User talk:Exairetos

Welcome!

Hello, Exairetos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Merovingian - Talk 08:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Żagań

Hello, Exairetos. Could you write article about my city (Żagań) on napulitano Wikipedia? Kondzio1990 07:46, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for quick answer. :-) Good luck! Kondzio1990 07:54, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. You're great! Kondzio1990 16:39, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Archieving the talk section of Tokyo Mew Mew

Seeing how you archieved the older discussions, may you please archieve the others? I really don't know how to archieve, so I'm asking you becase I'm afraid I'll do something wrong. The following need to be archived:

1 Note about English version takes priority
2 Cleaned up
3 Regarding Chimera Animal, Kimera Anima and Chimera Anima
8 Repetition
9 Story Section of Mew Mew Power

Thank you! "THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED!" 01:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

it:Lynne & Tessa

Hi. Have you any idea what happened to the page? Was it deleted, or just never existed? Thanks. Xiner (talk, email) 16:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's unfortunate. They should've kept the article and let us translate it first...I don't know Italian, but that kind of voting would be less likely to happen on en:. Thanks for the investigation! Xiner (talk, email) 16:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

You were right Dark Edge is a manga and not manwha. I don't remember why I thought it was the other way. (Duane543 17:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Whoops

Hi - completely forgot about your request a few days ago, sorry. Let me take a look at that article for a second:...okay, apparently they put a 2 year ban on giving these purple garments and titles to the priests in order to try to break the relationship between the emperor and religious circles, but during the ban he gave purple garments to over ten people and that's what caused the problem. Apparently the emperor had never had to consult them before so he just carried on as he had done before. Maybe he didn't think that they were going to try to do anything to enforce the 2-year ban. They made the bestowing of the garments invalid, and that got the other side all riled up because they thought it was an over and done matter, and sent strong letters of protest to the government. Then the government exiled them in 1629 to Dewa and Mutsu. It doesn't say what happened to the emperor. I haven't looked at Japanese history forever so I'm not sure what the background is but that's what that page says. Mithridates 17:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Di Luca - thanks

Thanks for contributing at Talk:Danilo Di Luca - your insight is really appreciated! Regards, Severo^TC 18:25, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zhou Revert

Thanks for catching that, I must have gone too far back or not far enough... Elijahmeeks 22:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Italian

It matters, O, it matters! Attilios is on my back all the time about getting the accents wrong, or leaving them off. Last time I was in Florence, my child (then 10) tried valiantly to order at ristoranti in Italiano and was met with waiters who looked down their aquiline noses and said into the cell-phones that were permanent fixtures, "O My God! this stupid English woman has a child with a Calabrian accent!" Which he did, having been called "Bambino bello!" by our neighbour since the day of his birth.

Because of the Australian tendency to stretch diphthongs (or create diphthongs out of short vowel sounds, yee-ess and nah-oh being prime examples) and the Calabrian and Sicilian tendency to emphasise them, Ocker Italian as spoken by the younger generation when they go home to meet the grandparents is quite distintinctive, and I suspect entertaining to native speakers. (Most Italian migrants to Australia in the 50s, 60s, 70s were from the South). Might have something to do with why my Ser becomes Sair. --Amandajm 01:17, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha! Australia is full of people with accents.

Real Ocker goes like this:-

"Cheese, Bev, snow ewes sboth kerry in the choppy gnome. I'll gome getta car! Sboth gome inner car!"

"Cheese, Shurl, yor reel nighster me! Ai wuzz gunna getta tack seeyome!"

To get the pronunciation absolutely correct you have to smile the whole time you are saying it.

OK I'll put the translation here for you ()

Back to wott-ever oi wuzz doin

--Amandajm 13:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never Give Up

A tag has been placed on Never Give Up, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Android Mouse Bot 2 07:28, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

Hi Exairetos. Thanks for the heads-up, but I am still within 3 reverts for 24 hours. Got your point though. Best regards. PHG 21:04, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revert Note

Hello Exairetos,

I got your note, and I definitely respect it and will continue to comply with wikipedia policy (as you can see, I am within my 3 reverts for may 19).

Regards,

Devanampriya 21:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article Scipionyx: Appropriate affiliation of Marco Signore

Hi, Exairetos. The article Scipionyx formerly read "Marco Signore of the Universita degli Studi di Napoli in Naples,[1] who identified it as the first Italian dinosaur." On 18 July 2007, you changed this to "Marco Signore of the University of Naples Federico II". Online sources on Scipionyx that I'm seeing seem to identify Signore with the Universita degli Studi di Napoli. May I ask your source for the change? Thanks -- Writtenonsand 17:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your clarification! -- Writtenonsand 00:47, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Deus Vitae

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Deus Vitae, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unnotable manga series. No significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources. Tagged since April.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:49, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Deus Vitae

I have nominated Deus Vitae, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deus Vitae. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 13:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of 95 year old philosophy.

Greetings,

I am trying to get a team together who would finally translate "Sistema di logica come teoria del conoscere" into English. I thought Wikipedia's list of Italian-to-English translators might be a good group to 'hit up' on this subject. If personal assistance cannot be provided, perhaps suggestions or helping point me in the right direction of who might be willing to help? Best regards & thank you. Nagelfar (talk) 05:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(reply to your response on my talk page) True about his associations hindering him, but look at the recent boom in popularity of Heidegger and the translations of Being & Time in nigh every bookstore. I thank you for getting back to me. I have contacted Living Time Press and the head of the Gentile Foundation in Italy (whom I have yet to hear back from) as well as author A. James Gregor, and I have his support. As for which to start on, I laud you for being so eager, but I haven't an idea on how we should start for I don't have a team together. I was hoping to get something like a 'council of translators' to decide what direction to go for consistency in translation etc. If you look through it, and there is some subsection which piques your interest to begin to translate, initiative is the greater part of virtue. I've contacted about 70 people, that's less than 10 pages a person if everyone was willing (which they are not), but consistency with translation is then a concern. The English translation of 'A Theory Of Mind as Pure Act' is a good reference point on what terms to use in translating that Mr. Carr has set the precedent for. Yes, definitely keep in touch. There isn't any place to upload or anything like that, perhaps the most eager translator can synchronize it all on their end. Look over it a bit is all I am asking for now, and a bigger group hopefull with come forward. Nagelfar (talk) 04:55, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deus Vitae for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deus Vitae is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deus Vitae (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dandy Sephy (talk) 19:53, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Exairetos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fun Fun Factory

The article Fun Fun Factory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to be a notable shojo manga. No sources located, and none on ja.wiki to borrow.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Exairetos. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of More Starlight to Your Heart for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article More Starlight to Your Heart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/More Starlight to Your Heart until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 13:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]