User talk:Zachbarbo

IMOB Business Tower moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, IMOB Business Tower, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 21:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, James Earl Ray, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:07, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Linking taxa

Please don't keep trying to link taxa (like genera or subspecies) in infoboxes. IF there is an article for such links to point to, then the link will already exist; if there is no link then no article is intended to exist on the other end. For example, Cryptoprocta redirects to Fossa (animal) because the genus is treated at that location; there is not enough separate material to make it a standalone article. As for the bald eagle subspecies, we don't usually have separate articles for subspecies unless there is a large amount to say about them - not the case here. Please take the hint if you are repeatedly reverted! --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:58, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Two-toed sloth. --Mr Fink (talk) 02:54, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American Dream Meadowlands

The uncited material you added to American Dream Meadowlands was removed. As mentioned above, Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. Nightscream (talk) 18:04, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding your recent edits, please stop making edits on the basis of your personal knowledge, something you have already been warned about on this talk page, by myself, and others.

As mentioned above, Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. There are no sources that indicate whether those venues are currently "under construction" or not, and splitting the section in this way is not only unnecessary and does not improve the article, but would require updating, when there is no way to know for certain that sources will be published in the future indicating the completion of those venues. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a newspaper, so it does not have to be so technically "current". Please see WP:DATED for more on this. Nightscream (talk) 20:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop disrupting the American Dream Meadowlands article. The name of the venue in question is The Game Room powered by Hasbro, per the cited source. The change you made did not improve the line, it merely distorted its correct name by adding an unnecessary descriptor that renders the line grammatically incorrect. A fuller description of what the venue is can already be found further up in the article, at the bottom of the 2019–present section.

If you make another disruptive edit, I will contract an adminsitrator and have you blocked from editing. Please do not make that necessary. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 16:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hi, and a belated welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for changing that heading name in the American Dream Meadowlands article, and for adding the go-kart tenant. I fixed the citation for you, as it looked like this when I found the article. (If you ever want to tweak your citations, you can read WP:CS, if you haven't already.)

However, the opening date you added for the Hasbro Game Room was reveted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 13:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please stop violating Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The source cited for the Hasbro Game Room does not given an opening date. Adding it without a supportive citation violates Wikipedia's policies on Verifiability, No Original Research and Source Citation. Since you've accumualted over 1,100 edit here since January 2020, you should be adhering to these policies, and not reverting other editors when they uphold them.

In addition, Wikipedia needs to be written with undated wording, whenever possible, per WP:DATED and WP:RELTIME. Vague, subjective words like "soon" are to be avoided. Please read these guidelines and learn them.

Lasty, citations are not written like this. Please refer to WP:CS for how to write citations, and WP:REFNAME for how to use that markup properly. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 00:18, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, saw after posting the message above that I had already warned you about your disruptive editing last December, so I merged the two sections. Further violations will result in ad administrator being contacted to block you. Please stop. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 00:22, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello. The uncited material that you added to the American Dream Meadowlands article has been reverted. Since it is clear that you either do not understand or or do not care to follow this site's policies, and guidelines, despite numerous warnings and blocks for this and other similar behavior, an adminsitrator will be contacted to impose a longer block on this account. Nightscream (talk) 18:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

You have been cautioned again and again about adding original research, then at James Earl Ray you appear to have watched a YouTube video and added a narrative to the article about what you observed. This is not the best way to contribute to Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:05, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Water slide. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:44, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:IMOB Business Tower

Hello, Zachbarbo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "IMOB Business Tower".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:56, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Duck family

Hi Zachbarbo, You've added information to Duck family (Disney) based on the short How to Have an Accident at Work. This short is not typically considered canonical for the purposes of Donald Duck's history, because no other film or comic ever used those characters. The only source you've provided is a Disney Wiki page, which is not considered a reliable source on Wikipedia. Do you have any other source that backs up "Donald Duck's son" as a canonical member of the Duck family? — Toughpigs (talk) 00:41, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dragon, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Macedonian (talk) 18:06, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of tallest buildings by country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Renaissance Tower. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User report

2a02:8084:2841:3a00:9fa:3c90:d64d:185a keeps reverting back to false information. He needs to be blocked.

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of tallest buildings by country, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nassau and Renaissance Tower.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at United Airlines Flight 93, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding unconfirmed information. David J Johnson (talk) 11:53, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages (including user talk pages) such as Talk:Ahmed al-Haznawi are for discussion related to improving (a) an encyclopedia article in specific ways based on reliable sources or (b) project policies and guidelines. They are not for general discussion about the article topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 21:30, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure about the floor count thing?

I noticed that you are sorting List of tallest buildings by country by floor count, which as far as I can tell isn't the purpose of the article. Maybe you should make a separate article "List of buildings with the most floors by country" if you feel like floor count is a better way to measure buildings. henrysz ▪ 💬 ▪ 📜 12:30, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Jklamo (talk) 09:09, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jklamo (talk) 20:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of tallest buildings by country

Hello, Zachbarbo. You have new messages at Talk:List_of_tallest_buildings_by_country#What this list is about.
Message added 17:54, 8 June 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Bartzyx (talk) 17:54, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of tallest buildings by country, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Bridge and Renaissance Tower.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Please take some time to read Help:Talk pages to see how to indent and sign comments. For example, diff is not consistent with how comments should be made. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 03:06, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning regarding edit warring

List of tallest buildings by country (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Edit warring is not permitted even if it takes place over a long period. Other editors are opposing your changes to this article and you have not substantively engaged in the discussion on the article talk page. If you make any further edits with first gaining consensus you will be blocked. Johnuniq (talk) 03:06, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Johnuniq (talk) 23:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Other editors have commented on article talk. Collaboration is required at Wikipedia and you must engage in discussion rather than try to force your view by repeating edits. Johnuniq (talk) 23:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Death of Rothenberg

I have tried to find/add sources for the claim that Rothenberg was the passenger who was stabbed and killed, according to Tom Burnett. I was unable to add a link to the flight 93 book; I was wondering if you could help or correct any mistakes I have made for your suggestion.86.8.200.101 (talk) 17:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of buildings with the most floors by country for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of buildings with the most floors by country is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of buildings with the most floors by country until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 18:25, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Continued addition of unsourced material

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Puppy in My Pocket: Adventures in Pocketville, you may be blocked from editing. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:14, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring

Please stop edit-warring, as you are at Haumea and Makemake. Especially with featured articles. If you believe our interpretation of the sources is wrong, bring it up on the talk page. (It won't be the first time!) — kwami (talk) 04:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

That amateur, out-of-date ref is ridiculous, and anyway we already have refs. Good ones. The point with challenged edits is not to cherry-pick bad refs that support your preconceptions, but to discuss the issue on the talk page and try to come to consensus. You've been here for a year, you've been blocked for edit-warring before, you know how this works. — kwami (talk) 11:34, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of pending edit-warring noticeboard report

I went to report you, then thought it better to try again, in case you really just don't understand.

At issue here is a compromise that editors have struck after years of discussion, that you are attempting to override without discussion of any kind.

At issue is which bodies "are" dwarf planets. The IAU has a convention for which naming committee gets to name which objects in the Solar system, and for that purpose they need to decide the nature of the objects (are they or are they not planets?). They therefore came up with a bureaucratic definition of dwarf planet (based on absolute magnitude) that is easily verified but contradicts their formal, geological definition. The SSSB's that are named by the dwarf-planet naming committee are then frequently reported as "the" dwarf planets. However, the IAU says they may turn out not to be DPs (their approach was a bureaucratic one, so that they'd be able to approve the names proposed by the discoverers, nothing more -- they don't claim to be a gate-keeper to reality) and astronomers often disagree -- either that the named bodies are not actually DPs, or to the common conclusion in lay literature that other bodies are not DPs. Numbering DPs in order requires that the nature of these bodies be settled, and we don't have any good way of doing that from Earth.

The dispute is well known to those of us who monitor these articles, and we've discussed it for years: do we take pronouncements and naming-conventions of an authoritative body (the IAU) as the authority for factual claims, despite the fact that science doesn't work that way, and ignore contradictory conclusions in more recent and more specialized astronomical literature, or do we make the lack of consensus of RS's clear to the reader? We've decided to use wording like 'likely' and 'possible' rather than making an absolute claim that large bodies either are or are not DPs, and to discuss the question (if we can even tell, given the evidence) in the body of the article.

So, please, stop edit-warring, or you are likely to be blocked. Again. — kwami (talk) 22:06, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Larry Gene Bell. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Inexpiable (talk) 16:45, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Giant panda

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Giant panda, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 17:01, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Jellyfish Lake into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🎄^{Talk/CCI guide} 21:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About Graffiti

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Graffiti a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Graffiti (crime). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. 747pilot (talk) 20:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Graffiti is an art genre. Zachbarbo (talk) 20:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Your recent editing history at Platypus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Schazjmd (talk) 15:36, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Official residence, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 03:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Character Popcicle

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Character Popcicle has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to be about a company, corporation or organization that did not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ‑ Iridescent 06:38, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Character Popcicle

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Character Popcicle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 18:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Winter link

Hello, please stop linking to Julia Winter at the Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (film) article. The link redirects to the very same article and is hence redundant. Thanks. Throast (talk | contribs) 15:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Julia Winter. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Throast (talk | contribs) 21:54, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLP

First, you need a source to change her name. Second, a woman getting married does not mean she is taking her husbands name and lastly, it's unlikely her professional name will ever change, she is most commonly known as Ariana Grande and unless that drastically changes with multiple RS, do not change her name. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:14, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

––FormalDude talk 21:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Robb Elementary School shooting, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ––FormalDude talk 03:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tales of Nai Nai moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tales of Nai Nai, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Shirt58 (talk) 12:02, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tales of Nai Nai

A tag has been placed on Tales of Nai Nai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Notability not apparent, largely unreferenced article, creator removed my maintenance tags

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mooonswimmer 12:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Tales of Nai Nai. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ––FormalDude talk 13:48, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at United Airlines Flight 93, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 20:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tales of Nai Nai

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Tales of Nai Nai has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that did not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ––FormalDude talk 15:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Astronomy

Hi Zachbarbo,

When you add info to a science article, like you did to Orcus, you need to provide a reference. E.g. when you say it will take 24 years for a flyby -- is that with a gravitational assist? Which years would it be possible to launch such a mission? Info like that will be in the reference for those who are interested. But without a ref, we don't even know if it's true, so you will unfortunately be reverted. — kwami (talk) 02:30, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Assassination of John F. Kennedy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 04:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at United Airlines Flight 93 and other 9/11 pages, you will be blocked from editing. David J Johnson (talk) 12:44, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content and speculation, as you did at United Airlines Flight 175, you may be blocked from editing. David J Johnson (talk) 12:43, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Madeline Amy Sweeney

Hi. You removed content from the Madeline Amy Sweeney article with this edit, but without providing a rationale for this in an edit summary. When removing material, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 18:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zachbarbo, I think you have completely misunderstood what "survived by" means. It mean that her relatives survived after she died. It is a way to list people who were alive at the time that somebody else died. The point here is that she had a living husband and two children at the time of her death.

It is important to check that the content you are correcting really is a mistake. In this case it wasn't.

I have reviewed some of your other edits and I can't tell if you are deliberately disrupting Wikipedia or whether this is just a competence issue. Either way you need to stop making large, aggressive, poorly explained edits. In particular the blanking out of big chunks of content has to stop. You have already had plenty of warnings. Please dial it back a notch or three if you want to avoid further trouble. --DanielRigal (talk) 21:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at United Airlines Flight 93. You have been warned repeatedly on this subject. Please stop now. David J Johnson (talk) 15:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tales of Nai Nai

Hello, Zachbarbo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tales of Nai Nai, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tales of Nai Nai

Hello, Zachbarbo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tales of Nai Nai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:12, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kid Lucky (TV series) moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Kid Lucky (TV series). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 04:33, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

An article you recently created, Kid Lucky (TV series) 2, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks. Silikonz💬 00:03, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits at species articles

Before this heads off into deep water... a) please don't add common names based on unreliable sources, as you did at Thaumatichthys pagidostomus and Xenophthalmichthys; random ancient book illustrations and internet galleries are not suitable. b) Don't add external links, use formatted references. c) If the article title is the scientific name, the lede begins with that name and then lists any common name, not the other way round. d) What were you up to at Giant squid? You do know there is such a thing as a preview button, right? And why fiddle with the correctly specified taxobox anyway? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

A report at my talk has pointed out that there are ongoing problems. Please respond to the two comments on this page dated 31 January 2023. They are at #American Dream Meadowlands earlier on this page and #Recent edits at species articles just above. Regarding the first of these, an editor has felt it necessary to post seven comments regarding American Dream Meadowlands at different times since November 2020. You do not appear to have responded. That is not sustainable. Replying to comments is not compulsory but if you repeat problems you will be indefinitely blocked because it is not reasonable that the time of other editors should be spent explaining basic requirements. My warning from June 2021 can be seen at #Warning regarding edit warring above. Johnuniq (talk) 04:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Zachbarbo: I mentioned you at WT:WikiProject Mammals#North American jaguar. Why did you make the edits to North American jaguar which have been reverted? I note that you have resumed editing without responding to my above comment. Be aware that collaboration is required and you will be blocked if you are unable or unwilling to communicate with other editors. Johnuniq (talk) 04:38, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. Collaboration is required at Wikipedia. Rather than responding to other editors on this talk page or at article talk, you have continued edit warring such as at American Peregrine Falcon. If you intend appealing this block, I recommend that you first respond to my messages in this section and at #Peregrine falcon below.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Johnuniq (talk) 03:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading images under false pretenses

Please do NOT upload images to Commons under false authorship declarations, as you did with this one. Unless you are "Andrew Gates" and uploaded the image to WoRMS 16 years ago, this is NOT your own creation, and you cannot claim that in the description. The image is NC-BY-SA licensed and so can be hosted at Commons, at least; I am asking to have the description sorted out there. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have now been blocked on Commons for repeatedly uploading unfree files after warnings. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:45, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peregrine falcon

Dude, this is becoming aggravating. Your edits to Peregrine falcon were pointless and made the article worse - we do not require a complete list of subspecies to bloat the box when they are all well covered in the text body, and we certainly do not need two dozen circular redirects! And you removed the summary paragraph on the Barbary falcon why? As for subspecies articles, these are only required if there is an unusual amount to say about the taxon that cannot be covered at the species article, which is apparently not the case for the American subspecies - please don't create subspecies articles unless you can do better than a stub. I have redirected this back to the species. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:43, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zachbarbo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need to add new animal species and give them common names.

Decline reason:

You need to respond to the messages on this talk page. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:15, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Kid Lucky (TV series)

Hello, Zachbarbo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kid Lucky (TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kid Lucky (TV series) 2

Hello, Zachbarbo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kid Lucky (TV series) 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kid Lucky (TV series)

Hello, Zachbarbo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kid Lucky".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kid Lucky (TV series) 2

Hello, Zachbarbo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kid Lucky (TV series) 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:11, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]