Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 280

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 275←Archive 278Archive 279Archive 280Archive 281Archive 282→Archive 285

Arivale

Deleted at AFD several years ago, has received much more coverage in reliable sources since then (e.g. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]) and I would like to update and recreate. Please move to my userspace, thanks. Antrocent (♫♬) 17:59, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

@Drmies: You're the deleting admin. Any objection to userfying to the creator's user space for improvement? ~Anachronist (talk) 18:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
You got it: User:Antrocent/Arivale. Drmies (talk) 19:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
@Antrocent:  Done by Drmies. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:13, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

robert jakobi

The Robert Jakobi page was deleted over the last few days and is now redirecting to Snyder's Lance. Someone did this without any authorisation and I would like the page to be reinstated. —Jwatson2015 (talk) 10:58, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

 Not done, nothing to do. The article is not deleted, and never was, it was just blanked, and no one needs "authorization" to do anything here. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:26, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Hunter S. Jones

I, JC1133, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JC1133 (talk) 22:59, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:32, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:AvDelphi

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 77.56.176.42 (talk) 06:06, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:34, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:RBH Sound

I, Egandb, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Egandb (talk) 18:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

 Not done. @Egandb: It wasn't deleted under CSD G13, it was deleted under CSD G11 as unambiguous promotion. You'd have to ask the deleting administrator RHaworth (talk · contribs) to restore it to draft space for further improvement. Or you could just start over, and write an actual encyclopedic article that complies with WP:CORP rather than a company brochure. See also Wikipedia:Golden rule to get an overview of what we expect to see. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:36, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:GM-Ford 9-speed transmission

I, Agajania, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Agajania (talk) 16:47, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Granites in Nepal

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Belbasesuraj (talk) 08:46, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Kenneth Ighalo

Player is active again. I am also going to improve the article. —Babymissfortune 08:38, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Yuri Albertovich Borisov

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 2405:205:510E:B044:F5D8:F18E:DE68:71C6 (talk) 07:24, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Easiness effect

I, Dodger67, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:57, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Naman Mishra

dear sir Naman Mishra is model of indian telugu cinema.he is starting career in Indian Telugu cinema. I will add full information right on this page —RaashikhannaDHFR (talk) 17:23, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

the man who sets the table

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —182.185.193.54 (talk) 17:55, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Evaflow

I, Skystarter, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Skystarter (talk) 18:58, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Ulanqab Stadium, etc.

I just found out that User:Sir Sputnik has prodded a large number of Chinese stadiums. I deprodded and expanded quite a few of them, but the ones listed above have already been deleted. These are massive stadiums which can accommodate tens of thousands of spectators, and most have hosted major sports teams or important events. It's ridiculous to claim they're not notable just because there aren't many English sources available. For the ones I've rescued, I've easily found Chinese sources and expanded the articles. See Shuangliu Sports Centre, Xilingol Sports Center, Qujing Cultural and Sports Park, etc. See also discussion on my talk page. Please undelete them so I can fix the sourcing issues. —Zanhe (talk) 06:44, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

@Hut 8.5: Thanks for restoring the articles. Could you please restore the talk pages as well? -Zanhe (talk) 23:24, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Done. Hut 8.5 06:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Samanashakti

I, Paul 012, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Paul_012 (talk) 00:32, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Reuven Mosheev

Because its a page that gives information to people that need it and this person is a real living person due to the information provided!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by BorodaStar (talk • contribs) 07:21, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Alex Shih (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. Wikipedia's inclusion criteria aren't "this page is useful" or existence - it's having been written about in depth by multiple reliable third-party sources. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 10:57, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

German Association for Synthetic Biology

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Gasb2017 (talk) 17:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

I am one of the founders for the German Association for Synthetic Biology. We created and registered this non-profit association in Germany and we are interested in having a wikipedia page here where people interested in this scientific subject can be informed and get together through this platform. Thanks for your time. Luis

  • The current page is not yet nominated to be deleted. A previous version was deleted because it appears to be copied from another web site. Perhaps you own copyright, but it is unlikely that the writing was in the right style for an encyclopedia. You may also whcih to read WP:COI Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:24, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Robert Hardgrave

I, DavidCM70, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DavidCM70 (talk) 19:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Athanasios Chatzis

Page was blanked by mistake, please recreate this page and make it discover-able on google search. Thanks. —Moko 20:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Gaspard Nicolas Perrier

was set for deletion due to no real-life references - there is two references now - please stop deleting in the blind ok? —Renelundquist (talk) 23:30, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G4, which means the page is a near-carbon-copy of a page previously deleted via deletion debate. Pages deleted via deletion debate will not be restored here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator who closed the deletion debate instead. See WP:Articles for deletion/Gaspard Nicolas Perrier. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:44, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:RBH Sound (2)

I, Egandb, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Egandb (talk) 04:28, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (RHaworth (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. You were told this above. This is not a G13 deletion and thus cannot be restored via this page. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Andy Levin

This page was not controversial. It is the page of a businessman and political figure that was deleted for some unknown reason. Andy Levin himself was updating the page and we are hoping to get it back online as soon as possible —2602:304:CD8D:1240:45E2:DAE0:4A06:5C8C (talk) 14:24, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. We also STRONGLY discourage editing one's own page. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:58, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Quadra Point

I, Imayas, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Imayas (talk) 05:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jo Ann Paul

I, Gsumlak, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gsumlak (talk) 14:05, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Nightgaladeld's United States of America

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —156.143.240.180 (talk) 16:53, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

This page was removed due to "lack of interest," despite the fact that it is the largest group on ROBLOX with over 180,000 users, and ROBLOX is one of the most popular online video games of all time.

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable as per Wikipedia's definition. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Metropolitan90 (talk · contribs)) instead. Our inclusion criteria is not popularity, but whether the subject has been written about in depth by multiple third-party reliable sources. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:56, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Asian Institute of Finance

AIF is a not to profit organisation which is established by the Central Bank of Malaysia and Securities Commission Malaysia to enhance Human Capital Development in the financial services industry. This information would be beneficial for students and the industry itself when it comes to the information offered by this organisation. It would be great if the administrators involved in the deletion of this page to advise and to highlight the areas to be corrected so that this page can be saved. Appreciate your kind assistance Sandrapriya (talk) 08:04, 5 September 2017 (UTC) —Sandrapriya (talk) 08:04, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi SpacemanSpiff. The administrator, Ad Orientem is on a wikibreak. In this case, can anyone else assist me on this request?Sandrapriya (talk) 01:57, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

You need to demonstrate that the subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies, specifically by finding better sources. That was the central issue at the deletion discussion. If you actually want to appeal the deletion as opposed to getting more information on it then you can use deletion review. Hut 8.5 06:33, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Grizzy et les Lemmings

Hello, Sorry, my mistake. I write for Wiki since years, but I wanted to made this article for the French Wiki, and it seems I do it in the bad place. Can it undeleted and placed were it belongs, please? I have to admit, I don't know how to do that. :-(

Thank you. Slym-Peter (talk) 09:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Somebody has already moved the article to the French Wikipedia: fr:Grizzy et les lemmings. Hut 8.5 18:18, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Social recognition of eSports ‎

abandoned draft —Prisencolin (talk) 16:28, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" (afc template is not on correctly anyway) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Naman Mishra

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) RaashikhannaDHFR (talk) 14:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Peter Triantos

I, Petertriantosartgallery, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Petertriantosartgallery (talk) 16:49, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Note taht if you are not Peter triantos you will need to change your user name, as users here cannot be for an organisation, only individuals. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:51, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Zahira College, Kalmunai

I would like to continue the editing —Sahfyismail (talk) 16:52, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Round of Richard

I, Amlstuart, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Anthony Stuart (talk) 18:02, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Amirhossein Arman

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Mahtab.tn (talk) 21:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Arash Hosseini

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Masoudabadi (talk) 12:31, 8 September 2017 (UTC) 

Hi.

I'm Masoud Abadi, the creator of the page titled Arash Hosseini, who is a precious link in the history of laser tag in Iran. As the chairman of laser tag in Iran and its founder, as well as a national champion and TedX speaker, Mr. Hosseini is well worth being viewed by lovers of laser tag around the world. Maybe his page was not a supermagnet interms of clicks, his role as a leading figure in e treme sports may not be neglected.

I hope this page will be restored back to "published or visible" as soon as possible.

With kind regards, Masoud Abadi

I'm going to restore this for a full deletion discussion which you can find at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arash Hosseini, but I'll warn you that at present it doesn't comply at all with Wikipedia's policies—you need to provide independent sources to demonstrate that he's considered noteworthy. At present, aside from his qualifications (which probably shouldn't be listed in any event), the only citations are to his own websites. ‑ Iridescent 12:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Valley Mall (Yakima)

Found sourcing that can assert notability —Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:18, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

@TenPoundHammer:  Done but I restored it to Draft:Valley Mall (Yakima) because if I had restored to main space, it would be speedily deleted again. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:58, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Charles J. Doyle

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —90.254.188.224 (talk) 00:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

This article was written after extensive research and checking by wikipedia editors following a proposal sent to me to be published in Wikipedia because of my achievements and career. Th editor was Brad Arquette of Wikipedia services: and research and editing services were paid for. All facts in the article are correct. I notice that the G5 criteria was applied - which is a 'banned user'. I am hoping that I have not been a victim of a scam in which money is extracted to publish in wikipedia ? Can you please let me knwo the reasons for this deletion ? charles j. doyle — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.254.188.224 (talk) 10:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Paid editors have to provide a disclosure. Many that ask for money to put an article on Wikipedia have been part of scams. They may make false representations about what they can put on Wikipedia. You are correct in that the G5 means that the article writer was banned. The G11 means that the page was completely promotional. The editor that wrote the page, JohnStannie, was blocked as a sock puppet of another user, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stoubora. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
In other words, yes, you were scammed. Demand a refund. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Mr Doyle, if you are confident you have a career and achievements that measure up to the wikipedia's inclusion criteria, leave me a note, on User talk:Geo Swan. I'll take a look at your references, and tell you if think you meet the criteria. If I think a short article could be put together, relatively easily, I'll do it for you. Geo Swan (talk) 00:37, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Rowland O. Abiodun.jpg

OTRS agent: to evaluate ticket:2017071810019582 I would like to be able to see what the image & file page looks like. Please ping when done and I will tag it appropriately, keeping an eye on it if the ticket is not successful. Cheers —seb26 (talk) 17:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

@Seb26:  Done -FASTILY 18:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Markovian parallax denigrate

Hi, could someone undelete and userfy Markovian parallax denigrate for me? It was deleted several years ago by Cirt, who has been inactive since 2016, so I cannot approach him and expect a response. The deletion discussion is here [10] with the deletion rationale being that there were no reliable sources covering the event, however I've found three (more recent than the AfD) with a simple Google search [11], [12], [13]. —The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 14:29, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

@The Master: It wouldn't survive long in main space today, so I restored it to Draft:Markovian parallax denigrate. There's some discussion in the talk page history too. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you Anachronist. It could have been restored to my userspace but this should be ok too. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 21:30, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Haitianism

The reason provided was "G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.itsabouttimebpp.com/Announcements/pdf/The_Ha%C3%AFtian_Revolution.pdf", G12 isn't applicable as the "copyright infringement" is actually a mirror of Wikipedia —Appah Rao (talk) 21:56, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

@Primefac: and @Sphilbrick: you're the deleter and nominator of this as G12. Would you please comment? That source sort of looks like a copy of a Wikipedia article to me. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:05, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Perhaps, but that leads to other questions.

First, I do a fair amount of copyright investigation using the tool Copypatrol. That tool has, I believe, incorporated a list of known mirrors and forks to help avoid such false positives. This attribute is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing for the obvious reason that it won't identify matches to known mirrors and forks. The curse is slightly more complicated. Before I used that tool, when I did copyright investigation, it was SOP to think about whether it could be a mirror or fork. Once the tool incorporated that knowledge, there still a large number of things to consider but thinking about mirrors and forks is not as high on the priority list. It looks to me like the site is not in this list: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks/Ghi. I don't raise this to suggest that it is not a mirror or fork, rather the opposite — if it is one, it should be added to the list.

As one other small piece of relevant information, I look at hundreds of potential copyright issues each week and one thing I've noticed in the last week is an increasing prevalence of issues involving Haiti. That helped me to quickly reach the conclusion this was yet another problem, although it may be that some of those other instances may need to be revisited. I'm not sure whether it is simply a coincidence that there have been so many copyright issues involving Haiti recently.

I mentioned other questions. You are the author who created that article. Are you telling me that you created it by copying from Wikipedia and didn't mention it? I do see that you are relatively new to Wikipedia, so perhaps you are unaware that while it is acceptable to incorporate information from other articles, it must be done in a particular way to preserve attribution, as well as to be open and clear about how the article is constructed.

That guideline can be found here:Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia.

If it is simply a copy from an existing article (I briefly looked for it and didn't find it but I assume it exists somewhere) the easiest next step is to re-create the article and include the proper language indicating where it's copied from. If it was mostly a copy but there was some other editing going on, it may be better to restore this one and then figure out how to get the proper attribution comments into the history. Can you start by identifying the article that it was copied from? Then we can figure out what the best next steps are. --S Philbrick(Talk) 00:37, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello and thanks for your polite answer, this is something I found out to be incredibly difficult to encounter. So yes, there was a section, the 'background' if I'm not mistaken, imported from the Haitian Revolution article that by chance was out there on the internet, that would be easily checked as there is wikilinks and even the wikipedia infobox on it. The article would continue into the subject but sleep time caught on and when I came back the article was deleted, there was an admin on my talk page calling me a bad editor and reverting half of my contributions for the sake of it. So if something could be salvage, the rest of the article must be ok I suppose, and be given proper attribution I would appreciate it (although I not no sure about expanding it anymore). Appah Rao (talk) 01:08, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
I've re-checked the copyright status of the lead and it appears that it, at least, was not copied from elsewhere (must have mis-read the earlier report). I'll restore the lead (which is the only sourced part of the article anyway), and give caution that if something is directly copied to the article in the future that proper attribution is given. Primefac (talk) 15:10, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Next time you could also be given caution when using your admin powers. Appah Rao (talk) 22:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Axminster Town F.C.

Article was deleted in 2008. Request restoration due to this club now being notable for having entered the FA VaseKivo (talk) 10:57, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

I don't see in WP:CORP where merely having entered into a competition makes one notable. Has there been significant coverage in multiple reliable sources? ~Anachronist (talk) 21:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Entering the FA Vase is deemed notable Kivo (talk) 21:17, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
@Kivo: The only previous version of this page was a redirect, not an article. If you want to create it, go ahead (and the club's name is Axminster Town A.F.C. anyway), but please do a better job than the other recent creations. It only takes 15-20 minutes to properly write and research a decent starter article. Have a look through this website as it lists their DEFL titles (all the way down to Division Four). They also played in the Perry Street and District League. Number 57 22:18, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Justin_Calen_Chenn

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Filmingworld (talk) 01:06, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

There are no pages created by this user that have been deleted. Must have posted this in error. Legacypac (talk) 03:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

The Cuban Affair (novel)

This page is meant to be a book description for Nelson DeMille's new novel. His assistant had trouble creating the information page and may have alerted the attention of an administrator because she attempted too many times to create the page. This page was not intended to be for advertising or promotion, but for Nelson DeMille's fans who like to keep track of all his standalone novels and series. —Simonandschuster (talk) 18:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done. It was deleted once as a copyright violation, and two more times as unambiguous promotion. Wikipedia isn't a publicity platform, and it isn't a web host for "fans who like to keep track of" his works. This is an online encyclopedia, and you evidently don't know the distinction. The creator also has violated the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guideline. The best thing to do is to start over from scratch in draft space or in the user's sandbox (not in main article space) and submit the article for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. That's the only way it could realistically be published here. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:10, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
The Cuban Affair was created 8 September 2017‎ by User:Geo Swan so problem solved. Legacypac (talk) 03:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Shalosh (Band)

I, Hewajd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hewajd (talk) 11:29, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Horace Knapp

Article was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horace Knapp back in 2015. Request restoration and redirect ({R to related topic}) instead to Purdy, Washington to preserve page history due to my merging in info. Believe that this should be considered uncontroversial for the purpose of avoiding DRV (courtesy ping closing admin Sjakkalle). —~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 08:59, 10 September 2017 (UTC) ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 08:59, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Noongarpedia

I, Evad37, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Evad37 [talk] 05:30, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Steven Füglister

Steven Füglister is the captain of the Philippines national ice hockey team, winning the gold medal at the 2017 Southeast Asian Games. Please recreate this page as I intend to work on it. Thank you. —AaronWikia (talk) 21:17, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Note the above subject fails WP:NHOCKEY. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:48, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Füglister, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:05, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Bhaga Mining

I, 72.95.104.248, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 72.95.104.248 (talk) 23:17, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

IONIS 361

This article was very well written and no promotional at all. IONIS 361 is one of the biggest incubator in France, lots of possibilities to develop the article —188.27.86.175 (talk) 07:22, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Friedrich Körner.jpg

file was deleted as F5 but original page Friedrich Körner now restored —KylieTastic (talk) 14:36, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Robert Curtis (actor)

I, Dectohean, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dectohean (talk) 12:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Emeka Umeh

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Prinzody (talk) 04:38, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

A rising Nigerian football star

Neutral Ground News

I, Littleeasy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Littleeasy (talk) 06:42, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

sfda

I, Aghurairi, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aghurairi (talk) 07:49, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

This should be moved to Draft:Saudi Food & Drug Authority Legacypac (talk) 03:53, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Franklyn Harvey

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Bthomson100 (talk) 19:03, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Page was deleted twice, once G13 and again G2 suggesting it had no meaningful content. Legacypac (talk) 04:02, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

CFC-Youth for Christ

Hi... The article CFC-Youth for Christ was deleted in G7 reason, I am willing to help to improve the article. Thank you. —AFrancois (talk) 07:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Not done. Sockpuppet. Yunshui 雲水 07:49, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Liveloud Worship

Hi, I am Francois... I am curious on the topic about a Christian band... I have seen the article before and I'm interested in it but it is deleted and the deletion reason is not clear... —AFrancois (talk) 14:58, 9 September 2017 (UTC) (AFrancois (talk) 14:58, 9 September 2017 (UTC))

Not done. AFrancois is that banned user. Yunshui 雲水 07:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Perniaspopupshop.com

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Govind Singh Rautela (talk) 09:00, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. SoWhy 09:30, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violetta_(season_2)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Insalvadormanoma (talk) 22:59, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

A deleted under A7. Additional rational needed why this should be restored User:Insalvadormanoma Legacypac (talk) 03:49, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect, deleted under G7, so eligible for refund. However, the article contained no content besides "Violetta series 2 consits 80 episodes." so Not done. Feel free to create a new article yourself. Regards SoWhy 09:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Publius Silius

I created this redirect to Publius Silius Nerva on the assumption that Nerva was the primary referent of simple "Publius Silius". The page was deleted less 7 days later by User:Llywrch (indicating that nobody PRODed it). It did not meet any speedy deletion criterion. I brought this to Llywrch's attention here, but s/he has ignored my request to self-revert. S/He has conceded that the name in question could refer to the redirect target (it is ambiguous). That s/he thinks the namespace in question should be an article about somebody is else is not a valid reason for speedy deletion without discussion or PRODing. —Srnec (talk) 04:25, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

[14] -- llywrch (talk) 06:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Not good enough. You abused your admin powers. I want the article undeleted. Then you can create this new article. Why is this so hard? Srnec (talk) 21:53, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The article isn't deleted. The only deleted contribution in the history is a redirect to Publius Silius Nerva. The two are different subjects, therefore one shouldn't redirect to the other, but a disambiguation line should be added to the top of each article. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:33, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
The article was deleted and the admin who deleted has now written an article over top. The edit in question should be restored. It was deleted in appropriately. Without notice or discussion when no criterion for speedy deletion applied. Srnec (talk) 23:17, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
To clarify, you want a partial name redirect restored instead of having a proper article about someone by that name? Legacypac (talk) 03:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Done by Anthony Appleyard, nothing more to see here folks, move along. Regards SoWhy 09:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Midnight Riptide

we will make changes according to guidelines, we at least need a second chance before deletion —Payal7496 (talk) 18:03, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

It is located at Draft:Midnight Riptide. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:56, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
So far from meeting our standards and sourced only to social media. Nom for deletion to discourage wasting time on it. Legacypac (talk) 07:00, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Done, technically speaking (since it was draftified). Primefac (talk) 12:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution

Hello, I saw that my page was deleted for copyright infringement. I do not quite understand how I violated a copy right when everything is our journal's own words/work and I have cited every paragraph. My name is Tyrik Jiang, I am a staff editor for the Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution (jiang.1579@osu.edu), I have cited every paragraph to our organization's page and I have been working with our leadership board in regards to the information I have put down. Every word that was on this wiki page was taken from our Ohio State University's Official Website with permission. In fact, I have cited repeatedly the exact page that the admins have noted that I took the information from. I believe that there was another issue "G11 Promotion", I had another thought on this and I could see how this is an issue as it is written in a very "first person" way, I am perfectly willing to edit everything with your suggestions to address that as well. Please assist, thank you sir/madam. —Tjiang93 (talk) 12:32, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

User:Tjiang93 two problems. You appeared to violated copyright when you copied everything from the other pages. Wikipedia pages can not be copied from copyrighted sources and it is unlikely the organization would release their website under a compatable free to use license. There is no way the Admins will restore a copyright violation like this. Secondly you have a WP:COI and probably should not be writing about your employer. Legacypac (talk) 03:59, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done and will not be done. We take copyright violations seriously. Even if you did it "with permission" from the University, the site itself is under copyright and thus we cannot have copy/paste submissions (even with attribution). You're welcome to restart the article in your own words. Primefac (talk) 12:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

yash gawli

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —YASH GAWLI85 (talk) 17:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC) this is official page on yash gawli wikipidia

Not done and will not be done No, it isn't an "official page". Wikipedia doesn't host "official pages" for anyone. It was deleted multiple times for being unambiguously promotional, and will stay that way. If you want an article about yourself, start it in your sandbox or in draft space, and submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. As an editor with a conflict of interest, you should not be editing articles about yourself. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:20, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Volunteer Optometric Services to Humanity

I, 130.191.185.74, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 130.191.185.74 (talk) 16:47, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

We request this draft be restored because we intend on working on it —130.191.185.74 (talk) 16:48, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:27, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Edits to Page

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —S.Col (talk) 15:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC) I believe my page was marked due to the edits that I was doing. I did not mean to make the format not suitable. The content should all be correct though and I can make the title not so bold if needed.

 Not done, nothing to do. You have no deleted contributions, and as far as I can tell, nothing you have contributed is currently in danger of being deleted. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:29, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Bine (mythology)

The article is currently the longest running hoax on Wikipedia. I wish to restore it, and move it to Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Bine (mythology) —Koopinator (talk) 15:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

@Koopinator:  Done, restored to list page as requested. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:36, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Neutral Ground News

I, Littleeasy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Littleeasy (talk) 21:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Bernhard Living

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —EdenGrey (talk) 21:09, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_280&oldid=1138664433"