. 2017. Budget of this step is 8.1 Billion KRW.

  1. ^ a b 부산광역시. "부산의 내일 : 부산시 도시계획 : 역세권개발 : 동해남부선 폐선부지 활용 : 부산광역시". www.busan.go.kr (in Korean). Retrieved 2018-04-07. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)

This is your text with some valid and some invalid markup stripped. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:28, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Vladimir Georgievski

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) GFros (talk) 09:40, 9 April 2018 (UTC) Creating Draft:Vladimir Georgievski

Draft:Adarsh Commercial Institute

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) From Reema Kumari 08:31, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

File:TUmith.jpg

Was tagged as WP:CSD#I9 and deleted after noone contested it. I am now contesting it, not that I dispute the non-free nature, but because I think it does NFC criteria for use in the infobox of this deceased person (Hoke L. Smith currently has no image). Even at the time of the tagging, the subject was already deceased and we had (and still have) no image, so I do not understand how this image is replaceable. Tagger is a long-inactive editor, so I am here for an alternate place to get input. —DMacks (talk) 15:28, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Pinging User:Quadell the deleting admin and User:Rhobite who tagged it. DMacks (talk) 15:31, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Toptal

The discussion was very short and didn't give a chance for previous contributors to raise their voice. I was working on this page before and didn't felt its breaching any wikipedia rules. I would like more people to be able to vote on this and I didn't even got a notification myself! Just found by accident when I wanted to do further edits today. —Pkuczynski (talk) 13:42, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

@Pkuczynski: The discussion lasted a full week, which is normal.
  • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toptal (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hut 8.5 17:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Aaron Zebley

This article was deleted back in 2006 after being WP:PRODed. If this is the same Aaron Zebley referenced in this source and this source then I think the article should be undeleted and revived. Aaron was Robert Mueller's chief of staff at the FBI, followed Mueller to Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, and then followed Mueller again as part of the Special Counsel investigation (2017-present). I posted a message to the deleting admin's talk page, but I think they may be inactive considering how long ago this page was deleted. — - PaulT+/C 16:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

There's so little in the deleted article, and it's so badly written, that I'd suggest just starting it from scratch, instead of restoring what was there. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
I'm sure it needs a lot of work, it was successfully PRODed after all! Sometimes it is good to see old versions of a page even if they are extremely out of date. It would also be helpful to have a starting point even if it isn't very useful. At the very least the old history would be restored once the article is recreated, right? - PaulT+/C 16:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
@Psantora: There isn't really anything there. I restored the deleted history. The present short article is way better. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:48, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! - PaulT+/C 18:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Rich Merritt

I've found enough sources with in-depth coverage that I feel Rich Merritt would pass WP:GNG. I would like to write a biography of him. I want to see if there is any content in the previous article that I could salvage. Could I get a copy of the old article in my userspace? BillHPike (talk, contribs) 23:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC) —BillHPike (talk, contribs) 23:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Raymond Crews

I am requesting REFUND because an uninvolved editor Gulumeemee reviewed this article and ruled that it was properly sourced and meets all criteria for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —– Lionel(talk) 00:40, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Thomas Keith

I, R.m.4263, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. R.m.4263 (talk) 14:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

User:Lfletch03/sandbox

If it appears to have potential, I'd like a G13 refund. Otherwise, never mind. Thanks. —Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 08:25, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

No point: 28 words about Six Story Psychos, no references, no claim of importance. Start this from scratch. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:47, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Eh, a Google search didn't find anything on them. No sources, 28 words, wouldn't survive A7. WP:GARAGE, probably. No potential here. Thanks though - Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 08:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft: Johnster Space Program

Draft: Johnster Space Program Please let me revise Johnster Space Chat again, it is not a company or scam, just a google doc being developed by me, Johnster2222.

Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Singapore

I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 14:16, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Palestine

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Abyssal (talk) 14:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:List of the prehistoric life of China

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Abyssal (talk) 14:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Maldives

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Abyssal (talk) 14:18, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Brunei

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Abyssal (talk) 14:19, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Kazakhstan

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Abyssal (talk) 14:19, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Bhutan

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Abyssal (talk) 14:20, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:List of the prehistoric life of Bangladesh

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Abyssal (talk) 14:20, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Len Deniro

I returned to edit the entry after receiving an email reminder but the draft had already been deleted. I wish to edit it —Stevebones2 (talk) 15:31, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:La Feria

I, Ornella Vallana, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ornella Vallana (talk) 19:58, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:David Abioye

I'm ready to work on the article —SuperSwift (talk) 01:13, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Charles Shoppee

Page was deleted before I could see what was wrong with it and fix it. Please restore to my user space (i.e. User:Pdfpdf/Charles Shoppee) so I can work on it. —Pdfpdf (talk) 23:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

It was claimed to be a copy of https://www.science.org.au/fellowship/fellows/biographical-memoirs/charles-william-shoppee-1904-1994 and thus a copyright infringement. However I can't see a violation there. In cases of speedy delete like this we give first right of reversing action to the deleting admin, User:Ronhjones. Another option is to have content emailed to you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:19, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
It was tagged by user:Diannaa as a copyright violation, when I checked with the Earwig's Copyvio Detector, it came back with (I think) about 50% matching data. The option was to remove the matching data or delete. The article was quite small, to remove 50% would have made it worthless. I'll email the last version. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:53, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Email received. Thank you, Pdfpdf (talk) 09:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
It looks like the first sentence is copyvio-free and it would make a minimal stub, but apart from that the text looks like a close paraphrase of the source cited, apart from another bit which is identified as a quotation. Hut 8.5 07:06, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Now that I can see it, perhaps the paraphrasing is a little too close. Obviously the names of the positions, the universities, the awards and the molecules are going to be identical to the source, but it shouldn't be hard to change the phrasing etc. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 09:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Category talk:Lists of railway accidents in Germany

After undeletion, this should be moved to Category talk:Lists of railway accidents and incidents in Germany to match the category name per the CFD at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 March 27#Category:Lists of railway accidents in Australia. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:05, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done As silly as this seems, the history shows this move is controversial, and the page was move warred. Instead since it has such simple project tag of Germany and lists, I may as well just create it in the right spot. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:01, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Category talk:Category:Lists of rail transport accidents in the United States

After undeletion, this should be moved to Category talk:Lists of railway accidents and incidents in the United States to match the category name per the CFD at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 March 27#Category:Lists of railway accidents in Australia. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Instead of prolonging the move war, I just recreated the project tagging for you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:04, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Magepoint

This is Company Page and it contains true information and then click the "Publish changes" button below —MagePoint (talk) 08:02, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done It seems you have been blocked by a passionate and dedicated administrator with expert specialization in determining promotional user names and various other aspects of the leading encyclopedia: Wikipedia. In the case of the MagePoint page it was deleted under criteria A7 and G11 (no claim of importance, and advertisement), and will not be undeleted. Where you want to write about your own company, it is best to avoid embarrassment and allow an independent person to first notice its importance and to write about it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:14, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Template:WikiBookscat

Requesting under the criteria of "deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator". Nomination claims "[U]sing {{Wikibooks}} [instead] is just sufficient.", but {{Wikibooks}} has erroneous linking as a replacement, so the original template is needed to compare its function. E to the Pi times i (talk | contribs) 03:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

@Hut 8.5: That would be perfect. I don't think it actually needs to be restored. E to the Pi times i (talk | contribs) 10:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Done sent the email. Hut 8.5 21:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:List of the prehistoric life of British Columbia

I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 13:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:List of the Paleozoic life of Massachusetts

I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal (talk) 15:11, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Argzim Redžović

My article Argzim Redžović was deleted by the User:The Blade of the Northern Lights on the grounds that it was created by a blocked or banned user but I am not blocked or banned but under editing restrictions- I can only create drafts for AfC that I cannot move into article space myself. However, User:Ad Orientem moved my Draft:Argzim Redžović into article space since the previous version was a copy-and-paste version of my draft and I wish for Argzim Redžović to be undeleted. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 14:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

  • You'll need to talk to the deleting admin, if you don't get a response or you aren't happy with the response then you can use deletion review. I suspect that the fact that a large number of edits to the page were made by User:Qifahs17, a block-evading sockpuppet, has something to do with the reason for deletion. Hut 8.5 22:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 Done I can confirm that the author is not blocked or banned. I am assuming this was a mistake. If there are any concerns please ping me or drop me a line on my talk page. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:11, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Ack. I didn't see the preceding cmt. However I don't think we should delete an article created by an editor who is not blocked because someone who is made significant edits. I will take a look and if it looks like there is an issue I will revert to the last non sock version. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:14, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
I have reverted to the last pre-socking version. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
As far as I can make out from the messy editing history this isn't a valid G5: the content was written in draft space by Das osmnezz, Qifahs17 moved it to mainspace in a cut-and-paste move, and then Ad Orientem then did the move properly (deleting Qifahs17's version). Since Das osmnezz isn't banned from creating draft articles, Qifahs17 didn't write the original text and the draft was moved to mainspace by Ad Orientem (who isn't banned from anything) I don't see how G5 applies, although I can certainly see how the deleting admin may have got confused. Hut 8.5 22:25, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Hodge Decision

I am in the process of creating this article for a school project through wikiedu —Leidelar78 (talk) 15:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title is correct? I see no evidence such a page has ever existed (if a page once existed on a given title, the page's deletion log will be displayed). This page is for requesting the un-deletion of a page, not for asking if it's kosher to make a page at that title; if there is indeed a deleted page you will need to provide the exact title (capitalisation and all; titles are case-sensitive) of the page you wish undeleted. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Bizarrely enough, an "article" by that name did exist; but all it consisted of, was a "bibliography" which in turn consisted of a single footnote to a Daily Kos item. Leidelar: create and use a sandbox until you've actually got some content. --Orange Mike | Talk 03:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Under what title? I didn't see any deletion logs under any valid permutation of the title, including adding a "The" to the beginning of it and lowercasing "decision". —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 09:33, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Hodge Decision and Draft Talk:Hodge Decision. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:42, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
That would explain why I didn't find them; I didn't think to look at the talk pages (though in my defence, such pages are generally deleted if attached to a nonexistent article/draft). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:About MERRITHEW

I, MERRITHEW, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MERRITHEW (talk) 13:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done This was one of several advertisements for your company which you have unsuccessfully tried to get into Wikipedia. Please have the decency to wait until somebody without a paid connection to this company decides to create an article about it. (And by the way: your failure to disclose your connection to the company was a violation of our Terms of Service.) --Orange Mike | Talk 05:36, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Doug Imbruce

The inventor and entrepreneur is notable, having won over a dozen "highest level" awards in the tech community (Webby's, Apple's "Best of", Time Magazine's "Best Startup CEOs", Business Insider's "Top 100 inventors in Silicon Valley", etc.) - all easily identifiable via a simple web search - and created technology still in use by major corporations including Yahoo! and Apple, with dozens of patent filings and notable sources within online search results and printed materials. He was a pioneer of automating the creation of video from data, as demonstrated via many cited news sources, and awarded patents. Deletion of the page seems unwarranted. The inventor remains a sought after expert, and reference materials on him are helpful to the technology community at large. He has authored articles in major publications including, but not limited to, Newsweek (on page one of his search results), and his inventions have featured prominently inside the pages of MIT technology review, the NY Times, and more. —65.204.33.38 (talk) 23:05, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

I have some doubts about duplication with the company article, but as a prod it can be restored., and I have done so. AfD optional DGG ( talk ) 06:25, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

WikkaWiki

The authors were never given an opportunity or notice about updating the article with primary resources. Numerous primary resources (mostly scholarly papers) have been published that refer to WikkaWiki. We would like the opportunity to update the page with these references just as other "notable" wiki pages have been given the same opportunity. —Brianko (talk) 03:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead.
Also: what is your connection with the publishers of this program? You don't seem to edit articles about any other topic. --Orange Mike | Talk 03:27, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

I didn't see any debate in the talk section, just a decision by a single admin to remove the article. I'm the main developer on the project; I've been involved since early 2000's and currently host the project on github. You'll find that I've updated the page with updates on various occasions over the years. Brianko (talk) 03:36, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Viewforth Church

I, Chemboro, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Chemboro (talk) 18:57, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Stephen Mbogo

There are sources on Google News (using the name "Steve Mbogo") that indicate that the person meets WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. The article and its talk page should therefore be undeleted, allowing for sources to be added to the article. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

  • @GeoffreyT2000: I think we may be looking at different people here, the deleted article described the subject as "a Kenyan development journalist and a regional security analyst". The Steve Mbogo who gets all the Google News hits is a "flamboyant politician" and businessman. Hut 8.5 06:41, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

judkins middle school

My page was just deleted and I dont know why? I was making a wiki page for my school and I requested on someone's page who declined the request to make it a page on what I should change to fix it and I just logged back in and it has been deleted. Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Jonahhhhh (talk) 20:11, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The page was redirected, not deleted; all edits remain visible in the article history. Deletion zeroes out the revision history. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:41, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Oh, hey, I remember that! I think we redirected the page into the article about the school district. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 06:00, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
That is indeed the case. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 07:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Kaseya

Company is one of just a few major players in the Remote Management & Monitoring software platforms for Managed Service Providers. I am a customer/user of their software products, and wanted to learn more about the company and surprise an article does not exist. I wish to establish a neutral viewpoint article about the company and their products. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwave (talk • contribs) 15:49, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaseya, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MER-C (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.

Pathikrit Basu

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Imdebdutsarkar (talk) 16:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Done @Imdebdutsarkar: You requested the deletion of User:Imdebdutsarkar/Pathikrit Basu. Since the only reason for the deletion was your request, I'm restoring it. —C.Fred (talk) 16:54, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

File:STLArmorDPRC.jpg

Permission received via OTRS (Ticket:2018040510007327) Mdann52 (talk) 17:59, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Fireman (Musician)

This deletion policy makes for a horrible experience! I will never contribute another minute of my time on wiki if my article is not returned for further editing. I don't have it saved anywhere, I am gradually writing the article at my pace and your just going to let someone delete it immediately?? It was not even close to finished! NOT EVEN CLOSE!! I doubt any research was done in your "SPEEDY" process, and it takes time to contribute good content. When all your work gets deleted by some lonely no life, it makes you want to go on a deleting rampage! If you give me more than a few days to figure out this mess of a failing website, and actually finish my article, I will eventually have all relevant information provided on the page. Thank You And Probably Goodbye}

This deletion policy makes for a horrible experience! I will never contribute another minute to this wiki BS if my article is not returned for further editing. I don't have it saved anywhere, I am gradually writing the article at my pace and your just going to let someone delete it immediatly?? It was not even close to finished! NOT EVEN CLOSE!! It takes time to contribute good content. When all your work gets deleted by some lonely no life, it makes you want to go on a deleting rampage! If you give me more than a few days to figure out this mess of a failing website, and actually finish my article, I will eventually have all relevant information provided on the page. Thank You And Probably Goodbye — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mciverbrooks (talk • contribs) 16:37, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

  • Restoring to draft space.
@Mciverbrooks: I agree with the deleting editor that the article did not assert the significance or importance of Fireman. (I disagree on the claim that the article is pure promotion.) I also note that you had been working on it just a few minutes before the speedy deletion was applied, yet you did nothing in the next hour to address the pending deletion—no further edits, no talk page messages.
Under the circumstances, I am going to restore the article to Draft space for you to work on it. Look for it momentarily at Draft:Fireman (musician). —C.Fred (talk) 16:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
There is a reason the drafting process exists, and it's so that you can edit articles that are not yet ready for mainspace with less fear of it being deleted, which is why the page was just undeleted and moved to draft (see Draft:Fireman (musician)). Creating an article directly in mainspace is the best way to ensure that it is deleted if it is found wanting, since mainspace is indexed by search engines (drafts are not by design).
I would also suggest not insulting the administrators - this is an unpaid volunteer gig, and the personal attacks are utterly uncalled for. It'd be akin to cursing out a waiter at a restaurant because you botched your order. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:54, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
@Mciverbrooks: See also Wikipedia's guidelines on conflict of interest in general and on autobiographies in particular. --Finngall talk 18:30, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Guy Joseph Palmieri

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —MILPAL (talk) 04:35, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:The Phantom Cowboys

(no text provided) Lertimo (talk) 13:26, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Request was blank--I assumed the draft referenced on requestor's talk page was what was meant to be undeleted and filled in the blanks accordingly. --Finngall talk 19:45, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_301&oldid=1145273973"