User talk:Zuzilicious

Cyril Michael Hetsko, M.D. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cyril Michael Hetsko, M.D., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am not paid for this article. :) Dr. Hetsko is a distant relative. The article was written with a contribution of his sister Cindy and information I have gained from American Medical Association (his BIO). I have personal knowledge about about his life from discussions with him and spending time with him in the past. I hope this helps with your review. thank you. Zuzana Zuzilicious (talk) 12:29, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cyril Michael Hetsko, M.D. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cyril Michael Hetsko, M.D., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:09, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you. I have a question thought. The sources, that I have availabe are pdfs, personal knowledge, information from his family, bio from AMA, how can I use it? thank you. based on his active years, it is difficult to find sources online. Zuzilicious (talk) 13:13, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, unfortunately personal knowledge, family interviews, private archives, and similar materials are not acceptable; we can only accept published sources ('published' meaning made available to the general public, and remaining so).

The sources don't have to be online (see WP:OFFLINE for advice on using offline sources), nor do they have to be in English. They do, however, have to be reliable, independent, and ideally secondary sources.

HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:18, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've moved this back to drafts, for two reasons:

Firstly, the article is almost entirely unreferenced, with the first citation appearing way down in the 'Education' section. This is a clear violation of WP:BLP, which requires inline citations of reliable published sources supporting each material statement, anything potentially contentious, and all private and personal details, in articles on living people (which includes the recently-deceased).
You have stated that the subject is a relative of yours, which means you have a conflict of interest (COI) and are therefore not allowed to publish this directly, but must instead go through the AfC review process.

Please do not move this into the main article space yourself. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. As far as COI goes, I am like fifth cousin born in Slovakia, but OK.

I have added citations.

So you mentioned I should not move it the main article space, so I assume I should address this with you?

It is my first wiki article, obviously, and English is my second language, so.... thank you for your patience. Zuzilicious (talk) 14:32, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When you feel the draft is ready, you can submit it for review by clicking that blue 'resubmit' button, no need to let me know. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will now move the draft. I hope it is acceptable now. Thank you in advance. Zuzana Zuzilicious (talk) 12:49, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just to remind you, I did not say you should move the draft into the main space when you feel it is ready, but rather that you should submit it for review. Given your relationship with the subject, and therefore your COI, you should not be publishing this directly yourself. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:18, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyril Michael Hetsko, M.D. (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Almost entirely unreferenced, which is wholly unacceptable in a WP:BLP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cyril Michael Hetsko, M.D. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:11, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zuzilicious! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:11, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Zuzilicious. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:30, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My employer is Lidl Slovakia, https://www.linkedin.com/in/zuzanabaloghova/ - my linkedin profile, where I work as an Head of HR.

I have no financial gain whatsoever from writing this article, I do this in my free time based on my own decision, voluntarily with no compensation of any kind.

I have not been asked or ordered to write this article.

Dr. Hetsko was my fifth cousin, who lived in the USA, whilst I work and live in Slovakia, Europe. Zuzilicious (talk) 13:12, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Hi again,

Having re-read the Cyril Michael Hetsko draft, I feel I need to also bring up the question of notability, which is a key requirement for inclusion in the encyclopaedia.

The most common way of establishing notability is by citing multiple independent and reliable secondary sources providing significant coverage of the subject, per the general notability guideline WP:GNG. However, the sources cited in this draft are mostly primary, and many are papers etc. authored by the subject himself. None of these contribute towards notability. The Madison obit seems to be the only one that satisfies the GNG standard, and it alone isn't enough.

There are also some special notability guidelines, such as WP:NPROF for academics, or WP:ANYBIO for biographies of people who have achieved extraordinary things. However, I didn't see anything in the draft that would obviously satisfy either of these, but if you do wish to make a case for this, you need to clearly demonstrate which of the many possible criteria is met, and what evidence there is to support such an assertion.

Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cyril Michael Hetsko, M.D. has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cyril Michael Hetsko, M.D.. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:02, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:CMH WisMed.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CMH WisMed.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:CMH WisMed.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:CMH WisMed.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CMH WisMed.pdf

A tag has been placed on File:CMH WisMed.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.wismed.org/Wisconsin/wismed/News/medigram/2022-medigram/november-17-2022.aspx#Story9. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 02:35, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CMH WisMed.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:CMH WisMed.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.wismed.org/Wisconsin/wismed/News/medigram/2022-medigram/november-17-2022.aspx#Story9. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 02:35, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Zuzilicious! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:38, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your feedback, i have worked on the draft today, hopefully this will solve the issue. If not, I would like to get some more specifics, if possible, thank you. also, the user called DoubleGrazing is reviewing my draft. Zuzilicious (talk) 21:49, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copypaste move

It seems you have copypasted the Hetsko draft into an article in the main space. This is a very bad idea, as it loses the draft's edit history, as well as creating various other problems. Please do not do that again. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:58, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thank you Zuzilicious (talk) 20:25, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have been thinking I am not aware, that I did that. I am not aware of copypasting anything, all I did was move the article. Zuzilicious (talk) 21:36, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have also found this:

Move log

12:06, 29 December 2022 Onel5969 talk contribs moved page Cyril Michael Hetsko to Draft:Cyril Michael Hetsko without leaving a redirect (Moved to mainspace by COI editor (via script)) (revert) (thank) Zuzilicious (talk) 21:47, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cyril Michael Hetsko for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cyril Michael Hetsko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyril Michael Hetsko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:05, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please help me out to understand the nomination? I have been correcting the article based on all your suggestions appropriately and the only outstanding issue I see is the fact that I am considered as a person with COI. Can you please, explain the matter? thank you kindly. Zuzilicious (talk) 20:25, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cyril Michael Hetsko has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cyril Michael Hetsko. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:16, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyril Michael Hetsko (May 23)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Scope creep was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Article went through Afd and was found to be non-notable. Individual is non-notable.

scope_creep^Talk 11:20, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cyril Michael Hetsko

Hello, Zuzilicious. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cyril Michael Hetsko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]