User talk:Y89943

Welcome!

Hello, Tmedia12, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Nandha Periyasamy. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Jeraxmoira (talk) 17:05, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guroudev Bhalla Screens (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guroudev Bhalla Screens and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:45, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tmedia12! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:45, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your account has been blocked from editing because your username gives the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy, which is summarized here.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username on this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken or in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 18:51, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, Tmedia12, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Mohit235 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Jeraxmoira (talk) 19:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraxmoira who’s this guy you are talking about? I think you’re mistaken. There’s no connection to be disclosed. I just came through these pages via redirects and red coloured made attention hence I tried to improve them and I have also asked for help on a help page, you can check. Tmedia12 (talk) 20:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Y89943 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

new username Give whatever you guys want (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I didn’t got the reason for which I am blocked. I am seriously not getting it. I just went on exploring pages for Indian television shows and personalities and I found these tasks pending. Hence I asked help to get these articles published. Also I have made further contributions to many people/actors/filmmakers.

Decline reason:

You need to pick the new username. Yamla (talk) 21:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that your user page indicates this is a shared account. Shared accounts are not permitted here. You need to specifically state only a single person has access to this account. --Yamla (talk) 21:34, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Username: Y89943

Will this work?

And I don’t know about second person. It’s only me who’s using this account. Probably there must be some misunderstanding. Tmedia12 (talk) 09:48, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page (User:Tmedia12) clearly indicates this is a shared account. That username looks fine. Once you fully address the shared account business, you are free to make a new unblock request. I or another admin would process the rename. --Yamla (talk) 09:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What you want to me to address. I don't have any 2nd account, how many times I have to say this? I don't need to clarify further. Tmedia12 (talk) 16:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla is asking you to explain why your user page states that there is more than one person using this account.

And, with respect, it isn't for you to decide that you "don't need to clarify further" when you're currently blocked and wanting to appeal that block. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I got Yamla's point @DoubleGrazing and for your information we means a community who follows media. It doesn't mean that many people are using same account. And if you have problem for me using 2 alphabet `we' then I'll surely change it but for that I need to get unblock right? Tmedia12 (talk) 18:11, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Y89943 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Y89943 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I learned that `we' can't be used by any user. Hence will revise my user page once unblocked. Thanks

Accept reason:

Renamed, so unblocked. Welcome back, happy editing! Yamla (talk) 18:21, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Yamla Y89943 (talk) 03:24, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Saubhagyavati Bhava: * Niyam Aur Shartein Laagu

Hi @Y89943, I have reverted your edit on Saubhagyavati Bhava: * Niyam Aur Shartein Laagu. Removing large amount of content is not equal to making it more concise. Cheers! Jeraxmoira (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem @Jeraxmoira I tried to keep it in a way every plot suppose to be. That part is written like a scene which I thought isn't required for a plot. But no problem someone else will do the improvement. Good day. Y89943 (talk) 07:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right. But instead of removing it completely, per MOS:TVPLOT, plot summaries can be within 200 words per episode and should be presented in a table using {{Episode table}}. Jeraxmoira (talk) 08:04, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guroudev Bhalla (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Times of India is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guroudev Bhalla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:37, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong are you kidding me? The Times of India is not reliable? seriously? Hahaha. Most of the Indian articles, infact every Indian article has citation from The Times of India. Its one of best relevant source one can have from country. Please recheck your knowledge buddy. Thanks. Y89943 (talk) 12:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To know more about which sources are considered reliable, please go through WP:ICTFSOURCES and WP:RSP. Kindly do not be hostile towards fellow editors. Jeraxmoira (talk) 13:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:TOI for more detail, The Times of India is considered to have a reliability between no consensus and generally unreliable. Theroadislong (talk) 13:45, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No offence @Jeraxmoira @Theroadislong I just saw that most of the Indian articles were published using TOI sources. Anyways thank you both of you for guiding me. I have revised the article and removed all TOI citations and added the new sources as per the list. Thank you. Y89943 (talk) 07:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guroudev Bhalla (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guroudev Bhalla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Java Hurricane 09:34, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

firefly ( t · c ) 09:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Y89943 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't done anything wrong to get blocked. Also I don't know the other person you are talking about. I submitted few articles and it was rejected. Does this becomes the reason to block me? Is it fair?

Decline reason:

Very obvious abuse of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 05:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UNBLOCK

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Y89943 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How can be so sure that I am using multiple account? The fact I am not.

Decline reason:

Ublock requests are not the place to ask questions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:20, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

General

@JJMC89 I just tried to submit 2 drafts i.e Guroudev Bhalla and Guroudev Bhalla Screens. And got blocked for no reason. I am not performing any paid task or copying someone's work. I just saw 2 drafts and tried to submit in my way after correction. No one is helping me and all are just blocking me from edit. You can check my contribution. I love to edit pages for Tv and Film personalities. You suggest me then I will request for unblock and try to submit those drafts as per guidelines. Y89943 (talk) 07:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the guide to appealing checkuser blocks. The reason you are blocked is for socking as confirmed by a checkuser. The 2 drafts that you tried to submit has not been edited by anyone else other than you and mohit, that makes it really obvious that you want it moved to mainspace. No one will help you when you are not here to improve Wikipedia but for your own agenda.

If you actually are guilty of sockpuppetry, and want to get a second chance at editing, please do as follows:

Refrain from making any edits, using any account or anonymously, for a significant period of time (e.g. six months), in the English Wikipedia. You are strongly encouraged to make significant and useful contributions to other Wikimedia projects prior to appealing.
Make the unblock request from your original account. Sockpuppeteers aren't often unblocked—since they've acted dishonestly, it's hard to believe them—and the administrators certainly aren't going to unblock the sockpuppet account.

Hope you come out of this and get a clean start! Jeraxmoira (talk) 08:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]