Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 108

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 105Archive 106Archive 107Archive 108Archive 109Archive 110→Archive 115

Cindy Bernadette

reasoningThe Article about Cindy Bernadette is important -YogaWP (talk) 00:59, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 16:10, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Ayano Shiraishi

the page about Ayano Shiraishi is important -YogaWP (talk) 00:58, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

 Not done - see reply for Cindy Bernadette above. It is not enough to say these are important, you need to show that other people think so, too, by giving references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, see also WP:N and WP:MUSICBIO. JohnCD (talk) 16:13, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

User:LouiseBrown1981/sandbox

I, LouiseBrown1981, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. LouiseBrown1981 (talk) 16:12, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:18, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daniel Bradford

I, Annenubis, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Annenubis (talk) 17:43, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:38, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TEMPI Syndrome

I, Sykesdb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Sykesdb (talk) 20:28, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:00, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Robert Queiroz

there is nothing wrong with my page, please do not delete. -RobertQueiroz (talk) 03:44, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

 Not done. There are plenty of sites like LinkedIn and Facebook where you can write about yourself, but Wikipedia is different: it is not a social-networking site but a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 09:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/中誠信集團

I, 116.48.143.136, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 116.48.143.136 (talk) 09:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 15:57, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James S. Carter AKA Karter Jaymes

Lisa Salio (talk) 12:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Master of Resources Law Studies

I, 98.245.129.232, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 98.245.129.232 (talk) 15:36, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. I think it is very unlikely that an individual course like this can meet Wikipedia's inclusion criterion of WP:Notability, which requires references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. It would probably be better to cover it by a mention in the College's article. JohnCD (talk) 16:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Neil Moffitt

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Amgprlv (talk) 17:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:38, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Randall Carver

Many prior revisions had copyright violations. Are there any revisions that do not infringe copyright? -George Ho (talk) 22:30, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

 Not done There is a blank page and a vandalism page. The A7 deletion was also a copyright violation. So nothing worth restoring. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:51, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Southern Brotherhood Militia

reasoning -74.192.92.81 (talk) 05:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC) It is needed information for the public to see.

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Dlohcierekim (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The only reference given is the organization's own website, but to establish Wikipedia:Notability requires references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 09:56, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Washington State University Global Campus

I, Rhmillerr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Rhmillerr (talk) 21:39, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

 Not done, because an article already exists at Washington State University Global Campus. You are welcome to improve that: in its present state it might well be proposed for deletion, because its only references are to primary sources, but to establish Wikipedia:Notability requires references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 10:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Liam Axbey

Footballing career

Liam Axbey was a reserve goalkeeper for Npower League One football team Brentford F.C.

He made 4 appearances in total for the reserve side however he played for 14 minutes in a League Cup came against Rotherham United after the goalkeeper had to be substituted as he had an injury.

At the age of 38, Axbey moved to Ryman Premier side Harrow Borough having a short spell at the club.

His stay at Harrow Borough ended quickly after a disagreement with members of the backroom staff over how much game time he was getting.

He also tried to distract the linesman by saying 'No that is not a correct decision I will get my Axbey family on you if you do it again' repeatedly.

He then got sent out of the ground where he turned around, held his middle finger up whilst cursing towards the referee.

Personal life

He is currently at the age of 54 running many small charities around the UK for people with Down's Syndrome.

His brother has this condition and Liam is always there to help him with his charity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.218.6.197 (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. please expand this contribution and add references. And then submit for review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Thomas Ridgewell

reasoning -80.229.246.153 (talk) 22:27, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Thomas Ridgewell is a contemporary Internet based film and multi-media creator. He has a large following and is in the YouTube 'Top 200 YouTubers of all time"

His short films and the animated "ASDF Movie" series have received over 444 million hits.

He has appeared on The BBC's One SHow and has been interviewed many times in media and technology programmes, and websites

I don't quite understand why a Wiki page on him would be deleted, as there is a growing interest in his career and content. It was a surprise when my original page was deleted. I would be happy to discuss this in more details with anyone

 Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. This article was deleted after a discussion took place at WP:Articles for deletion/Thomas Ridgewell, so it cannot be undeleted through this process; also, after that the article was re-created four times within a few days, so that the title has been salted - protected against creation without permission from an administrator.
If you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user TParis (talk). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:38, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ruth Morris Bakwin

I, Lisabethwcmc, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. The page was deleted because we did not update it in the last 6 months. We intend to update the page and will make sure to update it regularly. Lisabethwcmc (talk) 21:43, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
I have accepted the article which is now at Ruth Morris Bakwin, where you are welcome to develop it further. Thank you for your contribution. JohnCD (talk) 11:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/VeriApp

I, Gujiangtao, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Gujiangtao (talk) 03:36, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:29, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nebraska Latino American Commission

I, Jasel.Cantu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Jasel.Cantu (talk) 20:52, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

 Not done, Almost all the existing text is an exact copyvio of http://latinoac.nebraska.gov/about.htm. This cannot be restored, but if you have third party sources you are at liberty to write an article in your own words . DGG ( talk ) 23:51, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gabriel Calvo

I, 81.182.64.150, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 81.182.64.150 (talk) 18:54, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Comment The only available source is not independent--the author was "one of the pioneers of the Original Marriage Encounter in the U.S. " If we restore it, there is essentially no chance of writing an acceptable article. Perhaps it would be better to make a redirect from the founder's name to the organization. DGG ( talk ) 23:57, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

rajesh bhola

The article was deleted without justified reasons. Rajesh Bhola is a personality in social work and doing charitable work at a great level. No objectionable mater is there in the article. Request for undeletion.The article may be published in larger interest of humanity. -117.212.122.84 (talk) 07:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajesh Bhola, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Kww (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:28, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Suvodeep chatterjee

reasoning -Jeetbnr (talk) 22:12, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Dont Delete He is really a world record holder and world record india and Record holder republic is a registered organization.World record holders are the pride of a country,who should be supported with respect, prosperity and honor by every country and every citizen as well.- user: Jeetbnr

spastic society of gurgaon

The article was deleted without justified reasons. The Society is doing charitable work at a great level. No objectionable mater is there in the article. Request for undeletion.The article may be published in larger interest of humanity. -117.212.122.84 (talk) 07:16, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

HireJungle

Requesting userfication of this deleted page for further improvements that will make it according to Wikipedia regulations. Thank you. -BiH (talk) 21:50, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HireJungle, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:44, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chess London

I, James1912, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. James1912 (talk) 16:56, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. The article needs references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 09:57, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Responsiball

I, 46.126.170.142, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 46.126.170.142 (talk) 08:49, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

 Not done. There is a more recent version at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RESPONSIBALL which has not been deleted. I suggest you work on that. If the article is accepted, we can decide then whether the title should be all-caps. JohnCD (talk) 10:07, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Guide2tricks

its a rising website and to successfully rise we need a wikipedia page.its the only source.Please i request you to restore its. Thank You -117.198.102.32 (talk) 15:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Question Have you any references from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online?There were none in the speedy-deleted article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs) 23:59, 3 December 2013‎
 Not done. Sorry, but Wikipedia is not here to help promote your website. If Wikipedia is "the only source" about it, then it does not (yet) meet our WP:Notability requirement, which requires references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 10:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Suvodeep chatterjee

this person is a real world record holder and well known artist, his last group show comes in news paper also,he is also one winner of samsung incredible art among 3.2lakh perticipants, which was a guiness world record attempt.World record holders are the pride of a country,who should be supported with respect, prosperity and honor by every country and every citizen as well -Jeetbnr (talk) 10:43, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Not done This page is for requesting the undeletion of pages which were deleted uncontroversially. The article Suvodeep chatterjee has not been deleted, and is being discussed at Articles for deletion. You have already contributed to the discussion there, and are welcome to continue to do so; however, this page is not the venue for such a debate. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:47, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Funkshone

This UK band is notable within Europe and Japan, and I would like to improve the article to reflect this more clearly, by adding significant new information and references. -ClareGC (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

The article was originally deleted after it was flagged under 'articles for deletion' as being non-noteable, and an American user commented that the band only seemed to have 'free downloads and such' (This is an error since the band have produced highly successful albums on CD and vinyl, and this is verifiable), and one further American user, who contributes to Wikipedia only in their role as a deletionist, added their support to the deletion, and so it was deleted after 7 days. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Funkshone

I requested a deletion review, however this didn't attract any discussion during the 8 days it remained open, so I don't know whether anyone has yet viewed the significant new information I submitted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2013_November_22

We cannot help you here, but you can add another deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:52, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
I suggest you write a draft article - click Help:Userspace draft and fill in the title to make a draft page - with your new information and references, and go back to WP:Deletion review with a link to that. JohnCD (talk) 10:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you both for your replies, suggestions and details. I will write a draft introductory section, with references, in the hope that if this is considered acceptable for an article, it could be added into the original article, so that the page's history is preserved. The original had a lot of accurate information already present, including a near complete discography, which was contributed to by many users over 4 years. Possibly it's because the article has only just been deleted, but I'd feel like I was stealing their work, since the best I could write those sections, would be nearly exactly how they were before. I will add my draft in a new deletion review, as I had also hoped to generate a discussion on the level of influence a band needs to have to be included on Wikipedia, as I understand that it's more than simply selling successful albums. But I admit that that would be more for my general understanding, since I'd hoped to contribute to, and even start, articles about other bands, but am somewhat put off due to them being in the funk genre, where they might not be so well-known to the general worldwide population.
@ClareGC: actually, I think it is reasonable that you should have the old article as a starting point, so I have userfied it for you to User:ClareGC/Funkshone, and you can work on that. I have left in place for your reference the "multipleissues" tag at the top, to show concerns people had wih the article, but you can remove that if you address the issues. For general notability standards, see WP:GNG, and for bands see WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk) 11:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks very much for doing that. I'll start working on improving the article now. Thanks for the links as well. ClareGC (talk) 12:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrea Beaman

I, Wholesomehelper, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Wholesomehelper (talk) 17:57, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

 Not done - this Articles-for-creation draft is what was deleted after being untouched for six months, but there is no need to undelete it, because the article Andrea Beaman exists in the main encyclopedia - see below. JohnCD (talk) 19:04, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Andrea Beaman

public figure is still active with career -Wholesomehelper (talk) 18:00, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

The article was originally deleted because I received a notification it had not been updated in over 6 months.

 Comment:: what was deleted was the Articles-for-creation draft, see above. This article has not been deleted, but deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Beaman, and that is where you should comment. Read WP:DISCUSSAFD first. JohnCD (talk) 19:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Network Startup Resource Center

I, 2601:7:2380:50D:958A:85FF:4869:F08E, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 2601:7:2380:50D:958A:85FF:4869:F08E (talk) 13:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Magazine Fed Paintball

I, 24.49.33.185, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 24.49.33.185 (talk) 16:10, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Magazine Fed Paintball

I was away for work and family needs and have just now been able to return work on this project. I would like to not start over -24.49.33.185 (talk) 16:12, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Sam pepper (artist)

it is factual and not promotion..references prove what is said -Kpshu (talk) 19:09, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Not done this page was too promotional to restore. However there was a claim of importance. So recreation in an encyclopedic manner would be permitted, but please use correct capitalization! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:44, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Dillon_Lane

This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. That said, as per WP:BLP this article cannot remain on Wikipedia - as per WP:AUTO and WP:COI, you cannot write an article about yourself, and as per the notability guidelines, you're not notable enough for an encyclopedia article. ES&L 10:59, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Jamaica Vacation Spots

It's my Homework for class and I would Like to receive a grade for what I wrote this Far Thank YOU !!!!!! -Sara.Powell20 (talk) 00:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Wikipedia does not accept articles which consist of original research, or which lack any reliable sources of information. ES&L 11:03, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Floyd Cardoz

I, Silvercouch55, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Silvercouch55 (talk) 03:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

 Comment:: I see you have re-created it. That's fine, but it will not be accepted in its present form. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note in particular that you need references, for two reasons: (a) because of the WP:Verifiability policy: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source", and (b) to establish WP:Notability, which requires references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Also, be careful to maintain a neutral point of view and avoid promotional phrases like groundbreaking and truly celebrated the sensual flavors and spices of his native land. If the article sems to be trying to "sell" Cardoz, it will not be accepted. JohnCD (talk) 09:30, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Alan Juristovski

I see that the reason the article was deleted was due to a lack of "significant coverage" so I'm providing a list of applicable press coverage of Alan Juristovski, which details his success as a notable entrepreneur. Alan recently passed away, which I would like to have reflected on the page if/when it is reinstated.

<list of links removed - add them to the article>

What else needs to be done to have this page undeleted/reinstated? -Ostretch (talk) 23:35, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Smartse (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Please update the article as soon as possible. JohnCD (talk) 11:12, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alec Muffett

I, Melodien, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Melodien (talk) 23:04, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:21, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Zenon Software

I would like to edit it according to Wikipedia guidelines -CD33 (talk) 12:49, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:CD33/Zenon Software. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Jimfbleak (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Belluck & Fox, LLP

I, 187.23.216.116, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 187.23.216.116 (talk) 12:14, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Not done, too promotional in tone Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:01, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Next Generation Dental

I, Pjgdds, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Paul J Ganjian 06:40, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice; it seems to me unlikely that this can meet Wikipedia's inclusion criterion of WP:Notability, which requires references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 16:14, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Jafaria Disaster Management Cell

reasoning -Prince.aliabbas (talk) 20:28, 5 December 2013 (UTC) The page has been wrongly deleted from Wikipedia as it does represent a 'welfare organization'. I want this page to be republished as it is more and more informative and necessary.

 Not done. It does not matter that this is a welfare organization, it is subject to the same rules as any other article, see Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. The article was deleted (a) because it was largely a copyright violation from http://jdcwelfare.org/About-us.html, and (b) because it was much too promotional in tone for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not a notice-board for pinning up copies of organizations' own literature. An article would also need to to establish WP:Notability by references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources . JohnCD (talk) 21:08, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William Jay Weissinger

I, Seattleatya, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. want to add citations.Seattleatya (talk) 17:33, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Note: User has already created a new article for the subject at William Jay Weissinger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:07, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Therefore,  Not done - no point undeleting the AfC draft, please add citations to the existing article. JohnCD (talk) 21:10, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/2012: A Year Of No Significance ... Colonial Penetrations in the First World - Part 1 in the Sound and Light of India series

I, 117.199.89.189, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. have not finished article and plan to - awaiting decision which may require more time - do not wish to recreate the article from scratch 117.199.89.189 (talk) 15:23, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. Articles for creation is not for indefinite hosting of material not ready for the encyclopedia. Please read WP:Your first article for advice, and WP:Notability (books) to understand what is required for a book to have a Wikipedia article. JohnCD (talk) 23:01, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

369 Micro Systems

need to updated information -Shraddha Kolbekar (talk) 10:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

 Not done. This page cannot be restored because it is a copyright violation from http://www.369microsystems.com/about.html. Also, even if a formal copyright release were made, it is far too promotional in tone for a Wikipedia aricle, which requires a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion; it is not a notice-board for companies to post copies of their promotional literature. JohnCD (talk) 10:22, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Relaxation Therapy

I, 209.161.48.38, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Would like to retrieve my submission for Relaxation Therapy and edit it. Have been busy but would like to get this posted on Wikipedia. Thank you, Barbara George 209.161.48.38 (talk) 15:47, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Skibinski

I, Polishtom, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Polishtom (talk) 17:12, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. Articles for creation is not for indefinite hosting of material not ready for the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for general advice, and Help:Table for how to make a table. JohnCD (talk) 11:03, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

medindia

To recreate a new article for medindia -Castroregu (talk) 11:23, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Not done Previous versions of the article were either unsalvageable advertising or copyright violations. I suggest you create a userspace draft of the article; if it is suitable then I or another admin will be happy to move it to the correct title over the creation protection. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:07, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Kai Wong

Popularity of Producer in Independent Film Festivals and in China increased since 2006 -70.79.87.53 (talk) 13:01, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai Wong (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Kai Christophe Wong

merged with Kai Wong page in an earlier incorrect version. -70.79.87.53 (talk) 13:19, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

 Not done - this is the same person as "Kai Wong", so the same remarks apply as in the entry just above. JohnCD (talk) 13:52, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Guide2tricks

Requesting to restore the page -Mohammedniham (talk) 15:43, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jacob W. Gruber

I, 74.79.36.35, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 74.79.36.35 (talk) 14:11, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:41, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Center of Excellence in Molecular Biology (CEMB)

I, Afficer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Afficer (talk) 17:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:43, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Center of Excellence in Molecular Biology (CEMB)

wish to have the page on wikipedia as it will be helpful to readers -Afficer (talk) 17:49, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hemlock Recordings

I, 82.32.142.120, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 82.32.142.120 (talk) 17:55, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joseph W. Belluck

I, 187.23.216.116, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 187.23.216.116 (talk) 18:34, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:01, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Dre Knight

Dre Knight is a popular music producer within the recording industry. Working with artists ranging from Frank Ocean to LL Cool J. The sole purpose of his wikipedia page is to display his discography and various other achievements and accomplishments to the viewing public. This page was deleted without any rationale or clear explanation. We respectfully ask for this page to be restored. Thank you. -Drt831 (talk) 19:55, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dre Knight, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Stifle (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. To address this reason for deletion there would have to be a claim of notability, no promotion, and multiple references to substantial reliable independent sources. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:04, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Kent Evans

It seems that the reason for deletion was a lack of cites and sources as well as inconsequential material. Some changes have been made and I am making more as I get more material. I have seen that removal of fluff is gone and only pertinent information will be posted. -DizaBlah (talk) 00:51, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent Evans, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user SarahStierch (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 11:37, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Munay-ki

There are now third party sources and I would like to update the article. Thank you -99.167.206.167 Vajko (talk) 03:48, 7 December 2013 (UTC) 22:20, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request; but unless you can add references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources it is likely to be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 11:52, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jacob Hefner

I, 190.23.39.58, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Hello. Additional publications have been completed and are forthcoming in Q1 of 2014. Thank you for your consideration. 190.23.39.58 (talk) 04:05, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The fact that he is about to publish more work is not enough: what is required is evidence of independent comment about him, by references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 12:02, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Polemic_(band)

The article was originally deleted by applying A7, I think it was applied incorrectly, Polemic is a fairly popular Slovak band, see e.g. their website http://www.polemic.sk/, they released CDs, tourned various European coutnries etc. The page is also refered to from Slovak_popular_music page where the band is listed as one of the Slovak Ska bands -216.133.125.82 (talk) 03:03, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

 Not done - the article deleted in 2007 was about a different band. It started "Polemic is a band from Athens, Georgia." You are welcome to write an article about the Slovak band: read WP:Your first article and WP:BAND first, and then use WP:Articles for creation. JohnCD (talk) 12:09, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Beach bunny

Please restore the history of the article prior to its deletion so I may see what was there and work to expand the original article. ---evrik (talk) 21:35, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

 Not done. This was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beach bunny, so you would have to ask the closing admin, user Sandstein (talk) if you want it back; but it will not be much help because there was very little there: "...a general American popular culture term for a young woman who spends her free time at the beach. In surf culture it may also refer to a female surfer. Beach bunnies are known for the amount of time they spend sun tanning and are usually represented wearing bikinis," plus "In popular culture" references to Muscle Beach Party and Gidget, and two pictures of young women on beaches: 1, 2. No sources cited at all. JohnCD (talk) 12:31, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
I'll ask Sandstein, thanks. --evrik (talk) 14:34, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Hassan Abdalla

Thank you. I'll do it in a few minutes and let u know. Also, I'd like to republish the article according to the policies and guidelines. Should I rewrite and send back to u for review?

I have no problem with deleting the article. I was just wondering how I could get the text back? -Fayed.yousry (talk) 18:14, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

I can email it to you if you enable email on your account. To do that, click on "Preferences" at the top of the screen, and at the bottom of the "User profile" tab fill in your email address (which will not be visible to me or anybody) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users". You will need to respond to a confirmation email. JohnCD (talk) 18:36, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Done. The email has been set. It would be great if you could send me the text written in wiki form. Will make it much easier for me to edit it and repost it according to the guidelines. thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fayed.yousry (talk • contribs) 16:01, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 20:41, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Graeme Fuller

reasoning -Graemef (talk) 23:59, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

User:The_Rahul_Jain/Jain

Userspace draft that I wish to restore to continue work on. -Rahul (talk) 05:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

 Done - U1 deletion restored on request. JohnCD (talk) 10:21, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr. Bhaskar Bhole

I, Shubharaj, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Shubharaj (talk) 07:31, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:01, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rich Gaiti

I, 173.61.134.49, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 173.61.134.49 (talk) 14:23, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_108&oldid=1090623203"