Jump to content

User talk:Ypnypn/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 10

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

Wikidata weekly summary #54

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • Dispatch lag is now down to 0 so changes should show up very quickly on the Wikipedias in watchlists and recent changes
    • wikidata.org now always redirects to www.wikidata.org. This should among other things solve the issue where people were not able to edit when on wikidata.org (bugzilla:45005)
    • Fixed weird blocked-user/protected-page handling in UI (bugzilla:45140)
    • Final meetings for the external professional review of our code and architecture. They were quite happy with the quality of the codebase and gave useful tips for improvements
    • Worked on automatic summaries for editing claims
    • Investigation of different JavaScript frameworks dealing with date and time
    • Worked on using Redis and the job queue for change notifications to clients
    • Work on the storage code for answering queries
  • Events/Press
    • GLAM-WIKI 2013
    • upcoming: office hour on IRC about sources
    • upcoming: Opensource Treffen
    • upcoming: intro to Wikidata at the British Library
  • Discussions
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
  • Open Tasks for You
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 22:54, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Akrafena

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Akrafena. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:16, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

Wikidata weekly summary #55

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 21:54, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Testing Echo, Testing Echo...

So how does it work? -- 50.74.2.12 (talk) 01:51, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

module:factorization

I was thinking that instead of trying all the numbers less than the sqrt(N), you could keep a list primes. the first 500 would work up to around 13 million. the Module:ConvertNumeric has arrays that it uses, so something like that would probably work here as well. I made a minor change in the module to have it return an error when the number is out of range, since this would otherwise indicate that the number is prime, which it may or may not be. 198.102.153.1 (talk) 15:55, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #56

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

הודעה על תרגום: Wikidata:Flooders

שלום Ypnypn,

קיבלת את ההודעה הזאת מכיוון שנרשמת בתור מתרגם לעברית באתר Wikidata. דף חדש בשם Wikidata:Flooders זמין לתרגום. אנו מבקשים ממך לתרגם אותו בקישור הבא:

העדיפות של הדף הזה: בינונית. התאריך הסופי לתרגום הדף הזה הוא 2013-05-12.

Please translate the new policy affecting the new "flood" user group.

אנחנו מעריכים מאוד את עזרתך. מתרגמים כמוך עוזרים לאתר Wikidata לתפקד כמו קהילה רב־לשונית אמתית.

תודה!

רכזי תרגום באתר Wikidata‏, 14:57, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Notifications box replacement prototypes released

Hey Ypnypn; Kaldari has finished scripting a set of potential replacements available to test and give feedback on. Please go to this thread for more detail on how to enable them. Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 14:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 April newsletter

We are a week into Round 3, but it is off to a flying start, with Republic of Rose Island Sven Manguard (submissions) claiming for the high-importance Portal:Sports and Portal:Geography (which are the first portals ever awarded bonus points in the WikiCup) and Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) claiming for a did you know of sea, the highest scoring individual did you know article ever submitted for the WikiCup. Round 2 saw very impressive scores at close; first place New South Wales Casliber (submissions) and second place Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) both scored over 1000 points; a feat not seen in Round 2 since 2010. This, in part, has been made possible by the change in the bonus points rules, but is also testament to the quality of the competition this year. Pool C and Pool G were most competitive, with three quarters of participants making it to Round 3, while Pool D was the least, with only the top two scorers making it through. The lowest qualifying score was 123, significantly higher than last year's 65, 2011's 41 or even 2010's 100.

The next issue of The Signpost is due to include a brief update on the current WikiCup, comparing it to previous years' competitions. This may be of interest to current WikiCup followers, and may help bring some more new faces into the community. We would also like to note that this round includes an extra competitor to the 32 advertised, who has been added to a random pool. This extra inclusion seems to have been the fairest way to deal with a small mistake made before the beginning of this round, but should not affect the competition in a large way. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please feel free to contact one of the judges.

A rules clarification: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on 29/30 April, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 16:05, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism oops

Sorry for my deletion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism. I accidentally hit a rollback button on my watch list. I thought I caught it in time, but I was looking at the wrong article.--agr (talk) 16:45, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Do you understand NPOV?

You oddly referred to WP:NPOV on ANI. NPOV is for articles and is not related to people's arguments for or against something: we all have a POV, and are allowed to express it. Just because people express their point of view does not ever discount their vote as non-NPOV. You seem to misunderstand that policy and/or its application (✉→BWilkins←✎) 18:02, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

So if there's a discussion as to whether an article should include a certain detail, and some people support because they feel that detail is very important in their lives, their arguments would be valid?? -- Ypnypn (talk) 18:36, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Of course, and it would be silly to think otherwise. Just like if I was an avid birdwatcher, and someone wanted to delete, or promote to ITN something about a new bird species, I'd likely !vote in its favour of is because it's important in my life. We all have bias; it's only in articles where we're supposed to try and be bias-free, as per WP:NPOV (✉→BWilkins←✎) 18:46, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
To add onto Bwilkins point - you're welcome to vote your POV on, say, a bird-related article. However, as we have pre-established (and widely-agreed upon) policies to adhere to, your POV may not necessarily align with what's best for the encyclopedia and may be discounted in the context of a vote, such as ItN or XfD. m.o.p 19:05, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Exactly. Decisions are to based on policy, not on ILIKEIT and IDONTLIKEIT arguments, which are routinely ignored. And Bwilkins, your distinction between articles and non-articles is unclear. Biased arguments lead to a biased conclusion, which leads to a biased implementation – i.e., a biased article. -- Ypnypn (talk) 19:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
An admin, when closing any discussion (like an WP:AFD) will weight the arguments behind the !votes. Stating my bias does not make my !vote less important, or even more or less against any policy. Stating my bias also does not equate whatsoever to WP:ILIKEIT. For example, if I say "I like birds - thus, I think the article on Orange-winged, pink-footed Boobies should be a featured article on Wikipedia ... according to Policy X and Policy Y", the fact that I like birds doesn't make my !vote to be "because I like it". (✉→BWilkins←✎) 20:14, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
But my complaint was about users providing their biases instead of policies, not in addition to them. -- Ypnypn (talk) 20:21, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
And you were wrong. Your complaint had zero merit, in part because you linked to policies (like NPOV) that were wholly unrelated (✉→BWilkins←✎) 20:41, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Why exactly do you think I'm wrong and that my complaint has zero merit? And I just explained why NPOV is completely relevant. -- Ypnypn (talk) 22:06, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Ugh. We've come full circle, and yet you fail to understand that although NPOV is about articles, we're all allowed to have a POV in discussions. This is a key concept not only in Wikipedia, but in life. I'm not going to re-hash the same argument because I have better things to do in life. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 08:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: April 2013



Headlines
Read this edition in full • Single-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 21:54, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #57

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

Please comment on Talk:Georges Yatridès

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Georges Yatridès. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — 2A02:EC80:101:0:0:0:2:8 (talk) 00:59, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

IRC cloak request

Hello Ypnypn. You recently applied for a Wikimedia IRC cloak, but it looks like you forgot to register your nickname first. Could you please log on to IRC and do:

/msg NickServ REGISTER <password> <email>

where <password> is a password of your choice and <email> is your e-mail address? After you do that, please follow the instructions that are e-mailed to you to confirm your e-mail address. When you're done with that, I just need you to confirm your cloak request:

/msg MemoServ send wmfgc IRC cloak request

After you finish all of that, I'd be happy to get you a cloak. :-) If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my Meta talk page. Barras talk 11:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

Carnival of Limoux

Hi Ypnypn, how are you? I just made this new page, and I ask you, please, the help to read a little, to correct my BIG mistakes!

Thanks a lot for your help!

Rex Momo (talk) 07:52, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Very good, thanks a lot! Rex Momo (talk) 20:08, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #58

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

MfD nomination of Portal:Film/News/Wikinews

Portal:Film/News/Wikinews, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Film/News/Wikinews and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Film/News/Wikinews during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ypnypn (talk) 03:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

Please comment on Talk:Discord (My Little Pony)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Discord (My Little Pony). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:17, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Edit filter

Sorry, that was a mistake - I think the filter is fixed now. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:02, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Text formatting

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Text formatting. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:18, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
For bringing up a solution [1] which perfectly met all the requirements of both sides at Template talk:Sister project links. Thanks a lot. ···Vanischenu「m/Talk」 12:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! Ypnypn (talk) 23:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

Translation notification: Template:Recentchanges/text

Hello Ypnypn,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to Hebrew on Wikidata. The page Template:Recentchanges/text is available for translation. You can translate it here:

The priority of this page is medium. The deadline for translating this page is 2013-06-30.

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Wikidata to function as a truly multilingual community.

Thank you!

Wikidata translation coordinators‎, 21:38, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!

For fixing mi UBX!! :) Miss Bono (zootalk) 18:26, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Empire State Building

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Empire State Building. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:16, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

Sathiyam tv

I made an error on the title of the page you can delete it Benedictdilton (talk) 18:23, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Lander College

Hi Ypnypn, the section on staff and faculty is inadequately sourced, and as far as I've seen we don't include such listings unless the employees are clearly notable, as demonstrated by stand alone articles here. Usually such sections are maintained by COI accounts, and are promotional in intent. I don't intend to revert your addition, but I don't think it belongs. Perhaps I'll seek further opinion, but in the meantime I may add a template re: the promotional inclination of such content. Thanks, 76.248.151.159 (talk) 02:09, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Sister projects template

Hi, Ypnypn. Your recent change to Template:Sister project links appears to have introduced a bug. Please see Template talk:Sister project links#Wikivoyage for more details. Powers T 17:35, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

Please comment on Talk:Sarah Brown (wife of Gordon Brown)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sarah Brown (wife of Gordon Brown). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

WikiCup 2013 June newsletter

We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note. Idaho Figureskatingfan (submissions) claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition: Wyoming Ealdgyth (submissions) was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions) 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to Poland Piotrus (submissions) for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example, New South Wales Casliber (submissions) and Canada Sasata (submissions) being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.

A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 10:13, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Flickr

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Flickr. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:16, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Cristina Ferreira

Hi Ypnypn, how are you? Here it's too hot!!!

I made this new page, it speaks about a wonderful portuguese TV host. Please, I ask 5 minutes of you time to watch if I wrote everything correct.

Thanks a lot for your help!

Rei Momo (talk) 16:50, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

Please comment on Talk:Red wolf

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Red wolf. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:16, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

Please comment on Talk:Hog-dog rodeo

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hog-dog rodeo. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


This week's articles for improvement - 22 July 2013 to 28 July 2013

This week's article for improvement is
Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/2024/47/1
Please be bold and help improve it!

posted by Northamerica1000(talk) 13:53, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

I've added an opt-in section for those interested in receiving TAFI notifications on the project's main page, located here. Those that don't opt-in won't receive this message again. Also, a revised notification template has been created, located at Template:TAFI weekly selections notice. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:17, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 July 2013

WikiCup 2013 July newsletter

We're halfway through this year's penultimate round, and the competition is moving along well. Pool A's Canada Sasata (submissions) currently leads overall, while Pool B's Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) is second. Both leaders are WikiCup veterans, and both have already scored over 600 points this month. If the round were to end today, London Miyagawa (submissions), with 274 points, would be the lowest-scoring participant to make it through. This indicates that participants will need a score comparable to last year's (573, the highest ever) to qualify for the final. The high scores this year are a testament both to the quality of participants and to the increased focus on significant content (eligible for bonus points) in this year's competition. So far this round, both Sasata and Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) have made up over half of their score through bonus points, with, for example, high importance FA koala earning Sasata a total of 440 points (from a multiplier of 4.4) and high-importance GA sea earning Cwmhiraeth a total of 216 points (from a multiplier of 7.2). Other articles on important topics submitted this round include a featured article on the Norman conquest of England by Wyoming Ealdgyth (submissions), and good articles on Nobel laureate in literature Henryk Sienkiewicz, Nobel laureate in physics Hans Bethe, and the noted Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū. These articles are by Poland Piotrus (submissions), Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions) and Sturmvogel_66 respectively.

Other than that, there is not much to report! If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:19, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

Please comment on Talk:Pythagoras Lodge No. 41, Free and Accepted Masons

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pythagoras Lodge No. 41, Free and Accepted Masons. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:16, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

Please comment on Talk:Subject–object problem

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Subject–object problem. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

re FPOC

Portal:Judaism has been nominated for featured portal status. Would you be able to leave a few comments? -- Ypnypn (talk) 20:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Okay, I'll try to take a look soon — but could you please comment at some of the other discussions on that page, as well? Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 00:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Yes, can you take a look at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:European military history? It will be great to have an extra pair of eyes on this nomination. OhanaUnitedTalk page 02:25, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ypnypn/Archive_3&oldid=1168309985"