User talk:Zhanglei123456

Welcome!

Hello, Zhanglei123456, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ray Zhang, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AllyD (talk) 09:03, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ray Zhang

Hello. A tag has been placed on Ray Zhang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AllyD (talk) 09:03, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ray Zhang (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fuortu was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Zhanglei123456/Ray Zhang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fuortu (talk) 11:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Zhanglei123456, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fuortu (talk) 11:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tang Yan (executive)

Hello. A tag has been placed on Tang Yan (executive) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Razer^{Text me} 06:55, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sobrr

Hello. A tag has been placed on Sobrr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hitro talk 11:32, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sobrr

Hello. A tag has been placed on Sobrr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hitro talk 13:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another bad speedy. Plenty of very good refs on the page-- people should do their research before nominating.104.163.141.133 (talk) 07:06, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sobrr

A tag has been placed on Sobrr, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another bad speedy. Plenty of very good refs on the page-- people should do their research before nominating.104.163.141.133 (talk) 07:06, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ray Zhang（Founder）

Hello. A tag has been placed on Ray Zhang（Founder） requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice on notice

Hello. It seems that you want to self advertise, and to do this, you had put "If you want to delete it contact me" statement in your edit summary. That doesn't work.

Such "do not nominate" notices are usually ignored. Thank you.

NasssaNser_{and his edits} 10:58, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tang yan photo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tang yan photo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Accost(app)

A tag has been placed on Accost(app), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS (talk) 09:32, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sobrr（app）

A tag has been placed on Sobrr（app） requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Deleted as CSDG11 and protected at Sobrr.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:43, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Accost(app). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. GSS (talk) 10:05, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Accost(app), you may be blocked from editing. GSS (talk) 10:10, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Accost(app). GSS (talk) 10:26, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Accost app logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Accost app logo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:00, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ray Zhang photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ray Zhang photo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:00, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jaumo

A tag has been placed on Jaumo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RegistryKey^(RegEdit) 10:04, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jaumo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mobile. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Zank(app)"

Zank(app), a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organization, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm Sunmist. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to IObit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sunmist (talk) 07:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zank(app)

The article Zank(app) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No demonstration of notability per the general notability guideline

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:26, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zank(app) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zank(app) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zank(app) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:13, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Boompi

A tag has been placed on Boompi, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 06:38, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of LOVOO

A tag has been placed on LOVOO, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 06:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nice(app)

A tag has been placed on Nice(app), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 06:56, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of IObit Malware Fighter

A tag has been placed on IObit Malware Fighter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 10:38, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Boompi. Katie^talk 11:07, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hinge(app)

A tag has been placed on Hinge(app), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS (talk) 13:54, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jaumo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jaumo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaumo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk) 15:00, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zank(app), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Application. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Boompi

A tag has been placed on Boompi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FITINDIA (talk) 09:36, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zhanglei123456, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Cabayi (talk) 10:52, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Zhanglei123456. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Happn, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. If you have been paid to edit an article, please declare. A transparent declaration is much better and preferred. Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happn(app)‎, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. GSS (talk) 14:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wang sicong

A tag has been placed on Wang sicong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 11:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI User:Cabayi, Wang Sicong happens to be plenty notable. So no need to hassle this editor about the page. I developed it into something decent. If you or the other Speedy nominator had happened to do a little research before nominating him, you would have found dozens of high-qaulity refs sich as Blomberg, Forbes and the Irish Times. Have nice night. 104.163.141.133 (talk) 06:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 13:17, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wang sicong, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The only positive thing in your recreation of this article is that you recreated it with the deletion request still included. Cabayi (talk) 15:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I said above, there is no need to hassle this editor. The article was actually for a notable person. The editor deserves a welcome rather than being hassled.104.163.141.133 (talk) 06:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Wang sicong, you may be blocked from editing. Cabayi (talk) 15:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Wang sicong, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 18:25, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wang sicong

A tag has been placed on Wang sicong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sarahj2107 (talk) 05:54, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

People, Wang Sicong is actually notable

Google it my friends. I see a lot fo useless warnings above related to the article. Signed, a bystander. 104.163.141.133 (talk) 07:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wang sicong. Please stop repeatedly creating that page. Just because someone is a millionaire's son doesn't make them notable. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:09, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wang sicong for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wang sicong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang sicong until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:13, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang sicong, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please do not do this and this again. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:45, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zhanglei123456, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Cabayi (talk) 10:17, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang sicong, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. GSS (talk) 11:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Luo Yonghao

Hello Zhanglei123456,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Luo Yonghao for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Abbottonian (talk) 16:52, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Boompi

A tag has been placed on Boompi, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tang Yan (executive)

A tag has been placed on Tang Yan (executive) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:41, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Boompi. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tang Yan (executive) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tang Yan (executive) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tang Yan (executive) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:05, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hinge (app)

A tag has been placed on Hinge (app), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:35, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 19:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}}--Zhanglei123456 (talk) 07:22, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The principal problem is I think you would be better off on using a Wikipedia in your first language. I don't see anything obviously wrong with the articles you created; social media apps aren't my thing personally but teenagers seem to love them.

What I can offer is this - you agree to only create new articles in draft space via the Articles for Creation process, where the draft can be reviewed by an independent editor. Articles accepted by this process rarely end up at a deletion debate, so it's more manageable all round. If you can accept this, I will unblock. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:43, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hi.Ritchie333, glad to write me back,honestly,I know wikipedia rules ,but you blocked me for disruptive editing?are you kidding me? this article of Hinge (app) is notable on Google play and app store,and it also has news on nytimes,see: ^[1] now this article was under deletion debate :seeArticles_for_deletion/Hinge_(app) also.I have created these articles:Tang Yan (executive),Wang Sicong ,Happn.it indicates that I am NOT doing disruptive editing.on the contrary,I am doing undisruptive editing so,my behavior on wikipedia doesnt belong disruptive editing,please think twice before block users! have a nice day!--Zhanglei123456 (talk) 11:50, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've voted to keep Hinge at its deletion debate and supplied several sources to strengthen my argument, I know nothing about the other articles. The disruption is not what you are creating but how you are doing it; fundamentally other editors are confused about your intents and working methods, and it is creating disruption. Wouldn't it be better if these deletion debates didn't exist in the first place? Probably it would, hence my suggestion of using draft space from now on. I wouldn't know him from a hole in the ground and Beef up that first revision may be essays worth reading.

Anyway, as it stands, you can accept my offer of only using drafts, in which case I'll unblock, you can try your luck with another administrator (unblock requests are put in an active queue that all admins can see), or you can have a month's holiday. Personally in your shoes if an admin was offering me a way of an instant unblock, I'd take it and not squabble about semantics. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:03, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hi Ritchie333, I am not arguing with you with my so called misbehavior,I just trying to state my opinion ,I am still confused what does supposed mean by what am I doing on wikipedia ,please tell me specifically with more details.appreciate ! like what kind of my behavior you think I am doing disruptive editing.please point it out by Revision history! thanks!--Zhanglei123456 (talk) 15:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are a couple of obvious signs - you insulted Lemongirl942, you've had a warning about signing posts, and a lot of warnings about short and possibly not notable articles. Okay, when these have been put to the debate, it turns out the topics are notable, or at least there's sufficient debate to err on the sign of inclusion. The problem here is that when people are busy debating the notability of a one-paragraph stub, they're obviously not working on other areas of the encyclopedia. So the best solution, and one that has been hinted - albeit subtly - in the past is that you really need to beef up your articles if you're going to put them into mainspace. Put in 2-3 paragraphs and about 5-6 sources, so that anyone looking at New Page Patrol will think, "yup, that's fine" and give it a clean bill of health. It saves time wasted in arguing in AfD debates, and means you get a cleaner talk page. A win-win situation, I think.

Let's take Hinge (app) as an example. Your first draft of the article is here, and my initial response is "Hinge is an app. Well we've got thousands, if not millions of those, what makes this one special enough to appear in an encyclopedia", and my second is "that image is too large to comply with a valid fair-use rationale, which means it's probably a copyright violation".

Now, let's contrast that with the last article I created, which happens to be Victoria Hotel, Amsterdam. From the first edit, it shows clear importance (the first Dutch hotel to have electric light), lots of famous people are documented as visiting it, and a major motion picture was made about it. If I had written "The Victoria Hotel is a hotel in Amsterdam. It sits on the corner of of Damrak and Prins Henrikkade" and left it at that, I suspect I'd get at least a {{notability}} tag parked on it. So I make sure I put in strong claims of why the article should be in the encyclopedia. Also, notice how I put a link to the corresponding article on the Dutch Wikipedia, which is far more developed - similarly you might find that providing a link to the corresponding article on the Chinese Wikipedia may allow people to help you improve the article.

If you want to go any further, have a look at some articles created by Wehwalt (such as Pilgrim Tercentenary half dollar) which are generally prepared offline and create at a very high standard from their first edit.

I hope that explains some things. As it is, I wish you'd just accept the offer of only creating articles in draft space from now, as it means I can unblock and we can put this behind us. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:12, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hi Ritchie333.

1. I did't insulted Lemongirl942.the so-called evidences form my talk pages:感觉维基百科的管理员好屌！if you use Google translation :Feel wikipedia administrator good Cock!.but actually it stands for in local chinese:Feel wikipedia administrator‘s permissions are large. personally I did't insulted him actually.

2.Hinge (app) . a lot of people including me used hinge in china. also it has nytimes report and other media press.if you think these references I provided are lack of notable. then I have nothing to say.even the Tinder (app) is also on Wikipedia. plus:the image of hinge is from the official apple store link,I believe this isn't definitely copyright violation ,which I have stated in my upload history!

3.anyway.you are the administrator .I can only accept your advice to unblock my account!.as Wikipedia rules run by yours guys ! maybe I will not doing any edits.even if this article was created by me Xiaomi MIX.maybe you should check this article,maybe its better delete this,because you have never heard it. thanks!

A Wikipedia editor from china!--Zhanglei123456 (talk) 06:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've seen enough, in my view you are either filibustering or lack the necessary temperament to work well with others. I spent a bit of time improving Hinge so it is less likely to be deleted, so don't rant at me about how notable the article it is if you're not prepared to help. If Lemongirl942 feels insulted, its best to take that as face value than just deny flat out you did. I'm done here . Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

lol,interesting ,okay. you just said: I am lack of the necessary temperament to work well with others,please attention : this Hinge (app) was created by me,I spent lots of time to google ,and you just rewrited it,and later you just blocked me by my user talk page information ? ,this is what you think I am doing Disruptive editing !seriously ?

ok,I have nothing to say!anyway, you are the boss,please unblock my account .thanks,please check Xiaomi MIX,maybe you will think this will be the next sign of my Disruptive editing!--Zhanglei123456 (talk) 13:05, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hinge (app) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hinge (app) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hinge (app) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Boompi app screenshot.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Boompi app screenshot.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 00:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edits you make and articles you create appear to be promotional and don't meet quality standards, and besides the concerns mentioned above by Ritchie333 there's the socking by way of IPs--I just blocked another one. If you ever want to get back in properly, you should address these matters in any future unblock request. Drmies (talk) 00:33, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

：

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zhanglei123456 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please specify which articles I created appear to be promotional and don't meet quality standards,Xiaomi MIX,Wang Sicong,Tang Yan (executive),Happn, which one? or all of these?thanks!

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; no reason given to consider unblocking this account. Yamla (talk) 13:36, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Zhanglei123456 (talk) 04:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

： you still didnt want to proveide the block reason:--Zhanglei123456 (talk) 03:15, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tang-yan Founder and CEO, Momo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tang-yan Founder and CEO, Momo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:01, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hinge app screenshoot.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hinge app screenshoot.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:35, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Violation

Your addition to Operation Mekong has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Emphrase - 💬 | 📝 08:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Accost app screenshot.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Accost app screenshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:42, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Zhanglei123456/Ray Zhang

Hello, Zhanglei123456. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ray Zhang".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 17:33, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Happn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Happn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happn (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 23:14, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^ ""Hinge, a Dating App, Introduces Friends of Friends"". nytimes. Retrieved 1 November 2016.

[1] ""Hinge, a Dating App, Introduces Friends of Friends"". nytimes. Retrieved 1 November 2016.

[1]