Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Addition log/2022
Billboard number-one country songs (2nd supplementary nomination)
[edit]This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Billboard number-one country songs for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
Adding the list for 2022, which has just been promoted to FL, to the existing topic...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:05, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support: straightforward addition of the latest iteration. Great work! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 14:52, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support straightforward addition of the latest year. Regards, Armbrust The Homunculus 17:37, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support: great job! MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:07, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support Aoba47 (talk) 18:45, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support
CommentOn the refs citing Taste of Country and Townsquare Media, you should only cite one for the correct formatting. Elsewise,this is a hard worked and worthy addition to the FT! K. Peake 10:40, 27 November 2022 (UTC)- @Kyle Peake: - changed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:33, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support straightforward addition to the topic. Great work! NapHit (talk) 23:46, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Closing with consensus to supplement. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 20:39, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Tour Championship (snooker) for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
Getting the process going as 2022 Tour Championship became a Good Article on 22 October. Regards, Armbrust The Homunculus 08:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for doing this for me - wasn't sure how it worked! Lee Vilenski (talk ⢠contribs) 10:31, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support as a straightforward addition of the latest iteration. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 12:22, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support is just an addition. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support Simple addition to the topic. NapHit (talk) 21:42, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support no concerns with the addition. Z1720 (talk) 14:40, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I would suggest merging the second and third paras of the lead since they are both short and the theme is connected but besides this, the GA is well-worked, straightforward addition and does not need to be an FA with enough others in the topic already! --K. Peake 11:24, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support - straightforward addition -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:11, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- Closing with consensus to add. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 17:48, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/The Last of Us for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
The Last of Us Part I is a remake of The Last of Usâthe main subject of this topicâso I think its inclusion here is suitable and logical. â Rhain â (he/him) 07:25, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support a straightforward addition clearly within the topic's scope. â CR4ZE (T ⢠C) 08:20, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support: Certainly needed, and well done to all who worked on it! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 13:20, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support per rationale. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 07:34, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support as a straightforward addition to an existing topic. Regards, Armbrust The Homunculus 17:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Closing with consensus to supplement. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:35, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/EFL League One play-offs for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
1987 Football League Third Division play-off Final- 1988 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- 1989 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- 1990 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- 1991 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- 1992 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- 1993 Football League Second Division play-off Final
- 1994 Football League Second Division play-off Final
- 1995 Football League Second Division play-off Final
- 1996 Football League Second Division play-off Final
- 1997 Football League Second Division play-off Final
- 1998 Football League Second Division play-off Final
1999 Football League Second Division play-off Final- 2000 Football League Second Division play-off Final
- 2001 Football League Second Division play-off Final
- 2002 Football League Second Division play-off Final
- 2003 Football League Second Division play-off Final
- 2004 Football League Second Division play-off Final
- 2005 Football League One play-off Final
- 2006 Football League One play-off Final
- 2007 Football League One play-off Final
- 2008 Football League One play-off Final
- 2009 Football League One play-off Final
- 2010 Football League One play-off Final
- 2011 Football League One play-off Final
- 2012 Football League One play-off Final
- 2013 Football League One play-off Final
- 2014 Football League One play-off Final
- 2015 Football League One play-off Final
- 2016 Football League One play-off Final
- 2017 EFL League One play-off Final
- 2018 EFL League One play-off Final
- 2019 EFL League One play-off Final
- 2020 EFL League One play-off Final
- 2021 EFL League One play-off Final
- 2022 EFL League One play-off Final
Getting the process going as 2022 EFL League One play-off Final became a Good Article on 4 October. Armbrust The Homunculus 08:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support - Straightforward addition. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 02:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support Latest final to be included, no issues. NapHit (talk) 10:41, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support as a straightforward addition of the latest in the series. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:44, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:26, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Closing with consensus to supplement. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Inna albums (3rd supplementary nomination)
[edit]This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Inna albums for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
New GA addition. Cartoon network freak (talk) 07:25, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support: Looks like a straightforward addition of the latest release. Good work! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 12:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support as a straightforward addition of the latest album. Armbrust The Homunculus 16:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Closing with consensus to add. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 14:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
EFL League Two play-offs (1st supplementary nomination)
[edit]This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/EFL League Two play-offs for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
- 1987 Football League Fourth Division play-off Final
- 1988 Football League Fourth Division play-off Final
- 1989 Football League Fourth Division play-off Final
- 1990 Football League Fourth Division play-off Final
- 1991 Football League Fourth Division play-off Final
- 1992 Football League Fourth Division play-off Final
- 1993 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- 1994 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- 1995 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- 1996 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- 1997 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- 1998 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- 1999 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- 2000 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- 2001 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- 2002 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- 2003 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- 2004 Football League Third Division play-off Final
- 2005 Football League Two play-off Final
- 2006 Football League Two play-off Final
- 2007 Football League Two play-off Final
- 2008 Football League Two play-off Final
- 2009 Football League Two play-off Final
- 2010 Football League Two play-off Final
- 2011 Football League Two play-off Final
- 2012 Football League Two play-off Final
- 2013 Football League Two play-off Final
- 2014 Football League Two play-off Final
- 2015 Football League Two play-off Final
- 2016 Football League Two play-off Final
- 2017 EFL League Two play-off Final
- 2018 EFL League Two play-off Final
- 2019 EFL League Two play-off Final
- 2020 EFL League Two play-off Final
- 2021 EFL League Two play-off Final
- 2022 EFL League Two play-off Final
- Contributor(s): The Rambling Man, ChrisTheDude, Amakuru
I am nominating the article "2022 EFL League Two play-off Final" to be part of the larger EFL League Two play-offs topic. Obviously as the latest League Two play-off final it should be added to the topic quickly, and I am impressed that the editors were able to get this article to Good Article status in under 2 months. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 11:22, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support: Straightforward addition of the latest iteration. Good work keeping this up to date, whoever did the work! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 13:03, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support straightforward addition -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support no issues with this addition to this excellent topic. NapHit (talk) 16:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Closed with consensus to add. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 14:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Billboard number-one country songs (1st supplementary nomination)
[edit]This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Billboard number-one country songs for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
Billboard magazine has published charts ranking the top-performing country music songs in the United States since 1944. The first country chart was published under the title Most Played Juke Box Folk Records in the issue of the magazine dated January 8, 1944, and tracked the songs most played in the nation's jukeboxes. Billboard added a second chart in 1947 based on retail sales, and a third in 1949 based on radio airplay. The jukebox chart was discontinued in 1957, and the following year, the remaining two charts were dropped and replaced with a chart, initially entitled Hot C&W Sides, which combined sales and airplay data into one overall ranking. This chart was renamed Hot Country Singles in 1962, Hot Country Singles and Tracks in 1990, and Hot Country Songs in 2005. In 1990, its methodology changed to use only airplay data from country music radio stations. In 2012, this changed again to use data from stations of all formats as well as sales and streaming information. At the same time, a new Country Airplay chart was introduced, which continued the former methodology of tracking plays on country stations only.
- Contributor(s): ChrisTheDude
Adding the list for 2021, which has just been promoted to FL, to the existing topic...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:24, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support: Keeping up this stunning body of work with the next iteration. Great job! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support: Outstandig work as always. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 00:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support. Fantastic work. FrB.TG (talk) 09:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support: Great work as always! -- Pseud 14 (talk) 00:49, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support another marvellous list to be added to this topic! --K. Peake 15:25, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support- wah- holy cow! Amazing job! Panini! ⢠𼪠01:46, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support. Impressive! AryKun (talk) 13:34, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support. My goodness, i'm also impressed. --The helper5667 (talk) 05:45, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- Consensus for addition â Aza24 (talk) 19:02, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Paper Mario (1st supplementary nomination)
[edit]This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Paper Mario for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
Paper Mario is a video game series and part of the Mario franchise, developed by Intelligent Systems and produced by Nintendo. It combines elements from the role-playing, action-adventure, and puzzle genres. Players control a paper cutout version of Mario, sometimes with allies, on a quest to defeat the antagonist, primarily Bowser. The series consists of six games and one spin-off.
- Contributor(s): Panini!
Satisfies WP:GT? and all the same reasons of the last nomination. However, I've gone out of my way to do this in retaliation of Bryanrutherford0: "...this proposal is missing Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam. It's another game in Category:Paper Mario, and it seems odd to leave it out here, though I get that it's a "crossover" spin-off and not exactly part of the series proper. It'd be an easy support with the last game included, but I'm not sure I can support without." I just thought I'd stop by and do a "well, take that" sort of thing, you know? I updated the text intro as well. --Panini! ⢠𼪠03:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support: An easy support now, for me. ;) -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 14:28, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Strong Support Panini has put hours and hours of effort into these articles allowing them to be perfect. I see absolutely no reason to not deny this simple addition. This is an incredible accomplishment and I am proud to have reviewed a part of it myself. GG. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 15:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support. AryKun (talk) 09:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support: My favorite video game ever is Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door! Great work on this topic! --Christian (talk) 16:31, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support Semi-related note:
I see three GA articles on Mario & Luigi (series) - Is that a potential topic, either standalone or merging with this one + Super Mario RPG into a Mario RPG topic?Oh, eek, 1d. Struck. casualdejekyll 01:36, 26 March 2022 (UTC)- Yeah, I considered it, but there's still a long ways: Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga and Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time need a re-sprucing, and there's still Mario & Luigi, Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story and Mario & Luigi: Dream Team. There's also Sparks of Hope, Puzzle & Dragons Z + Super Mario Bros. Edition, and Fawful, I assume. Panini! ⢠𼪠01:49, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support: I certainly don't see any reason not to. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 22:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support: Panini has spent a respectable amount of effort onto these articles. They are all consistent and met good topic criteria for me. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 00:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support
Commentsthe release dates should be written out and sourced in the body to avoid using references in the infobox, also fix the overusage of "it" in the reception part of the lead. Outside of these two issues,solid work on this article and it is definitely an appropriate addition to the topic! --K. Peake 08:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)- Thank you for the comments, @Kyle Peake. I've addressed your concerns. Panini! ⢠𼪠03:43, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Closed with consensus to promote. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 17:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Kanye West studio albums (1st supplementary nomination)
[edit]This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Kanye West studio albums for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
This topic's retention period was nearly a month ago, but I nominated Donda way back in October for GA status with this in mind. The album did take a while to get picked up, though it has passed now after a smooth review! Update since I made this additional nomination, West released his eleventh studio album Donda 2 that I brought to GA status and would also like to add to the topic, though it would be appropriate to know if everyone maintains their support votes now. --K. Peake 08:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support as the GA reviewer of Donda
(with additional comment):I would suggest maybe changing the current topic image the Donda "cover art".Realmaxxver (talk) 09:04, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Realmaxxver I understand that you are making this point since it's the only new article, but shouldn't the image for the supplementary nomination be the same as the one for the actual topic? --K. Peake 10:30, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Pretty sure you are right. crossed out. Realmaxxver (talk) 10:35, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support
CommentsUnsure about Rap Mais reliability, it looks like a blog. The Source needs at least one wikilink. Page six â People magazine, very different. Remove Appleinsider, on their "about us" page: "Our editorial staff has wide latitude to review and report on what they want, how they want." Henceforth, there is no editorial review. I'm unsure about the reliability of Distractify as it is co-founded by a Youtuber, no editorial staff. When translated I can't be sure regarding Buro 24/7, I would stay away from these. Maybe the album notes can replace this source easily? Doubts regarding "Southpawer" source, but the same information can be found on a Billboard article, Hot New Hip Hop.MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:09, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- I removed or replaced any of the questionable sources, also I must have missed The Source due to the large amount of refs so have wikilinked now and it is uncertain who added Page Six for the People ref because I remember that being the first from the publication and displaying as such, so I changed it back to citing People. --K. Peake 14:23, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- I checked everything you did and now I support the nomination. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support: Straightforward addition of the latest album to the existing topic. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 15:22, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support â Donda 2 is next! Keep up the good work! Damian Vo (talk) 08:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Director comment - Ok so this probably should have been closed sooner but with Donda 2 being a Good Article now, how about we make things easier and just add that to the topic after this review is closed? Is that cool with people here? GamerPro64 04:06, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- GamerPro64 I have been going through a thought process that invokes this, being unsure whether to add the album to this nom or create a second supp nom when Donda has been added, as we don't know if the supporters here would vote the same way for Donda 2. Messages could be posted on their talk pages though and now that both options are on the table, which do you think is most appropriate? --K. Peake 07:49, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- We can do a quick messaging with the reviewers to give a vote. Shouldn't be controversial. GamerPro64 13:24, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- GamerPro64 Yes I agree, that is the process I had in mind too! --K. Peake 10:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support Great topic. And yes, I think Donda 2 should be included in this nomination before it closes. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 22:34, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support with the inclusion of Donda 2: Electric Dondaloo. Panini! ⢠𼪠22:37, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Realmaxxver:, MarioSoulTruthFan, Bryanrutherford0 and ChrisTheDude, do all of you support Donda 2 being part of this additional nomination? --K. Peake 21:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- I would vote against it, not putting into consideration any of your work, Kyle, which I know is outstanding. However, I believe it is quite soon? The album was not even released a month ago, shouldn't I breathe and gather more info? The full credits are not even out. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 22:29, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the kind comments MarioSoulTruthFan, but I would like to explain that the album is a Stem Player exclusive, so will not be able to chart as Billboard even acknowledged. Also, credits may take a while to be publicly available, if ever. K. Peake 08:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- I support adding both, with the same reasoning as before. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 00:01, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Kyle Peake I understand that now. It caused massive pirating since there is an evident lack of support, charts, and so on. Then support, just afraid it might change in the middle of the race. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 22:44, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Kyle Peake I just checked the source and I have some reservations regarding TorrentFreak since it is a blog and it's deeply connected with a piracy website. Cheers, MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- MarioSoulTruthFan WP:RSP lists the source as reliable for topics like file sharing. --K. Peake 15:32, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Kyle Peake Not aware of it, thank you for letting me know. Support MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:50, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- MarioSoulTruthFan WP:RSP lists the source as reliable for topics like file sharing. --K. Peake 15:32, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Kyle Peake I just checked the source and I have some reservations regarding TorrentFreak since it is a blog and it's deeply connected with a piracy website. Cheers, MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support â While I think it's too early to have Donda 2 in good article status since it only been released for nearly a month, but you have my support. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 07:19, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- Consensus to approve supplemental nomination - Seems to be enough consensus to get both Dondas on the topic. We can finally close this nom. GamerPro64 21:53, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Line 1 (Sound Transit) stations (1st supplementary nomination)
[edit]This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Line 1 (Sound Transit) stations for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
Line 1 (Sound Transit) stations.jpg)
Three new stations on this line have opened and they have already passed their GANs. After some appropriate updates and restructuring, I feel they're ready to be included in the topic. SounderBruce 07:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support: Looks like a straightforward addition of new stations to the existing line. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 12:14, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support per above -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:10, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support - looks pretty straightforward to me..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:40, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support Routine additions, looks all good to go from here. đ Ęá´á´á´Ęá´ ę 16:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support
Commentseither expand the location section of Northgate station or merge it with another section due to the small size, while I have my doubts regarding the reliability of SDOT Blog on Roosevelt station and Huffington Post contributor on Washington University station is unreliable per WP:RSP. The source Cheasty Greenspace on Columbia city station appears to be a blog-style one, merge the last para of history for Othello station with the above one, plus neither SeaTac/Airport station nor Angle Lake station should have refs for the opening dates in the infoboxes and the usage of SeaTac Blog on the latter seems unreliable. Despite these issues,the topic itself is of my interest; well done on putting such dedicated work into a collection of stations within an area! --K. Peake 09:27, 18 November 2021 (UTC)- Hi SounderBruce, did you have a chance to address Kyle's comments above? Aza24 (talk) 00:59, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- The sources used are still appropriate for content at the GA level, especially government blogs (such as SDOT Blog) and prominent local blogs (SeaTac Blog, CHS, WSB) that get republished into the newspaper of record (The Seattle Times). The Huffington Post piece was written by an architecture critic for a normal newspaper, so I don't see it being problematic; it certainly did not come up as problematic in the FAC. These suggestions are far beyond what is required for a GTC, as it should have been brought up in the individual GANs. SounderBruce 04:12, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- I wouldn't think trying to improve articles is ever inappropriate for really any venue on Wikipedia, and I have no doubt the suggestions came in good faith. Your rationales re sourcing seem reasonable, and I wonder if Kyle Peake would agree with them. Aza24 (talk) 05:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Things sometimes don't come up in a GAR or FTC because not everything is always spotted in those processes, also I have struck out my comments about the sources because your explanations justify their reliability and you should have posted this earlier to address me. However, what I wrote about the small sizes of the location section and the final part of the history section for two respective articles still stands, as does the problem with refs in infoboxes. --K. Peake 08:25, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- All fixed, but I'm still of the opinion that these "issues" are incredibly minor, and moreover changes to articles in the existing GT should not affect the supplementary nomination. SounderBruce 04:50, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Things sometimes don't come up in a GAR or FTC because not everything is always spotted in those processes, also I have struck out my comments about the sources because your explanations justify their reliability and you should have posted this earlier to address me. However, what I wrote about the small sizes of the location section and the final part of the history section for two respective articles still stands, as does the problem with refs in infoboxes. --K. Peake 08:25, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- I wouldn't think trying to improve articles is ever inappropriate for really any venue on Wikipedia, and I have no doubt the suggestions came in good faith. Your rationales re sourcing seem reasonable, and I wonder if Kyle Peake would agree with them. Aza24 (talk) 05:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Consensus to approve supplemental nomination - GamerPro64 00:57, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Tuvalu at the Olympics (1st supplementary nomination)
[edit]This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Tuvalu at the Olympics for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
Tuvalu's competed at the Olympics four times now, and since I've gotten the latest occasion up to GA, here's this supplementary nom. All the articles in this topic are GA. AryKun (talk) 02:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support
Commentyou should not be using a ref in the lead for the info about the event getting postponed, as that can be written out and sourced in background. It is ironic for me to be the first to comment since I was the one who nominated the topic for removal before this was even a GAN and outside of this issue,good job on this article less than six months after the event; it is well-written and covered by reliable sources. --K. Peake 08:23, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Removed the ref from the lead and added the info to Background as well. AryKun (talk) 12:17, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nice work there, the prose in the body looks very smooth itself! --K. Peake 14:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support: Straightforward addition of the latest iteration to the existing topic. Good work! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 15:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support. Straightforward. Gog the Mild (talk) 09:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Consensus to approve supplemental nomination - GamerPro64 22:31, 25 January 2022 (UTC)