Wikipedia:Featured article review/Oriel College, Oxford/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 2:46, 12 June 2021 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: TSventon, Ravenpuff, Wiki alf, WP Higher ed, WP Oxford, WP Middle Ages, 2021-01-18 talk page notification
Review section
[edit]This is a 2007 featured article that has not been maintained to FA standards. Some updates were done after the January talk page notification, but the article still has considerable maintenance tags and relies heavily on primary sources. There are bare URLs, inconsistent citations, page numbers needed, citation needed tags, spaced endashes, and considering the overall deterioration in the article, a top-to-bottom rewrite and review is probably in order for datedness. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:40, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC - Lots of work needed per nom; minimal engagement since FAR opened. Hog Farm Talk 03:36, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC Not much has been addressed. ~ HAL333 21:24, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC lots of work needed and little engagement. Link20XX (talk) 14:28, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and currency. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- much work needed and not much happening. Hog Farm Talk 16:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]- Well, Hog Farm, I can't help but think that deletion might be just a bit of an overreaction. (It did give me a good laugh.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:11, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - I must've had AFD on the mind. Hog Farm Talk 17:56, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, Hog Farm, I can't help but think that deletion might be just a bit of an overreaction. (It did give me a good laugh.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:11, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist – little progress toward resolving the boatload of issues pointed out in the nom. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:11, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. Tagged as needing citations, needing page numbers and lacking reliable sources since January. DrKay (talk) 11:25, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:46, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.