Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 179

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 175←Archive 177Archive 178Archive 179Archive 180Archive 181→Archive 185

works of Julius Evola mass PRODded by SPA

I noticed an SPA IP mass prodded the works of Julius Evola, a pretty well known writer in the world of esoterism/esoteric subjects. For those I checked out so far (those which hadn't yet been deleted), I've seen at least enough sources to contest a prod and in some cases more than enough to show notability. Looking at the names the IP removed from Template:Julius_Evola, I saw that I hadn't noticed them quickly enough. Requesting undeletion. Hopefully it's ok that I combine multiple into one section (with the same rationale). -— Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:07, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

see above -— Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:07, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

@Rhododendrites: no problem combining them, in fact I have combined them further to save space. As these are contested PRODs, I will restore them if you really want, but first please check out WP:Notability (books) and consider whether you can actually make anything out of an unreferenced sub-stub like:

"Synthesis of the Doctrine of Race is a work by Italian esoteric writer Julius Evola and was published in 1941 by Hoepli."

That's the complete "article", and others I have looked at are not much better. I can't see them surviving AfD. Would it not be better to list them, with some commentary, in the author's article? JohnCD (talk) 21:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
@JohnCD: Thanks. That one is pretty awful, to be sure. Others aren't great. But they were prodded based on notability, and being familiar with NBOOKS I saw that at least a couple of them are. That, combined with the fact that the editor's only edits were to prod books by this author with the same "non notable pamphleth" rationale, makes me think there wasn't enough thought behind the judgment. I wanted to have them restored so I could check them and then, if there's not enough substance or if it's not notable, I'll redirect them. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:46, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
OK, but it will be tomorrow before I get to them. JohnCD (talk) 21:52, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Done - All pages restored. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:55, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
@ThaddeusB: thank you! It was a pleasant surprise to find these all blue when I eventually rolled up my sleeves and sat down to do them! JohnCD (talk) 18:39, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Neel Kamal Chongdham

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Neelkamal05 (talk) 21:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

@Neelkamal05:  Not done. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place for people to write about themselves. For that, you want a social-networking site like Facebook or LinkedIn. See Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 21:24, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Jamie Herrell Miss Earth winner.jpg

reasoning -Jamie:Herrel (talk) 01:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

The file that I uploaded has been nominated to deletion due to my statement in my own account, I didn't mean to have restrictions, I clearly stated that Everyone is able to use image or files that I upload , just because of the little mistakes of mine, the file has been nominated for deletion. I've already changed the description of my account, stating:

This Wikimedia account of Jamie Herrell is handled by herself and to her Manager from the Miss Earth Organization. Every photos that are uploaded using this account may be use from any of this article: Miss Earth, Miss Philippines Earth, Jamie Herrell etc... The photos are free-licensed, which means, everyone is free to use these images for any purpose.. Thank you.


There are no restrictions already, please, remove the deletion and cancel it, this file is free use and is worthy to be saved with. As I say, this image is free-licensed which means, Everyone is free to use it. Thank you

Not done this appears to be in response to this request, which is on Commons, not on English Wikipedia. I will handle it there. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:17, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you so much sir... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamie:Herrel (talk • contribs) 01:24, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

International Alchemy Guild

I am the President of the International Alchemy Guild. I am not plagiarizing my own page -Mxgnrtnx02 (talk) 02:12, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Not done Mxgnrtnx02, even if you are the President, Wikipedia still cannot accept copyrighted text unless you file a ticket through WP:ORTS that gives Wikipedia permission to use the text. The reason for this is that in the past Wikipedia has had people claim to be the copyright holders of copyrighted materials, only for it to happen that they weren't. However, even if you do this you will still have to re-write the page because the text was ultimately too promotional to remain on Wikipedia and if re-added, the article would very likely be deleted through WP:G13, unambiguous promotion. That's the catch with using copyrighted text- most of the time it was written with a specific bias that wouldn't be an issue on the original site, but it would not be acceptable in an encyclopedia. As a point, try to avoid WP:PEACOCK words and buzzwords like "remarkable" and try to write in a more WP:NPOV. The text on the club's website was just too casual to really be appropriate on Wikipedia. Now that said, there are two other things I need to mention. The first is that Wikipedia discourages writing with a conflict of interest because it's so easy to insert promotional/non-NPOV material without noticing it unless you're very careful and also because it's very easy to see more notability than there might otherwise be. This leads me to my second point: I did a search for this guild and I can't really see where it's received enough coverage to pass notability guidelines for an organization. Other than some passing mentions in the contact section of a few books (being listed in this fashion is considered to be a WP:TRIVIAL mention at best), I don't really see where the IAG has received any coverage and even if the copyvio and promotional terms weren't an issue, this probably would not pass the speedy deletion criteria for WP:A7 (notability for organizations) or the articles for deletion process. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:20, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/St.Yesterday

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) JPanic15 (talk) 02:23, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Dorkinian Football Club

I, Vincebaldwin, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vincebaldwin (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:37, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Main Page/CSS

This was moved (without redirect?) to Wikipedia:Main Page/CSS, which still exists. When it was still at Main Page/CSS, some of its content was copied to the Main Page with a link to Main Page/CSS for attribution. Basically, the history of the Main Page depends on WP:MP/CSS, and we need this redirect for history searchers to be able to find WP:MP/CSS. -Nyttend (talk) 07:09, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Jennifer Abbott, War of The Gods

This page was Edited under malicious circumstances. the facts stated for the deletion were not correct and seem to be personal attacks from someone with a hidden agenda -24.68.137.198 (talk) 08:51, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

the Post was deleted and changed under malicious circumstances. The facts given for deletion were false and seem to be more of a personal attack on the author. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.68.137.198 (talk) 09:00, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

 Not done Please read WP:AGF. I can't find any deleted page with that title, or any variation that I have tried. Please give the exact title (spelling and capitalisation are important}. It would also help to know the username of the page's author, or a link to any notice about the deletion. JohnCD (talk) 10:45, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
  • JohnCD, it looks like they were trying to get Jennifer Abbott (director) restored. However as it was deleted at AfD, it cannot be restored here. As far as the allegations of personal attacks go, they're entirely unfounded (considering who the nominator was and some of the people participating in the AfD, one of whom was myself) and looking back, I have to concur on the nominator's suspicion that there was some sockpuppetry (or at least meatpuppetry) going on with the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:38, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Abbott (director), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Guerillero (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:47, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Ellington Lee Ratliff

I, R5family16, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. i would really like to work harder and have another shot at making this page happen. As Ellington Ratliff DOES NOT have his own individual wikipedia page. Yes if you go to the bands wikipedia page he is stated below but that is not his own page. I would really like to create Mr Ratliff's page if given the opportunity. R5family16 (talk) 15:07, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk)

Kamran Zahid

I, Poetawan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kamran Zahid 10:58, 3 March 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Poetawan (talk • contribs)

  • @Poetawan:The page you are looking for Draft:Kamran Zahid is not actually deleted, it was moved into the draft space as this is now the preferred area for articles to worked on prior to being place in the main space.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:00, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Just to clarify, it was deleted at one point, but was restored per a request here in January. Please work on the article at its new location, as Draft space is not for the indefinite holding of not-ready-for-mainspace articles. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:21, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pat Miller

I, Kutters1975, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kutters1975 (talk) 15:10, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Desperate Preacher's Site

I did not create this page, but I have had a link to it on my website, which is ClergySecrets.com, for some time. I am still in process of editing a book that makes several references to the "Desperate Preacher's Site." I would definitely appreciate having the article restored. Thank you. Sincerely Warren Vitcenda, author of "Clergy Secrets - They Don't Want You To Know!" -----Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -2601:2:5B80:60C9:D012:2377:486A:F330 (talk) 18:13, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

One source does not an article make. You need multiple reliable sources (such as newspapers, magazines in the subject's industry/topic area, or books) with no connection to the subject and editorial oversight that discusses the website in depth. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:22, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Ok. Well, is there a way that I can still get a copy of what was in the article so that I may perhaps work on it per your instructions? I did not create the page, but I would like to at least personally preserve what was there and add to it if I can. Thanks. Warren Vitcenda (Lectionary Lite, ClergySecrets.com) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LectionaryLite (talk • contribs) 18:44, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Question for "Administrator" Here: I found the deleted "Desperate Preacher's Site" on one of the "mirror" sites that copies Wikipedia's pages, so I have the information and links that Wikipedia deleted. Perhaps the "parameters" need increasing, instead of being just about the "Desperate Preacher Website"???? If a Wikipedia page were called something such as "Sermon Plagiarism," then perhaps all of the information from the deleted "Desperate Preacher's Site" Wikipedia page as well as the external links provided there could help make a new Wikipedia page with an expanded focus?? Expanding the subject would make the deleted "Desperate Preacher's Site" info just another source that would go along with the external links previously provided - as well as whatever other information/links that could be added as well. Any thoughts/comments/advice?? Thanks.

@LectionaryLite:  Done. As this page was deleted by WP:Proposed deletion, it is automatically restored on request. I will notify user Vrac (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. If that happens, you could propose any change of scope you have in mind and see whether there is WP:Consensus for it. JohnCD (talk) 20:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Hoshcof

I am Hoshcof, I am a person who records video games and theories on YouTube, and I wanted a Wikipedia page, because I knew Pewdiepie has one, so why not me? I may only have 32,000 subscribers, but they are growing fast. I know that you are a busy person, but please restore the page I created, and let me and my fans finish it. If not, then soon another will probably be created, probably by a fan, and it'll repeat the process. If you are not convinced, then you can check me out here. Thank you for your time, sir or madam. I hope you do the right thing. -Hoshcof (talk) 19:39, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

I will add, @Hoshcof:, that you might also want to read about deliberately disrupting Wikipedia to make a point, which will get you blocked if you persist in your threat to keep recreating the article. Doing that will also cause the article to be permanently protected from being re-created. Do the right thing and work with the community, not against it. Because you have a WP:Conflict of interest about yourself, your best venue for submitting an article is Wikipedia:Articles for creation, but that is no guarantee that your article will be accepted if it doesn't comply with the basic requirements described in Wikipedia:Golden rule. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:58, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Twelve Gauge Valentine

Requesting Userfication of the article history. Some years ago, I edited this article, and I remember it being in somewhat respectable shape, but did not add it to my watchlist. The 2014 deletion discussions speak of it as if it were exceedingly poorly referenced and written, which makes me think it may have been bombed by a novice editor in the intervening time, and all of its references erased. My memory may be imperfect here, but I wanted to make sure. -Chubbles (talk) 07:34, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Guess my memory wasn't up to snuff on this one. There's some referencing for this band out there in the world, still deciding whether I will attempt a resurrection... Chubbles (talk) 02:13, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

50 Moves (magazine)

Page was deleted in order to change the page title, however it was not removed from google index so can be restored -60.240.20.124 (talk) 23:26, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Google's cache does not instantaneously update. Give it a few days and the Google index should update to reflect the article's deletion/move. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Google seems to be very quick about finding newly created articles on Wikipedia, but very slow about removing deleted ones from its cache, in my observation. In any case, it is not clear what is being requested here. We have no control over how Google chooses to index content. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:48, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Michelle Orpe

I, Kellineroman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kellineroman (talk) 09:32, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:43, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Farman Nawaz

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Snehahurrain (talk) 18:58, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes I do remember that this page was previous deleted but is it necessary that if a page was deleted in the past so again the same rule of previous deletion is enough to decide the fate of the new page. Kindly compare the previous deleted page and now this one. There are hundreds of changes between them. I wish to raise few questions here ... 1. How many references were provided last time? 2. How much times is lapsed after the first deletion? 3. Do you feel that only the matching Titles of the previous and present pages are sufficient enough to delete this page? 4. Do you feel that the references provided here from Daily Global Times China, Daily Outlook Afghanistan, The Frontier Post, Daily Dawn, Express News TV Network, Express Tribune etc are fake? 5. What were the points of previous deletion discussion? 6. Are those points valid now to be applied on this new page? My more than 250 articles are published so far in the above mentioned newspapers. It can be confirmed from my webpage farmannawaz.wordpress.com and even the newspapers can be contacted to verify. Because of these articles Cardiff University UK has offered me an unconditional offer to admission to MA International Journalism. I am an emerging columnist and wants to contribute in the field if journalism. just type my email farmannawaz@gmail.com in any search engine and see the results. But here the the world most authentic encyclopedia has put the sword of deletion on my page. Is it justified to treat an emerging columnist in this way? sorry to say but I was not expecting this from the people who claim to belong to a free world. here I would like to give the example of Pakistani actor Hamza Ali Abbasi's account removal and then the apology of Mark Zuckerberg. Kindly see this link http://www.dawn.com/news/1156536 . I think the same name Charlie Hebdo is used in my page and twisting the arm of the Wikipedia to put the sword of SPEEDY DELETION on my page. I will wait for your response.

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farman Nawaz, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. This is also not the avenue to contest a CSD.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 19:39, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Cory Harding

Accidently deleted -YPMagic (talk) 04:50, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

@YPMagic:  Not done. It was deleted because you blanked the page, but looking at the content before that, I see no benefit to the encyclopedia in restoring it, as it seems to be partly a joke and partly a hoax. This is a serious encyclopedia, not a social-networking site. If you want it restored, please present a reliable source for the statement that "Mr. Harding now owns the largest conglomerate in the world." JohnCD (talk) 15:33, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosphere_Technology

The Biosphere Technology and the Biosphere Process©™ System was a technology developed and successfully marketed by a company called Global Environmental for 15 years under license from the inventor Dr CA McCormack. The technology is the subject of 6 successful international patent awards beginning in 1978 and most recently updated in the Bahamian patent No. 2181 awarded in July 2009 extending the technologies protection for another 20 years. Global was founded and initially chaired by Dr Albert Reynolds the former Prime Minister of Ireland and the Architect of the Irish Peace Process in partnership with President Bill Clinton. As such the company and it enormously successful technology are an important part of Dr Reynolds legacy. Dr Reynolds died on 21st August 2014 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Reynolds). The gasification technology embodied in the Biosphere and in its successor technologies was and remains true to the basis principals of gasification as developed in the early part of the 19th century in Europe. Clean air Gasification is a tried and tested environmentally friendly way to generate power from waste materials and play a significant part in the matrix of waste reduction and energy options for the future. Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Alb2015 (talk) 10:27, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:50, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Behnam Shakibaie

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Hamed Dehghani (talk) 18:25, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Hamed Dehghani (talk) 18:25, 5 March 2015 (UTC) Please read: http://www.esmd.info/speakers-profiles/76-dr-behnam-shakibaie.html http://www.leadingimplantcenters.com/clinic/dr-behnam-shakibaie-m-specialist-in-oral-surgery/ http://implant-op.com/en/main.php

he is a distinguished dr

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. As an aside, none of those three sources are usable - the first and third are listings (passing mentions are useless for sourcing) and the second appears to be a press release. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:37, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Detailed Clinical Models

I, William Goossen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ISO TS on Detailed Clinical Models is currently in press at ISO -William Goossen (talk) 09:16, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

@William Goossen: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Detailed Clinical Models. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Andy Penn

AP is the new CEO of Telstra a $70b market cap corporation and a top ten telco globally -121.211.251.58 (talk) 02:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

OK. So? Does he have significant coverage in reliable sources?
The article was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7, making it ineligible for restoration by request on this page. Please discuss it with the deleting administrator Bbb23.  Not done. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
@New but motivated: To clarify, Penn may well be notable, but the article did not show why he is notable. Indeed, it had no content at all - just an infobox. If you want the article back, I am sure either Bbb23 or myself would be happy to restore it to draft space where it can be worked on. However, a blank article isn't going to be restored to mainspace. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:45, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Deepak Bajracharya

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Koiralaindeep (talk) 11:21, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Deepak Bajracharya, a Nepali singer was born on May 2 in Lalitpur, Nepal. He started his musical career in the song Chodi Gayo Priya. Since , he had recorded more than 250 songs and did more than 300 programmes. He also did his first live concert in City Hall (1988) (2045). He too combine with other band for the concert in different countries including Nepal. With 1974AD ICON 2003 at .Ktm And Hong Kong, Rovin & Lujaw And Mongoliyan Heart at Dasrath Stadium. Ktm, with Ram K Dhakal and J Rajani Kant at Japan. He did his major solo concert in Deepak’s Night In Hong Kong (2002), World No Tobacco Day Mega Event live (2003) Presented By NHEICC & WHO at Dasrath Stadium. Ktm, Deepak Bajracharya Live In Patan at Patan Durbar Square, Deepak Bajracharya Live In Unplugged 2004 at Royal Nepal Academy.Ktm, Ma Ra Mero Guitar at Malla Hotel, Deepak Bajrachary Live In Biratnagar (2005). Among 250 songs his famous and hits songs included, Kali Kali Hissi Pareki, Ow Amira, Kati Baschau Maiti Gharma, Ritu, Jhumu Jhumu . He was also the brand ambassador of Bagpiper Whiskey, Kodak Film, Samsung Electronic and World Link Communication. He also awarded with different title award as Best Male Vocal Performance 1999 A.D., Best Music Video Award 2000 A.D, Album of the Year 2003 A.D.and so on.

for more info http://songsnepali.co/biography-of-deepak-bajracharya/

http://singerdeepak.com/

So i would like you to re generate this page again so that i can post all info to this.

Thanks and Regards

Indeep Koirala

@Koiralaindeep:  Not done. This article was deleted after a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Bajracharya, and has been protected against creation because it was repeatedly re-created. I suggest that you make a draft article at Draft:Deepak Bajracharya, with references to show how he meets the WP:Notability criteria of WP:MUSICBIO, and then apply at WP:Deletion review. Check out WP:Your first article for advice, and take care not to write in a promotional tone. JohnCD (talk) 11:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
@Koiralaindeep: If you do decide to give the article another try in draft space, let me know and I can restore the old version as a starting point for you. Keep in mind that the article will have to be approved by a third party before it can return to mainspace, so make sure Bajracharya meets the notability guidelines (as explained by JohnCD) before starting work or you will just be wasting your time on a hopeless article. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:49, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
@ThaddeusB: there exists sources now to pass GNG. Can you please restore it. I want to work on it. He is pretty well known figure in Nepal. Its sad that there was not enough sources in previous creation. As you noticed, the article was created multiple times. why? Probably beacuse of his popularity. nirmal (talk) 10:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Alfin Tuasalamony

Article of a footballer who has since gained notability. The article of the individual Alfin Ismail Tuasalamony has already been created, but it would be useful to re-create this article as a redirect since his middle name is sometimes omitted. Thank You -Inter&anthro (talk) 15:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

@Inter&anthro:  Done. Would it better the other way round - by which name is he more usually known? JohnCD (talk) 16:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
That is a valid point, and I'm not actually sure. I'm going to add @MbahGondrong:, @Rizky Rio:, & @Tommy1933: to this conversation as they are probably are more knowledgeable in the subject area than me. If a clear consensus cannot be immediately reached the discussion will be moved top the articles' talk page. Inter&anthro (talk) 20:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
It's a crude measure, but Google returns 150k hits for AT and only 30k for AIT. JohnCD (talk) 20:49, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Yeah I think your logic is correct, although it might be for the best to have another editor's opinion. Inter&anthro (talk) 21:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank for the notice Inter&anthro. As mentioned by JohnCD, he is popularly known as Alfin Tuasalamony and rarely mentioned with his middle name included. This can be seen on his Wikipedia ID page and in almost all football statistic websites (soccerway, transfermarkt, etc). Hopefully that helps. MbahGondrong (talk) 21:28, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
OK, article moved to Alfin Tuasalamony, with the other as a redirect. JohnCD (talk) 22:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Dark Awakening: A Star Wars Fan Film

i change the page and took out the copyrighted info. Its a notable star wars fan film. why is the page keep getting deleted. its there something i'm doing wrong that needs to be corrected -Kevin Jones (talk) 20:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC) Kevin Jones (talk) 20:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

@Kwjones30: deletion is being discussed at WP:Articles for deletion/Dark Awakening: A Star Wars Fan Film, and that is where you should comment, but first read WP:DISCUSSAFD and WP:Notability (films). JohnCD (talk) 22:19, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Not done There is no claim of importance here for a piece of on-line content so it meets the speedy delete criterion. You will have to find reliable independent writings about the film to base an article on. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

User talk:HYH.124/DYK

subpages of user talk pages are not dependant on the main user subpages. -HYH.124 (talk) 01:46, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

@JohnCD: Could you please undelete the page? HYH.124 (talk) 01:47, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 Done, I restored it. I can't say I understand why it was deleted in the first place. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Sorry about that! User:HYH.124/DYK was tagged {{db-u1}}, and I wrongly assumed that meant its talk page, too. JohnCD (talk) 09:34, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peachy Queen Boutique

I, Gnomeably, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gnomeably (talk) 09:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

@Gnomeably: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Peachy Queen Boutique. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:54, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:The Leppien Sisters

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) LovegoodMusicians (talk) 15:54, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

@LovegoodMusicians:  Not done. This page was a copyright violation from http://leppiensisters.com/about/. Wikipedia cannot hold copyright text, even in draft pages, without a formal copyright release. Assertion of permission is not enough. It is seldom worth making a copyright release, because just copying a website does not make an acceptable article: groups' own web-pages are written in a promotional style unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" are required to establish Wikipedia:Notability, see also WP:MUSICBIO. JohnCD (talk) 17:07, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Reducetarianism

Enter your reducetarianism has now received considerable press - http://www.reducetarian.com/press - and requires a wikipedia page to clarify its meaning. It has been included in other wikipedia pages including semi-vegetarianism, but it differs from it with a focus on eating less meat with respect to individual diets - http://www.reducetarian.com/faq/ here and then click the "Save page" button below -209.92.162.4 (talk) 16:18, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Wikipedia has quite a high bar for new words like this - check out WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary#Neologisms. JohnCD (talk) 17:11, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

InfoQuest

Due to miscommunications and change of particular websites it resulted in Deletion of pages, we will rectify those errors and update it -115.241.28.11 (talk) 17:08, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InfoQuest, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ymblanter (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:14, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Browser app

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -70.209.32.92 (talk) 18:08, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

 Not done, malformed request. No such article browser app (upper or lowercase) nothing found in requester's deleted contributions. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:26, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

K. Krithi Karanth

K. Krithi Karanth is a very prominent conservation biologist , she was a INK Speaker , A national geographic grant winner , A ramanujan fellow, was awarded the 10,000th research grant from National Geographic Society, was named as a rising young women of achievement by Elle Magazine, and has been nominated in the Environment category for the L’Oreal Paris Femina Women Awards 2013. Her information on the page was incomplete i agree but deletion was unwarranted and Schetm agrees with the reasoning. -Chinmayisk 11:01, 7 March 2015 (UTC) --Chinmayisk 11:01, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

@Chinmayisk: checkY restored to draft. The page is now at Draft:K. Krithi Karanth where you can work on it. Wikipedia's inclusion test is called WP:Notability and is not a matter of saying so but of showing references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Please check with the deleting administrator, user Bbb23, before returning this to the main encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:54, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
@Bbb23: please have a look at the article Draft:K. Krithi Karanth now and let me know if it is ok to include it into the main encyclopedia --Chinmayisk 19:45, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
@Chinmayisk: I don't think we're supposed to have this discussion here, but what the hell. I would not delete it per A7 in its current state. That said, don't you think you should clean it up before moving it to main space? It's got formatting errors and unsourced material. As an aside, pinging me doesn't work unless you use standard signing of posts. I just happened to see your edit on my watchlist; I wasn't notified of it. Good luck.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:12, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Laith Awda Kadhim

I, 37.236.184.81, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 37.236.184.81 (talk) 13:36, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

 Not done. This is a personal CV. Wikipedia is not a place to promote yourself. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:35, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft: Godfrey Diamond

Unnecessarily removed -68.174.167.80 (talk) 15:29, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

 Not done. No such article has ever existed here, either in main space, draft space, or AFC space. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
If perchance this was typed in by you but refused, then it was stopped by a filter log. If that occurred, you would have to tell us what IP or username you were using when it happened for us to tell you the reason as it was not under your currently assigned IP address. If it was under your current IP address then, as above, the page never existed, so it was never successfully saved by you. In any case, you would need to tell us the specifics of exactly what occurred, what you did, where, under what name, and what happened.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:52, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Schwartz Center Rounds

I submitted the page for approval but it was deleted due to copyright. I would like the chance to review the page and make the necessary amendments for resubmission. I am writing the article on behalf of the organization who organizes Schwartz Rounds in the UK. The system is now used by over 100 healthcare providers in the UK and recognized as a significant contribution to the culture of the NHS. Please let me know what I need to do to move this submission forwards. Thanks -Goldstar23 (talk) 21:11, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Not done - this page is a copyright violation.. Copyright violations won't be undeleted. And Wikipedia doesn't host articles "on behalf of" organizations, nor does it approve of editing with a conflict of interest or using Wikipedia for advertising or promotion. I strongly suggest you find something else to write about. BencherliteTalk 22:05, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Lisa E. Bloom

I, TeleComNasSprVen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 23:41, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BencherliteTalk 00:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

ER. Ajay kr. meena

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -ER. Ajay kr. meena (talk) 07:38, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Not done This was deleted by User:Bbb23 as WP:A7 and WP:G11, "unambiguous advertising or promotion" and an "article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject". Because of that, this cannot be restored here. You need to ask Bbb23 if he will restore it and if not, you need to go through deletion review. However at the same time I do have to recommend that you not create an article about yourself since autobiographies are strongly discouraged. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Rotary Cartoon Awards

Do not understand why this page was not accepted for publication and subsequently deleted. Please advise. -Cartoonlover2 (talk) 04:30, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:43, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
The AFC request was declined for the following reason: "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.". Since no additional edits were made to the page, it was considered abandoned after 6 months and subsequently deleted. If you have reliable sources to use as references, I can restore this page so they can be added and the page can be re-submitted for consideration. Thanks, Nakon 04:47, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
@Cartoonlover2: - In case it wasn't clear, the page can be restored upon request if you intend to work on it to address the issues raised in the previous AfC review. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:05, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Bryan Holley

Accidently deleted as abandoned for 6 months no edit Was unable to do it by then "Save page" button below -Austexan (talk) 10:26, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Not done - page was deleted was a copyright violation of [1]. Feel free to start a new article/draft article using your own words, but Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from other sources. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Done Correction - the linked page was deleted as a copyright violation, but the draft version at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bryan Holley was deleted as abandoned, as you say. I have restored the draft version. Please work on it ASAP. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:13, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Sierra the Barefoot Girl

I believe my article was deleted unfairly. All of my sources of information were listed. Sierra the Barefoot Girl is a prominent figure in the barefoot community and is one of the biggest advocates for barefoot freedom and rights. Please reinstate this page./ -Barefootsierra (talk) 10:58, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Done - Notability looks possible, so I have restored the article, but moved it the draft space. It can now be found at Draft:Sierra Larson. Please see the articles for creation process by using the green submit button on the template I added to the page. This will allow you to get feedback from experienced users without the threat of rapid deletion. Using this process is especially important if you have a conflict of interest, as implied by your user name. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Camberley Cricket Club

I, Smiler1991, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Please reinstate the page Smiler1991 (talk) 14:15, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:24, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oldje.com

I, Cindy Class, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cindy Class (talk) 15:11, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The page can now be found at Draft:Oldje.com. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

$heikh Zaman

$heikh Zaman My article page undeleted.

Replace 'reasoning' with the reason you wish to have the article undeleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qila Sheikhupura (talk • contribs) 15:13, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

  • (non-admin comment) This user is a suspected sockpuppet of User:Sheikh Zaman ll, which is why the article is being considered for CSD- it has not yet been deleted. Also, this article has been created many times my sockpuppets. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:17, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Here's an idea: why not actually record some music, and do something with your life? Posting hoaxes about yourself all day on Wikipedia makes you look a bit pathetic, mate. Just a thought. Dai Pritchard (talk) 15:21, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Kamran Zahid

I want to re edit the content & get it approved as soon as possible. -Kamran Zahid 15:24, 9 March 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Poetawan (talk • contribs)

@Poetawan: this was restored in January when you requested it. The page is now at Draft:Kamran Zahid as this is the preferred location now for draft articles. Going forward please sign your posts with ~~~~ so it is easier for us to respond and talk to you as there is no user Kamran Zahid.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:34, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Cardflex, Inc.

Thousands of companies have Wikipedia entries, and we created ours in the same format as these other entries. There is no marketing or promotional copy in the text - merely some basic history and background about what this company is and what it does. Please let us know specifically why we are not allowed the same privilege to be part of Wikipedia as the other companies now listed on the site. -71.170.193.227 (talk) 15:37, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Not done Please see the advice I gave you last time you made this request. Everything I wrote there still applies. If you continue to ignore the advice given, the article title will be locked and no one will be able to edit it again. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:08, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MAX MEAZZA Singer / Songwriter

I, Neiljaycody, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Neiljaycody (talk) 21:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. It is in no danger of being deleted anytime soon, but it won't be an article the way it is right now. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:19, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

User:SkylarDoesMinecraft

Please don't delete this because all this IS RELIABLE because it it an article about Savageookwolf. I mean, who knows more about Savageookwolf than Savageookwolf? And all this information is reliable because I am savageookwolf's friend and it's all true. It's an autobiography and doesn't need references. I feel as this deletion is a personal attack on him because I'm new on Wiki and my biography isn't deleted even though it's like his. Don't delete his biograghy! Don't delete it or delete mine too! -SkylarDoesMinecraft (talk) 17:48, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Wrong. Not only do we require references for biographical articles, but we very heavily discourage writing about oneself on Wikipedia as people have a tendency to aggrandise themselves. Also, other articles' presence or absence does not justify your own. Lastly, user pages are not substitutes for articles. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:01, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 Not done Wikipedia is not a webhost. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:22, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Allianz Australia

I have discussed the page and its contents with DGG ([1]) and I would be grateful for the opportunity to modify the existing page as per the feedback provided -00:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)MikiClarke (talk)

References

  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG#Speedy_deletion_of_Allianz_Australia
Not done. @MikiClarke: Hi Miki. DGG gave you some excellent advice, which included that you can "try again". This did not mean the prior article could or should be undeleted (and in fact it cannot be undeleted because it was a copyright violation), but that you actually try again from scratch. There is no impediment to your clicking on the red link above and to start writing. Please be careful of the advice. Don't copy and paste content again (understand that this also includes taking other people's writing and modifying it only on the surface; what we call close paraphrasing); take a look at Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and Help:Referencing for beginners, and note our requirement that the article be written from a neutral point of view, which is usually extremely difficult for people like you with a conflict of interest. Also, please don't ignore his advice advice about complying with the Terms of Use by providing mandatory disclosure of your paid editing. You should have already done so, before taking any steps regarding the prospective article. See more at Terms of use/FAQ on paid contributions without disclosure, which was also linked for you by DGG.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:04, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

translation in other other laguage

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -RichaChaudhary (talk) 07:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)translation in other language

You need to be writing those translated articles in the appropriate-language Wikipediae. The English Wikipedia has no use for content that is not in English. See also meta:List of Wikipedias. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 08:36, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_179&oldid=1138663851"