User talk:Abbottonian

WELCOME TO MY TALK PAGE! Leave me a message · My archive

Wikipedia:BabelYou haven't set up any languages. Please see Template:Babel/doc for help.Search user languages

Deletion discussion about E. D. Marshall Jewelers

Hello, Abbottonian,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether E. D. Marshall Jewelers should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. D. Marshall Jewelers .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:13, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Abbottonian, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Abbottonian! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shahmeer Amir

The article Shahmeer Amir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreliable sources for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 16:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rafay Baloch (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rafay Baloch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 19:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

E. D. Marshall Jewelers

added a link pointing to Scottsdale

MindStir Media

added a link pointing to Amazon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of GetFiveStars for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GetFiveStars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GetFiveStars until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Abbottonian. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article GetFiveStars, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:11, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of page created by me.

How do I delete a page created by me? I'm unable to do so. Help me out. If you know,then please delete the page 'Advait khare' — Preceding unsigned comment added by THEADVAITKHARE (talk • contribs) 13:49, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Don't you worry, I marked it for deletion, it will be automatically deleted. Abbottonian (talk) 13:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jacob's War

The article Jacob's War has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Self-published book with no indication that it meets the notability guideline for books or the general notability guideline. The sources do not show notability - they consist of one interview with the author on a website with questionable notability and one press release.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bonadea contributions talk 09:53, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Mindstir Media for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mindstir Media is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindstir Media until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Churchill Knight & Associates for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Churchill Knight & Associates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Churchill Knight & Associates until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of The Homeless Voice for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Homeless Voice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Homeless Voice until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Highgate Private Hospital

I think it is entirely unreasonable to delete an article within 2 hours of giving notice. I would be obliged if you would restore it so it can be properly considered. Rathfelder (talk) 18:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Accents of Argentina

I'll go along with its deletion, but what about redirecting this to Rioplatense Spanish? Bearian (talk) 00:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

@Bearian: thats a great idea. Will you go for redirecting it right away or after deletion? Abbottonian (talk) 12:59, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, I did it just now per WP:BOLD. Bearian (talk) 17:05, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of April Malmsteen page

Hi Abbottonian,

Could you explain why you decided to revert the April Malmsteen page back to an Yngwie Malmsteen redirect? The decision was made almost four years ago and I feel that it's outdated. Congobongoman (talk) 15:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

@Congobongoman: if 'outdated' was a reason to re-instate page then Wikipedia admin would not have reverted it back to old revision per this. Abbottonian (talk) 16:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

@Abbottonian: Not sure that I follow. It just seems to me that the deletion is unwarranted as April has become more prominent since that decision was made. I feel a redirect is inappropriate as Yngwie Malmsteen and April Malmsteen are not the same person. Congobongoman (talk) 16:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Million Miles (Fuel song)

Sorry, you can't A9 that, as the performers have an article here. A9 is a double criterion, and both parts must be there. The record must be non-notable, and I can see no sign in the article that it is. However, the band has an article and that means no to A9. It looks like a waste of space for an article, and AfD might lead to deletion or someone improving it. IMO there are too many of these articles about records. Things like Rubber Soul, yes. Most other things that are a simply track listings (which is hardly needed for a single...) are no use to anyone. Peridon (talk) 17:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for clarification. Abbottonian (talk) 05:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

De Nios lyrikpris

What do you mean by "because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references"? De Nios lyrikpris is not a biographic article. You should look at the talk page of the article. By the way, where can I find the discussion about others comments regarding if the article should be kept or not? --Vannucci (talk) 17:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

@Vannucci: There isn't a discussion. PROD (WP:PROD) is a deletion request format that is either declined, or is left to run seven days, followed by deletion by an admin. WP:AFD is the discussion place for articles that someone considers not suitable. That too lasts seven days, and there can be several possible outcomes. BLP-PROD is a variant of PROD for biographies of living people that have no reference. PROD tags may be removed by anyone, including the creator of the article, but speedy deletion tags may not be removed by the creator, and BLP-PROD may only be removed by anyone when the article contains a reference. Unless, that is, the BLP-PROD was wrongly applied, as in this case. (Speedy tags should not be removed by creators even if wrong - the reviewing admin or another patroller will see to that. AfD must be contested at AfD, and a totally wrong tagging will be sorted fairly quickly.) I will say that the article in question does need referencing to something rather more independent than a very closely related website - please see WP:RS. Saying 'look at the website' is not an accepted Wikipedia way of referencing. Outside links may decay - we need info to be here. Peridon (talk) 20:54, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Good to know, thank you! --Vannucci (talk) 21:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion activity

First, welcome as a new user. But I've been looking at some of your article deletion activity and for example this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kikan_Namara&oldid=744427609 suggests you might want to get more experience in notability guidelines and also perhaps in creating articles before proposing for deletion. Just a suggestion. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

I got it. Thanks for the concern though! Abbottonian (talk) 05:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Given the article you just nominated for deletion, I really have to agree with him. You asked if I had questions about the nomination: Yes, I do. I'll give you the polite version: What are you thinking? Did you read the article? This band is deeply involved in important social movements, has many many releases, some of which were in the charts, and has been influential for 35 years... no nothing notable there, no, not at all. @In ictu oculi: just thought you should see this comment. Elinruby (talk) 06:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

• I admitted that I didn't read the article completely but just the lead. What is this fuss about? Abbottonian (talk) 06:27, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Let me try to explain it, calmly. Above all, you should read the article before you AfD it. A) this is a translation, which does not excuse its flaws, but this is how we create articles based on other wikis, we translate, then edit from the translation. It currently lacks references because the es.wikipedia article lacks references. Yes, this needs to be fixed but the article has only been in the article space for a few minutes -- maybe an hour by now -- and the translation is also work and I need a break. Yes, it's a bit of a list; again, this reflects the state of the spanish article. I can see that the article as it sits assumes that you realize how famous some of the musicians are, and yes, this is something the editing needs to address.

• But. If you are questioning their notability you should have been familiar with the notability criteria for rock bands, and had you read the article -- or even skimmed it -- you might have discerned that they have a dozen or so releases on major and important indie labels. Which are listed in Discography, of all places. They only need one (1) record to be notable. They meet notability criteria in a number of other ways (important in Rock en tu idioma, La Onda, Rock en Mexico for one, famous and award-winning collaborators and singles in the charts, for others, and I suspect some awards of their own. Just for a start). I can sort of understand not seeing that, since the current article assumes you know who they are.
• But. They only need to meet one of those criteria to be notable, and since the article lists out the dozen releases on important labels (ie Sony)....see, this is why you should read the articles you are assessing, before you delete a bunch of other people's work. Twelve is more than one so they meet that criterion and you were wrong to AfD. And afaik speedy delete is supposed to be for not-english, villages with 12 residents, and egregious BLP problems. Hopefully that helps.Elinruby (talk) 07:58, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

I'm just going to jump into this conversation and say, you really need to learn more about Wikipedia before you delete things. Your lack of knowledge is really showing. Llammakey (talk) 13:22, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta

Hello, Abbottonian. You have new messages at Titodutta's talk page.
Message added 16:59, 30 October 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tito Dutta (talk) 16:59, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Barbara Kolar

Hello, Abbottonian. I didn't use any references because I directly translated the Croatian Wikipedia's article about Barbara and there weren't any resources. I will do my best to find some website with the information about Barbara. I don't want the page to be deleted because it was shining that red letters at the page Croatia in the Eurovision Song Contest, so...I will do my best. Thanks, Mihitza78 (talk) 18:02, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

@Mihitza78: Abbottonian is a new editor. Abbottonian, maybe it would be better if you could desist from all deletion activity of any article with an article on another language wiki. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:14, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

@In ictu oculi: maybe learn a little about how wikipedia works? The comment from @Llammakey: above reflects an AfD that appears to have been equally wrongheaded. It was not a translation but was another specific category (navy, as I recall). New page patrol seems to be a problem for Wikipedia, but Abbottonian seems to be a shining example of why new editors should not be allowed to do it. Especially since I made an effort above to explain, and he apparently has done now the same thing to @Mihitza78: anyway Elinruby (talk) 11:53, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Nevermind, I found some "source" anyway... Mihitza78 (talk) 13:11, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia Asian Month!

Hi there! Wikipedia Asian Month is about to start. Here is some information about participating in the event:

1. Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
2. Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
3. Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
4. If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
5. If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.

Best Wishes, Addis Wang
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Are you from Abbottabad Public School? :o — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waleed Abbasi (talk • contribs) 05:14, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Churchill Knight & Associates.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Churchill Knight & Associates.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Abbottonian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia Asian Month 2017: Invitation to Participate

Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.

Thank you!

- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

/* Speedy deletion nomination of Islamalkhiyami */

Hello Abbottonian,

3 years ago i have tried to create an article about my work in the music field , but i had no sources and not enough information for the article , but now I'm requesting more time to work on it and to edit it because i do have many verified and legit sources for my article and i would love to edit it so you can review it as well .

Thank you so much , and i'm waiting for your response on if i can edit it or not . or you can remove it and i will submit a new article , i'm okay with anything you are suggesting .

best regards islam — Preceding unsigned comment added by IslamAlKhiyami (talk • contribs) 20:56, 1 January 2020 (UTC)