This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject My Little Pony, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of My Little Pony related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.My Little PonyWikipedia:WikiProject My Little PonyTemplate:WikiProject My Little PonyMy Little Pony articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
My previous comments still apply; not all the sources on this page are primary, so it should definitely not be put up for deletion/merger/redirect due to the sources. That said, if someone has some reliable secondary and tertiary sources, then adding them to the article could only increase the quality (and get that giant banner off of the lead!) :) --Yellow1996 (talk) 23:33, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
clearly based almost entirely on primary sources - and of the few reliable third party sources, such as the Wired, is clearly a poster child for "trivial passing mention" of the subject of this article used only to identify the voice actor behind it who is doing other things, and the Entertainment Weekly is purely a PR promotional clip.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom19:09, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What exactly do you mean by "need"? Any article can always use more secondary sources. Are you asking if we need more such sources to avoid the article being deleted? Then this discussion belongs at AfD. -- Ypnypn (talk) 01:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No, this RfC predates the deletion nomination and is based upon the discussion here. Though it should be closed now since the article is supposed to be merged into the list of characters page per the AfD discussion. --Yellow1996 (talk) 01:23, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
discussed in afd, best possible solution SmartyPantsKid, Signing off. 17:22, 16 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmartyPantsKid (talk • contribs)