User talk:YuriGagrin12

Hello Everyone, this is Yuri here, I speak Italian and English. If anyone has a question on any space race things, just ask me. YuriGagrin12 (talk) 18:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC) YuriGagarin12[reply]

MfD nomination of User:YuriGagrin12/sandbox

User:YuriGagrin12/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:YuriGagrin12/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:YuriGagrin12/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Winged Blades^Godric 08:33, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, YuriGagrin12, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:25, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:YuriGagrin12/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:YuriGagrin12/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:25, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, YuriGagrin12,
Even if there was a notable micro-nation called "The Republic of New Italy" - which there isn't - in Italian it would be "Repubblica della Nouva Italia".
Pietro "quattro e venti" AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:02, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I understand wikipedia is not a free web host service and I hope to contribute to actual articles, I thought sandbox was used as you wish though and I just wanted to understand and see how country boxes and templates work. I thank you for correcting me though on the Repubblica issue. I can read and write Italian however it was just thought to me by my father, Arrivederci. YuriGagrin12 (talk) 17:20, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Shirt58: I'll just ping them to restore it - seems reasonable that someone would want to experiment with templates Galobtter (pingó mió) 04:35, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

sandbox

I understand Wikipedia is not a free web host service and I hope to contribute to a lot of articles in the future, in the sandbox I was experimenting with templates and trying to get used to and practice editing and using templates. I have looked at the info page on sandboxes and do not believe my page should've been deleted. YuriGagrin12 (talk) 17:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi YuriGagrin12! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 20:07, Wednesday, November 22, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Apology about the deletion of your sandbox

Hi YuriGagrin12, and again welcome to Wikipedia!
I owe you an apology. I made a far bigger mistake than creating a sandbox page about a non-existent micro-nation.

What I did

I saw a page that was tagged for speedy deletion
I deleted it - your sandbox
I sent you a message that could be seen at best unhelpful and at worst just plain rude

What I should have done, but didn't

Checked your contributions, and found out that you were a new editor
Sent you a message explaining what the problem was with your sandbox
Encouraged you to continue contributing to the Wikipedia project

All editors should assume that changes made to Wikipedia are improvements and that new editors may not be aware of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. That includes me.
As I'm an English language Wikipedia administrator as well as an editor here, I am obliged to act with a high standard of care and judgement.
By deleting your sandbox without a proper explanation, I think I failed the expectations of a Wikipedia editor and the obligations of a Wikipedia administrator. I apologise for my mistake.
Please let me me know if I can assist you in any way about Wikipedia.
Peter in Australia aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:36, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I went to the help desk and after a while I found out what was wrong with my sandbox. I now understand you cannot put any wrong information in your sandbox even if you are trying to experiment with templates(or at least thats what a user said there, I don't know how to tag articles or anything like that yet so sorry). And thank you for leaving that message. I should apologize too as I didn't read all the rules before creating it. Thank you and I hope to see you again on wikipedia :) YuriGagrin12 (talk) 15:18, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Return of the Obra Dinn might be notable under our policies, but as a forthcoming game it's less likely to be the case, for reasons explained at WP:CRYSTAL. What we'd need to have an article on the topic is multiple, reliable, independent sources which talk about or review the work in signficant detail. To get assistance on finding suitable sources for video games, you might ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games and/or the Wikipedia Teahouse at WP:Teahouse. Best of luck.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:YuriGagrin12/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

joe decker ^talk 07:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! YuriGagrin12, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! joe decker ^talk 07:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Return of the Obra Dinn, from its old location at User:YuriGagrin12/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. sami ^talk 20:45, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay [[User:Samee}} Thank you for letting me know, also do you think my draft and sources are good and could be accepted? YuriGagrin12 (talk) 22:19, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I noticed that in this edit to Shenzhou (spacecraft), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 22:33, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I am very sorry, I put a description in the inboxes page but it showed up on the Shenzou page and I tried to delete that text on the top and it deleted the Shenzou template, please forgive me, I tried to undo the edit but then someone else did. YuriGagrin12 (talk) 22:36, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
87	DirecTV satellite fleet (talk)	Add sources
78	GOES-16 (talk)	Add sources
3	Seychelles Chess Championship (talk)	Add sources
19	GOES-S (talk)	Add sources
202	Reusable launch system (talk)	Add sources
4	Jamaican Chess Championship (talk)	Add sources
11	Badr-4 (talk)	Cleanup
34	Yu Yangyi (talk)	Cleanup
94	Space medicine (talk)	Cleanup
10	Curt Brasket (talk)	Expand
4	TDRS-10 (talk)	Expand
89	Boeing 702 (talk)	Expand
279	Sabatier reaction (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
174	Single-stage-to-orbit (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
245	Intergalactic travel (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,132	Human mission to Mars (talk)	Merge
161	Subcooling (talk)	Merge
115	Soyuz-5 (rocket) (talk)	Merge
16	2005 in spaceflight (talk)	Wikify
24	Hermes (missile program) (talk)	Wikify
12	CNCP Telecommunications (talk)	Wikify
6	Advanced Extremely High Frequency (satellite) (talk)	Orphan
4	Danitza Vázquez (talk)	Orphan
3	Erik Kislik (talk)	Orphan
3	Intelsat 802 (talk)	Stub
5	Synchronous Meteorological Satellite (talk)	Stub
13	GOES-G (talk)	Stub
5	JCSAT-4A (talk)	Stub
7	GOES-T (talk)	Stub
6	Turkan Mamedyarova (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:53, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:ReturnoftheObraDinntite.gif

Thank you for uploading File:ReturnoftheObraDinntite.gif. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I put the image a unknown copyright so someone could help me later with it. This is just the title screen of the game from the creators website. I have put where I got the image from as the upload page said to do if it was an unknown copyrighted image. YuriGagrin12 (talk) 03:35, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have reduced the file size now too. YuriGagrin12 (talk) 15:01, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ReturnoftheObraDinntite.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ReturnoftheObraDinntite.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:07, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CX

I saw your comment at the Village pump. If you want to translate articles, you just need to give it a name that starts with User:YuriGagrin12/ After you publish the translated article to your userspace, you can WP:MOVE it to the mainspace, where it will be treated like any other article that you create. Any autoconfirmed editor (=10 edits + 4 days old) can do this. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:57, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@WhatamIdoing: Thank you, I have already made some but not published, but the main problem I want to address is if any auto confirmed user can do that why can't the translation requirements just be auto confirmed. YuriGagrin12 (talk) 15:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I can give you an answer that doesn't make someone sound bad.

So, with apologies in advance for the blunt assessment:

Some editors here think that all other Wikipedias are worse, so they don't want translated articles. In this group, I put people who believe that other Wikipedias don't cite enough sources and people who believe that other Wikipedias write too much about subjects that might not be WP:Notable.
In other cases, they think that all translators are bad until proven otherwise, so they don't want translated articles. They think that all translators are likely to be bad at writing English, and they see 500 edits as a test to show that the person can write in English. (I know native English speakers and people who use English as their primary language who have been stopped by this rule.) You may have noticed at some of the pages that describe this block, there is an assertion that 95% of articles needed to be deleted. Well, what they fail to mention is that (a) that number included a large number of 100%-machine-translated articles added by a single person, (b) most of those articles were deleted for reasons other than translation quality, and (c) this isn't very different from the deletion rate of brand-new articles by new editors.
There is also a group that doesn't want any more articles. Some editors find new articles to be a real burden. They worry that an incomplete article makes Wikipedia look bad. Although they know it's impossible, these editors like the fantasy of stopping article creation entirely, perhaps except for "important" new things. Since they can't have that, they are trying to hide as many new articles from readers until they're practically perfect (especially on "unimportant" subjects, such as popular culture subjects in non-English-speaking countries), and to make it hard for newer editors to create articles in general.
- One of the problems they've discovered: Since ACTRIAL was planned last summer, some paid spammers started making 10 edits and waiting four days, so that each paid article is posted by an auto-confirmed account. Since the autoconfirmed restriction didn't stop the paid spammers, they think that auto-confirmed status is too easily reached (rather than the wrong approach in general), and would oppose having the bar be the same for translation as it is for spammers. (Instead, they would like to raise the bar for the spammers to match what's imposed on translators.)
Finally, there is the Security through obscurity group, which thinks that the auto-confirmed workaround is a feature. They think, if you know enough about Wikipedia to figure out how this works, then you must be an experienced editor (at some wiki). In their mind, this keeps inexperienced editors out, and good editors in. So the rule, in their minds, is "500 edits for newbies, but 10 edits for experienced editors". (You don't have to be autoconfirmed to publish the translation. You need the 10 edits only to move the page to the mainspace.)

Other people might divide the groups differently, and perhaps I would on a different day, but this is my current way of thinking about it. The mindsets are profoundly different from the view produced in the recent strategy exercise. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@WhatamIdoing: Wow, thank you for that explanation. I can see where some of these groups are coming from but some are absurd and really don't support a free and ever changing online Encyclopedia. Also how do you add those badges like I contribute using OS X Yosemite? Ive noticed them several times but how do you add them?

I can see where they're coming from, too, but I don't agree with them. I hope that we will find some solutions that keep some of the perceived benefits but reduce some of the real harms.

You can probably find the userboxes (badges) you want in the lists at Wikipedia:Userboxes/Galleries/All. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:27, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Main page redesign

Your help desk question didn't get a response. Did you find your answer somewhere else?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:47, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Vchimpanzee: Thank you for asking, no I didn't find an answer elsewhere. I have alot of ideas for a redesign but I'm trying to learn mediawiki language so it would be a learning experience and a possibly a viable redesign. YuriGagrin12 (talk) 23:36, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I recall seeing questions about the main page on the Help Desk or in The Teahouse, but I don't remember where they said to go.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Return of the Obra Dinn logo-title.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Return of the Obra Dinn logo-title.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — fourthords | =Λ= | 23:21, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Il collegio.png

Thanks for uploading File:Il collegio.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:46, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Il collegio.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Il collegio.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:45, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JJMC89 Thanks for the heads up! This image is also on the Italian Wikipedia, https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Il_Collegio.png , that didn't have a rationale so I thought i wouldnt have to have one either. Sorry and I will correct that soon! YuriGagrin12 (talk) 00:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Il collegio.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Il collegio.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]