Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 180

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 175←Archive 178Archive 179Archive 180Archive 181Archive 182→Archive 185

Energy Sword

This article was deleted per an AFD discussion in 2010, but I'm not wanting to restore the article, but rather its edit history. A possibly related article, Energy sword, was created recently. The edit history of Energy Sword may provide some content that could be merged into Energy sword. If there is reasonable edit history that could possibly be merged into Energy sword from Energy Sword, then I would like for Energy Sword to be recreated as a redirect to Energy sword as an {{R from alternative capitalization}}, and possibly a {{R from merge}}. -Steel1943 (talk) 21:55, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

And if the article is kept, a history merge might be in order. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
The histories are unrelated, so a history merge would not make sense. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:24, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Minimally Invasive Surgical Institute

I, SplashMedia, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G11. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it and add it to the [of Texas Hospitals] in Dallas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SplashMedia (talk • contribs)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (NawlinWiki (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. G11 is not the "abandoned draft" speedy criterion, it's the "Unambiguously promotional" criterion. I will note the requestor is blocked as a promotional account. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Not done "SplashMedia" has been blocked since they were here to spam, article was deleted as G11 so it is not eligible for restore. I'd suggest taking a look at WP:PSCOI instead. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:52, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Image Studio Lite

I, Sam at LI-COR, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sam at LI-COR (talk) 18:14, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

@Sam at LI-COR: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Image Studio Lite. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Speaker Knockerz

Blatant guideline violation: WP:CSD#G4 policy excludes pages that are "not substantially identical to the deleted version" (see different versions), and/or "pages to which the reason for the deletion" (see WP:TOOSOON) no longer applies -71.82.114.12 (talk) 00:21, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Well, TOOSOON was obviously a dumb thing to say at the AfD of a dead person, but this isn't AfD2. The new article wasn't the same as the old one, but there was no indication anything had changed since then either... I think the subject is arguably notable, but I can't restore the article in place for you. I could restore it to draft space so that you can work on it without threat of rapid deletion, if you like. It would then need to be approved by an experienced user to move back to mainspace (which is to your own benefit - you don't want it to be deleted rapidly again after all). Let me know if interested. --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:28, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
See Draft:Speaker Knockerz. If you want to help work on it there, feel free. 71.82.114.12 (talk) 02:03, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Mohit Jain

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Wowmohitjain (talk) 06:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

@Wowmohitjain:  Not done. All these links are basically reports of the same event. Congratulations on setting a record for mass-creating websites, but being in the papers only for one event is not enough for Wikipedia's WP:Notability requirement, see also WP:Notability (summary). In any case, Wikipedia is not a place for people to write about themselves - please read Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 09:47, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Pinder Sahota

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Kaurdhillon (talk) 11:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

@Kaurdhillon: Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 11:54, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

rajesh bhola

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Sombir9555 (talk) 06:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC) Dear Sir, A strong protest is herewith lodged against the morality principles of Wikipedia. It had been indeed very shocking to see that suddenly the said article which was published by Wikipedia (through submission of the same in Articles for Creation AFC and not created by my own self) after due course of discussions / verifications of references and links etc has been deleted without assigning plausible / tangible reasons after 9 months of its creation on 6 July 2014. Though I am a regular duly logged in contributor to Wikipedia and has made certain quality contributions in growth of Wikipedia by submitting articles / modification from time to time, the said arbitrary and erratic deletion has pained me immensely.
I have been informed that “This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.”
The reason / argument given is false and misleading. The person about whom the article is published is notable as per your rules. The notability is duly established by way of attachment of number of references which are authentic sources for making the subject notable. The submissions made by me were duly accepted by you and hence the article was published by you under AFC and not directly by myself. The notability of the subject is duly established by way of his contributions to the most esteemed newspapers and periodicals of India. He has made more than 200 contributions to such papers and periodicals apart from being founder of Spastic Society of Gurgaon where more than thousands of children afflicted with autism, cerebral palsy, mental retardation and multiple disabilities are being taken care of and a page is duly published by you on the same after due acknowledgement of the notability of that subject.
It is unethical to delete a page which is published by you in AFC after taking due cognizance of all the aspects and criteria of notability and genuineness of the subject until something to the contrary is found or reported! How can an article published by you 9 months back be suddenly deleted with the above reason when due debate was held and the article was published by your official in AFC after due submission of article by me.
I request you to immediately undelete the article for the creation of which due process of compliance of Wikipedia criteria and policies has already been done. Let your readers, who are spread in all the nooks and corners of this planet, retain trust in your policies which should not sound arbitrary at any stage of evolution of Wikipedia. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sombir9555 (talk • contribs)

@Sombir9555:  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajesh Bhola, it cannot be undeleted through this process.
AfC reviewers are not "officials", they are ordinary users who give some of their time to helping newer users by reviewing their contributions. Acceptance at AfC means that in the reviewer's opinion the article is acceptable, but it is not a guarantee that it will be kept or that it cannot be nominated for deletion.
If you believe that the article was significantly different from the one deleted in April 2013, so as to overcome the reasons for deletion there, you should approach the deleting adminstrator, user RHaworth (talk). Then, if you are not satisfied, you may apply at WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 09:32, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Update:  Done - page restored by Shirt58. JohnCD (talk) 12:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Christine Rosen

This article was deleted, as an expired prod in 2006. There is a Christine Rosen who was awarded a prestigious fellowship. I request userification, to see if the prodded article is about the same person. Geo Swan (talk) 15:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 15:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

@Geo Swan:  Done - looks like the same person. JohnCD (talk) 15:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Comfort Windows

I, Slightlynine, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Slightlynine (talk) 15:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

RLLMUK

The article appears to have been speedily deleted with rationale "Article about a website, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject" - however the article contained references indicating the importance of the site as the largest UK videogames forum and this can be incorporated into the article if needed -Tim (Xevious) (talk) 19:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Done - I went ahead and restored it. @Xevious:, please add a sourced claim to notability ASAP. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:54, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

User:JennyA12988/sandbox

I, JennyA12988, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JennyA12988 (talk) 19:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Done Let me apologize JennyA12988 as the page should not have actually been deleted since you had edited it after getting a notice of pending G13 deletion. It has been restored. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Jeremy Levy

This page was deleted in 2009 for 'Vandalism', I'm not certain what sort of vandalism. Jeremy Levy's organization PQI has gotten much bigger in the past few years and I think he should have an active wikipedia page. -Joelibm (talk) 21:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Not done The 2009 article was a hoax/joke article about a fake person (or nominally about someone with the same name with made up facts). You are free to create a new page if you think Levy is notable, but there is nothing to restore. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:38, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:PatioShoppers, Inc.

I, JMD2014, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JMD2014 (talk) 19:40, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:39, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

User:TheUnknownNinjaNN2/sandbox

I, 50.158.232.91, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 50.158.232.91 (talk) 23:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 04:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomadic Fanatic

I created this page because Nomadic Fanatic is a youtube icon and is very well know I was going to improve article over time but now can't do so due to it being deleted. -Articlecreater99 (talk) 01:19, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Not done - The page was deleted because it didn't explain why this person might meet our inclusion criteria for web content. In short you will need references to reliable sources to prove notability. If you wish to develop the page slowly, I suggest you do so in draft space at Draft:Nomadic Fanatic. That way, you aren't under threat of rapid deletion. Keep in mind the subject will have to meet the inclusion criteria for the article to survive in mainspace, so you might want to give that some thought before continuing to avoid wasting your time. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me directly. --ThaddeusB (talk) 04:25, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Peak Reliability

I, 67.189.125.134, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 67.189.125.134 (talk) 03:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Not done While it was nominally deleted under G13, the page was declined as a copyright violation and blanked before that. Wikipedia cannot accept text copied from other locations (such as the Peak Reliability website, as was done here). Feel free to start a new draft using your own words, but there is nothing usable to restore. --ThaddeusB (talk) 04:28, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

StankStorm

I just want the document information back for future reference and further development. Clearly as it is not important or significant enough for the Glorious Wikipedia in which hundreds of pointless articles are submitted and accepted, i would like to have my information back so that i can submit it where they would appreciate it. kind regards :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ARP50tm (talk • contribs) 14:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

@ARP50tm: see Wikipedia is not for things made up one day for why this is not suitable for Wikipedia. I will email the text to you if you enable email on your account. To do that, click on "Preferences" at the top of the screen, and at the bottom of the "User profile" tab fill in your email address (which will not be visible to me or to anyone) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users". JohnCD (talk) 14:20, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Broadbandchoices

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -WikiuserUK (talk) 18:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Not done The page was deleted under G11 (advertising). While I wouldn't quite call it advertising, it was rather promotional. If you are interested in starting a new draft article on the subject, let me know and I can restore what was there to draft space. From there, you could get feedback from experienced users without the threat of rapid deletion. If you are able to improve the draft, it could potentially return to mainspace. The article won't be restored to mainspace as is, however. Let me know if interested WikiuserUK --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
could I see what the issue is? or can you simply remove it and restore the page? thanks -WikiuserUK (talk) 19:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Obviously, if I restore it to draft space you can see the text. If you want it restored in mainspace, you'll need to contact the deleting admin: Jimfbleak (talk · contribs) --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:50, 11 March 2015 (UTC)


can you please restore it into draft so I can check it?

also how do I contact the admin who deleted it?

thanks -WikiuserUK (talk) 08:57, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Not done, and user blocked as an obvious sockpuppet. Yunshui 雲水 09:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
I have unblocked and restored the page to Draft:Broadbandchoices. Previous account was blocked for a username violation, so even if this is the same person a new account is permitted. WikiuserUK, do not attempt to move this article back to mainspace yourself unless you want it deleted and yourself blocked. (I am going out on a bit of a limb to help you here, so I can't be lenient on this point.) Instead, use the submit button on the an articles for creation template that I added to the page when you think it is ready and it will be reviewed by an experienced editor. They will then either move it to mainspace or let you know what needs done to make it acceptable. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:43, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Roger Groos

This person is a real person and a well known health practitioner in the field of naturopathy and colonic hydrotherapy in the United Kingdom Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -IngridBetancourt (talk) 12:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

  • I have moved the page to Draft:Roger Groos instead of deleting it to give you a chance to improve it. Being "a real person" is not sufficient for inclusion to Wikipedia. Instead you must demonstrate what we call notability, which in short means in depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. Once you think you have satisfied that requirement, then use the green "submit this draft" button on the template at the top of the page and it will be reviewed by an experience editor. If you decide not to proceed, add {{db-g7}} to the top of the page and it will be deleted for you. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Khushiar/Mohak Meet

I, Khushiar, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Khushiar (talk) 16:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

mohak meet

The circumstances has been changed now. Mohak Meet's Bollywood movie named Anjaan Parindey had been released. So i want to edit the article. Please restore the page. Thanks. -Khushiar (talk) 16:15, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohak Meet, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Spinningspark (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:20, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Note, I have restored the draft version of the article above. You can work on improving it to meet the concerns expressed at the AfD there. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:43, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Table of Content

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Psuf02 (talk) 21:02, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Johann Huber

I now have the requested references to the person -Lobsteroh (talk) 12:47, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

@Lobsteroh:  Done. I have reset the seven-day timer on the BLP-prod; you may remove it once you have added a reliable source to the article. JohnCD (talk) 14:57, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

F. Gregory Holland

Article has additional reliable sources. and then click the "Save page" button below -76.199.150.91 (talk) 16:30, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F. Gregory Holland, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Czar (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 18:30, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Boyd Bushman

Please userfy article to my space, Possibly taking this to DRV, but need to see the history of the article. Thanks. -Valoem talk contrib 10:34, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Wisdom Publications

I, Kestrel.Slocombe, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kestrel.Slocombe (talk) 17:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Not done That was not deleted as G13 (expired draft) but rather as G12 (copyright violation). Such material is not restored. You are free to start over if you like, taking care to not paste content from other sources again. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

nitesh estates limited

Hello, I am intend to work on this page. So, Please allow me to do so. The company is notable enough to appear on Wikipedia and hence I want to work on this page. -182.68.91.108 (talk) 11:26, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

  • ==Reason== Please give me the reason why can't I work on it and yes why I was blocked? I simple requested to create this page and I know that this page was deleted several number of times as was created against Wikipedia policies but I will create it as per Wikipedia's policy only and will not go beyond it. I will add the content that everyone will willingly read.
  • I agree that the article has been removed number of times. I checked the complete logs of it but on the other hand I feel that the company is notable enough to be present on Wikipedia and hence want to start it from beginning. And yes i really need your help in it. Once I will get the approval from your side, will create this page and its a humble request to please correct it if there is any kind of mistake. Also, if I cannot create this article then I would like to ask you one thing that can't we create this page ever in future? Because if today I have not been allowed then that means in future also nobody will be allowed to work on it? Does it so?
  • Even if you weren't an unrepentant sockpuppeteer with such a massive conflict of interest that it can be seen from orbit and a wanton disregard for Wikipedia's policies and Wikimedia's Terms of use, we do not restore AfD'd articles here on request. WP:DRV is the appropriate venue. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Oregon Angel Fund

I, BrittaPfeffer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BrittaPfeffer (talk) 22:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

@BrittaPfeffer: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:12, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
However, BrittaPfeffer, please be careful about close paraphrasing. I removed two sentences that are far too close to the content here. You have to rewrite the information in your own words, and minor surface modification is not sufficient. Thanks--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Patricia Matthews

I, Calgarytech, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Calgarytech (talk) 00:10, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:33, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Horace Fisher (artist)

I, Acbaird, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Alan C. Baird http://w.9TimeZones.com (talk) 05:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:11, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Stupid 7

The circumstances have changed. Before i created this page in 2012, the film was about to release and did not have proper articles on the internet. The film has now released and has proper information about it on the internet and even IMDb profile. It was a full feature Pollywood Movie. So, i request to re-consider the undeletion of this page. The page is provided with proper information and references. -122.173.27.236 (talk) 06:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G4, which means the page is a near-carbon-copy of a page previously deleted via deletion debate. Pages deleted via deletion debate will not be restored here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator who closed the deletion debate instead. That said, the article is not salted, so any registered could attempt to write a new article using reliable reviews as sources. Alternatively, the drafting process is available if one isn't comfortable writing directly on a title that has seen an AfD, an A7, and a G4. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 07:21, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
I have restored this to Draft:Stupid 7 so that you can fix it up with those references. IMDb counts for nothing here. Recreation was different to AFD version, so G4 delete was sloppy. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:31, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Aniket Gupta

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Aniket Gupta 07:13, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Dear Sir/Ma'am

Please restore Aniket Gupta Page.

(Possible proposed article content removed 07:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC) —Jeremy v^_^v Bori!)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G4, which means the page is a near-carbon-copy of a page previously deleted via deletion debate. Pages deleted via deletion debate will not be restored here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator who closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 07:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aniket Gupta, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. recreation identical to afd version. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:35, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Soft Robotics

The article has been deleted because of a copyright issue. Unfortunately, various attempts to get the review to provide me with details, what was actually the issue, did not work. He did not respond. There I would like to get the draft and see, which parts I could delete to avoid the copyright infringement. The article is quite extensive, since a lot of people have been working on it and it would be a pity to loos all the work, because of one picture or sentence. Thank you so much for your help. Kind regards, -SirJamesHunt (talk) 11:34, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

@SirJamesHunt: working on it. This is a long draft, and so far I have found only two paragraphs that are direct copies. It should certainly be possible to restore most of it, but it will take a bit of time to check it properly. JohnCD (talk) 14:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
@JohnCDt: Thank sooo much! I will then await your feedback. SirJamesHunt (talk) 14:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
@SirJamesHunt: I'm not sure this is salvageable - it's worse than I thought. I have so far removed nine paragraphs, copied from three different sources. I will press on and see what is left; I have kept all the references, which at worst may act as a framework for rebuilding something. I will also look back through the history to see whether any earlier versions are better. JohnCD (talk) 16:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
@SirJamesHunt: I have restored Draft:Soft robotics (small "r" because normal style is to use capitals within a title only for proper names). You will see that removing copyvios has left it pretty well gutted - I found eleven passages which had been copied, from five different sources. More on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 20:11, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
However, there is some good news - several of those passages were from a source released under a CC-BY license, which means they can be used provided proper attribution is made. JohnCD (talk) 21:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Dwayne Tryumf

I, Pablodejaniro, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pablodejaniro (talk) 14:06, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fighting_Pose_wa_Date_ja_Nai!

it was the page must not to be deleted since I want to protect the article from deletion. -Yoga Widya Prasetyo (talk) 09:26, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

  •  Not done Pages cannot be protected against deletion. To avoid deletion you just have to follow the instructions. This means that you find references for the content, add them in, and then remove the prod template. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:02, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Abdulla Al Gurg

I, DimaGIT, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DimaGIT (talk) 08:29, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G12, which indicates a page copied and pasted wholesale from another source, or otherwise closely paraphrased from same. G12 deletions will not be overturned here or anywhere else. The article *was* restored on February 21st and then pretty-much immediately (as in, in the same minute it was restored) deleted once again as a copyright infringement, which suggests to me the G13 deletion is a misclick and the draft was supposed to be deleted under G12 to begin with. Regardless, copyright-violating material will not be restored. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 08:37, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect

The copyright violation points to random page on the internet that has as much reason to assert copyright as Wikipedia itself (i.e., it most certainly does not represent the author). Furthermore, the quote used in this page is a small excerpt from a speech the original author held. The speech has not been published on the author's website, as far as I can see, or I would have linked there. It being a relatively short excerpt (compared to the supposed length of the whole speech), it seems like this excerpt should fall under fair use provision anyway. -DirkjanOchtman (talk) 10:56, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

David Wilson (Scottish football manager)

Manager is now head coach of Gibraltar national football team and now meets notability guidelines -Gri3720 (talk) 18:04, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Dojodave/sandbox

I, Dojodave, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dojodave (talk) 22:23, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Done There was nothing to restore since your submission was empty, but I've re-created it with the sandbox banner which you can use to submit once you have some actual content. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:20, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

sweet pool

I'd like the page to be brought back so that there is a coherently, well written page to refer to when an individual searches for the game. There are other 'wikis' out there that are either not in English or that are, but poorly translated and/or worded. I'd like to either edit this page if brought back or remake it entirely so that it's a reliable information source for the game. ( Voice cast, release date, summary, character cast, etc. ) -Fruitgrub (talk) 06:12, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

@Fruitgrub: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user DAJF (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Read WP:Your first article for advice; if the article is to be kept, it needs references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 09:24, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Karim SoFly

109.174.171.50 (talk) 11:30, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to anew location at Draft:Karim SoFly. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. See WP:MUSICBIO for what a performer needs to have achieved before they can have a Wikipedia article. JohnCD (talk)

Draft:Howell Movement (Contract bridge)

I, Rchillyard, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Beowulf (talk) 13:33, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

This is a legitimate topic for inclusion in the Contract Bridge project -- the article needs some work which I plan to do soon -Beowulf (talk) 13:36, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Not done. @Rchillyard: Hey Beowulf. This cannot be restored as you copied and pasted the material from here for its content and thus it was a copyright violation. This does not stop you from started anew, but please don't copy and paste previously written material from anywhere. Thanks--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:09, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

DAS MUTTERLAND

DAS MUTTERLAND It shouldn't be deleted because it's a personal opinion on what feelings there are about the motherland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DBROCONNER (talk • contribs) 14:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

@DBROCONNER:  Not done Wikipedia is not for personal opinions, see Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought #3. JohnCD (talk) 14:23, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Dastaar:symbol of dignity

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Csaman60 (talk) 09:37, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Not done - this page was deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7 and thus is not eligible for undeletion here. Furthermore, upcoming films are rarely notable and this one doesn't appear to be an exception. Feel free to recreate the article after the film is released if it is covered by reliable sources (for example receives reviews from professional movie critics). If you want a copy of the deleted article for later reference, let me know. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Broadleaf Commerce

Carlypnicholson9 (talk) 15:20, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

@Carlypnicholson9: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:34, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Reno Earth Day Celebration

I, Heatherhowell, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Page was deleted as "abandoned" after moderator review and I wish to review the notes, edit the page and resubmit for publication -Heatherhowell (talk) 17:35, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

@Heatherhowell: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Reno Earth Day Celebration. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Barbara Bjorklund

131.91.4.52 (talk) 20:21, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:33, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Fred Bendheim

The Lancet, Vol. 360, No. 9329, p347 Published in issue: July 27, 2002 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Staffer55 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The article you seek is at Draft:Fred Bendheim. Note that posting references on this page is usually pointless, especially when it doesn't have an argument for undeletion accompanying it. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:52, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
@Staffer55: checkY restored to draft space. The page has been restored to Draft:Fred Bendheim where you can work on it. Read WP:Your first article for general advice, and WP:Notability (people), particularly the section WP:ARTIST. Rather than just lists of works and exhibitions, Wikipedia's WP:Notability criterion looks for references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 08:59, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

John Cocke

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -NWJohnston (talk) 01:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

This is an article I'm writing about my dad because he made the first optical discovery of the pulsar star in the late 1960's. I'm taking so long to reedit the article because I'm not an egghead and this wikipedia process is mindbogglingly confusing to me. I'm not a complete idiot, yet I can barely understand the instructions for undeleting the article, let alone the instructions I received for fixing the issues a moderator had with when it was declined. Please undelete it because my dad's history is relevant to the scientific history of this world. Thank you.NWJohnston (talk) 01:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Have you read WP:Notability (people)? I ask because if it is undeleted here, it's very unlikely to get undeleted again. Alternatively, you could ask for the draft's contents to be emailed to you so you can work on it offline and then submit it for drafting once you feel you're ready. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:45, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
@NWJohnston: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:John Cocke. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article and the advice on the draft - one of the reviewers, user Tikuko, has offered to help, if you contact him. JohnCD (talk) 09:12, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Bulawayan94/Centrik Afrye

I, Bulawayan94, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. This user would like to edit the page as new reliable, verifiable information and links are now available after further research -Bulawayan94 (talk) 08:43, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

@Bulawayan94: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Check out WP:MUSICBIO which explains what a performer needs to have achieved before having a Wikipedia article. JohnCD (talk) 09:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuldeep_Sharma

Mr. Kuldeep Sharma has recently entered the Canadian Hotel industry after over 30 Years of experience in the Security industry in India. He is recent into the hotel industry and his hotels are performing better than his competitors with decades of experience. Mr. Sharma has stirred up the industry as a new comer and will be acquiring more properties in the Greater Toronto Area. In his previous operations in India he employed over 10,000 people and in Canada he currently employs 100+ people in the Greater Toronto Area and will be increasing his employment exponentially in the years to come. He is currently a nominee by the Brampton Board of Trade to receive the Leadership Award 2015 for the City of Brampton.

It is unclear why his profile was deleted despite proper citation. Please advise on next steps. You can contact me directly at: (Redacted) -Djsdown (talk) 22:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Gogo Dodo (talk · contribs)) instead. I have redacted your email address; posting such information publicly is an invitation to be spammed by ne'er-do-wells who may happen upon this page. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:47, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
  • @Djsdown: - The reason the article was deleted is that all the sources are about the hotel Sharma owns, not the man. Our policy on biographies of living people is very tough. It is this way because otherwise anyone could write anything about anybody (including horrible lies) and we would have no way of verifying if the info was true or not. You may well know that what you wrote about Sharma is true, but we don't. Thus we must delete the article for his own protection (someone could come along later are write lies about him, perhaps after having a bad experience at his hotel, for example). --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:06, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Thierry Chantha Bin

Article of a footballer who was previously deleted for failing WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL, but has since made an appearance for his respective national team as well as scoring during 2018 World Cup Qualification. Sources 1, 2. Thank You. -Inter&anthro (talk) 14:10, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Good enough, thank you. Inter&anthro (talk) 15:19, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Jeremy112233/My sandbox/21

Would like to resume work on a test page I had abandoned -Jeremy112233 (Lettuce-jibber-jabber?) 18:14, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

@Jeremy112233:  Done. JohnCD (talk) 18:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Fede alvarez

The editors have deleted article without making sufficient research on the person. I am a football enthusiast from Turkey and saying that I put my own resume or a friends is rude! I have been writing football articles in an internationally famous magazine, and I have been contributing to wikipedia for many years. Please provide me the undeleted form so I can add resources and develop the article in accordance with wikipedia principles -İstreader (talk) 19:07, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CommercialTruckTrader.com

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) A H Shoop 19:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:58, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_180&oldid=1138663857"