Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 234

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 230←Archive 232Archive 233Archive 234Archive 235Archive 236→Archive 240

.CEO

Administrator Psychonaut has deleted the page for the top level domain .CEO. They have stated that the page was "Promotional; no evidence of notability." without detailing what the specific issues were. All information on the page was factual. If necessary to add additional sources or citations to have the page undeleted, I will do so. Thank you for your attentiveness. -AmyBrownPB (talk) 15:27, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Wrong; the page was deleted because it was tagged for proposed deletion and the tag was in place for at least a week. Note that promotional pages have an issue with tone, not sources. (It's possible to have a well-sourced article that is nevertheless promotional.) —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 15:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
The whole article was an advertisement, using promotional language, with unsubstantiated phrases like "registrants are invited", "designed to increase online influence", "leveraged Inbound and Social Media marketing techniques", and so on. And half the citations are to other Wikipedia articles. I would have deleted this as WP:CSD#G11, which would disqualify it from restoration by request on this page. I could in fact restore and delete it as G11 right now, but I'll refrain. It's an advertisement that should be rewritten from scratch. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Hamersons Hotel Cebu

The page contains only information for the hotel and no intention of advertising button below -Dave.codilla (talk) 06:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Not done Dave.codilla, the content in the article was extremely promotional. Hotel articles on Wikipedia should not spend time talking about the hotel's amenities or use phrases like "you" or "our guests". Wikipedia is not a hotel booking site, so there's no need for content of this type in the article. This is considered to be very unambiguously promotional on here, even if it may not come across as promotional elsewhere. Also, the article didn't establish why the hotel was a notable business, as hotels are not automatically notable because they exist. You need to show where the hotel has received coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources per WP:RS. Using the hotel's website or articles like this that look to be reprinted press releases will not be considered sources that can establish notability. It's pretty difficult to establish this for hotels given that there are so many out there and hotel operations are considered fairly standard. When articles do exist it's usually because the hotel has a lot of historical importance or it's on a hotel chain that has received a lot of coverage as opposed to specific individual locations. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Nusky

I would like this page to be restored because I was still editing its content before my device went off, then before it got on I saw that this page was deleted -Nuskyfdz (talk) 08:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Lectonar (talk) 13:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Rad (Transformers)

Could you please undelete this article and place it in my user space so I can work on it? Thanks! -Mathewignash (talk) 11:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

supersubstantialem

Now and then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanVNguyen (talk • contribs) 13:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Not done There wasn't any content in the article to restore really, just what you've written above and the phrase "All of man's need for existence." Neither are enough content for an article and neither version had sourcing to really explain what you were writing about and why it would require an entry on Wikipedia. I do see that there is an entry for this at Wiktionary and unless there is a lot of coverage for this term in reliable sources, there's really no true need for a Wikipedia entry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Smash Fighting League

I, 360mph, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 360mph (talk) 16:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Not done 360mph, normally we restore AfC articles without much fuss (unless they've been abandoned multiple times or violate some major guideline/rule) however the problem here is that ultimately it looks like this league is just a group of friends hanging out and playing Super Smash Bros. You don't really show where the Smash Fighting League has received any coverage in major gaming websites or in the newspapers Wikipedia would consider to be reliable sources. It's incredibly difficult for gaming groups or people to pass notability guidelines on Wikipedia and there are people who play professionally at major competitions and win, yet still fail overall notability guidelines on Wikipedia. I hate to sound harsh, but I really can't see where this group would ever pass notability guidelines on Wikipedia. If you enable the e-mail on your account I can send you a copy of the content and you can try creating a wiki at places like Wikia, but I don't think that it would be a good use of your time to continue trying to create an article at Wikipedia specifically. I don't mean this to sound harsh or unkind, just that Wikipedia is not the right place for this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Phillip Allen Hall III

Please Restore, Phillip Is A Actor With Many Credits His Most Recent Is The Movie Called "The Trust" Located At https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trust_(film) Or http://www.metacritic.com/movie/the-trust/details His Details, Bio, Pictures & Other Credits Can Be Found At http://www.moviesbudget.com/people/63584-phillip-allen-hall-iii -Pahall1984 (talk) 10:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

(Non-administrator observation) See also several previous requests in the archives. New role appears to very minor. Have we reached the point yet where we a) revert future requests here, and/or b) block Mr. Hall as clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia? --Finngall talk 13:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Saraswati Gyan Mandir School

The content of mentioned page was not saved at the created time, it will be updated as soon as it recovered -Skapil334 (talk) 07:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

@Skapil334:  Not done - nothing to restore, because there was nothing there, except a link to a blog which was deleted for reasons explained on your talk page. Start again, read WP:Your first article for advice, and use WP:Articles for creation to guide you through the process. That way you can take time about building a page, with less risk that it will be deleted before you have finished. JohnCD (talk) 17:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Friendeyz

I would like this page to be restored because I was still editing its content before my device went off, then before it got on I saw that this page was deleted -Nuskyfdz (talk) 08:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

@Nuskyfdz:  Not done, there was nothing worth restoring, only "Friendeyz written in php,python,perl,c++ and javascript". Before an article goes in the encyclopedia it needs, as a minimum, to make clear what it is about and why that thing is important or significant. Start again, read WP:Your first article for advice, and use WP:Articles for creation to guide you through the process of making a draft. JohnCD (talk) 17:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Bangkok Titans

retrieving WP:A7 -Prisencolin (talk) 22:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Lectonar (talk) 09:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Alexander L. Fernandez

Hi. I've requested for this page to be undeleted because I'm trying to get a reliable source. Since this person is a living person, I need a bit of help to get a source. Not sure how to get my sources check. Please help -Lucidity76 (talk) 09:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

@Lucidity76:  Not done. That was far too promotional to be acceptable, a blatant puff piece: "experienced, dynamic... accomplished... leading... ground breaking... " Anything like that is deleted from Wikipedia at sight. I will email you the text if you like, but it needs a complete rewrite. Read WP:PEACOCK and drop all the glowing adjectives. No opinions, just plain facts cited to reliable sources. WP:Your first article is helpful.
The sort of sources you need could be articles in newspapers or trade journals - see WP:Identifying reliable sources. They are needed for two reasons: the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy that "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source", and the Wikipedia:Notability test for inclusion, which looks for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Youtube, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought him significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also Wikipedia:Notability (summary). JohnCD (talk) 09:39, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jimmy Jenkins

I, Matthew.novitzky, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. mrn 18:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:52, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

2009–10 Grays Athletic F.C. season

Compared to another article from a club in the same division that was deleted through AfD. However, another club in the same division is at GA status. This article was well referenced and I fail to see where it doesn't meet WP:NSEASONS. ---Jimbo[online] 16:39, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Alfred stone photo.jpg

Meets criterion 2 of {{PD-US-unpublished}}, as it was likely created in the 1860s. (Previous request at Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_231#File:Alfred_stone_photo.jpg apparently abandoned. This is also ticket:2016041110023257.) -Storkk (talk) 08:51, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Ping Amatulic, who dealt with the previous request and knows the background. JohnCD (talk) 20:23, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
The previous request was never really resolved: Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 231#File:Alfred stone photo.jpg
The final email in the OTRS ticket speculates "based on the age of the subject, it was taken no later than 1865. So even if the photographer was 20 years old and lived 100 years, then they would have died by 1945." So it has likely been 70 years since the death of the photographer.
But since it was created before 1896 and the death date is unknown, it can be restored.
 Done. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:15, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

sang bleu

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Sbldnttt (talk) 16:59, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

<text of draft removed - this is not the place for it>
@Sbldnttt: I cannot find any evidence of a deleted article. There is a draft at Draft:SANG BLEU which you can work on and submit for review when it is ready, but it would not be accepted in its present state. Advice on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 17:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Susan Irby

I, Billboard75anr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Billboard75anr (talk) 04:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Reema Kumari

Reema Kumari is a talented girl.She is the school topper of Emmanuel Mission High School. She is also the founder of an educational website <redacted> .She is also a well known preacher of siwan district of bihar. -Reema Kumari (25) (talk) 15:51, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

@Reema Kumari (25): Not done and will not be done. Sorry, but Wikipedia is not a social-networking site for people to write about themselves. More explanation on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 17:34, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oswaldo Oropeza, el compositor de Latinoamerica

I, Caribana10, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Caribana10 (talk) 11:18, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Good morning, i need to retrieve the page: Oswaldo Oropeza, el compositor de Latinoamerica.

Please help me get it back, I will work on it and finish it soon.

Thank you,

@Caribana10:  Done. The page is now at Draft:Oswaldo Oropeza. It was restored last year after this request, but you only made two small edits. Please complete it as soon as convenient, and submit it for review: Articles for Creation is not for indefinite storage of material not ready for the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note particularly that you need to give references, for two reasons: the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy that "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source", and the Wikipedia:Notability test for inclusion, which looks for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 12:00, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Cheers season 5.png

I think maybe the PNG version should replace the JPEG one at Cheers (season 5). Agree? -George Ho (talk) 19:21, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Dennis Gehlen

retrieving expired WP:PROD -Prisencolin (talk) 02:07, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Gao Di-Ping

retrieving deleted WP:A7 -Prisencolin (talk) 01:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Yu Xian (League of Legends player)

retrieving deleted WP:A7 -Prisencolin (talk) 01:32, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Made in Brazil (e-sports)

retrieving expired PROD -Prisencolin (talk) 01:40, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Jesper Wecksell

retrieving expired WP:PROD -Prisencolin (talk) 01:44, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Philip Kapneck

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Photoloop (talk) 12:37, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

EThanthi.com

No reasoning given. -Imagphoto (talk) 22:18, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Not done This was repeatedly deleted as WP:A7 and WP:G11, predominantly by Gogo Dodo. Offhand it looks like it's more of an issue of notability than promotional tones, although words like "fantabulous" should be avoided since they are considered to be a personal opinion or WP:BUZZWORDS that can seem promotional. Now Gogo has cautioned you against creating any new articles for ETanthi.com on Wikipedia, so any further attempts to get the content restored needs to go through him. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 22:56, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Primal sympathy

the primal sympathy page was restored just a week or so again, and now it appears to have been maliciously deleted again? Please restore it, as it represents what has been the top Google search result for a subject of scholarly merit and discussion and the most reliable and detailed source of information on the subject matter (the meaning and interpretation of Wordsworth's primal sympathy. Thank you. This web page is used for my class room and others in our school district.) -210.148.47.161 (talk) 23:41, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

  • There doesn't seem to have been any malicious intent here and in general it's usually not a good idea to make comments of that nature because it can be seen as an WP:ADHOMINEM attack. Now as far as the page's usefulness goes, WP:ITSUSEFUL isn't really an argument that holds up on Wikipedia since you have to show where the term/concept has been covered in multiple independent and reliable sources that cover the term in specific. There were also concerns at the deletion discussion that the content constituted original research and offhand I can see where these concerns come from, as the content was entirely unsourced and seemed to have been written with a specific viewpoint or opinion. In any case, at this point you'd need to talk to Northamerica1000 about any future restoration. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 01:32, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Robin D.Gill

This was deleted by User:Explicit. My request for clarification was met with silence. I didn't know this was up for deletion, not have edited the page for years. Were the same criteria applied we would delete Harold S. Williams, a Japanologist known to few, and whose page is free composition (he was important nonetheless). Gill's works have been reviewed positively by Thomas H. Rohlich, Emeritus Professor of Japanese Language and Literature at Smith College: by Adam L Kern, (University of Wisconsin, Madison; by William J. Higginson (Gill is'one of the most original minds to take up the related subjects of haiku and cross-cultural communication.'; by Matthew Fraleigh (Brandeis University ) etc. He's cited in a recent book by *David G. Hebert; he was widely a reliably published in Japan by major book firms; the above reviews, esp. by Kern, note and explain how regrettable it is that one of the most erudite and original scholars of Japanese poetry hasn't drawn a wider public or obtained the recognition they think he deserves. -Nishidani (talk) 20:43, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

  • @Nishidani: It looks like this was deleted via WP:PROD so there didn't need to be a discussion akin to what you'd see at AfD. It's usually considered good form to notify people of any potential deletion, however they might have seen the semi-retired label on the page and just decided not to post anything. It'd still have been nice if the nominator had posted, but it's not entirely a requirement. (On a side note, Explicit is just the deleting admin and not the nominator.) As far as Explicit goes, it looks like they have not signed back on to Wikipedia since you posted the notice on their talk page since their last edit was posted on the 19th, the day before you requested clarification. In any case, since this was deleted via PROD it can be restored through here.
On a side note, notability guidelines for authors have become far more strict over the years and just publishing is no longer enough to establish notability on here - you'd have to show the places where Gill's work has been reviewed. The only catch is that the reviews have to have been published in places Wikipedia would consider reliable, such as academic journals and the like. Offhand it doesn't look like that'd be an issue, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 21:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

powwownow

the page has no promotional material, simply facts from third party sources that I could find. I am happy for the page to be edited and expanded, but I simply wanted to create a page for a company that is becoming increasingly prominent in the UK media for its conferencing services and was surprised it didn't have one yet since I've seen it in the press quite a few times. I don't appreciate all my hard work of finding relevant references and formatting in a neutral way just to get deleted without feedback. If you think areas sound promotional, my apologies, maybe I haven't paraphrased the references to the best neural ability, but happy to work on these sections as I am still researching about the company. I could not of yet find third party sources about the services the company offers and anything controversial that readers should know about. However, by posting the page live, I was hoping other editors would bring up a few points in the discussion that I can investigate. As the page stands, I fail to see how it's "Unambiguous advertising or promotion", the page simply outlines what third parties are talking about the company in factual form, acquisitions, company size, when it was founded, its impact in the industry. I agree it does need a section breaking down the conference services it offers, but I have yet to find references that contain feedback about the company's services, and of course if I see anything of the sort I will add it to the page. I am passionate about British startups and the impact they have to the global economy, so this is quite disheartening considering I read so much media about British startups which I think allows me to create unbiased, informed and factual wikipedia pages based on credible and relevant media sources. I would like the Powwownow wikipedia page re-instanced so I can carry on editing it as I see new references appear in online and offline media. -EJGlobal (talk) 08:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

For the sake of clarity, does "EJ Global" represent the name of a business? And are you being paid for your edits to pages about businesses? Edgeweyes (talk) 12:16, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
  • No, my background is in the media, I'm an individual who follows journalists that cover emerging British startups and I have thoroughly enjoyed consolidating coverage to form factual wikipedia pages about different companies and industries. I fully comply with Wikipedia guidelines and would not create or edit wikipedia pages for profit. I am still working on this wikipedia page and published it as a working progress as it was all the references I had gathered so far, but would love for editors to highlight areas that they would like to see expanded, to aid my investigation into the company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EJGlobal (talk • contribs) 12:40, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Can this page please be restored so I can continue editing the sections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EJGlobal (talk • contribs) 15:40, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Iambakey_Okuk

Citations have been added -Dr Lisabeth Ryder (talk) 19:37, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

@Dr Lisabeth Ryder: the article was not deleted, it is at Iambakey Okuk. Wikipedia's standard style is that article titles should consist of the name only, without titles or distinctions. I have made a redirect from Sir Iambakey Okuk. JohnCD (talk) 11:36, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Swapan Biswas/Palpara

I, Swapan Biswas, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Swapan Biswas (talk) 11:10, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

@Swapan Biswas: I have restored it so that you can access the history if you need to, but there is an article at Palpara and you should improve that rather than the userspace draft. Better references would be useful. JohnCD (talk) 11:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Daniel Noah

I have requested guidance for issues with this page to no response from administrators. The subject is an accredited motion picture writer, producer and director. There are many, many more people with lesser credits than the subject, and I would like help in this matter, which would be greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.91.231.176 (talk) 21:49, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I suggest you read WP:Your first article for advice, and ask at the WP:Teahouse for help in polishing this up. JohnCD (talk) 12:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Silvery-leaved

Wrongfully deleted. It does not fall under WP:R3 as it wasn't "recently created"; it had existed for years. It should've been taken to RfD if it were to be deleted. It is not implausible as the target mentioned "silvery-leaved" as a synonym. -Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

@Anarchyte:  Done. This was originally tagged under the WP:CSD#G6 Neelix exception, but once that was challenged it should have gone to RfD. I agree that R3 was not appropriate/ JohnCD (talk) 12:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

IambakeyOkuk.jpg

I was given a copy of this picture from Iambakey Okuk himself in the 1980's and it was taken in the 1970's, I believe it should be considered public domain and has been circulated widely on the internet -Dr Lisabeth Ryder (talk) 19:41, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

@Lisryder: I'm afraid it's not as simple as that. Things do not get into the public domain simply by being published. Copyright probably belongs to the photographer - do you know who that was? The image has not been deleted, but it will be unless its status is established by 29 May. I suggest you ask advice at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, explaining the origin and history of the picture. JohnCD (talk) 13:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Aqasi Designers

Aqasi designers is a digital company in Pakistan, that offers very cheap solutions to there users or customers, main thing is that they started a project regarding whole Urdu Language which is the national language of Pakistan, and it often works free for small business ... so i think that this article has a great value for urdu lovers and for small businessmen ... second reason which wiki gives me for deletion is that there is very low content so i tell you that i have not yet finished my article at that time... so please delete this article -صیام اسجد (talk) 11:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

@صیام اسجد:  Not done. Wikipedia is not a place for you to advertise your company. Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 13:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Dr. G. Shankar

KVn (talk) 14:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

@KVn: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Superyacht Builders Association

I, Rmpvantol, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rmpvantol (talk) 12:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

@Rmpvantol: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Superyacht Builders Association. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

ZendyHealth

I, 98.119.152.128, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 98.119.152.128 (talk) 14:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Tanishq Abraham

I would like to improve upon this article, perhaps under the draft namespace Draft:Tanishq Abraham. The original article was originally deleted under WP:BLP1E, though the subject is back in the news again after being accepted into college. -FallingGravity (talk) 00:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

@FallingGravity: looks like this has been done already. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
(edit conflict)  Done - restored to Draft:Tanishq Abraham. The history is somewhat confused and you may have to explore it a bit to find relevant content. As this was deleted after WP:Articles for deletion/Tanishq Abraham you should not restore it to the mainspace without agreement from the closing admin, Randykitty, or failing that from WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 15:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. FallingGravity (talk) 18:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Rafael Carbajal

I don't understand why this article was deleted. According to Wikipedia:Notability (sports) any player or manager who has played and managed in any Tier 1 International Match, as defined by FIFA, (including the Olympics) are notable. Isn't he notable due to the fact that he is currently coaching as a assistant coach at the senior international level (Tier 1 International Match) with Canada men's national soccer team.[1] Shotgun pete (talk) 07:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC) -Shotgun pete (talk) 19:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

@Shotgun pete: the manager may be automatically notable at that level, but it does not follow that an assistant coach is. However, he seems to have had a varied career: can you maybe find references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" so as to pass the WP:GNG? In any case, as this was deleted after WP:Articles for deletion/Rafael Carbajal, you would do best to make a draft article and check it out with the closing administrator or WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 20:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:History of EMS Electronic Patient Care REcords

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) gwalter 17:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

ganesh dev panday

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Ganesh dev panday (talk) 18:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. You absolutely MUST find some sources to prove notability. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
It's deleted now in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 and is therefore ineligible for restoration by request on this page. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Günter Pichler

I, NerdusMaximus, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NerdusMaximus (talk) 19:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

File:GotFragWebsite.gif

retrieving WP:I4 deletion -Prisencolin (talk) 21:35, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Black Motion

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Kchaba (talk) 14:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:32, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Argentine School of Protocartography

I, Cayuela, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cayuela (talk) 15:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:The Interrupters (band)

I, 2605:E000:618D:8F00:21E:C2FF:FEA8:3B1E, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2605:E000:618D:8F00:21E:C2FF:FEA8:3B1E (talk) 19:45, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:36, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:The Association of British Columbia Land Surveyors

I, 184.69.10.14, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 184.69.10.14 (talk) 20:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Team Turquality

retrieving WP:A7 deletion -Prisencolin (talk) 01:56, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Not done Prisencolin, this was deleted as an A7 and the admin who deleted it, DGG, is still active. You must ask him first. I know that several of us have mentioned this in the past, but when it comes to A7s you really, really need to ask the deleting admin first. We are not supposed to restore these here and this can be seen as you trying to go around the process, which has been pointed out to you several times. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:19, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Sometimes, rarely, we can make exceptions if the admin is inactive or if we know the admin particularly well enough but you've requested enough restorations here to where you know the way that these requests are supposed to go and what can and can't be done here. Some of the pages you're requesting were deleted this month, so you really need to ask the deleting admins. If they say no, then DRV is really the only route to go. I'd imagine that most of these admins would likely restore the pages, but you need to ask them directly. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:26, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
I am not going to restore this one in its present form,. It claims significance on the basis that they "are particularly known for their success in FIFA tournaments." but there are no sources whatsoever beyond the bare assertion. It also lists several people as notable alumni, but not a single one of them have WP articles (which is the ordinary standard). In the absence of any sources, the assertion of significance is very unconvincing. I suggest you try again with a properly sourced article, preferably in Draft space. DGG ( talk ) 03:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
There seem to be a lot of, albeit Turkish-language, sources if you look up "Team Turquality" on google news--Prisencolin (talk) 22:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Could you guys specifically add the fact that you can't restore an A7 here at the top the page. I keep forgetting/get lazy for whatever reason.--Prisencolin (talk) 22:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
It's already in the editnotice, in a big box that takes up a third of the screen even at 1080p. How much more specific do you need it to be than "Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7 or G11 be undeleted here. Requests for the undeletion of pages deleted under these criteria will not be accepted here." (all emphasis in the original)? —Cryptic 22:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Well shucks, the edit notice is the one thing that I tend not to read. I'll just edit the page to mention of it, if only to save some other editors a few seconds of time.--Prisencolin (talk) 22:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Blue Jays–Rangers brawl

Please put deleted version in my user space -Jax 0677 (talk) 02:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

  • On my end it's mostly a procedure thing - there's a certain process you have to go through in order to get content restored when it's been deleted a certain way (AfD and A7). Going out of turn, especially on something that looks like it's going through another deletion discussion of sorts, can backfire in the long run, especially if the AfD or restoration could be seen as contentious. It's kind of a little bit of extra insurance so that people can't additionally argue that the restoration or userfication was improper. (And unfortunately I've seen people argue that on occasion.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Done Restored to userspace, kept RFD in place. Nakon 00:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

G7 Teams

retrieving expired WP:PROD -Prisencolin (talk) 22:33, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

cybosol infotech

The page was created as an official Wikipedia page for a company with no personal relationship with the organization. I had also provided references to other pages wherein the company name was mentioned. Kindly help in solving the issue. -Jacobbabucybosol (talk) 11:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

We do not do "official" pages of any sort, and we need substantial coverage in third-party sources with editorial oversight - not mentions or name-drops. Wikipedia is an encyclopædia and thus is only as good as its worst source. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
You could politely ask the deleting admin @RHaworth: to turn it into a draft for you. Then you could improve it to an acceptable state to avoid a speedy deletion. The page did not contain a clear claim of importance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:52, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Andre Allen

Expired WP:PROD. Please restore to User:BU Rob13/Andre Allen, NOT mainspace. I don't know the content of this page, but I'm about to write a pair of articles on Canadian football players named Andre Allen, so this may be helpful to start one of them if it has relevant content. -~ RobTalk 05:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Non-Discrimination symbol

I, Karlind Govender, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Karlind Govender 09:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Ginislao Paris

I, Mudheno, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mudheno (talk) 13:38, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Would like to do more work on the article, thanks. -Mudheno (talk) 13:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:54, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Creatures of Grimm

I would request that this be emailed to me if still available - --Zfish118⋉talk 23:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

It is, but it's been reproduced and improved in List of Grimm characters#Creatures. A couple years ago I created that section from the content in the deleted article. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:45, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the hard work! I guess I no longer need the article, then. --Zfish118⋉talk 17:06, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Rustam Emomali

This page was deleted as G11. I am reviewing Draft:Rustam Emomali, which I would be inclined to accept if it were not for the recent speedy deletion history. Please restore the deleted version to my user space as User:Robert McClenon/Rustam Emomali. I will delete the undeleted version after I can compare it against the draft. -Robert McClenon (talk) 02:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

List of Neverwinter Nights characters

Can someone please userify this for me to add RS'es? Deleting admin was unable to do so. -Jclemens (talk) 07:40, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Thank you! Sorry it was a hassle, at the time I had no idea it was anything but a transient DB issue. Feel free to report it to the developers, as I have no idea why that should have been an issue. Jclemens (talk) 04:16, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
  • It would be a known "feature" to protect the system against excessive resource use. We also cannot delete pages that have too many revisions, eg the main page is known for that. Perhaps stewards can override the timeout, but in this case since it can be done in batches, we do not need to involve them. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:04, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Range Christian Fellowship

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Chapman*55 (talk) 23:41, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:18, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_234&oldid=1144149257"