Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 264

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 260←Archive 262Archive 263Archive 264Archive 265Archive 266→Archive 270

Sworn In (band) 'a newer band has deleted our page but we were there in 2002 and are reforming, please reinstate'

Because a band that came several years after ours has decided to delete out page that was up for many years on Wikipedia. and then click the "Save page" button below —Storieshollywood (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) There do not appear to have been previous incarnations of Sworn In (band) prior to its creation in 2014, but Sworn in (band) existed and was A7 speedy deleted in 2010. (The apparent creator of the latter article appears to have no other undeleted edits.) Sworn In was created as a redirect to Oath in 2015, after a previous article with that title was A7 speedy deleted in 2007. Not being an admin, I have no access to the deleted content to see if either of the deleted articles referred to the earlier band mentioned above. --Finngall talk 20:09, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
The deleted article is unrelated. The existing Sworn In (band) and Sworn in have no deleted contributions. The lead sentence of the deleted Sworn in (band) starts out "Formed in early 2001 members included Del Jae, Buddy Hell, Steve Meader and Alex and Matt Smith and were known for their abrasive live shows and certain members for their distinct fashion sense." The article has zero sources. The article claims the band released one EP under two different reasonably-notable indie labels, Bridge 9 Records and Reflections Records. If it were restored, it would be deleted again because WP:BAND requires two albums released under a notable label. Therefore, this request is no Declined (and it is ineligible for restoration anyway due to being deleted as WP:A7).
@Storieshollywood: I suggest you start over in draft space, say Draft:Sworn In (punk band) or something similar, then submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. You must do it this way because you have a conflict of interest. And be mindful that the article won't be accepted unless it meets the guidelines in Wikipedia:Golden rule as well as criteria in WP:BAND. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
@Storieshollywood: I've changed the Sworn In links on the record label pages above to point to Sworn In (punk band). If an article on your band makes it to main article space under a different title, please be sure to update those other links accordingly. --Finngall talk 21:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Antoine Ramy

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Jack Taffy (talk) 09:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Jack Taffy (talk) 09:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC) Hi, I am new here and I don't know why this has happened. I just want to know why the page cannot be created and what could be done to fix it? If someone did something wrong while posting this persons what is the mistake of Mr, Tony (Antoine) in it. Please tell me how to fix the article.

Maykel Montiel

meets WP:NFOOTBALL, 7 caps per Nicaragua national football team#Current squad - I will add a reference —Nfitz (talk) 10:38, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Fred Adison

I'm interested in restoring this article and wondered if the deleted one had salvageable content. Adison is notable - see the articles in French and German. —Chubbles (talk) 23:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

OK, thanks Chubbles (talk) 00:33, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Mark Robinson (meteorologist)

I, Sundog22, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sundog22 (talk) 13:39, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:57, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Edie McKee Harper

I, Worldbruce, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Worldbruce (talk) 06:13, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Surfing in India

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —JohnSeatonCallahan (talk) 10:26, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Everything I said is true.

It doesn't matter if it is about myself - I used a completely neutral point of view.

Like I said previous, I have read numerous articles about surfing in India where my projects in the Andaman Islands, Andhra Pradesh and Diu Island were completely uncredited - very annoying.

Even MORE annoying is when people take credit for things I have done - ?

Isn't that what an encyclopedia is for? To be a reference of FACTS?

That's is exactly what I am doing - stating FACTS.

Restore the deleted material from "Surfing in India" immediately, please -

I am not doing anything wrong - I did read the guidelines. Read what I wrote and posted - before you automatically delete it.

Thank You

JohnSeatonCallahan (talk) 10:26, 12 March 2017 (UTC)johnseatoncallahan

JohnSeatonCallahan the page has not been deleted. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:00, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
@Dodger67: I believe JohnSeatonCallahan is complaining that his edits got deleted. This was a blatant violation of Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, so it was correct to delete the material, regardless of how factual it was. John, an encyclopedia's purpose isn't to be a reference of facts. See WP:INDISCRIMINATE for guidance on this. There are many facts available, but not all of them are encyclopedic; that is, not all facts are suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Furthermore, because you have a conflict of interest, you should propose your contribution on the talk page rather than attempt to add it yourself. Continued attempts at self-promotion will result in your account being blocked. Also read WP:BURDEN. If something you want to add is removed, the burden is on you to gain support for your addition on the article's talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:09, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Reef_Williams

will add reference to page —Needhs (talk) 07:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Barney & Friends (2017 TV series)

Move to Draft:Barney & Friends (2017 TV series) for improvement. I don't think this is a hoax. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:05, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Have you got any references at all that suggest this is real? The only reference on that page did not mention the show. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:40, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
@Graeme Bartlett: This and this looks reasonably convincing to me that it isn't a hoax, but I question the value of having a Wikipedia article about a show that doesn't quite exist yet. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:09, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Sachin G lokapure

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Jaycot (talk) 06:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC) Plz see patent of lokapure don't delete page plz restore a man work independently granted 50 design patent in india

Jutta Barth

I, WS ReNu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. WS ReNu (talk) 12:21, 13 March 2017 (UTC

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Lectonar (talk) 20:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Timeline of Facebook

The page was speedy deleted under WP:G11. I was a major contributor to the page, but forgot to make a local backup. I would like the wikitext (before any possible large removals from the page; the page as of 2017-03-01 should be fine) emailed to me. —Riceissa (talk) 23:26, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Hmm. It seems that the same administrator JzG deleted Timeline of Twitter, Timeline of Instagram, Timeline of Pinterest, Timeline of Snapchat, Timeline of LinkedIn as G11, without anyone proposing them for deletion. I'm wondering if this was an inadvertent slip of an automated tool, since there isn't really a precedent for long-standing articles to be deleted suddenly without community review. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
I have just restored Timeline of Facebook at this point, and we can ask JzG to reverse the other deletions. Checking the content of the articles, they do not appear to be promoting these platforms. Deletion also looks to be controversial for these timeline pages. It started with the deletion of Timeline of GitHub and then a bunch were deleted in two minutes. Timeline of Monsanto was deleted at 13:15. And it looks as if Twinkle was the tool doing the deletes. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Yes, why not. It's not as if someone paid for these advertorial timelines to be created in order to boost their SEO or anything. Wait! That is EXACTLY what happened! I am mystified by our current determination to give spammers what they want. Guy (Help!) 11:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    @JzG: so this was deliberate, and not accidental? Since when do we delete long-standing articles that have contributions from established editors without proper review? AFD would have been the better venue. If you objected to Riceissa's recent changes, you could have just reverted them. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
I have a problem with characterising someone a a long established editor when they are part of a paid editing pyramid scheme. The fact that they got away with it for a long time does not make them anything other than a spammer. I admire your good faith, but I am afraid it is misplaced. Guy (Help!) 07:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Well, it's a bunch of sockpuppets working together to create articles and making a profit out of it Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Vipul.27s paid editing enterprise., so... Exemplo347 (talk) 23:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Fetchr

Was deleted by the creator, but needs to be revived, some data was previously missing. —Bkshots (talk) 19:30, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ready10

Wish to re-edit this page now that there is more content available for inclusion —5.148.15.234 (talk) 13:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Golf Boost

I, Rafagorgory, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rafagorgory (talk) 15:28, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Rotary Club of SoHo Hong Kong

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —112.118.236.74 (talk) 15:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

The Rotary Club is still an active service organization in Hong Kong.

Symsyn

There are many good resources on the web about this programming language that could be made into an article. Since this page has been created before, I'd like to have it restored so I can build upon what was originally there before it got deleted. —<<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 17:59, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ellie Baskett

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —24.52.160.82 (talk) 18:59, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Second Day after Good Friday

Invalid deletion: Easter is the second day after good friday —73.1.57.180 (talk) 23:38, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Not done It is, however the deletion rationale ("Recently created, implausible redirect") also addresses whether or not someone is likely to use that term as a redirect. To be very honest, I don't really think that it's a common enough search term to warrant a redirect. Most people looking for content on Easter will just go to the article itself rather than search with this term. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:44, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Google Maps Icon.png

File has sbeen deleted on Commons per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Google Maps Logo.svg. Needs to be uploaded locally under fair use (again). —(t) Josve05a (c) 00:42, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Downtown by Petula Clark UK vinyl A-side.jpg

The FFD discussion is recently closed as "free to use" in en wiki. Therefore, previous revisions should be undeleted. —George Ho (talk) 17:10, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anthony Antonello

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Anthony Antonello (talk) 19:42, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

OntoStudio

I have started this article and went offline for three hours to collect some academic references which I want now to include to increase the quality and objectivity of the article. Unfortunately, the article stub was deleted in the meantime. I am a researcher and do research in the field of ontologies. Please help. Thanks!! —Ontologician (talk) 20:28, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Brian Calle

I deleted the issue before I cited and added references to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Briancalle (talk • contribs) 08:16, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Panchkula Shopper

This is a 23 old and famous magazine if any content in this page is un-natural.. i will correct it before post — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankit16009 (talk • contribs) 09:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Nils Bildt

Deleted about 48 hours after PROD tag. I was counting on the standard 7 days. I intended to contest the deletion and remove the PROD tag after gathering some additional references over the weekend. —Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 06:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I think I phrased that unclearly. I intended to contest and do contest this PROD. I delayed removing the PROD tag only to do so concurrently with checking references I'd already found and editing them in, hoping to avoid going straight to AfD over WP:ONEEVENT. Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 19:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
I have deleted this under A7 due to lack of a claim of importance. The text also looked as if it was a criticism of the subject. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:27, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:ISS Art

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Olga Rekovskaya (talk) 13:06, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Pradeep Chandran

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Anujanu2010 (talk) 10:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC) In majority of films, Pradeep has shared screen space with actor Mohanlal. He made his television debut through the serial ‘Kunjali Marakkar’. For his acting brilliance, he won the Asianet Television Awards 2011 for Best Debut Actor.

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. As G4 deletions are tied to deletion debates, they likewise cannot be overturned here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aishwarya Arjun

I, Catchnaveen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thank you, NaveenKumar N (talk) 18:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Ladyboys

We are creating an updated wiki page titled Ladyboys. This page will not violate any of wiki's code of conduct. If the page must be deleted, please allow us to keep the content —Sandysjyoon (talk) 00:15, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Victoria Yeates

Article was twice deleted for notability, although an AFD resulted in Speedy Keep. A week later, an administrator User:DragonflySixtyseven appeared to have arbitrarily ignored the outcome of the AFD, decided it lacked notability and deleted it. I'm here because it doesn't seem right to ask for an AFD Review, as the AFD resulted in Speedy Keep. She definitely meets the notability criteria as a star of a hit show who has received sufficient coverage about her life and career. I was just going to create a new article but I think it would be more fair to the original editors to simply restore the deleted article and update with additional sources. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] ——МандичкаYO 😜 01:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

  • There really isn't much to restore, honestly. The only content was "Victoria Yeates is a actress who has been in several shows. She has a following as well with her fans." I suppose it could be restored just to show the person that originally launched the article, but it was in pretty poor condition. You'd be doing so much work on the article that you would essentially be writing it from scratch. There weren't any sources and the only link on there was to the IMDb listing for the actress. I'm going to assume that DragonflySixtyseven didn't see the AfD, but I do think that a search would've provided enough to show that Yeates would have passed speedy criteria at the very least. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 01:46, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the info @Tokyogirl79:. As long as the original author(s) is in good standing, I'd like to please undelete it out of principle, so their efforts, however small, are not erased. Having valid articles deleted off Wikipedia (especially after a speedy keep AfD!) is the kind of thing that drives good editors away. Thank you! —МандичкаYO 😜 06:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
  • WP:CSD specifically prohibits this kind of deletion. "If a page has survived its most recent deletion discussion, it should not be speedy deleted except for newly discovered copyright violations and pages that meet specific uncontroversial criteria", which criteria are things like G6, F8, and other stuff that definitely doesn't include A7 or other content-related reasons for deletion. IAR exceptions can arise, of course, but "notability not asserted" isn't an exceptional circumstance that needs IAR. I've undeleted the article. Nyttend (talk) 03:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Coinsecure

Valid facts not endorsing or advertising any company. Check my other contribution history. Just trying to revive and update one of my earlier contributions which has been deleted yet again. Please consider. I did research around the topic and add valid references this time. India lacks resources for Bitcoin trying to build up the wiki content around it. —Droidmaxxx (talk) 19:05, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Yacoub Shaheen

Deleted because the person who created has been blocked —62.167.197.198 (talk) 23:29, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Not done Speedy criterion G5, "creations by banned or blocked users", is routinely overused; deleting good content, regardless of the author, is harmful to the encyclopedia. However, most of the edits in this article's history were rev-deleted as copyright infringements, and that alone means that the creator's edits after the revdel are quite suspect. If you're interested in writing a new article about Yacoub Shaheen, let me know and I can provide you with the citations from the deleted page. Nyttend (talk) 01:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Mohamed El Gawady

I, Sunrise2016, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sunrise2016 (talk) 22:59, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Revolutionary Times 1998.jpg

The author of the media in File:Revolutionary Times 1998.jpg, Loey Glover, sent an email granting permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and {{OTRS pending}} was added to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. —The Hammer of Thor (talk) 05:47, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

In this we await the otrs volunteer to verify what permission is given from whom

. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:02, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

AZ - Aoun Zia

Ameerkhantareen (talk) 16:41, 19 March 2017 (UTC)I, Ameerkhantareen, request the undeletion of this article AZ - Aoun Zia, i was not able to contest its deletion and still had to edit it to remove the content that seemed promotional. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.

Draft:Minus delta t

we will look into the requested changes and address them —188.118.221.194 (talk) 23:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:FundedHere

I, 118.200.3.79, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 118.200.3.79 (talk) 00:37, 20 March 2017 (UTC)


Content has not yet been finalized, we would like to keep this draft page for future use —118.200.3.79 (talk) 00:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

AFC Drafts are not just supposed to be kept. I restored this before and no one improved the page. When you are ready to edit it, plese ask. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:22, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

SaveTheInternet.in

The article was deleted after insufficient participation in AfD citing notability. There were enough news articles, scholarly references about the website, which was at the forefront of campaign for Net neutrality in India and is key website to have shaped public policy through mass participation in India. Requesting undeletion to improve. — Srikanth (Logic) 12:35, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

 Not done This page is not for challenging AFD results. If you disagree with User:Kurykh's close you should ask that user about it. Otherwise the venue is WP:DRV to try to overturn AFD results. In any case there is nothing to restore here, as the content is linked From https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SaveTheInternet.in&action=history. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:27, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Cole Whittle

I, Malecken, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Malecken (talk) 14:11, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Songs from the Heart Tour

I was working on it and YOU DELETEd it while I was working on it. It meets notability because it has sources and all the stuff. Please unblock it so I can finish it —PantherMan (talk) 22:08, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Rajiv Kathpalia

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —27.5.52.157 (talk) 16:31, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajiv Kathpalia, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:23, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Igor Kozlovskyy

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Moroshka67 (talk) 22:23, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Uncle Don's Toys

Enter The page was deleted due to claims on no existence of notability, where there is some. —Robbyiscrazy (talk) 02:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncle Don's Toys (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Dr._Crawford

I put in the necessary criteria for each of the things and every time the pot would mark it again, I would add more in. I don't see the reason why it was deleted. —Schwiiz (talk) 20:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Wi-SUN

I, Rbienert, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rbienert (talk) 15:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

We would like to continue editing the article to address the comments —Rbienert (talk) 15:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
"We"? Are you confessing to a shared account? Cabayi (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If someone else wants to contribute to the article, they must register their own account. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Charanjeet Singh Sondhi

this is page about a prominent singer of India. He has released more than 15 pop and devotional album under various companies like T-Series, Venus etc. —Iconicmj11 (talk) 14:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note this request was made by a block-evading sockpuppet account. --Yamla (talk) 15:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Sex in the Title

I, Nitareeny, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nitareeny (talk) 03:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

would like to continue to work on it and then click the "Save page" button below —Nitareeny (talk) 03:51, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Charanjeet Singh Sondhi

actually thispage is about a singer who has released many albums from various big companies like T-Series, venus —2405:204:E18A:516E:0:0:D14:38AC (talk) 04:03, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NOMBREX

I, G8gon, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. G8gon (talk) 13:27, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Templeton University

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Edmund777 (talk) 12:29, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Jim Carrington

This author has new books about to be published in Cambridge University Press's Cambridge Reading Adventures, a worldwide reading scheme , and he has produced a series on social skills for autistic-spectrum students for LDA Learning. http://www.ldalearning.com/products.aspx?search=1&style=0&kw=robot

Jim Carrington · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions] The subject has further forthcoming titles in the CUP worldwide reading scheme Cambridge Reading Adventures. Leading special educational publisher LDA has commissioned a series of social skills books from Jim Carrington for use with autistic-spectrum students. http://www.ldalearning.com/products.aspx?search=1&style=0&kw=robot

ZEBRONICS

User@Exemplo347 has made mutiple edits in page and also caused the deletion by appealing for speedy deletion under act G11. Also the article has no intend of promotion nor any other, also there is no proof for spamming activity.

Not done and will not be done. It was clearly promotional, with numerous links to product pages and citations to public-relations press releases. DO NOT attempt to bypass the community process here by re-creating the article under alternative names. If you feel the article was improperly deleted, take it up with the deleting administrator, and if they decline to restore, take your case to WP:DRV. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Thoth: Software for Data Visualization and Statistics

Please restore the page as I intend to edit it and make it encyclopedic. —CorniceBowlSkier (talk) 19:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

 Not done. Start over. In draft space, or in your sandbox, and submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Request for undelection of Victor Ike

Hello, I've been trying to send a message to Northamerica1000, but when i click on "Talk back" or {{You've got mail}} on his page, it directs me to a different page. I wrote here some weeks ago, about the delection of Victor Ike Article and did'nt get no response, which i think was'nt faire. I also wrote to John of Reading & Κσυπ Cyp about the delection of the article i'm still working on and they told me that it was Northamerica1000 that delected it. Please can you explain your deletion of that article "Victor Ike"? It was a soft redirect and was created using the appropriate template for such. I'm still working on it and It did not qualify for a speedy or any other deletion since we having pages like that is very normal. I would appreciate if you can restore it. Best Regards, Tracy

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Ike, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
Did you read the deletion discussion?
Just write a note on the administrator's talk page, without trying to use templates. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Queen Cora

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Cgspeed1 (talk) 22:05, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

@Cgspeed1: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Jon Smith

the article was fully referenced. As the deleting admin noted, the author is an author of some notable works and therefore is notable by connection to those works. That the author doesn't seek publicity personally shouldn't detract from the notability of their works and their author. —— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanseng (talk • contribs) 16:51, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

@Sanseng: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.
...and, proposed for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Smith. An author doesn't become notable by virtue of having written some books that got some publicity. See WP:NAUTHOR and WP:NOTINHERITED. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Rubrik

The content (including recognitions) was all well-cited, as was mentioned by others who reviewed it. So, it's inaccurate to claim it was a promotional page. In addition, there are many startups listed on Wikipedia, many of which are lesser-known than Rubrik. —LaLoo (talk) 20:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubrik, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Hut 8.5 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Barbara Devlin

I, Caliki, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Caliki (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

@Caliki: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Women’s League for Conservative Judaism (

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 108.24.148.165 (talk) 01:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Matt Tarrant

I, 114.198.126.142, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 114.198.126.142 (talk) 03:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:James MacDonald ‎

I want to continue editing it for publishing. I took some time away and I didn't realize there was a timeline. Thank you —TeepTeep (talk) 21:45, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

TPM Inc

Hello, I am having trouble understanding the exact reason why this page was tagged for deletion and eventually deleted even after I edited the text. I do not work at this company, have carefully researched Wikipedia posting rules before doing it, and I truly don't think the text was promotional. I had included only 1 link to the website of the company (the link led to homepage and was in infobox and external links, no link in text), but would still remove it without an issue if that was the reason. I had also researched similar topics on Wikipedia and tried to keep the style consistent to them. Moreover, I have specifically refrained myself from taking ANY kind of information from the company website or blog. All of the information I included, without exceptions, were sourced from external sources, not related to the company. So, apart from the default paragraphs of the possible reasons why the page was deleted, can you please indicate the exact parts of the text that looked promotional to you or the exact reasons why the page didn't deserve to be saved. Please understand where I come from, at this point I still don't understand how I could have possibly improved the text and it is hard to progress and make other edits/create other pages not knowing why the previous one got deleted. I would really appreciate the help, thank you. Poster11 (talk) 21:14, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

  • The deletion clearly states it and it followed our main policy WP:What Wikipedia is not, however, I will note that anything still suggestive of a business profile will be deleted; focusing only with the basics and also major independent news is what helps in articles here. SwisterTwister talk 22:10, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
  • As I recall the article was for a local chain of print shops. The article relied heavily on claims of WP:INHERITed notability from its client base rather than any claims of notability of its own. To be fair, the first admin to respond declined the CSD. It was only because Poster11 restored the CSD that the article was in consideration for deletion. If the article is restored, and there are no verifiable claims of notability I will take it to AfD. Cabayi (talk) 21:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • The reason it looked promotional was the use of marketing style words, such as prestigeous, exclusive, awards, expertise, recognized. If you didn't retore the delete tags yourself it mya have survived till this day. The way ahead is to ask User talk:Deb to restore it for you. You can tell her that you added the delete tags by mistake. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Hey everyone, I want to say thank you for all of you replying, this really did clear up things for me. I don't think I will ask to restore the tag, I might just rework the information, make the necessary fixes, and then maybe try again. With these comments, I don't think the previous text will work even if I edit it. Thank you again. Poster11 (talk) 13:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Aileen Cassinetto

Accidentally deleted —Ugatdos (talk) 12:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Roar

The reason why Low Roar was merged with Audrye Sessions was because of insufficient notability back then. However, Low Roar is releasing a third album, and according to Spotify has 185,000+ monthly listeners. I don't see how that is insufficient notability, considering an artist like Azure Ray only has 39,000+ monthly listeners. Low Roar is a separate entity which is gaining a considerable fanbase, while Audrye Sessions is a thing of the past (534 monthly listeners last I checked). Surely, Audrye Sessions should not have their article deleted since they did enjoy a period of notability, but Low Roar should also have their own page since they have reached a sizable amount of followers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edmondduong (talk • contribs) 18:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Since it did not get deleted, we don't have to restore. Instead you can see previous version at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Low_Roar&oldid=619543177 and edit from there. Though I have seen some controversial editing recently, so a discussion on the talk page would be wise. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_264&oldid=1138664347"