User talk:JennyA12988

Your edits

Hi JennyA12988, uou have now introduced poorly sourced promotional material on four occasions to Royalty Exchange, which has been removed each time. I have explained why I removed it, on the article's Talk page. Wikipedia isn't the place for companies to publish their entire history, when it is only sourced from their own website. Please do not re-add the same material, without either discussing it first on the Talk page, or providing independent sources to show that this content is worthy of an encyclopedia article. Sionk (talk) 15:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Royalty Exchange, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sionk (talk) 16:07, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JennyA12988, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Sionk (talk) 15:50, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The SPI case will be closed with no action, but please try to remember to log in before editing. While logged out editing is technically allowed, doing so to create the appearance that multiple people are editing a page can result in blocks. Let me know if you have any questions, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:11, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:JennyA12988/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Revent^talk 11:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! JennyA12988, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Revent^talk 11:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Royalties

Category:Royalties has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Sionk (talk) 22:18, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:JennyA12988/sandbox

Hello JennyA12988. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:JennyA12988/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 15:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Royalty Exchange has been accepted

Royalty Exchange, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ThaddeusB (talk) 21:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also salvaged some info from the article's history. Hopefully you learned your lesson from the previous deletion and won't re-add promotional material to the article. Indeed, it would be highly advisable that you not edit it at all if you have a conflict of interest. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]