Jump to content

User talk:Xiner/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linking to templates

[edit]

Hey there, noticed your comment that you werent sure how to do this. The easiest and best way is to use {{tl|templatename}} - simple as that! So, lets say you wanted to link to Template:User countries visited, just type {{tlu|User:EVula/Userboxes/countries visited}} which pops out as {{User:EVula/Userboxes/countries visited}} :) Hope this helps! Glen 13:44, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely no problem, t'was a pleasure! Anytime :) Glen 14:06, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly suggestions

[edit]
Hello. Interesting Notion: If certain users stopped being self-righteous on other people's talk pages over matters of absolute non-importance, perhaps there would be less stubs on Wikipedia. Thanks, and happy editing.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by ExplorerCDT (talk • contribs) 21:16, 19 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

I never knew an edit summaries reminder would get so heated. They are more than matters of absolute non-importance -- I can't imagine a software engineer not commenting their checkins to their analogous Concurrent Versions System. But if that's your viewpoint, fine. I was just asking you to consider it. Xiner (talk, email) 21:23, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Turns out this user has been blocked for incivility, etc., but I'm still a sucker for Wikipedia:Assume good faith. Xiner (talk, email) 22:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

XfD comments

[edit]

Could I ask you to please follow the format of others when commenting in XfD discussions? I noticed in RfD you are using the colon to indent when everyone else is using an asterisk to create a bullet point. Thanks. BigNate37(T) 00:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parkes, NSW

[edit]

Xiner, thank you very much for promptly fixing my references problem. Roaming27 23:56, 9 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Agree

[edit]

I do not expect to change any of their minds. I hopefully open an eye here or two or clear up some confusion. A lot of times useful information does emerge from these conversations believe it or not. My own personal views in some ways are actually not that far from H's, which I am sure everyone would be surprised to know. It is just I do not share the same tolerance for irrationality; I would rather use the brains I have been given to good effect, as was intended.--Filll 02:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have mail.--Filll 03:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Morawski page

[edit]

Thanks SOOO MUCH for your help today! Esimones 03:59, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bot error of your thank-you on Help desk being reverted falsely for vandalism to the bot owner

[edit]

ohmygosh that was a lot of big wikipedia words... I think that means I didn't do what the bot thought I did right? hahaha thank you, I am learning!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Esimones (talk • contribs) 04:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC). [reply]

While I support your removal of unrelated material from the Big Bang talkpage...

[edit]

...it's best not to call someone a "vandal" when they might just be misguided or deluded. Remember to assume good faith at all costs. This will be good insurance for later on. Just keep your edit summaries, short, to the point, and not too personal. --ScienceApologist 01:30, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ADOPT

[edit]

Hi there,

As a current Adopter with the Adopt-a-User program there has been some ongoing developments that we would like to bring to your attention.

A new Adopter's Area has been created where you can find useful resources and other Adopter's experiences. Please feel free to add any resources you may have found useful as an Adopter, as well as recount any experiences that you think may help others. If you know of any useful resources for new users / Adoptees then you can add them here.

Also the way the adoption process works has changed slightly. To decrease workload at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user, on offering adoption please change the {{Adoptme}} template to {{Adoptoffer}} on the user's user page, and this will add the user to Category:Wikipedians having been offered adoption. Users that have already been offered adoption can always have a second or third offer, but by separating out those users that have not had an adoption offer yet, it is hoped that no one will go lacking.

Furthermore numerous Adopters have been adding their details to a list of users available for adopting, to offer a more personalised service and allow new users to browse through and pick their own Adopter. The quickest way to adopt though, is still to contact users at the Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user.

Finally - thanks for all your hard work, keep it up - and if you have any general questions or suggestions about the further development of Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User please bring them to our talk page. Cheers Lethaniol 14:05, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

[edit]

Hi Xiner,

Thanks for your message, and for your suggestion that I could be an admin - it is very kind. Unfortunately - see User_talk:Amarkov/Archive_5#Need_for_Admin_tools - it appears that I do not have the need for such tools, (I know this is only one user's opinion but he is probably right), so unless people start making Admins for there ability/enthusiasm, and are less concerned about the need for the tools - then I am unlikely to succeed :( Oh well Cheers Lethaniol 14:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes your right - thanks for the advice and happy vandal fighting Cheers Lethaniol 14:55, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is a VERY Good Question!!

[edit]

Good question! I think it means you put them in alphabetical order. It not ABC order, what type is it? ?_?

Sklocke has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Sorry

[edit]

What was going on???!!! That question was at the bottom then like that it was already way up there and a dozen questions were already there. WOW. Thanks for getting rid of that awnser. 20:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

[edit]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Xiner! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego talk 01:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Album Source comment

[edit]

You made a suggestion on J Milburn's talk page that adding <ref>Album X, CD liner.</ref> would clear up the confusion I was having. My question is this, is that not another reference to something in my possession? If so how is it verifiable if there is no source on the web (or if there is an incomplete one)? Unless someone is going to come out the the island and check it (in that case give me time to clean) am I not back where I started?. It's not that important but thanks for your input. Solonyc 02:15, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your attempt. And I am not saying it's wrong off the bat. It just seems to be that I'm caught in a circle. If I don't cite then it's not referenced. If I cite the booklet then it's not verifiable unless you own the disc or go buy it. If I cite another web page then it may or may not be correct and it looks like I used another persons work when I spent the time myself. The funny thing is the last two will keep my page up and the first will probably get deleted. Again thanks for the interest. Solonyc 02:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Baiji

[edit]

Are you interested in getting Baiji featured on the main page? frummer 10:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

A Barnstar for You

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your tireless contributions through very helpful replies to the Wikipedia help desk. .V. (talk) 17:01, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What I have to say.

[edit]

Well, I hat's off to you, you are the bigger person. :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alroney (talk • contribs) 19:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Adoption?

[edit]

Hey Xiner, I like the way you answer qstns. (not just mine) on the help desk and I've agreed with your posts that I have come across in different discussions. You and I seem to be somewhat in sympatico. When I visited your user page, I noticed the adoption thing. Are you still taking on adoptees? What exactly does this mean? Will you answer all my random questions about contributing? I seem to come up with new ones regularly and don't always know where to ask them. Let me know. Thanks.--Vbd 04:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Redirects

[edit]

Redirect should -not- be fixed because they are absolutely harmless. Double redirects, on the other hand, where you have a redirect redirecting to a redirect, are fixed by one of the many other bots that get to it before I can. ★MESSEDROCKER★ 22:24, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CFD: Canadian Americans

[edit]

Hi Xiner, I just wanted to give you the heads up that I finally posted my proposed changes for this category. It is similar to what you had suggested on the help page, but not quite. I didn't say this in my posting, but I am happy to do (or help with) the work involved in recategorizing articles. Is that expected or do the admins usually deal with it? Also, I am still unclear on who finally resolves a discussion on the CF page and decides what the outcome will be. I realize it is supposed to be by consensus, but at some point someone must make a final call, right? --Vbd 23:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

User categories

[edit]

I generally ignore user categories. You may want to ask someone else. Dr. Submillimeter 23:36, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Further info on translations

[edit]

Thanks for responding to the "HELP" call for User:Technopat. Sadly, there's nothing directly addressing translations in the Wikipedia:Copyrights, it's just a derivative understanding of the basic copyright.

As I stated on Technopat's page, basically, a translated text is a derivative work, and as such subject to the original's copyright as well as the translator's. Therefore there would be an infringment of the copyright. Translations in general are subject to copyright. The main exception is that a translation made by an author who died more than 70 years will generally be in the public domain, but more recent works remain copyrighted.

It's normally OK to cite and link to such translations on the web but quotations from the translations are subject to 'fair use' rules. One may use very brief examples, a word or phrase here or there (Such as "The Beatles song, "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" begins with the words "Picture yourself in a boat on a river...") All quotations must be short and essential to the context. Some purists would say that more than 1 line is 'pushing it', and I'm sure that going over 2 or 3 would push it into a violation of the lyrics copyright.

Hope this helps - I work a bit on translating articles from German/Spanish/Italian into the English Wiki, and have run into this question many times in all of those languages!

Ciao - Adios - Guten Abend - Cheerio! SkierRMH 01:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Hello!

[edit]

Hi!

Yeah, I'm a new user here... Eventually, and hopefully, I'll be a Pro-Wikipedian. Hehe...

Hey, There was a time that I edited a page, and I added a few lines and a paragraph and I saved it. And the next day, when i visited that article, my contributions were erased. I guess that there are people who saves their articles word-by-word in other writing program. And if there's someone who would change or edit something, they'll just copy-paste their article from that writing program, erasing the ones of the person who edited just a little bit. Gets? Hehehe... I mean, there are people who are so selfish that they want nobody to edit their article! So mean...

Anyway, have a nice day!!

Mogultown 05:37, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Xiner01, this is Ghostrider01 on Air Force Common. Bandit at my six oh clock, vampires engaged. Obvious slang tips me off. Reverting back my TCS Ghostrider01, out.71.142.213.199 04:44, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Friendly inbound your station, email check. Ghostrider01, out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.142.213.199 (talk) 05:24, 23 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Help on code

[edit]
You wrote: If the three are showing up, as I see, but not in the order you want, which I'm not sure about but if you say so...then have you tried switching their order in the code?

Well, I forgot to say that it's not showing right on Mozilla Firefox (the browser I use), but it seems to be alright on Internet Explorer (probably the browser you're using). - Aditya Kabir 15:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

[edit]

Hi Xiner -

Sorry about the edit summary - I was having some connection problems. Thanks for pointing that out. Avi9505 16:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

That was amazing! I thought that creating new templates was a form of "Black magic". But they arent and their easy to make! Thank you for your assistance. --Regards, Darkest Hour Talk•contribs 20:52, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for response and advice

[edit]

Thank you for responding to my plea for help regarding copyright for translations. Your comments (as well as those of other experienced Wikipedians) were of great interest and help. Sorry abt putting my foot in it with the user page - I misread it for "user talk page" (or was it vice versa?) --Technopat 22:52, 22 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Email

[edit]
You would be surprised how many people have other user's talkpages on their watchlist (part of the open system I spoke about). I have one on mine who is actually doing me a favor. I have 493 pages on my watchlist. Many were accumulated while I was on active vandal patrol. About a third are actually ones I really care about and contribute to regularly or just protect. When I came off active VP earlier this month, it was my intention to go back and clean up pages. Now, all I have to do is make a minor correction on a page and the other user does the majority of the work for me. Every so often I hit an orphaned page and watch the fun. :) Ronbo76 04:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I can see both sides of this debate. If I read the whole nom correctly, it kinds of boils down to two issues for me: choice and the ability to contribute as other users put it. If you side with the free choice debate, then it's keep in my mind. If it about your ability to contribute or not contribute based upon being in the category, then it goes contrary to what Wikipedia espouses: openness. Unless some user manages to seize on the second issue firmly and convince all that it is contrary to Wikipedia, I see this being a split vote. This is typically the type of AfD I avoid. I want my votes to show I care, thought about the debate and voted my conscience. Sometimes I will weigh in on definite WP:SNOW debates in the majority. But, I have also been a lone voice in the wind. That's why my comments in the TV talkpage are relevant. If you followed my thoughts there, you saw how in a matter of minutes, I had the info at hand, linked it and hopefully crystalized the conversation for others. That's what I do with an AfD. I read the nom, article, follow links and then do do-diligence voluntary research on the net to finalize my vote. I will incorporate typically my net research into my position.
I don't see where your ultimate position in the Wiki community will end up in jeopardy (unless I am really missing the debate and what you are asking me) - unless, someone somehow turns it into SNOW. Hope that helps. Ronbo76 05:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I read the debate several times after my initial assessment and again prior to this post. I still believe that the debate will be somewhat evenly split because it is a heated topic. And, unless someone can seize on the Wiki opensource edit option and convince all of it (which I find highly doubtful), I think it will end in tie unless the closing administrator tips it one way or the other. I do not believe that revealing your position would be detrimental unless you do one, if not all, of the following: 1) take an odd position that is non-supportable; 2) reveal something about yourself that leads others to question your debate choice; 3)continue to argue your position beyond two or three comments; and 4) violate the Wikipedia:Trifecta.
I stumbled on the Wikipedia:Trifecta last night. I sure wish someone had pointed it out to me when I first became a member. If you follow the links, I typically get tripped up by the DBAD community facet. But, once you get to know me, you will that I am not part of the Peter Principle.
I feel honored that you trusted me to ask my opinion and respect what I said. Likewise with the horse you rode in on (little levity). Cheers, Ronbo76 15:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Xiner01, ronbo76 angels 280; aluminum cloud cruising; seeking a trifecta; ronbo76, out Ronbo76 18:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tactical call sign is TCS using have a number assigned. Aluminum cloud indeed is a Tomcat loaded for bear or a fight. Angels is altitude times 100 (can be 1000 if the trailing zero not utilized). Trifecta refers back to WP:TRIFECTA. Cruising means available.
If you meant cryptic, not really but as I said people watch your talk pages. People that speak the same lingo can fly like an aluminum cloud in a grey sky all day long. Ronbo76 18:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary - newbie mistake

[edit]

Sorry about not leaving one. I missed the bit about "no matter how minor", and as it was the caption and link to a photo I just uploaded I guess I thought it didn't matter. I know better now. Thanks. :-) Makrhod 12:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And where, pray tell, did I fail to give an edit summary? As a matter of course, I don't summarize minor edits. Non-minor edits (almost) always get summaries from me. Biruitorul 02:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All right, I will try to be careful. Biruitorul 02:23, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Going back to add edit info

[edit]

Can you go back and add info about previous edit? Since I didn't start making comments. I am the same when programming, but I eventually go back and add comments (months later when I no longer understand my code). I have already started, if that helps. If it does not automatically come up, how do I add the date and time stamp? Graham


Actually, my comment was about both, edit summaries and signing, I got the signing last night, and I have started leaving edit summaries. Thanks Grahamwild 00:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes I know.

[edit]

I have been reminded of assuming good faith multiple times, but if you look beneath the surface he acts QUITE to the contrary. although i'll try to be a bit more good faith assuming, but if no progress is made for another few weeks or so.

It's going to slowly begin to crumble (If Illuminato stays the reason in my opinion for no progress being made)

Anyways, bring articles to AFD for merging?, if you mean adding in POVS to the article, than read the talk page on adolescent sexuality, i've proposed putting all major pov's on a subarticle.

However, if you mean deffirently then PLEASE feel free to explain.

I seriously DO think that deleting the article might be a good idea. Perhaps for the meantime it would serve wikipedia well to be devoid of articles on this subject.

Regards, Nateland 21:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Fellow New Yorker

[edit]

Isn't it? I used to live in Woodside, Queens, but I'm currently experiencing the fire hose that is an undergraduate education at MIT. Larry V (talk | e-mail) 20:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The KTVX translator vote

[edit]

Hi. Is there any reason why you think the info should be kept at all? I'm curious. Thanks. Xiner (talk, email) 15:18, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • As long as info meets WP:N I don't mind it being on Wikipedia. That's not to say I advocate the info being in a chart the way it is now. Better it be condenced into a paragraph or even mult-column bullet points. Shaundakulbara 21:28, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hi. What do you mean by your message? Thanks. Xiner (talk, email) 23:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry-- try that. Don't know How I screwed that up. The premise of your vote was off a bit. NBD, but the two cats have very diff purposes and originations. I'm fixing that documentation now. (And you're always posting ahead of me in talks... speedy Xiner, I dub thee!) // FrankB 23:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit] The message on my talk page

Sorry, I'm still not clear what (CfD) you're talking about. Xiner (talk, email) 00:01, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

'PING LINK' will take you to the proper CFD paragraph, to consider (reconsider) the discussion I added. Your vote was Merge per nom. Xiner (talk, email) 17:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC), which you can stay with, or strike through and revote. Since I found this so late, I notified everyone participating in that about the information I added. So I 'Pinged', which is apparently a tradition you haven't yet experienced. It simply means 'Hey, minor matter to look at'... it saves cluttering up talk pages with numerous (and unwanted sections). So 'PING', is such a minor notification. It comes from early days of DOS based and early windows based internet when you had to directly link to an IP, but might have a typo (or mis-remember) part in the twelve digit IP address. One had a utility to 'Test' the data loop, and the test was 'pinging' the interface. IT maintenance people still do use such a tool when you are having interconnectivity problems, it usually also returns the time and path of servers one transits getting the data loop 'echo'. Since that's like sonar, it's called 'pinging'... At least you aren't being depth charged! <g>! // FrankB 00:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

A couple of questions

[edit]

Hi Xiner,

I've been off-line for a couple of days. I just got a message from you that I found rather cryptic. It had to do with vandalising some page? Please clarify!?!

I'm trying to discern where the line is drawn between notability and a stub when dealing with an actor. See Scott Porter for an example. I added the stub note, but am wondering whether this article is a candidate for speedy deletion. I've looked at the Notability guidelines and find them to be somewhat subjective. For an actor, it lists "Name Recognition" and "A large fan base" as possible criteria. How am I supposed to know if this guy has a big fan base?

I also recategorized the entry, but wasn't sure whether to delete the links to currently non-existent categories (the TV show and musical he was in). What's the rule of thumb for categories -- should they all be live if they are in the box?

Thanks for your help, --Vbd 01:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unsigned comment

[edit]

Hi Xiner. Please remember to sign your posts! . Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 05:55, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, it was maybe one out of a few hundred posts. Xiner (talk, email) 06:01, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I know . That's why I pointed it out. Cheers! Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 06:52, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Mr Mistoffelees

[edit]

First off, I'm not sure where you got the idea I'm reverting myself on Mr. Mistoffelees. I think you should take a closer look at the edit history. And as for Leon Trotsky, I can write whatever I want in my edit summaries and there's nothing you can do about it. At least not policy-wise anyway. Take a look at the talk page of that article if you want to see what I was doing.

This is the second time in a few weeks I've come under fire from you, Xiner. What are you, stalking me? Leave me alone and assume good faith in future. --90.240.34.177 14:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh look. You are stalking me. --90.240.34.177 14:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike some other people, I don't watchlist others' talk page in secret. As for what you were doing on those pages, I've had my say on your talk page. For the record, misleading edit summaries is a policy violation. Xiner (talk, email) 15:35, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Lies! Prove it! --90.240.34.177 16:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And with that last template on my talk page, I have concluded that you disgust me. I can't believe you can't have a simple discussion without resorting to templates. God forbid you ever succeed in your bid for adminship. This will be the last message I post on your talk page henceforth. --90.240.34.177 17:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your help!

[edit]

I just want to thank you very much for always being so helpful whenever I have a question and put {{helpme}} on my talk page. Have a great day! :-) Sue H. Ping (talk • contribs) 01:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no one knows it is me

[edit]

hi i want to make a new account because no one knows it is me Wrestling Maniac 01:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


also gmshelp is more school apropeat Wrestling Maniac 01:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC) user:WrestlingManiac

Less Trobble 4 me

[edit]

if i sign on @ School as WrestlingManiac i get in trobble but GMShelp is more profesional

(if u no wat i mean) Wrestling Maniac 01:38, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

so do i have...

[edit]

so do i have your permission to start a new account just 4 school Wrestling Maniac 01:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

multi

[edit]

Multitasking can be dangerous. I'll be more careful during my next edits. Oyo321 13:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

I am aware this is an old issue, but it should not really be a supries that Oyo321 removed a section from china, because he is korean, and wants to cover up on how greater china is than him....RestoreTheEmpireSociety (talk) 02:08, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikifying and other mystifying things

[edit]

Hi "adopter" (perhaps "Wikifather" or "Wikimother" would be better?)-

First of all, thanks for adopting me!

I started some tentative work on the Mettoy-Corgi article. For my tastes, it has far too much detail about individual models -- yet misses major aspects of the history of the brand! -- but I thought I have to start somewhere, and since it has been "tagged" for over a year now, I might as well just slowly start to go at it. So I began by adding a few subheadings (before they were added, was almost impossible to read). A few days later, somebody then added the following tag to the article: "This article may need to be wikified to meet Wikipedia's quality standards" etc. etc."

Can you state, in plain English, what that means? I tried to look it up but find the Wiki help pages rather... ummm... well, let's say circumlocutious.

I also have a few questions about the original tagging. As I said, it is officially "tagged" as an article that needs cleanup work. How does this happen? What does it mean? What does one need to do to get it "back on track"? Whom does one need to contact to have it reviewed? And why is there no indexing aside from "pages needing cleanup" etc.?

Questions over questions, I know, but us newbies are, well, new!

Jtnet 16:40, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- * - * - * - * -

Some new questions:

1) On my page, you placed a paragraph on "User Warnings", with what appears to be a task for me to do. Is this intentional -- i.e. is this part of the adoption process, like a kind of homework -- or did you intend this for someone else? I honestly don't know! It just seemed to be apropos of nothing, but I don't know enough about how things run here.

2) On the Matchbox (toys) page, which was the first one I really worked on a lot, I have a question. You remember how I wanted to change it from "Matchbox (toy company)" to "Matchbox (toys)", which I did. Now somebody else changed it to "Matchbox Toys".

I feel this is an incorrect change -- the Germans say "Verschlimmbesserung", meaning maybe something like "deimprovement". Believe me, I am not "being sensitive because somebody changed something I wrote" or anything like that. I welcome improvements. But this is, again I believe, a case of incorrect facts. There is no trademark "Matchbox Toys". (As opposed to some of their competitors' names, such as Dinky Toys, which is -- as two words -- a trademark.) Thus I feel it is factually incorrect to have the article under the name "Matchbox Toys".

How does one go about solving a situation like this? I thought about it and wrote something on the talk page of the user who made the change. I am still awaiting his response, but nevertheless - what if he wants it that way but has no reasoning? What do you do in cases like that?

Jtnet 20:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Food Brand Guidelines...

[edit]

In connection with some lists I was compiling,See:

I felt some notability guidelines on what to include would be useful to myself and to other Wikipedians. So I checked and at present there aren't any Guidelines for Food or Drink brands.

A VERY rough set of possible points is here

User:ShakespeareFan00/Food and Drink Notability Guidelines

Your input would be welcomed in respect of both the guidelines and the lists mentioned. Thanks ShakespeareFan00 23:29, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


OK I note the general guidelines for all products, I felt the stuff on Brand Name Foods

should be more specfic. Thanks for looking BTW

Hmm, good point, perhaps you should raise it on Village Pump or community Portal? I am not good at getting opinons on things, as my efforts to get interest in WikiCast should demonstrate :-(


ShakespeareFan00 15:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Polar Bear edit

[edit]

just wanted to say that you're prob right that the sentence reads easier the way you have it now... not that what i put didn't make sense - see my recent comments on the associated talk page. - Metanoid 03:30, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

me again! per you: "What I meant in the last edit was, the quotes cause more confusion among the casual reader than they help, I think."

if you haven't noticed, i can obsess over those finer points at times. but you're right, of course. ;) - Metanoid 01:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikicast

[edit]

As you asked

Wikicast - the free content broadcast

Thanks ShakespeareFan00 16:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i believe it

[edit]

replied on my talk page. — coelacan talk — 21:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My homework assignment ;-)

[edit]

Hi Xiner -- Check out the Level 1 vandalism warning that is on the sandbox discussion page (I assumed good faith on your part). I'm not sure what you meant when you asked me to show you the diff. I know how to look at a page's history and compare versions, but I don't know how to send that to you (or if that is what you wanted). Thanks for engaging! --Vbd 23:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Helpdesk

[edit]

Not a problem I add a colon half the time and half the time I just forget, I'll do my best to keep it in the back of my mind from here own.— WilsBadKarma (Talk) 02:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza controversy

[edit]

Glad to explain, as best as I understand it. Have you read the two MfDs? They are (or should be, let me know if they arn't) linked from the main Esperaza page. Reading them should give you an idea of the magnitude and bitterness of the controversy. While I don't remember a specific statement about the category, I presume, as it does have some pages still in it, and it was rephrased to refer to Esperanza in the past-tense, that it was intended to be left to still help organize the remaining pages. The best person to ask would be the person who put the category text in the past tense (that'll be in the history). Hope this helps, and thanks for doing the scut-work at CfD. JesseW, the juggling janitor 07:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

3RR edit

[edit]

Hi Xiner, If you don't mind I'm going to revert your edit to the {{uw-3rr1}} template. The only reason is that someone might not understand what 3rr is and talking in mnemonics to someone who has no idea what they mean can come across as technobabble and be ignored. Khukri - 07:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK compromise, check now. Cheers Khukri - 15:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:90.240.34.177

[edit]

Hello I replied to your message on my talk page but you didn't answer so I presume that you are not watching my page and I'll answer you here. Please reply here, as I think it better to keep conversations in one place. Anyway what I want to say is - it doesn't look to me as if you have handled this user very well at all, and as you have ambitions to be an admin one day I wondered if you would like some advice from an old hand (i.e. me)? Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 16:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The user had removed info from at least two other articles (Five, Trotsky), so my radar was set off when he then removed nav boxes from two articles. Should I have handled it differently? In hindsight, yes, and I apologize for not making a bigger attempt at engaging the user in conversation. I did ask for an explanation in the edit summaries, though, and the user didn't respond, but only persisted in making the same changes. I should've done more, though, before it became 3RR. Xiner (talk, email) 16:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC) (copied here by Theresa Knott | Taste the Kornas conversations on two user pages at once break the flow)[reply]

His edit to five(channel) was to remove trivial info that probably didn't belong in the article. His edit to Trotsky was to move some pics around. He didn't actually remove anything. My main concern is with you following him around at all.It's very dodgy waters here. We do check the contributions of a vandal to see if he vandalised anywhere else, but checking the contributions of people who clearly are not vandals isn't something people should be doing at all. It's creepy. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 17:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is what had started it all. Btw, I'm also sorry for calling him vandal there. And I'm sorry I followed him around afterwards. Xiner (talk, email) 17:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problem Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 20:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

cache, browser settings, etc., what is that supposed to mean?!

[edit]

Look: I've listened to what several users have told me and I can't follow their instructions. Meaning, I can't understand them. What else am I missing here: User:Power level (Dragon Ball)/monobook.js... about that bypass stuff, what DOES it mean? what is browser address? Can someone explain this to me in simple terms? Layman's terms perhaps...

Also, revert what to "0"? I need someone who can explain it to me thouroughly and directly. NOT someone who will explain it to me using big words ya know... Power level (Dragon Ball) 21:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I have, several times since I use Windows XP Internet Explorer. And I don't understand it. I'm not retarded, it's just soooo diffcult to understand what I have to do exactly. You have my permission to edit my monobook, you won't warned if you're tryin to help me out. Power level (Dragon Ball) 21:31, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How can I change the size of the text I type? (I will remove the template.) Madison44 22:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What does that have to do? How can I make "text in a colored box"?

For a website.

My review

[edit]

Hi there, thanks so much for your comments on my editor review. You see the only wikipedia talk pages I can find is the new userboxes ideas page and other than that I can't find any and I'd like to increase them edits in that area, do you know where I can find some wikipedia talk pages?? Thanks!!Tellyaddict 17:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for your help!
  • Well I'd consider takng it up to 2,000. Mind I only have about 1,500 mainspace edits so I'm not criticising or anything. Thanks for the messages on my review too! I'd happily nominate you for an RFA when the mainspace edits goes up to 2,000! Tellyaddict 19:37, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will!!

Warning IPs for old vandalism

[edit]

Just a note; if an IP vandalises (but isn't warned), then several months pass without the IP editing, and then the IP edits again, warning the IP for the vandalism is probably pointless, as it's likely to be being used by someone else. Your addition of the warning to User talk:12.29.112.2 edit-conflicted me, so I removed the warning whilst adding the edit I was going to make anyway. Thanks! --ais523 18:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I forgot to check the date there. Good catch. Thanks. Xiner (talk, email) 18:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't please

[edit]

Please do not send me:

Greetings

[edit]

Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, such as those you made to talk:Darkest Hour, it is recommended that you discuss them first. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you.

Because now you know why that Ip continually edited my talk page. Thank you, --D.H. • (TextMe)•(MyWork) 20:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Er, you've told me that before. Also, if you use WP:SAND for such edits, there wouldn't be any misunderstandings. I was only trying to protect your user talk page. Xiner (talk, email) 20:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Help with Userpage Navigation

[edit]

Yes, the images on the navigation bar above seem to keep moving every time you load the page and then when you hover over the image, it puts itself back into place. I dont know whether this is just on my side of the computer, its just highly frustrating me. --Extranet (Talk | Contribs) 23:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Examples of before and after on my screen can be viewed at:

--Extranet (Talk | Contribs) 23:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At this point of writing, I am on a secondary laptop running Windows 2000 with Internet Explorer 6. I usually use my primary Windows Vista with IE7 but that is getting fixed at the moment. From now, I will be replying on my talk page - please don't forget to watch it! --Extranet (Talk | Contribs) 00:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

talk page comment

[edit]

> Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing. > Xiner (talk, email) 00:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Was there a particular page that I edited and didn't summarize? I generally will not provide a summarization for correcting links or typos.

PatrickR 23:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

My adminship request

[edit]

Thanks for your advice. I did it. Still I am happy I nominated myself. It was a good experience. Take care. Sangak 18:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KTVX Translator List AfD

[edit]

I wanted to thank you for your professional conduct during the KTVX Translator AfD process and for your willingness to compromise and to contribute ideas, rather than just calling for deletion. I've defended several AfDs recently and your open mind was a refreshing departure from the ordinary. I know you don't quite agree with listing every translator for a television station, so I greatly appreciate your willingness to suggest a merge option; it was a large part of reason why I tried to expedite things on my end. Again, thanks. dhett (talk • contribs) 01:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your offer to put a link to the discussion on WikiProject Television Stations, but I doubt it will be necessary. The nine standalone translator articles were created as a response to extraordinary circumstances and are not repeated anywhere else, to the best of my knowledge. dhett (talk • contribs) 02:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remedial homework

[edit]

Xiner,

The first time around, I used the template code {{uw-vandalism1|Arsenal F.C.}}. Your last message noted that user warnings are always susbtituted. Does that mean I should have modified the code to read {{subst:uw-vandalism1|Arsenal F.C.}}. I read the page on subst. and I'm not sure I followed it. I may need play around with it further. Now for the diff. -- see it here. Regards, --Vbd 03:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for your (bemused) response! I am flattered that you inquired whether I have any RFA ambitions. I take that as a compliment. Quite frankly, I had not given it any thought. As you note, it is a bit early for me to take on such a role, but I might consider it in the future. It would largely depend on my time commitments. You're not an admin, are you? Might I ask why you thought I might be interested? Time for me to retire on the West Coast. Cheers!--Vbd 06:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't EXACTLY understand what to do with vandalism

[edit]

You said in my talk page:

Please use WP:WARN templates on vandals

but i'm not sure what that means exactly as I don't fully understand templates... I removed another case of vandalism: Harmonic oscillator, so another warning needs to be added.

Clemwang 07:42, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

unfortunate multiple nomination

[edit]

Hi Xiner. =) I've argued for delete all three, at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 February 1#Category:Fooian scientists. I'm just wondering if you were voting keep only because the three shouldn't have been nominated together (I sort of agree)? Or was there one in particular you wanted to keep? I figured even though the nomination was overbroad, none of them needed to be kept anyway. What do you think? — coelacan talk — 11:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

it:Lynne & Tessa

[edit]

It did exist, and as far as I've read it was even more complete that the one here on en.wiki (although I can't really guess why); I didn't even know of its existence until this morning, though. I just happened to find a dead redirect on it.wiki, and I tagged it for deletion.

If you're curious, the article was proposed for deletion once on September 17, but it seems the author wrote some reasons for keeping it on the talk page, and the voters were moved (generally when a discussion like this take place the author starts insulting and accusing of censorship, and this wasn't the case), so the page was kept; on January 26 the page was proposed for deletion once again, and this time it was considered below the standards for a biography, as it didn't provide enough data on the actual persons involved.

Hope this satisfies your curiosity ;-) --Εξαίρετος (msg) 16:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Double Redirects

[edit]

1 month ago you replied to my help request regarding Double Redirects.

Please Vote here: http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8799 ;

Then the page will start to update again: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:DoubleRedirects

thnx. --Parker007 05:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Mentorship

[edit]

Hi, I'm looking for someone to be a mentor for me, to help me figure out how to make Wikipedia a better place. I saw you listed as a potential adopter, and wondered if you'd be interested? I've had an account for a while, but I haven't done much until recently. Most of my contributions have been anti-vandalism so far, and I'd like to do a better job with identifying and countering vandalism.--H-ko 03:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm looking forward to learning how to better contribute! I'm in classes all day the first half of the week, so probably the majority of my questions will come late in the week or on the weekend.--H-ko 09:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I can tell pretty obvious stuff of course--blanked pages, additions of expletives, etc. I can sometimes tell when a page has been vandalised more subtly, such as here[1]--usually by doing a little research. However, I don't know what I should do when I find someone who is repeatedly vandalising a page, or find a page that seems to be the subject of repeated vandalism, or how to get an opinion if I'm not really sure if something qualifies as vandalism. Also, I read about the counter vandalism unit, and I'm interested in that--is it something I can just sign up to do? And is the "recent changes patrol" an official patrol that I'd need to sign up for, or am I doing it just by checking recent changes (when I have time)? Thanks for the help!--H-ko (Talk) 03:47, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, well see--that's just the kind of thing I wanted a mentor for! <grins> I'd no idea if some of those sorts of things were "official" groups or not--but I despise vandalism and definitely want to get involved in that way at the very least.--H-ko (Talk) 03:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Frustration

[edit]

Hi Xiner! I often find myself getting frustrated with people who don't share my understanding of what a well-referenced, encyclopedic article should be. I like to see citations and non-trivial statements. Call me crazy. Or anal.

Anyways, I recently put a "Citations Missing" warning on an article only to find it removed soon after. (I'm less annoyed that the "Fan Site" warning was also removed; an "Inappropriate Tone" warning might have been more appropriate.)

I have re-inserted the "Citations Missing" warning, and I am tempted to just do the work myself. But clearly whoever removed the warning is invested in this article and I am reluctant to get into some kind of editing war. So I am also tempted to let it go and walk away. What's your advice?

--Vbd 15:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for the follow-up. As you suggested, I created a discussion section and left a message for the person who deleted the warning. Unfortunately, they were not signed in, so I only got an IP address talk page, which they may or may not ever see.--Vbd 16:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Message

[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kiumars#Helllppppppppppppp Kiumars

Xiner 20:14, 5 February 2007; you have been giving me that shit for the last 72 hours and stopped the dispute to be resolved! Do you have a vested interest in this topic? Icez 20:00, 5 February 2007 already said that he/she does not see any problem with the article! So what is your problem? Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kiumars"

Warn template help pages

[edit]

Hi Xiner. Maybe you want to bring it up at Wikipedia talk:Template messages/User talk namespace. I know they just completely revamped the warning system, so maybe they haven't gotten around to the help pages yet. Subst explanation is tricky no matter what you do--I haven't read the explanation page but I know it took me a little while to understand it, just because there is coding involved. I suppose people assume that if you've been around enough to start reverting vandalism, you probably know what subst: is by then. But I agree with you that help pages should be as clear and, well, as helpful as possible. :) --Fang Aili talk 21:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion, please

[edit]

I'm spending too much time online today. I came across the following Degrassi VHS and DVD releases article and would like your opinion as to whether it is "encyclopedic." If not, do I take it to Afd? Have you seen a guideline or discussion about such pages? As always, thanks.--Vbd 22:29, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit at User talk:76.173.42.150

[edit]

Hello Xiner. I have just replaced your comment at User talk:76.173.42.150 with a friendly {{welcome}} message. When a new user takes the time to write a very polite message[2] to the Help Desk to report some vandalism, I find it extremely rude to reply that she should basically do her homework, learn about fixing vandalism and "do it herself".[3] First impressions, and all that. You might want to take a look at Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers for some tips and guidance. I noticed that you're on editor review, so consider this to be my feedback to you. Cheers --Plek 02:15, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wish I had an excuse for that, but I don't. Thanks for letting me know. Xiner (talk, email) 02:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I can't help it, I've to say that my message, while TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, was in response to this edit, which continues a long tradition of people wondering if passages about certain people raping others could've been part of our pages on radiology, metereology, and whatnot. And check out the title of the poster, too. It's why I brought up this discussion on the HD talk page. There's WP:AGF, and there's WP:DUCK. That said, I should NOT have responded the way I did, because it could not possibly have helped. Xiner (talk, email) 03:13, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Salk School of Science

[edit]

Hi,

I noticed that you contributed to the AfD debate on this school. I have made a contribution to this debate in which I discuss why the school is notable, and edited the article a bit. Any comments you could make would be much appreciated.

Thanks for your help with this.

Sincerely,

WMMartin 15:26, 6 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

E-mail

[edit]

You've got mail! VegaDark 02:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nadín Ospina

[edit]

Hi there, fyi I've revamped this article as a stub. Please take a look at the revised article if you like Bwithh 06:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Multi-user IPs?

[edit]

How do I determine if an IP is multi-user? How do I handle the warnings/requests for block (after final warning) with a multi-user IP? Thanks!--H-ko (Talk) 05:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on H-ko's talk page since you're inactive at the moment. — coelacan talk — 05:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the vote of confidence. =) I'm going to take some more time before that though. I feel I still need to familiarize myself with policy first. I know I can seem like I have quick answers but I often have to dig through a lot of reading to find what I'm looking for and I've very often "winging it". I've still got some work to do first. — coelacan talk — 02:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also realized I forgot to answer you about the Fooian Scientists CFD. I'm leaning "listify" myself. I think that categories are just a flawed method for this topic, but an article/list, that can anticipate and explain likely pitfalls, would be just fine. I'll go over and make sure I've bolded this as a !vote on the CFD right now. BTW, have you seen this yet? Picture of the Year vote on Commons... quite fun, and many beautiful photos to enjoy. — coelacan talk — 02:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It probably took me about 45 minutes, maybe even an hour, to narrow it down to five. I enjoyed every minute of it though. =) — coelacan talk — 02:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

VegaDark's RfA

[edit]

Hey. Once you're done posting your nom and setting it up, send it to me so I can throw my co-nom in. I'll then send it to VegaDark so he can post it on RfA. (Or let me know when you have Wikipedia:Requests for Adminship/VegaDark created, that works too :)--Wizardman 04:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More qstns.!

[edit]

Hi Xiner,

  • I've come across an empty cat. -- Category:Francophone Canadians. WP:CFD tells me to use {{db-catempty}} to speedy del. an empty cat. But I am not sure the category should be deleted. Maybe it should be used instead. I guess this is kind of a non-question, because I could just ignore the whole thing or figure out what articles should populate the cat. Do you have an intermediate course of action to recommend, like flagging it for discussion on WP:CFD or something else?
  • I know this sounds ironic, given how often articles need more sources, not fewer. The Jack Kerouac article has an incredibly long list under the Further reading section. In fact, the whole article reads like a college paper (or several combined). It is barely footnoted, and there is already a warning box on it for that. I added a warning regarding the writing style. But I couldn't find an appropriate warning for the length of the list.

soapboxes

[edit]

actually i have yet to meet an editor that doesnt use wikipedia for their "soapbox"...every editor has their version of "how it is"...some are more subtle in their soap boxing than others...some merely delete things: its untouchable soapboxing...(im not accusing you at all Xiner)...its another editor i have in mind on the "deletion soap boxing"...i prefer to add material than remove it when at all possible...a "wikipedia creationist"?...anyways most talk pages read like blogs...and thats good...thats what they are for...and thats what adds some interest...ive had a doctor tell me on a talk page "my family likely doesnt use the swiss trains & im choking on CO2..."...its the actual article pages that we have to keep an eye out for excessive soap boxing...yet they will always be soap boxes...someones version or a combo of versions gets put out...its the nature of any encyclopedia including wikipedia..."an encylopedia is a soapbox"...we just try and make it as accurate and squeaky clean a one as possible...Benjiwolf 18:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bad faith???

[edit]

i think i have said several times i think u are a good faith editor...and this message i just wrote...how have i assumed bad faith on ur part???...anyways...take it chill...Benjiwolf 18:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Descendant of the Dragon

[edit]

Hi, the specific phrase "龙的传人" was first coined by Taiwanese (ironic, eh?) musician 侯德建 (zh:侯德建) in the late 1970s, and subsequently popularised by the song of the same name. There has been considerable academic opinion that the concept of "descendants of the dragon" as a badge of pride started around that time, and could not have been much older.

The evidence they raised for this include, first, during the imperial era, only the emperor and the emperor's descendants are descendants of the "dragon". Anyone else claiming to be a descendant of the dragon would be committing treason. Secondly, the dragon was the symbol of the Emperor. Thus in the Republican era anyone who supported the "dragon" was by implication a monarchist and counter-revolutionary. Similarly in mainland China after 1949.

In any case, it is clear that the phrase "龙的传人" cannot be of pre-modern pedigree since its use of "的" does not accord with classical grammar.

Incidentally, the song "龙的传人" started life as a patriotic propaganda song in Taiwan, which is why it was banned in mainland China for several years, before becoming popular there as well (in the 1980s). --Sumple (Talk) 22:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Xiner/Archive_2&oldid=1144123209"